rec.games.bridge

• Date Index

---

• Salary Of $5000 Per Month, money
• Re: A fun bid 2 : the bidding, Thomas Dehn
• A fun bid 1 : result, patpowersspam
  • Re: A fun bid 1 : result, Dave Flower
• funny story - I hope, IMFinegold
• what to do, IMFinegold
  • Re: what to do, smn
  • Re: what to do, Gordon Rainsford
• Re: A fun bid 2, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: A fun bid 2, Ivan Popivanov
• Re: A fun bid 1, Dave Flower
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A fun bid 1, Ivan Popivanov
    • Re: A fun bid 1, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: A fun bid 1, brsrichter
    • Message not available
      • Re: A fun bid 1, brsrichter
    • Message not available
      • Re: A fun bid 1, brsrichter
• A fun hand 3, patpowersspam
  • Re: A fun hand 3, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: A fun hand 3, vlastimil
  • Message not available
    • Re: A fun hand 3, Dave Flower
• What do you bid with a (4m333 + 9HCP) after your part opens 1NT strong (15-17) ? PoB only, vincit
  • Re: What do you bid with a (4m333 + 9HCP) after your part opens 1NT strong (15-17) ? PoB only, vspoker
  • Re: What do you bid with a (4m333 + 9HCP) after your part opens 1NT strong (15-17) ? PoB only, Andrew
    • Re: What do you bid with a (4m333 + 9HCP) after your part opens 1NT strong (15-17) ? PoB only, vincit
      • Re: What do you bid with a (4m333 + 9HCP) after your part opens 1NT strong (15-17) ? PoB only, Andrew
      • Re: What do you bid with a (4m333 + 9HCP) after your part opens 1NT strong (15-17) ? PoB only, boblipton
• What line for a losing result?, S. Needham
  • Re: What line for a losing result?, Adam Beneschan
    • Message not available
      • Re: What line for a losing result?, grizzly . sweden
• SAYC Question, grizzly . sweden
  • Message not available
    • Re: SAYC Question, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: SAYC Question, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: SAYC Question, Ed
• Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, Adam Beneschan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, wheaties
  • Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, vspoker
  • Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, boblipton
  • Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, Lorne
  • Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, raija d
    • Re: Partner touched her bidding cards and then passed, but I was going to bid anyway, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Uses for 3m-4m and 3C-4D, Andrew
  • Re: Uses for 3m-4m and 3C-4D, Larry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Uses for 3m-4m and 3C-4D, Eric Leong
    • Message not available
      • Re: Uses for 3m-4m and 3C-4D, Andrew
• Raise or Not, Lamford
  • Message not available
    • Re: Raise or Not, Lorne
  • Re: Raise or Not, David Stevenson
  • Message not available
    • Re: Raise or Not, boblipton
  • Re: Raise or Not, Eric Leong
    • Re: Raise or Not, wheaties
      • Re: Raise or Not, darint
      • Message not available
      • Re: Raise or Not, wheaties
  • Re: Raise or Not, Adam Beneschan
  • Message not available
    • Re: Raise or Not, Lamford
  • Re: Raise or Not, raija d
  • Re: Raise or Not, metobillc
• You Hold, Captain Kirk
• Re: 5H jump... Pass, Captain Kirk
• ? Ogust ?, Dave Flower
  • Re: ? Ogust ? Several things, Captain Kirk
    • Re: ? Ogust ? Several things, Dave Flower
  • Re: ? Ogust ?, Dave Flower
  • Message not available
    • Re: ? Ogust ?, Alan Malloy
  • Message not available
    • Re: ? Ogust ?, Dave Flower
      • Re: ? Ogust ?, Steve Foster
      • Re: ? Ogust ?, David Stevenson
  • Re: ? Ogust ?, Lorne
  • Re: ? Ogust ?, Neil
  • Re: ? Ogust ?, Steve Foster
  • Re: ? Ogust ?, boblipton
    • Re: ? Ogust ?, Adam Beneschan
  • Message not available
    • Re: ? Ogust ?, Steve Foster
      • Re: ? Ogust ?, Dave Flower
      • Re: ? Ogust ?, Steve Foster
  • Message not available
    • Re: ? Ogust ?, Steve Foster
      • Re: ? Ogust ?, Rob Morris
      • Re: ? Ogust ?, Steve Foster
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: ? Ogust ?, Steve Foster
      • Re: ? Ogust ?, campboy
      • Re: ? Ogust ?, campboy
  • Re: ? Ogust ?, grizzly . sweden
• An interesting hand to play (Aug 29, 2008), Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: An interesting hand to play (Aug 29, 2008), Steve Foster
    • Re: An interesting hand to play (Aug 29, 2008), wheaties
  • Re: An interesting hand to play (Aug 29, 2008), Charles Brenner
  • Re: An interesting hand to play (Aug 29, 2008), pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Re: An interesting hand to play (Aug 29, 2008), Charles Brenner
  • Re: An interesting hand to play (Aug 29, 2008), Ivan Popivanov
• Mystery sequence -- solution, Richard Pavlicek
  • Re: Mystery sequence -- solution, Adam Beneschan
  • Message not available
    • Re: Mystery sequence -- solution, Richard Pavlicek
      • Re: Mystery sequence -- solution, thissteve
  • Re: Mystery sequence -- solution, vspoker
  • Re: Mystery sequence -- solution, grizzly . sweden
• Re: Two person bridge vs computer, BBO expert
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Two person bridge vs computer, Henk Uijterwaal
  • Re: Two person bridge vs computer, BBO expert
• Re: 5H jump..., boblipton
  • Message not available
    • Re: 5H jump..., BBO expert
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 5H jump..., Adam Beneschan
  • Re: 5H jump..., grizzly . sweden
    • Re: 5H jump..., Mark Brader
  • Re: 5H jump..., Kieran Dyke
  • Re: 5H jump..., Eric Leong
    • Re: 5H jump..., Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: 5H jump..., grizzly . sweden
  • Re: 5H jump..., patpowersspam
• carding agreements, Collins
  • Re: carding agreements, Lorne
  • Re: carding agreements, wheaties
  • Re: carding agreements, richlp
    • Re: carding agreements, Adam Beneschan
  • Message not available
    • Re: carding agreements, vspoker
  • Re: carding agreements, Captain Kirk
• Wayback nostalgia... :), grizzly . sweden
  • Re: Wayback nostalgia... :), grizzly . sweden
• 1975 World Championship Book for sale . . ., Dave Flower
• Re: How many hearts to bid?, Dave Flower
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How many hearts to bid?, John Hall
    • Re: How many hearts to bid?, Dave Flower
  • Re: How many hearts to bid?, Dave Flower
  • Re: How many hearts to bid?, Eric Leong
  • Re: How many hearts to bid?, Lorne
• Bidding dilemma!, brsrichter
  • Re: Bidding dilemma!, Dave Flower
    • Re: Bidding dilemma!, brsrichter
  • Re: Bidding dilemma!, grizzly . sweden
  • Re: Bidding dilemma!, Andrew
  • Re: Bidding dilemma!, smn
  • Re: Bidding dilemma!, Eric Leong
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Bidding dilemma!, wheaties
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bidding dilemma!, Will in New Haven
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bidding dilemma!, brsrichter
  • Re: Bidding dilemma!, Rob Morris
• Re: One heart opening, four spade overcall, Kieran Dyke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: One heart opening, four spade overcall, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: One heart opening, four spade overcall, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: One heart opening, four spade overcall, Eric Leong
• Re: Jump cue-bids in opener's minor, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Jump cue-bids in opener's minor, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Jump cue-bids in opener's minor, David Babcock
• Re: Mystery sequence, Kenny McCormack
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mystery sequence, Phil
• Re: Kaplan-Sheinwold Interest Group, Adam Beneschan
• Interesting comments on hesitations and break in playing tempo..., akhare1@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Interesting comments on hesitations and break in playing tempo..., Adam Lea
• 5-card Puppet Stayman, Henry Lockwood
  • Re: 5-card Puppet Stayman, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: 5-card Puppet Stayman, grizzly . sweden
      • Re: 5-card Puppet Stayman, Gary Seckinger
      • Re: 5-card Puppet Stayman, Gary Seckinger
• What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, grizzly . sweden
  • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Dave Flower
    • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Henry Lockwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, David Stevenson
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, ttw6687
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, BBO expert
    • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, vspoker
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Henry Lockwood
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, garrybl
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
    • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, grizzly . sweden
    • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Barry Margolin
  • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, grizzly . sweden
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, darint
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, thissteve
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Adam Lea
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Ron Johnson
    • Message not available
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Blind Broccoli
  • Message not available
    • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Andrew
  • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Richard Pavlicek
    • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Michael Kopera
      • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Dave Flower
  • Message not available
    • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, Ron Johnson
  • Re: What is the most abused and misunderstood convention in Bridge history?, patpowersspam
• Bergen books, Stig Holmquist
• Re: 2C Response to a Major OB, Nick France
  • Re: 2C Response to a Major OB, Lorne
• Two-Way Bids: Allowed or not in the ACBL?, wheaties
  • Re: Two-Way Bids: Allowed or not in the ACBL?, Stu G
  • Re: Two-Way Bids: Allowed or not in the ACBL?, Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: The Losing Trick Count, BBO expert
  • Re: The Losing Trick Count, Will in New Haven
    • Re: The Losing Trick Count, wheaties
      • Re: The Losing Trick Count, Nick France
• 4S IMPs play, grizzly . sweden
  • Re: 4S IMPs play, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: 4S IMPs play, metobillc
• Matchpoint 3NT play, grizzly . sweden
  • Re: Matchpoint 3NT play, Dave Flower
  • Re: Matchpoint 3NT play, wheaties
    • Re: Matchpoint 3NT play, grizzly . sweden
• Re: Trick 1 play from 3rd seat, Bill Jacobs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Trick 1 play from 3rd seat, Dave Flower
    • Message not available
      • Re: Trick 1 play from 3rd seat, Steve Foster
      • Re: Trick 1 play from 3rd seat, Rob Morris
  • Re: Trick 1 play from 3rd seat, Eric Leong
  • Re: Trick 1 play from 3rd seat, boblipton
• Ravindra Murthy, John Gabbriel
  • Re: Ravindra Murthy, Richard Pavlicek
  • Re: Ravindra Murthy, Andrew
• Re: Best use of 1N-2C; 2R-2S?, benlessard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Best use of 1N-2C; 2R-2S?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Best use of 1N-2C; 2R-2S?, Travis Crump
    • Re: Best use of 1N-2C; 2R-2S?, Lorne
  • Re: Best use of 1N-2C; 2R-2S?, Nick France
    • Re: Best use of 1N-2C; 2R-2S?, Travis Crump
      • Re: Best use of 1N-2C; 2R-2S?, Nick France
  • Re: Best use of 1N-2C; 2R-2S?, Hans Georg Schaathun
  • Re: Best use of 1N-2C; 2R-2S?, Tim
• Pass, double, or 3D?, Bud H
  • Re: Pass, double, or 3D?, brsrichter
  • Re: Pass, double, or 3D?, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Pass, double, or 3D?, boblipton
  • Re: Pass, double, or 3D?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Pass, double, or 3D?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Pass, double, or 3D?, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Pass, double, or 3D?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Pass, double, or 3D?, metobillc
  • Re: Pass, double, or 3D?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Pass, double, or 3D?, vspoker
  • Re: Pass, double, or 3D?, raija d
  • Re: Pass, double, or 3D?, Thomas Dehn
• Re: Mea culpa/Law 40, Phil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mea culpa/Law 40, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Mea culpa/Law 40, David Stevenson
  • Re: Mea culpa/Law 40, Bill Jacobs
    • Message not available
      • Re: Mea culpa/Law 40, Barry Margolin
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mea culpa/Law 40, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Mea culpa/Law 40, richlp
• Re: information theory and bidding, dake50
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: information theory and bidding, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: information theory and bidding, thissteve
  • Re: information theory and bidding, Carl
    • Re: information theory and bidding, dmorgan
  • Re: information theory and bidding, Anton van Uitert
    • AW: information theory and bidding, Jürgen R .
      • Re: information theory and bidding, Anton van Uitert
  • Re: information theory and bidding, Nick France
  • Re: information theory and bidding, Lorne
    • Re: information theory and bidding, Matthew Johnson
  • Re: information theory and bidding, Fluxman
• Re: Another impossible auction., raija d
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Another impossible auction., OldPalooka
  • Re: Another impossible auction., Will in New Haven
• Good Player, raija d
  • Message not available
    • Re: Good Player, Frank
  • Message not available
    • Re: Good Player, Adam Beneschan
  • Message not available
    • Re: Good Player, raija d
  • Re: Good Player, Eric Leong
  • Re: Good Player, Dave Flower
• Everybody's bidding., vspoker
  • Re: Everybody's bidding., raija d
  • Re: Everybody's bidding., Player
    • Re: Everybody's bidding., Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Everybody's bidding., Player
    • Re: Everybody's bidding., vspoker
      • Re: Everybody's bidding., boblipton
      • Re: Everybody's bidding., Player
      • Re: Everybody's bidding., Andrew
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Everybody's bidding., Adam Beneschan
• Re: Records of Computer Championships, none
• Stig Holmquist's Major Suit Shortness Problem, Martin Ambuhl
  • Message not available
    • Re: Stig Holmquist's Major Suit Shortness Problem, grizzly . sweden
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Stig Holmquist's Major Suit Shortness Problem, brsrichter
  • Re: Stig Holmquist's Major Suit Shortness Problem, Stig Holmquist
• Re: 1NT relay after 1M opening ! Why not ?, Jeffrey
  • Re: 1NT relay after 1M opening ! Why not ?, Adam Beneschan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 1NT relay after 1M opening ! Why not ?, Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Your call: OKB 082408, OldPalooka
• What common agreements do good players often not know?, David J. Grabiner
  • Re: What common agreements do good players often not know?, Jeffrey
    • Re: What common agreements do good players often not know?, raija d
  • Re: What common agreements do good players often not know?, boblipton
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: What common agreements do good players often not know?, thissteve
  • Message not available
    • Re: What common agreements do good players often not know?, OldPalooka
  • Message not available
    • Re: What common agreements do good players often not know?, richlp
  • Message not available
    • Re: What common agreements do good players often not know?, Barry Margolin
      • Message not available
      • Re: What common agreements do good players often not know?, alvin
      • Re: What common agreements do good players often not know?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: What common agreements do good players often not know?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: What common agreements do good players often not know?, Richard Pavlicek
      • Re: What common agreements do good players often not know?, Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Your call: OKB 082408, Lorne
• A brief law change summary for ACBL members, Bud H
  • Re: A brief law change summary for ACBL members, rtraxler
    • Message not available
      • Re: A brief law change summary for ACBL members, Bud H
  • Re: A brief law change summary for ACBL members, Mark Brader
  • Message not available
    • Re: A brief law change summary for ACBL members, blackshoe
  • Message not available
    • Re: A brief law change summary for ACBL members, BBO expert
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: A brief law change summary for ACBL members, David Stevenson
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: A brief law change summary for ACBL members, David Stevenson
• shark bridge, none
• Re: ACBL GCC overcalls, Stu G
  • Re: ACBL GCC overcalls, thissteve
    • Re: ACBL GCC overcalls, Barry Margolin
      • Re: ACBL GCC overcalls, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: ACBL GCC overcalls, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: ACBL GCC overcalls, thissteve
    • Re: ACBL GCC overcalls, Tim
  • Message not available
    • Re: ACBL GCC overcalls, richlp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ACBL GCC overcalls, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: ACBL GCC overcalls, David Stevenson
• Re: Short club versus convenient minor?, Steve Willner
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?, Steve Willner
• Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D, Steve Willner
• Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, Eric Leong
      • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, scyardman
      • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, Eric Leong
      • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, Eric Leong
    • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, scyardman
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, StevieTee
      • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, scyardman
      • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, Will in New Haven
      • Message not available
      • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, Richard Pavlicek
  • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, dake50
  • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, raija d
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, brsrichter
  • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, vincit
  • Re: Copare two 10 HCP hands with 5-4-4-0, grizzly . sweden
• call frends for free world wide, ratana
• 1 NT overcall by passed hand in direct seat, rtraxler
  • Re: 1 NT overcall by passed hand in direct seat, Will in New Haven
  • Re: 1 NT overcall by passed hand in direct seat, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: 1 NT overcall by passed hand in direct seat, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: 1 NT overcall by passed hand in direct seat, rtraxler
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page, Bud H
  • Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page, David Babcock
• Lots of pointed suit cards, Bud H
  • Re: Lots of pointed suit cards, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Lots of pointed suit cards, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Lots of pointed suit cards, paulhigh
• Individual MP Tourneys, daily w Prize Money -- www.topbridge.com, grizzly . sweden
• concession question, David Babcock
  • Re: concession question, Dave Flower
  • Re: concession question, Tim DeLaney
    • Message not available
      • Re: concession question, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: concession question, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Message not available
      • Re: concession question, raija d
      • Re: concession question, Richard Pavlicek
      • Re: concession question, Lorne
      • Re: concession question, Richard Pavlicek
      • Re: concession question, Dave Flower
      • Message not available
      • Re: concession question, Richard Pavlicek
      • Re: concession question, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: concession question, Barry Margolin
      • Re: concession question, raija d
• What do you think of showing a doubleton the Scanian Way ?, vincit
  • Re: What do you think of showing a doubleton the Scanian Way ?, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: What do you think of showing a doubleton the Scanian Way ?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: What do you think of showing a doubleton the Scanian Way ?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What do you think of showing a doubleton the Scanian Way ?, David Babcock
      • Re: What do you think of showing a doubleton the Scanian Way ?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What do you think of showing a doubleton the Scanian Way ?, vincit
  • Re: What do you think of showing a doubleton the Scanian Way ?, dake50
  • Re: What do you think of showing a doubleton the Scanian Way ?, Martin Nygren
• Responding With Two Weak 5-Card Majors, jameson
  • Re: Responding With Two Weak 5-Card Majors, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Responding With Two Weak 5-Card Majors, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Responding With Two Weak 5-Card Majors, boblipton
• Non-constructive major raises?, paulhigh
  • Re: Non-constructive major raises?, dake50
  • Re: Non-constructive major raises?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Non-constructive major raises?, Jeffrey
  • Re: Non-constructive major raises?, Eric Leong
• Re: Was this a defence?, Arthh
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Was this a defence?, Andrew
    • Re: Was this a defence?, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: Was this a defence?, Andrew
    • Re: Was this a defence?, wheaties
      • Re: Was this a defence?, Andrew
      • Re: Was this a defence?, wheaties
      • Re: Was this a defence?, Andrew
      • Re: Was this a defence?, wheaties
      • Re: Was this a defence?, David Stevenson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Was this a defence?, Andrew
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Was this a defence?, David Stevenson
  • Re: Was this a defence?, David Stevenson
• Your lead against 3NT? 8-22-08, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Your lead against 3NT? 8-22-08, Eric Leong
    • Re: Your lead against 3NT? 8-22-08, boblipton
  • Re: Your lead against 3NT? 8-22-08, Andrew
    • Message not available
      • Re: Your lead against 3NT? 8-22-08, Andrew
  • Re: Your lead against 3NT? 8-22-08, rhm
  • Re: Your lead against 3NT? 8-22-08 The full deal, and my ulterior motive, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Your lead against 3NT? 8-22-08, Kieran Dyke
• Merits of 15-17 HCP 1 NT opening with 5 card major?, SemiMike
  • Re: Merits of 15-17 HCP 1 NT opening with 5 card major?, Nick France
  • Re: Merits of 15-17 HCP 1 NT opening with 5 card major?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Merits of 15-17 HCP 1 NT opening with 5 card major?, vspoker
  • Message not available
    • Re: Merits of 15-17 HCP 1 NT opening with 5 card major?, ttw6687
  • Re: Merits of 15-17 HCP 1 NT opening with 5 card major?, Arthh
    • Message not available
      • Re: Merits of 15-17 HCP 1 NT opening with 5 card major?, Arthh
  • Re: Merits of 15-17 HCP 1 NT opening with 5 card major?, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Merits of 15-17 HCP 1 NT opening with 5 card major?, paulhigh
  • Re: Merits of 15-17 HCP 1 NT opening with 5 card major?, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: Merits of 15-17 HCP 1 NT opening with 5 card major?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Merits of 15-17 HCP 1 NT opening with 5 card major?, vincit
• Re: Assess the Responsibility, Bill Jacobs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Assess the Responsibility, Andrew
  • Re: Assess the Responsibility, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Assess the Responsibility, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: Assess the Responsibility, Bernard Schneder
    • Re: Assess the Responsibility, brsrichter
    • Message not available
      • Re: Assess the Responsibility, wheaties
      • Re: Assess the Responsibility, vspoker
  • Re: Assess the Responsibility, metobillc
  • Re: Assess the Responsibility, paulhigh
    • Re: Assess the Responsibility, Bernard Schneder
• opening lead vs. suit when pard has promised A or K in leader's suit, David Babcock
  • Message not available
    • Re: opening lead vs. suit when pard has promised A or K in leader's suit, David Babcock
      • Re: opening lead vs. suit when pard has promised A or K in leader's suit, alvin
      • Re: opening lead vs. suit when pard has promised A or K in leader's suit, David Babcock
      • Re: opening lead vs. suit when pard has promised A or K in leader's suit, alvin
      • Message not available
      • Re: opening lead vs. suit when pard has promised A or K in leader's suit, alvin
      • Re: opening lead vs. suit when pard has promised A or K in leader's suit, David Babcock
  • Re: opening lead vs. suit when pard has promised A or K in leader's suit, pgmer6809
    • Re: opening lead vs. suit when pard has promised A or K in leader's suit, David Babcock
    • Re: opening lead vs. suit when pard has promised A or K in leader's suit, alvin
• Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Rob Morris
    • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, wheaties
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Rob Morris
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, BBO expert
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, ian . payn
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, wheaties
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, BBO expert
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Bill Jacobs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Will in New Haven
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, OldPalooka
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Will in New Haven
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, David Babcock
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Lorne
  • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Stig Holmquist
    • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, vspoker
    • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, boblipton
  • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Player
    • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Player
    • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Rebidding a 5-card major redux, vincit
• Re: Most Hated Contracts, John Schwartz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Most Hated Contracts, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: Most Hated Contracts, dake50
  • Re: Most Hated Contracts, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Most Hated Contracts, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: Most Hated Contracts, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Most Hated Contracts, Bill Jacobs
• Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, Andrew
  • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, brsrichter
  • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, brsrichter
  • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, vspoker
  • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, Lorne
    • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, Andrew
      • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, ttw6687
      • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, brsrichter
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, brsrichter
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, Andrew
  • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, Nick France
  • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, Ivan Popivanov
    • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, brsrichter
    • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, Andrew
      • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, Ivan Popivanov
      • Re: Is length or shortness in the opponents' suit a plus when overcalling?, brsrichter
• Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Richard Pavlicek
    • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, shuster
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Andrew
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Charles Brenner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, jrw
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, John Blubaugh
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, pgmer6809
  • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Eric Leong
    • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, John Crinnion
    • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Player
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Ivan Popivanov
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Rob Morris
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Tom Reid
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, thissteve
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, raija d
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Does anyone know why Ken Gee was banned from playing?, Eric Leong
• Minor Penalty Card, When to play it?, pgmer6809
  • Re: Minor Penalty Card, When to play it?, Barry Margolin
    • Message not available
      • Re: Minor Penalty Card, When to play it?, Adam Beneschan
    • Message not available
      • Re: Minor Penalty Card, When to play it?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Minor Penalty Card, When to play it?, Lorne
      • Re: Minor Penalty Card, When to play it?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Minor Penalty Card, When to play it?, Steve Willner
      • Re: Minor Penalty Card, When to play it?, Steve Willner
      • Re: Minor Penalty Card, When to play it?, Sven Pran
      • Message not available
      • Re: Minor Penalty Card, When to play it?, Sven Pran
• 'The Fun Way to Serious Bridge", Stig Holmquist
  • Re: 'The Fun Way to Serious Bridge", Carl
    • Re: 'The Fun Way to Serious Bridge", Stig Holmquist
  • Re: 'The Fun Way to Serious Bridge", Player
• Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, paulhigh
  • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, Henry Lockwood
    • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, paulhigh
    • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, Alan Malloy
      • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, Eric Leong
    • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, paulhigh
    • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, vspoker
    • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, Kieran Dyke
      • Message not available
      • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, OldPalooka
      • Message not available
      • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, Henry Lockwood
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, OldPalooka
      • Re: Optimal strategy for inviting 3NT, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
• free games download free, maryratanakumari03
• Looking for a Reese deal, garrybl
• this is a test for our site, Sysadmin
• Who would you hire, richlp
  • Re: Who would you hire, John Blubaugh
    • Re: Who would you hire, Andrew
    • Re: Who would you hire, Ron Johnson
      • Re: Who would you hire, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Who would you hire, Eric Leong
      • Re: Who would you hire, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Who would you hire, Eric Leong
      • Re: Who would you hire, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Who would you hire, Eric Leong
      • Message not available
      • Re: Who would you hire, Tim
      • Re: Who would you hire, John Blubaugh
      • Message not available
      • Re: Who would you hire, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Who would you hire, BBO expert
      • Message not available
      • Re: Who would you hire, Eric Leong
      • Re: Who would you hire, John Blubaugh
      • Message not available
      • Re: Who would you hire, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Who would you hire, Georgiana Gates
      • Re: Who would you hire, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Who would you hire, Player
    • Re: Who would you hire, Andrew
      • Re: Who would you hire, Player
      • Re: Who would you hire, Player
      • Re: Who would you hire, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: Who would you hire, richlp
  • Re: Who would you hire, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: Who would you hire, ian . payn
      • Re: Who would you hire, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: Who would you hire, StevieTee
    • Re: Who would you hire, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Who would you hire, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Who would you hire, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Who would you hire, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Who would you hire, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Who would you hire, brsrichter
  • Re: Who would you hire, Carl
  • Re: Who would you hire, Eric Leong
    • Re: Who would you hire, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Who would you hire, Eric Leong
  • Re: Who would you hire, pgmer6809
• Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, metobillc
  • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, brsrichter
    • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, brsrichter
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, brsrichter
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, brsrichter
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, brsrichter
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Player
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Dave Flower
  • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Phil
  • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, OldPalooka
    • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, metobillc
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, OldPalooka
  • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, John Blubaugh
    • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Andrew
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Carl
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Andrew
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, metobillc
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Andrew
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, raija d
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, metobillc
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Andrew
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, brsrichter
  • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Andrew
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Andrew
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Andrew
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Eddie Grove
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Eddie Grove
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Andrew
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Eddie Grove
    • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Jari Boling
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Jari Boling
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Andrew
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, raija d
      • Message not available
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Jari Boling
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Wayne
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Jari Boling
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Eddie Grove
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Jari Boling
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, OldPalooka
    • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Ivan Popivanov
      • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, OldPalooka
  • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Player
  • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, Dave Flower
  • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, dake50
  • Re: Refuting Mike Lawrence's theory on 4-card overcalls, rubberduck
• lightning strikes twice, Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
  • Re: lightning strikes twice, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: lightning strikes twice, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Will in New Haven
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Will in New Haven
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, vspoker
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
    • Re: lightning strikes twice, Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
    • Re: lightning strikes twice, BBO expert
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Adam Beneschan
    • AW: lightning strikes twice, Jürgen R .
    • Re: lightning strikes twice, Dave Flower
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Rob Morris
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, blackshoe
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Dave Flower
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, blackshoe
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Dave Flower
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Andrew
  • Re: lightning strikes twice, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: lightning strikes twice, raija d
    • Re: lightning strikes twice, Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, raija d
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, raija d
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
      • Re: lightning strikes twice, blackshoe
    • Re: lightning strikes twice, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: lightning strikes twice, Alan Malloy
• forcing pass of redouble, David Babcock
  • Re: forcing pass of redouble, raija d
    • Re: forcing pass of redouble, David Babcock
  • Re: forcing pass of redouble, Kieran Dyke
• Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, bajjens
  • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, BBO expert
    • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, PriorKnowledge
    • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, Carl
      • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, BBO expert
  • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, StevieTee
    • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, thissteve
      • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, bajjens
  • Message not available
    • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, David Babcock
      • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, bajjens
      • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, BBO expert
      • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, bajjens
      • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, BBO expert
      • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, bajjens
  • Message not available
    • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, Jon Siegel
      • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, PriorKnowledge
  • Message not available
    • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, bajjens
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, bajjens
      • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, raija d
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, David Babcock
  • Message not available
    • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, bajjens
  • Re: Why are bridgeplayers not interested in meeting an even better cardgame?, Bill Jacobs
• Rorschach test, Steve Willner
  • Re: Rorschach test, Andrew
  • Re: Rorschach test, brsrichter
  • Re: Rorschach test, Lorne
  • Re: Rorschach test, Dave Flower
  • Re: Rorschach test, raija d
    • Re: Rorschach test, thissteve
  • Re: Rorschach test, jameson
  • Re: Rorschach test, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Rorschach test, Steve Willner
    • Re: Rorschach test, brsrichter
    • Re: Rorschach test, darint
    • Re: Rorschach test, raija d
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rorschach test, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Rorschach test, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Rorschach test, Will in New Haven
• Rebid after single raise in competion, Bud H
  • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, raija d
  • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, boblipton
  • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, brsrichter
  • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, Nick France
  • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, metobillc
  • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, vincit
  • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, Eric Leong
    • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, Andrew
  • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, Bud H
      • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, Steve Willner
      • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, vincit
      • Re: Rebid after single raise in competion, Will in New Haven
• Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, Bud H
  • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, vspoker
  • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, boblipton
  • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, brsrichter
  • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, raija d
      • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, vspoker
      • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, OldPalooka
      • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, raija d
      • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, vspoker
      • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, alvin
  • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, Nick France
  • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, metobillc
  • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, raija d
  • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, Eric Leong
  • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, alvin
  • Re: Call after partner's reduoble as opening bidder, Will in New Haven
• 2H, 3H, or double?, Bud H
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, Stu G
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, boblipton
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, brsrichter
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, Nick France
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, brsrichter
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, brsrichter
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, darint
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, brsrichter
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, brsrichter
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, OldPalooka
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, Art Hoffman
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, boblipton
    • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, metobillc
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, PriorKnowledge
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, Eric Leong
    • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, Bud H
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, vspoker
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, raija d
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or double?, Bill Jacobs
• 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, Carl
  • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, ted
    • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, Eddie Grove
      • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, ted
      • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, Eddie Grove
      • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, vspoker
  • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, Andrew
  • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, Carl
      • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, Nick France
      • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, Carl
      • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, blackshoe
      • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, raija d
      • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, Carl
  • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, vspoker
  • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, OldPalooka
    • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, Carl
  • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, raija d
  • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, Will in New Haven
  • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, blackshoe
    • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, Carl
      • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, blackshoe
      • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, Eddie Grove
    • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, mfagan@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 1C - 1D Walsh - Comments Please, blackshoe
• Inverted Minors = Game Force?, jameson
  • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, Ed
      • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, alvin
      • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, kingfish
      • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, jameson
  • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, blackshoe
      • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, blackshoe
      • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, blackshoe
  • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, Stu G
  • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, Andrew
    • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, vspoker
  • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, shuster
    • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, kingfish
  • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, Nick France
    • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, PriorKnowledge
  • Re: Inverted Minors = Game Force?, kingfish
• BridgePad/Bridgemate, lentulax
  • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Stu G
    • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, lentulax
  • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, PriorKnowledge
    • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Stu G
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Peter Smulders
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, joannem
    • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, lentulax
  • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Stu G
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Steve Foster
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Tim
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Stu G
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, boblipton
      • AW: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Jürgen R .
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Tim
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Barry Margolin
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Tim
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Rob Morris
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Tim
      • AW: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Jürgen R .
      • Re: AW: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Barry Margolin
      • Re: BridgePad/Bridgemate, Michael Angelo Ravera
• Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, Ed
  • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, SCyardman
  • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, metobillc
    • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, blackshoe
      • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, Lorne
      • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, raija d
  • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, OldPalooka
  • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, raija d
  • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, Nick France
    • Re: Does anyone play 3S forcing on this auction?, Lorne
• Followup to pass_or_blast vs. standard invitational, metobillc
  • Re: Followup to pass_or_blast vs. standard invitational, vspoker
  • Re: Followup to pass_or_blast vs. standard invitational, brsrichter
  • Re: Followup to pass_or_blast vs. standard invitational, Steve Willner
• What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, Andrew
  • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, Frank
    • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, Andrew
    • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, Will in New Haven
    • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, BBO expert
  • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, Andrew
  • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, StevieTee
  • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, Andrew
      • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, StevieTee
  • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, vspoker
    • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, dranon
      • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, Andrew
      • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, dranon
      • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, Andrew
  • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, Eric Leong
    • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
      • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
      • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, Andrew
      • Re: What do you bid: Kx, A9, Q98xxx, Q9x, StevieTee
• What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, John Blubaugh
    • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, raija d
  • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, joannem
    • Re: What famous bridge scandal does this article remind you of?, Adam Beneschan
• Probability of a 9-fit?, Stig Holmquist
  • AW: Probability of a 9-fit?, Jürgen R .
  • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Eric Leong
    • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, StevieTee
    • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, StevieTee
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, StevieTee
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, BBO expert
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, boblipton
  • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Carl
    • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, dranon
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, StevieTee
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Carl
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Carl
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, dranon
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Carl
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, StevieTee
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Carl
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Carl
  • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Wayne
    • AW: Probability of a 9-fit?, Jürgen R .
  • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Don Reble
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Martin Ambuhl
      • AW: Probability of a 9-fit?, Jürgen R .
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Don Reble
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, vspoker
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, vspoker
  • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, darint
    • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Probability of a 9-fit?, darint
• And now......?, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: And now......?, Dave Flower
  • Re: And now......?, Nick France
  • Re: And now......?, CBFalconer
  • Re: And now......?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: And now......?, Player
  • Re: And now......?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: And now......?, metobillc
  • Re: And now......?, raija d
  • Re: And now......?, OldPalooka
  • Re: And now......?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels - The Rest of the Story, Steve Willner
• Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, CBFalconer
  • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, OldPalooka
  • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, thissteve
    • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, OldPalooka
  • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, SCyardman
    • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, vspoker
  • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, Tim
  • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, vspoker
    • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, vspoker
    • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, StevieTee
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, vspoker
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, Alan Malloy
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, StevieTee
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, StevieTee
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, StevieTee
  • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, Alan Malloy
  • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, Tim
    • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, Tim
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, OldPalooka
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, StevieTee
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, wheaties
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, OldPalooka
    • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, wheaties
      • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, Tim
    • Re: Adventures in Evil Sun Land slam bidding, SCyardman
• Re: 2008 Laws in ACBL-land, David Babcock
  • Re: 2008 Laws in ACBL-land, Barry Margolin
    • Re: 2008 Laws in ACBL-land, David Babcock
• Henry Sun 909 is a thief, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, Henry Lockwood
    • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, BBO expert
      • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, John Crinnion
  • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, Player
  • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, Stig Holmquist
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, Tim
      • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, ian . payn
      • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, StevieTee
  • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, John Blubaugh
    • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, Tim
      • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, Andrew
      • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, StevieTee
      • Re: Henry Sun 909 is a thief, Andrew
• 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, jameson
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, Henry Lockwood
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, brsrichter
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, CBFalconer
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, Will in New Haven
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, Lorne
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, Eric Leong
    • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, ted
      • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, ahri
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, OldPalooka
    • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, Andrew
      • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, CBFalconer
      • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, Andrew
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, boblipton
    • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, Player
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, Andrew
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, OldPalooka
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, blackshoe
    • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, blackshoe
      • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, CBFalconer
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, vspoker
  • Re: 6-Loser, 4-Level Bid, Assess the Blame, kingfish
• your bid, ourfunboys
  • Re: your bid, CBFalconer
  • Re: your bid, Martin Ambuhl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Your bid, IMFinegold
    • Re: Your bid, Dave Flower
    • Re: Your bid, Jan Veerbeek
      • Re: Your bid, Dave Flower
    • Re: Your bid, brsrichter
    • Re: Your bid, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: Your bid, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Your bid, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Your bid, Player
      • Re: Your bid, ted
    • Re: Your bid, Henry Lockwood
    • Re: Your bid, Lorne
    • Re: Your bid, Michiel
      • Re: Your bid, Dave Flower
      • Re: Your bid, vincit
    • Re: Your bid, Art Hoffman
    • Re: Your bid, vincit
    • Re: Your bid, vincit
    • Re: Your bid, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Your bid, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Your bid, IMFinegold
    • Re: Your bid, OldPalooka
      • Re: Your bid, Andrew
      • Re: Your bid, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Your bid, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Your bid, brsrichter
      • Re: Your bid, vincit
      • Re: Your bid, brsrichter
      • Re: Your bid, vincit
      • Re: Your bid, brsrichter
    • Re: Your bid, metobillc
      • Re: Your bid, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Your bid, raija d
      • Re: Your bid, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Your bid, metobillc
      • Re: Your bid, raija d
      • Re: Your bid, Andrew
      • Re: Your bid, IMFinegold
      • Re: Your bid, Andrew
    • Re: Your bid, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Your bid, vincit
    • Re: Your bid, boblipton
      • Re: Your bid, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Your bid, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Your bid, Dave Flower
      • Re: Your bid, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Your bid, Dave Flower
      • Re: Your bid, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Your bid, OldPalooka
      • Re: Your bid, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Your bid, Dave Flower
      • Re: Your bid, boblipton
      • Re: Your bid, Andrew
    • Re: Your bid, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: Your bid, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Your bid, BBO expert
    • Re: Your bid, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Your bid, kingfish
    • Re: Your bid, Eric Leong
      • Re: Your bid, Player
• 1962 World Championship book for sale . . ., Dave Flower
  • Re: 1962 World Championship book for sale . . ., Kieran Dyke
    • Re: 1962 World Championship book for sale . . ., Dave Flower
  • Re: 1962 World Championship book for sale . . ., boblipton
• Re: What do you bid here?, Steve Willner
  • Re: What do you bid here?, BBO expert
    • Re: What do you bid here?, CBFalconer
    • Re: What do you bid here?, Steve Willner
      • Re: What do you bid here?, BBO expert
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008, Steve Willner
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England), Steve Willner
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up, Steve Willner
  • Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up, Art Hoffman
    • Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up, Robin Barker
      • Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up, Art Hoffman
• ACBL alerting question, Alan Malloy
  • Re: ACBL alerting question, Mark Brader
    • Re: ACBL alerting question, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: ACBL alerting question, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Message not available
    • Re: ACBL alerting question, BBO expert
• 2S Doubled Contract, jameson
  • Re: 2S Doubled Contract, dmatt
  • Re: 2S Doubled Contract, Lorne
  • Re: 2S Doubled Contract, Eric Leong
  • Re: 2S Doubled Contract, OldPalooka
  • Re: 2S Doubled Contract, raija d
  • Re: 2S Doubled Contract, boblipton
  • Re: 2S Doubled Contract, PriorKnowledge
  • Re: 2S Doubled Contract, kingfish
• 4 Suit Transfers, jameson
  • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, campboy
  • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, StevieTee
    • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, wheaties
  • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Nick France
  • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Lorne
  • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Eric Leong
    • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Alan Malloy
  • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, raija d
    • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, PriorKnowledge
    • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, vspoker
    • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, metobillc
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, raija d
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, David Babcock
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, vspoker
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, metobillc
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Alan Malloy
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, metobillc
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, metobillc
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Alan Malloy
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, vspoker
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Andrew
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, vspoker
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, metobillc
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Andrew
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, metobillc
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, metobillc
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Andrew
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, metobillc
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, vspoker
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, vincit
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, metobillc
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, campboy
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, vspoker
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, vspoker
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, metobillc
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, vspoker
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, David Babcock
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, vincit
  • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Andrew
  • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, Sid
  • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, kingfish
    • Re: 4 Suit Transfers, StevieTee
• Did I deserve this zero?, Jim Greer
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Dave Flower
    • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, boblipton
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, ian . payn
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Dave Flower
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Lorne
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Jeffrey
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, thissteve
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, brsrichter
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Jim Greer
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Eric Leong
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Nick France
    • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, boblipton
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, boblipton
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, boblipton
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Eric Leong
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, raija d
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, PriorKnowledge
    • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, OldPalooka
  • Re: Did I deserve this zero?, Andrew
• Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, StevieTee
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Dave Flower
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, ahri
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, brsrichter
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Henry Lockwood
    • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, boblipton
    • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Dave Flower
    • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Eric Leong
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Eric Leong
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Lorne
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, BBO expert
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, thissteve
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, patpowersspam
    • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, raija d
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, PriorKnowledge
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, raija d
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Andrew
    • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, kingfish
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, dranon
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Dave Flower
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, dranon
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Andrew
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, brsrichter
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Andrew
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, vspoker
    • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, brsrichter
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, brsrichter
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, vspoker
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, CBFalconer
    • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, CBFalconer
    • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, brsrichter
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, kingfish
  • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, Player
    • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, StevieTee
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, brsrichter
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, StevieTee
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, CBFalconer
      • Re: Who Should Have Been More Aggressive, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
• Please rate possible bids, vlastik58
  • Re: Please rate possible bids, Dave Flower
  • Re: Please rate possible bids, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Please rate possible bids, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: Please rate possible bids, boblipton
    • Re: Please rate possible bids, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Please rate possible bids, Lorne
  • Re: Please rate possible bids, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Please rate possible bids, ahri
  • Re: Please rate possible bids, Eric Leong
  • Re: Please rate possible bids, metobillc
  • Re: Please rate possible bids, vlastimil
• Support double or not?, Bud H
  • Re: Support double or not?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Support double or not?, raija d
  • Re: Support double or not?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Support double or not?, campboy
    • Re: Support double or not?, Jan Veerbeek
      • Re: Support double or not?, campboy
      • Re: Support double or not?, raija d
  • Re: Support double or not?, vspoker
• splinters, vspoker
  • Re: splinters, Barry Margolin
    • Re: splinters, vspoker
      • Re: splinters, Barry Margolin
      • Re: splinters, alvin
  • Re: splinters, raija d
  • Re: splinters, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: splinters, Charles Brenner
  • Re: splinters, Douglas Newlands
    • Re: splinters, vspoker
      • Re: splinters, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: splinters, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: splinters, ian . payn
  • Re: splinters, Lorne
    • Re: splinters, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: splinters, vspoker
    • Re: splinters, Charles Brenner
      • Re: splinters, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: splinters, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: splinters, blackshoe
  • Re: splinters, kingfish
  • Re: splinters, Eric Leong
  • Re: splinters, Richard Pavlicek
• Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, raija d
    • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, raija d
    • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Jim Greer
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Carl
    • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, darint
  • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Stig Holmquist
    • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, boblipton
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, vspoker
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Jim Greer
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, StevieTee
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Carl
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Player
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, Player
  • Re: Thread extraction: Stig and the 4C count, vspoker
• Decision at trick 1, kingfish
  • Re: Decision at trick 1, Dave Flower
  • Re: Decision at trick 1, Lorne
  • Re: Decision at trick 1, boblipton
    • Re: Decision at trick 1, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Decision at trick 1, Dave Flower
  • Re: Decision at trick 1, CBFalconer
  • Re: Decision at trick 1, Eric Leong
    • Re: Decision at trick 1, kingfish
  • Re: Decision at trick 1, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Decision at trick 1, Charles Brenner
• Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, kingfish
  • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, metobillc
    • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, boblipton
  • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Eric Leong
    • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, vspoker
      • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, vspoker
  • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Lorne
  • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Phil
  • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Andrew
    • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, OldPalooka
  • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, raija d
    • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Art Hoffman
      • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Art Hoffman
      • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, vspoker
    • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, raija d
  • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, kingfish
    • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Art Hoffman
      • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, boblipton
    • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, metobillc
    • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Matchpoint Decision 8/10/08, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
• Bidding Inquiry, kingfish
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, metobillc
    • Re: Bidding Inquiry, PriorKnowledge
    • Re: Bidding Inquiry, BBO expert
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, metobillc
    • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Eddie Grove
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, rhm
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Eddie Grove
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, kingfish
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Art Hoffman
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, vspoker
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Player
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, brsrichter
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Player
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Bidding Inquiry, OldPalooka
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, rhm
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Lorne
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, boblipton
    • Re: Bidding Inquiry, metobillc
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, jameson
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, brsrichter
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Nick France
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, raija d
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, OldPalooka
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, Eric Leong
  • Re: Bidding Inquiry, patpowersspam
• Insufficient bid - sufficient bid replacement now a reverse, Bud H
  • Re: Insufficient bid - sufficient bid replacement now a reverse, blackshoe
  • Re: Insufficient bid - sufficient bid replacement now a reverse, Dave Flower
    • Re: Insufficient bid - sufficient bid replacement now a reverse, budh9534
      • Re: Insufficient bid - sufficient bid replacement now a reverse, OldPalooka
      • Re: Insufficient bid - sufficient bid replacement now a reverse, blackshoe
      • Re: Insufficient bid - sufficient bid replacement now a reverse, Dave Flower
  • Re: Insufficient bid - sufficient bid replacement now a reverse, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Insufficient bid - sufficient bid replacement now a reverse, David Stevenson
  • Re: Insufficient bid - sufficient bid replacement now a reverse, Steve Willner
    • Re: Insufficient bid - sufficient bid replacement now a reverse, Nick Wedd
      • Re: Insufficient bid - sufficient bid replacement now a reverse, Steve Willner
• Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Steve Willner
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, risingaces
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, raija d
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Andrew
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Lorne
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Nick France
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, boblipton
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, metobillc
    • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Andrew
      • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, metobillc
      • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, kingfish
      • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, BBO expert
      • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, kingfish
      • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Dave Flower
      • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Andrew
      • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, metobillc
      • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Travis Crump
      • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Andrew
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, CBFalconer
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, kingfish
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, BBO expert
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, OldPalooka
    • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Andrew
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Eric Leong
  • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Steve Willner
    • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, boblipton
      • Re: Unfamiliar partner, 1NT auction, Steve Willner
• Negative double or pass?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, ted
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, Nick France
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, smn
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, boblipton
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, Eric Leong
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, Andrew
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, brsrichter
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, Lorne
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, brsrichter
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, Andrew
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, metobillc
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, brsrichter
      • Re: Negative double or pass?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, Art Hoffman
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Negative double or pass?, StevieTee
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, vspoker
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, raija d
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, CBFalconer
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, budelove
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, kingfish
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, Eric Leong
      • Re: Negative double or pass?, PriorKnowledge
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, jameson
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, Nick France
      • Re: Negative double or pass?, raija d
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, Lorne
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, Andrew
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, OldPalooka
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, metobillc
      • Re: Negative double or pass?, raija d
      • Re: Negative double or pass?, metobillc
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Negative double or pass?, thissteve
  • Re: Negative double or pass?, kingfish
  • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, brsrichter
    • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, Nick France
      • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, Andrew
      • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, Andrew
    • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, metobillc
      • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, brsrichter
    • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, StevieTee
      • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, Eric Leong
    • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, StevieTee
    • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, vspoker
      • Re: Negative double or pass? Complete hand, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
• For amusement only, Stephen Bush
  • Re: For amusement only, Nick Wedd
    • Re: For amusement only, Mark Brader
      • Re: For amusement only, Stephen Bush
    • Re: For amusement only, Charles Brenner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: For Amusement Only, Andrew B.
    • Message not available
      • Re: For Amusement Only, Lorne
  • Re: For Amusement Only, Wes Powers
  • Re: For Amusement Only, wheaties
  • Re: For Amusement Only, Andrew
    • Re: For Amusement Only, Andrew
      • Re: For Amusement Only, garrybl
      • Re: For Amusement Only, Andrew
  • Re: For Amusement Only, ian . payn
    • Message not available
      • Re: For Amusement Only, ian . payn
  • Re: For Amusement Only, ted
  • Re: For Amusement Only, Peter Smulders
    • Re: For Amusement Only, ian . payn
      • Re: For Amusement Only, Dave Flower
      • Re: For Amusement Only, ian . payn
      • Re: For Amusement Only, ian . payn
• Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, jameson
  • Re: Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, metobillc
  • Re: Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, Andrew
  • Re: Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, CBFalconer
    • Re: Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, CBFalconer
  • Re: Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, Lorne
  • Re: Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, kingfish
    • Re: Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, kingfish
      • Re: Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, CBFalconer
  • Re: Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Sequences after 1 minor - 1NT responses, Player
• doubling for the lead, Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
  • Re: doubling for the lead, john . elusive
    • Re: doubling for the lead, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: doubling for the lead, metobillc
  • Re: doubling for the lead, Andrew
  • Re: doubling for the lead, Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
• Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, BobPark
  • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, blackshoe
    • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, Dave Flower
      • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, blackshoe
      • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, Stu G
      • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, BobPark
      • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, Stu G
      • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, BobPark
    • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, BobPark
      • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, Travis Crump
      • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, Steve Willner
      • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, BobPark
      • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, BobPark
  • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, Steve Willner
  • Message not available
    • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, BobPark
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Prohibitions (?) after insufficient bid accepted, David Stevenson
• defense to weak 2 opener, lsf
  • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, Hasse
  • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, Nick France
  • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, raija d
  • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, Travis Crump
      • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, Nick France
      • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, Lorne
    • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, blackshoe
      • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, Lorne
      • Re: defense to weak 2 opener, lsf
• Rate the Bids, StevieTee
  • Re: Rate the Bids, brsrichter
  • Re: Rate the Bids, Player
  • Re: Rate the Bids, Dave Flower
  • Re: Rate the Bids, Nick France
  • Re: Rate the Bids, vspoker
  • Re: Rate the Bids, vspoker
    • Re: Rate the Bids, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Rate the Bids, vspoker
      • Re: Rate the Bids, ttw6687
      • Re: Rate the Bids, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Rate the Bids, vspoker
      • Re: Rate the Bids, brsrichter
      • Re: Rate the Bids, CBFalconer
      • Re: Rate the Bids, vspoker
      • Re: Rate the Bids, OldPalooka
      • Re: Rate the Bids, CBFalconer
    • Re: Rate the Bids, StevieTee
  • Re: Rate the Bids, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Rate the Bids, raija d
    • Re: Rate the Bids, raija d
      • Re: Rate the Bids, Dave Flower
      • Re: Rate the Bids, Nick France
      • Re: Rate the Bids, Dave Flower
      • Re: Rate the Bids, brsrichter
      • Re: Rate the Bids, Dave Flower
      • Re: Rate the Bids, raija d
      • Re: Rate the Bids, Nick France
      • Re: Rate the Bids, Dave Flower
  • Re: Rate the Bids, ted
    • Re: Rate the Bids, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Rate the Bids, ted
  • Re: Rate the Bids, metobillc
  • AW: Rate the Bids, Jürgen R .
  • Re: Rate the Bids, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Rate the Bids, Art Hoffman
    • Re: Rate the Bids, Dave Flower
    • Re: Rate the Bids, OldPalooka
• ACBL Online Sectionals or Regionals, budelove
  • Re: ACBL Online Sectionals or Regionals, Will in New Haven
  • Re: ACBL Online Sectionals or Regionals, vspoker
  • Re: ACBL Online Sectionals or Regionals, Stu G
• Double =my bid, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Double =my bid, smn
  • Re: Double =my bid, Nick France
    • Re: Double =my bid, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Double =my bid, ted
    • Re: Double =my bid, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Double =my bid, David Babcock
      • Re: Double =my bid, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Double =my bid, Alan Malloy
      • Re: Double =my bid, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Double =my bid, boblipton
      • Re: Double =my bid, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Double =my bid, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Double =my bid, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Double =my bid, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Double =my bid, Lorne
  • Re: Double =my bid, StevieTee
  • Re: Double =my bid, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Double =my bid, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Double =my bid, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Double =my bid, StevieTee
  • Re: Double =my bid, pattayabridge
    • Re: Double =my bid, Bud H
  • Re: Double =my bid, Carl
    • Re: Double =my bid, StevieTee
      • Re: Double =my bid, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Double =my bid, CBFalconer
      • Re: Double =my bid, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Double =my bid, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Double =my bid, CBFalconer
  • Re: Double =my bid, patpowersspam
• Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, wheaties
    • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, blackshoe
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, smn
  • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Nick France
  • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, metobillc
    • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Tim
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, metobillc
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Lorne
    • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Player
  • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, raija d
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Tim
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Player
  • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, pattayabridge
    • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, blackshoe
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, raija d
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Alan Malloy
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Steve Willner
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Tim
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Steve Willner
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Tim
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Tim
    • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Player
  • Re: Thread extraction: psychic 3nt response to 3m?, Douglas Newlands
• Opener's rebid, raija d
  • Re: Opener's rebid, Jim Greer
  • Re: Opener's rebid, Andrew
  • Re: Opener's rebid, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Opener's rebid, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Opener's rebid, ted
  • Re: Opener's rebid, metobillc
  • Re: Opener's rebid, Eric Leong
    • Re: Opener's rebid, raija d
  • Re: Opener's rebid, boblipton
  • Re: Opener's rebid, smn
  • Re: Opener's rebid, Nick France
  • Re: Opener's rebid, OldPalooka
  • Re: Opener's rebid, raija d
    • Re: Opener's rebid, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
• Quick Poll on Balancing, wheaties
  • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, Andrew
  • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, raija d
  • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, metobillc
  • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, OldPalooka
  • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, ted
    • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, Nick France
  • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, wheaties
    • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, Dave Flower
    • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, raija d
    • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, metobillc
      • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, metobillc
      • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, OldPalooka
    • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, Nick France
    • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, Lorne
    • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, OldPalooka
      • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, raija d
      • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, OldPalooka
      • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, Steve Willner
  • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, Eric Leong
  • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Quick Poll on Balancing, Will in New Haven
• Please rate these bids, Michiel
  • Re: Please rate these bids, Dave Flower
  • Re: Please rate these bids, Ville Likitalo
  • Re: Please rate these bids, Lorne
  • Re: Please rate these bids, Nick France
  • Re: Please rate these bids, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Please rate these bids, boblipton
  • Re: Please rate these bids, Henry Lockwood
  • Re: Please rate these bids, Kevin Podsiadlik
  • Re: Please rate these bids, raija d
    • Re: Please rate these bids, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Please rate these bids, wheaties
  • Re: Please rate these bids, Jeffrey
  • Re: Please rate these bids, Andrew
  • Re: Please rate these bids, metobillc
    • Re: Please rate these bids, raija d
      • Re: Please rate these bids, Dave Flower
  • Re: Please rate these bids, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Please rate these bids, wheaties
      • Re: Please rate these bids, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Please rate these bids, Eric Leong
    • Re: Please rate these bids, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Please rate these bids, Bud H
  • Re: Please rate these bids, Steve Willner
    • Re: Please rate these bids, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Please rate these bids, OldPalooka
• 40B3 elections, Dave Flower
  • Re: 40B3 elections, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: 40B3 elections, Dave Flower
      • Re: 40B3 elections, blackshoe
      • Re: 40B3 elections, Dave Flower
      • Re: 40B3 elections, blackshoe
      • Re: 40B3 elections, Dave Flower
      • Re: 40B3 elections, Michael Angelo Ravera
• What is my rebid - 2 parts, mark
  • Re: What is my rebid - 2 parts, Eric Leong
    • Re: What is my rebid - 2 parts, boblipton
  • Re: What is my rebid - 2 parts, metobillc
  • Re: What is my rebid - 2 parts, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
• Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, David Terris
  • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, metobillc
    • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, Alan Malloy
      • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, metobillc
      • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, Wayne
  • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, dake50
  • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, Andrew
  • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, Lorne
    • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, Andrew
  • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, wheaties
  • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, budelove
  • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, Chris
  • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Ultra Weak Notrump Opener, FrancesHinden
• Olympics and Bridge, Arthh
  • Re: Olympics and Bridge, markhj111
    • Re: Olympics and Bridge, jrw
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Wayne
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, jrw
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Phil
    • Re: Olympics and Bridge, BBO expert
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Tim
    • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Chris Pisarra
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, CBFalconer
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, CBFalconer
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, John Crinnion
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Peter Lipp
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, BBO expert
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, CBFalconer
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, OldPalooka
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Tim
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, BBO expert
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, BBO expert
  • Re: Olympics and Bridge, brsrichter
    • Re: Olympics and Bridge, raija d
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, brsrichter
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, BBO expert
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, brsrichter
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, brsrichter
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, CBFalconer
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, BBO expert
  • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: Olympics and Bridge, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Tim
  • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Eric Leong
    • Re: Olympics and Bridge, brsrichter
    • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Andrew
  • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Richard Pavlicek
    • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Fluxman
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, Andrew
      • Re: Olympics and Bridge, BBO expert
• August newsletter & bidding forum, newsgroups.comcast.net
• First Night with the New Laws, Dave Flower
  • Re: First Night with the New Laws, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: First Night with the New Laws, David Stevenson
    • Re: First Night with the New Laws, David Babcock
      • Re: First Night with the New Laws, blackshoe
  • Re: First Night with the New Laws, Tim
    • Re: First Night with the New Laws, BBO expert
    • Re: First Night with the New Laws, Mark Brader
    • Re: First Night with the New Laws, Dave Flower
      • Re: First Night with the New Laws, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: First Night with the New Laws, Tim
      • Re: First Night with the New Laws, blackshoe
      • Re: First Night with the New Laws, Tim
      • Re: First Night with the New Laws, blackshoe
      • Re: First Night with the New Laws, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: First Night with the New Laws, Tim
      • Re: First Night with the New Laws, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: First Night with the New Laws, Adam Beneschan
• 1969 World Championship Book for Sale ..., Dave Flower
• Re: Ruling question, Steve Willner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ruling question, Steve Willner
• Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest, Steve Willner
• Re: 2/1 question, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: 2/1 question, Bud H
  • Re: 2/1 question, Bud H
  • Re: 2/1 question, David Terris
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 2/1 question, Steve Willner
• tough rebid problem, Collins
  • Re: tough rebid problem, vspoker
  • Re: tough rebid problem, wheaties
    • Re: tough rebid problem, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: tough rebid problem, wheaties
  • Re: tough rebid problem, Will in New Haven
  • Re: tough rebid problem, Collins
    • Re: tough rebid problem, Ville Likitalo
      • Re: tough rebid problem, boblipton
      • Re: tough rebid problem, Will in New Haven
    • Re: tough rebid problem, Will in New Haven
      • Re: tough rebid problem, wheaties
      • Re: tough rebid problem, Will in New Haven
  • Re: tough rebid problem, boblipton
    • Re: tough rebid problem, Rob Morris
      • Re: tough rebid problem, Will in New Haven
      • Re: tough rebid problem, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: tough rebid problem, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: tough rebid problem, Will in New Haven
      • Re: tough rebid problem, Rob Morris
      • Re: tough rebid problem, Will in New Haven
      • Re: tough rebid problem, Rob Morris
      • Re: tough rebid problem, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: tough rebid problem, Will in New Haven
      • Re: tough rebid problem, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: tough rebid problem, ted
• Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, Phil
  • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, Henry Lockwood
  • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, Andrew
  • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, CBFalconer
    • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, hummer
    • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, hummer
    • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, Lorne
    • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, Sid
  • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, Sid
  • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, thissteve
  • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, Eric Leong
    • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Look for 4-4 when we already have a 5-4?, Kieran Dyke
• Pass or Double?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Pass or Double?, CBFalconer
  • Re: Pass or Double?, dranon
  • Re: Pass or Double?, Ville Likitalo
  • Re: Pass or Double?, paulhigh
  • Re: Pass or Double?, Jeffrey
  • Re: Pass or Double?, OldPalooka
    • Re: Pass or Double?, Nick France
      • Re: Pass or Double?, Andrew
      • Re: Pass or Double?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Pass or Double?, dranon
      • Re: Pass or Double?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Pass or Double?, boblipton
      • Re: Pass or Double?, vspoker
      • Re: Pass or Double?, OldPalooka
      • Re: Pass or Double?, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Pass or Double?, Andrew
      • Re: Pass or Double?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Pass or Double?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Pass or Double?, Eric Leong
      • Re: Pass or Double?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Pass or Double?, markhj111
      • Re: Pass or Double?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Pass or Double?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Pass or Double?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Pass or Double?, Eric Leong
  • Re: Pass or Double?, boblipton
  • Re: Pass or Double?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Pass or Double?, darint
  • Re: Pass or Double?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Pass or Double?, darint
    • Re: Pass or Double?, metobillc
  • Re: Pass or Double?, vspoker
  • Re: Pass or Double?, Nick France
  • Re: Pass or Double?, Kieran Dyke
• Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, OldPalooka
    • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, OldPalooka
  • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, StevieTee
  • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Rob Morris
    • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Carl
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Carl
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, BBO expert
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Jim Greer
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, StevieTee
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, vspoker
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, StevieTee
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, raija d
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Carl
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, raija d
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, StevieTee
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, dranon
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, StevieTee
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, dranon
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Douglas Newlands
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, StevieTee
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Carl
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, dranon
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Nick France
    • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Nick France
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, BBO expert
  • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, dake50
    • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Bergen Rule of 20, brsrichter
• responsive and constructive, lsf
  • Re: responsive and constructive, Andrew
    • Re: responsive and constructive, raija d
      • Re: responsive and constructive, Andrew
  • Re: responsive and constructive, CBFalconer
    • Reading Subject lines (was Re: responsive and constructive), Barry Margolin
      • Re: Reading Subject lines, CBFalconer
      • Re: Reading Subject lines (was Re: responsive and constructive), dranon
      • Re: Reading Subject lines (was Re: responsive and constructive), OldPalooka
      • Re: Reading Subject lines (was Re: responsive and constructive), dranon
      • Re: Reading Subject lines (was Re: responsive and constructive), Steve Grant
      • Re: Reading Subject lines (was Re: responsive and constructive), Fluxman
    • Re: responsive and constructive, thissteve
    • Re: responsive and constructive, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: responsive and constructive, CBFalconer
  • Re: responsive and constructive, Phil
    • Re: responsive and constructive, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: responsive and constructive, Phil
      • Re: responsive and constructive, Andrew
      • Re: responsive and constructive, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: responsive and constructive, raija d
      • Re: responsive and constructive, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: responsive and constructive, Andrew
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • responsive and constructive, lsf
    • Re: responsive and constructive, PriorKnowledge
• Light Overcalls, jameson
  • Re: Light Overcalls, Frank
  • Re: Light Overcalls, Alan Malloy
    • Re: Light Overcalls, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Light Overcalls, metobillc
  • Re: Light Overcalls, Andrew
  • Re: Light Overcalls, OldPalooka
  • Re: Light Overcalls, Lorne
  • Re: Light Overcalls, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Light Overcalls, PriorKnowledge
    • Re: Light Overcalls, vspoker
      • Re: Light Overcalls, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: Light Overcalls, Player
    • Re: Light Overcalls, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Light Overcalls, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: Light Overcalls, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Light Overcalls, OldPalooka
      • Re: Light Overcalls, vspoker
      • Re: Light Overcalls, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Light Overcalls, Andrew
      • Re: Light Overcalls, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: Light Overcalls, stephen . mcdevitt
      • Re: Light Overcalls, Player
      • Re: Light Overcalls, stephen . mcdevitt
      • Re: Light Overcalls, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: Light Overcalls, Andrew
    • Re: Light Overcalls, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Light Overcalls, vspoker
    • Re: Light Overcalls, Eric Leong
  • Re: Light Overcalls, dake50
  • Re: Light Overcalls, Player
  • Re: Light Overcalls, Steve Willner
    • Re: Light Overcalls, Andrew
      • Re: Light Overcalls, Steve Willner
      • Re: Light Overcalls, Andrew
      • Re: Light Overcalls, Steve Willner
    • Re: Light Overcalls, Ron Johnson
• The Best Way?, jameson
  • Re: The Best Way?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: The Best Way?, Eric Leong
    • Re: The Best Way?, Bud H
      • Re: The Best Way?, Eric Leong
      • Re: The Best Way?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: The Best Way?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: The Best Way?, metobillc
  • Re: The Best Way?, Alan Malloy
  • Re: The Best Way?, Andrew
    • Re: The Best Way?, Andrew
      • Re: The Best Way?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: The Best Way?, vspoker
    • Re: The Best Way?, jameson
      • Re: The Best Way?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: The Best Way?, Andrew
  • Re: The Best Way?, CBFalconer
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Who is right, pattaybridge or his detractors? (was 1NT after RHO opens 1H...), Adam Beneschan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?, BBO expert
    • Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?, StevieTee
  • Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?, Steve Willner
• 5NT - wtf!, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: 5NT - wtf!, Alan Malloy
    • Re: 5NT - wtf!, Douglas Newlands
    • Re: 5NT - wtf!, Douglas Newlands
      • Re: 5NT - wtf!, Alan Malloy
  • Re: 5NT - wtf!, boblipton
  • Re: 5NT - wtf!, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: 5NT - wtf!, Andrew
  • Re: 5NT - wtf!, CBFalconer
  • Re: 5NT - wtf!, Frances
  • Re: 5NT - wtf!, Lorne
    • Re: 5NT - wtf!, Kent Feiler
      • Re: 5NT - wtf!, Lorne
      • Re: 5NT - wtf!, Kent Feiler
      • Re: 5NT - wtf!, vspoker
  • Re: 5NT - wtf!, vspoker
    • Re: 5NT - wtf!, OldPalooka
  • Re: 5NT - wtf!, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: 5NT - wtf!, Douglas Newlands
• Re: What does this double mean?, David Stevenson
  • Re: What does this double mean?, Andrew
    • Re: What does this double mean?, David Stevenson
      • Re: What does this double mean?, Andrew
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: What does this double mean?, Andrew
      • Re: What does this double mean?, David Stevenson
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: What does this double mean?, David Stevenson
      • Re: What does this double mean?, OldPalooka
• President's Cup 2008, David Stevenson
  • Re: President's Cup 2008, Georgiana Gates
    • Re: President's Cup 2008, David Stevenson
      • Re: President's Cup 2008, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: President's Cup 2008, David Stevenson
      • Re: President's Cup 2008, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
• Another grand slam question, Alan Malloy
  • Re: Another grand slam question, Travis Crump
    • Re: Another grand slam question, OldPalooka
  • Re: Another grand slam question, vspoker
  • Re: Another grand slam question, Eric Leong
  • Re: Another grand slam question, boblipton
  • Re: Another grand slam question, scyardman
  • Re: Another grand slam question, metobillc
  • Re: Another grand slam question, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Another grand slam question, Andrew
      • Re: Another grand slam question, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Another grand slam question, Andrew
  • Re: Another grand slam question, Lorne
  • Re: Another grand slam question, paulhigh
• Bid or pass, metobillc
  • Re: Bid or pass, paulhigh
  • Re: Bid or pass, rhm
  • Re: Bid or pass, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Bid or pass, vspoker
  • Re: Bid or pass, Dave Flower
    • Re: Bid or pass, vspoker
      • Re: Bid or pass, metobillc
      • Re: Bid or pass, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Bid or pass, scyardman
  • Re: Bid or pass, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Bid or pass, Andrew
• It's your call, metobillc
  • Re: It's your call, rhm
    • Re: It's your call, Andrew
      • Re: It's your call, rhm
      • Re: It's your call, Andrew
      • Re: It's your call, rhm
  • Re: It's your call, paulhigh
  • Re: It's your call, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: It's your call, Andrew
  • Re: It's your call, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: It's your call, boblipton
    • Re: It's your call, metobillc
  • Re: It's your call, john . elusive
  • Re: It's your call, Eric Leong
• computer bridge final, none
  • Re: computer bridge final, Carl
    • Re: computer bridge final, none
• Double or Pass, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Double or Pass, Henry Lockwood
  • Re: Double or Pass, Dave Flower
  • Re: Double or Pass, Frank
  • Re: Double or Pass, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Double or Pass, dake50
  • Re: Double or Pass, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Double or Pass, Eric Leong
    • Re: Double or Pass, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Double or Pass, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Double or Pass, Andrew
    • Re: Double or Pass, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Double or Pass, raija d
    • Re: Double or Pass, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Double or Pass, raija d
      • Re: Double or Pass, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Double or Pass, raija d
      • Re: Double or Pass, Travis Crump
  • Re: Double or Pass, Nick France
  • Re: Double or Pass, vspoker
  • Re: Double or Pass, boblipton
    • Re: Double or Pass, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Double or Pass, rhm
      • Re: Double or Pass, boblipton
      • Re: Double or Pass, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Double or Pass, boblipton
  • Re: Double or Pass, Andrew
    • Re: Double or Pass, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Double or Pass, Andrew
      • Re: Double or Pass, Andrew
      • Re: Double or Pass, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Double or Pass, Andrew
• Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, rhm
    • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, rhm
  • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Bud H
    • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, rhm
  • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Dave Flower
    • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Tim DeLaney
    • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Eric Leong
      • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Dave Flower
      • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Eric Leong
      • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Dave Flower
  • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Eric Leong
    • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, rhm
      • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, rhm
      • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Eric Leong
      • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008 My analysis, Tim DeLaney
    • Re: Defend 3NT 8-3-2008 My analysis, Charles Brenner
• Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, paulhigh
  • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Carl
      • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, vincit
      • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, vincit
      • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Bud H
  • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Richard Pavlicek
    • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, brsrichter
    • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, raija d
    • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Carl
    • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, paulhigh
  • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Dave Flower
    • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, paulhigh
      • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Andrew
      • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Andrew
      • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, paulhigh
      • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Andrew
  • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Eric Leong
  • Re: Safety plays: are there any general principles or guidelines?, Dean Stow
• J97xxx opposite K8x, Bud H
  • Re: J97xxx opposite K8x, Charles Brenner
  • Re: J97xxx opposite K8x, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: J97xxx opposite K8x, Bud H
  • Re: J97xxx opposite K8x, Sid
    • Re: J97xxx opposite K8x, Tim
      • Re: J97xxx opposite K8x, Sid
  • Re: J97xxx opposite K8x, Bud H
    • Re: J97xxx opposite K8x, OldPalooka
    • Re: J97xxx opposite K8x, Eric Leong
  • Re: J97xxx opposite K8x, Eric Leong
  • Re: J97xxx opposite K8x, CBFalconer
    • Re: J97xxx opposite K8x, Eric Leong
• Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Edward Mitchell
  • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, OldPalooka
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Edward Mitchell
    • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, StevieTee
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Travis Crump
    • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, raija d
    • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, dranon
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Edward Mitchell
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, dranon
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, dranon
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, dranon
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, raija d
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, dranon
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, raija d
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, dranon
  • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Edward Mitchell
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Eric Leong
    • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Edward Mitchell
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Andrew
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, vspoker
      • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Edward Mitchell
  • Re: Should I bid on as an Overcaller?, Steve Willner
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis, Stephen Fischer
• How is the partnership between Zia and Hamman working?, John Blubaugh
  • Re: How is the partnership between Zia and Hamman working?, Tim
    • Re: How is the partnership between Zia and Hamman working?, David Babcock
      • Re: How is the partnership between Zia and Hamman working?, garrybl
      • Re: How is the partnership between Zia and Hamman working?, Charles Brenner
    • Re: How is the partnership between Zia and Hamman working?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: How is the partnership between Zia and Hamman working?, garrybl
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?, CBFalconer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?, John David Galt
• Re: Play problem: 4HX, John David Galt
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Jürgen R .
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Jürgen R .
    • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • AW: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Jürgen R .
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • AW: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Jürgen R .
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Tim
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, blackshoe
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Tim
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, CBFalconer
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, BBO expert
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Tim
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Tim
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, BBO expert
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Tim F-W
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, raija d
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, blackshoe
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, blackshoe
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, OldPalooka
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, blackshoe
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, dranon
  • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
  • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
    • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Nick Wedd
  • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Stevenson
    • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Stevenson
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, dranon
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, jrw
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Tim
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • AW: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Jürgen R .
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • AW: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Jürgen R .
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • AW: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Jürgen R .
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • AW: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Jürgen R .
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • AW: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Jürgen R .
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, jrw
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • AW: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Jürgen R .
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, jrw
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Ron Johnson
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, dranon
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, dranon
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, dranon
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Stevenson
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, dranon
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Stevenson
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Stevenson
  • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, jonottawa
    • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, jrw
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
  • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
    • AW: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Jürgen R .
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, jrw
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, jrw
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Blind Broccoli
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, jrw
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, jrw
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Ron Johnson
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, John Blubaugh
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, David Babcock
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, jrw
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?, Ron Johnson
• Reverse or Jump Rebid?, jameson
  • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, CBFalconer
    • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Andrew
    • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Sid
    • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Tim
  • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Eddie Grove
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Andrew
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Eddie Grove
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Player
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Andrew
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, rhm
    • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Tim
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, alvin
    • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, David Stevenson
  • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Dave Flower
  • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Andrew
  • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Eric Leong
  • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, raija d
  • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, boblipton
    • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, CBFalconer
  • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, alvin
    • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, henrysun909
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, S. Needham
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, alvin
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, brsrichter
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, alvin
  • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, vspoker
  • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, jpriebe34
  • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, brsrichter
    • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Dave Flower
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, brsrichter
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Dave Flower
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Lorne
      • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, brsrichter
  • Re: Reverse or Jump Rebid?, Kieran Dyke
• Squeeze with four threats?, Alan Malloy
  • Re: Squeeze with four threats?, henrysun909
    • Re: Squeeze with four threats?, Alan Malloy
      • Re: Squeeze with four threats?, henrysun909
      • Re: Squeeze with four threats?, raija d
  • Re: Squeeze with four threats?, raija d
    • Re: Squeeze with four threats?, Rob Morris
      • Re: Squeeze with four threats?, paulhigh
      • Re: Squeeze with four threats?, ncc123
  • Re: Squeeze with four threats?, David Burn
  • Re: Squeeze with four threats?, Bob
• Guess which ESD is which, henrysun909
  • Re: Guess which ESD is which, Alan Malloy
    • Re: Guess which ESD is which, Rob Morris
      • Re: Guess which ESD is which, henrysun909
    • Re: Guess which ESD is which, henrysun909
  • Re: Guess which ESD is which, Tim DeLaney
    • Re: Guess which ESD is which, henrysun909
      • Re: Guess which ESD is which, StevieTee
  • Re: Guess which ESD is which, Lorne
  • Re: Guess which ESD is which, vspoker
  • Re: Guess which ESD is which, boblipton
    • Re: Guess which ESD is which, StevieTee
      • Re: Guess which ESD is which, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Guess which ESD is which, richlp
  • Re: Guess which ESD is which, brsrichter
  • Re: Guess which ESD is which, OldPalooka
  • Re: Guess which ESD is which, Eric Leong
    • Re: Guess which ESD is which, StevieTee
  • Re: Guess which ESD is which, Andrew
    • Re: Guess which ESD is which, henrysun909
  • Re: Guess which ESD is which, henrysun909
    • Re: Guess which ESD is which, vspoker
  • Re: Guess which ESD is which, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Guess which ESD is which, StevieTee
      • Re: Guess which ESD is which, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
• Las Vegas NABC Board of Directors Report Plus Photos, Jonathan Steinberg
  • Re: Las Vegas NABC Board of Directors Report Plus Photos, blackshoe
• bridge computer championship final, none
• A question for the jurists, henrysun909
  • Re: A question for the jurists, Eric Leong
    • Re: A question for the jurists, StevieTee
      • Re: A question for the jurists, Tim
  • Re: A question for the jurists, blackshoe
  • Re: A question for the jurists, darint
  • Re: A question for the jurists, OldPalooka
    • Re: A question for the jurists, henrysun909
  • Re: A question for the jurists, raija d
  • Re: A question for the jurists, paulhigh
  • Re: A question for the jurists, vspoker
  • Re: A question for the jurists, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: A question for the jurists, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: A question for the jurists, Lorne
    • Re: A question for the jurists, henrysun909
      • Re: A question for the jurists, OldPalooka
      • Re: A question for the jurists, raija d
      • Re: A question for the jurists, henrysun909
      • Re: A question for the jurists, Tim
  • Re: A question for the jurists, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A question for the jurists, StevieTee
    • Re: A question for the jurists, vspoker
    • Re: A question for the jurists, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A question for the jurists, StevieTee
      • Re: A question for the jurists, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A question for the jurists, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A question for the jurists, vspoker
      • Re: A question for the jurists, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A question for the jurists, StevieTee
      • Re: A question for the jurists, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A question for the jurists, vspoker
      • Re: A question for the jurists, vspoker
      • Re: A question for the jurists, blackshoe
      • Re: A question for the jurists, Tim
      • Re: A question for the jurists, vspoker
      • Re: A question for the jurists, raija d
      • Re: A question for the jurists, Steve Willner
      • Re: A question for the jurists, blackshoe
    • Re: A question for the jurists, raija d
• Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909
    • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Steve Foster
    • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909
    • Re: THE STIG COUNT, CBFalconer
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Steve Foster
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, CBFalconer
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Steve Foster
  • Re: THE STIG COUNT, thissteve
    • Re: THE STIG COUNT, henrysun909
      • Re: THE STIG COUNT, Alan Malloy
• Do You Balance?, StevieTee
  • Re: Do You Balance?, ahri
  • Re: Do You Balance?, Henry Lockwood
    • Re: Do You Balance?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Do You Balance?, Dave Flower
  • Re: Do You Balance?, boblipton
  • Re: Do You Balance?, brsrichter
    • Re: Do You Balance?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Do You Balance?, brsrichter
  • Re: Do You Balance?, Nick France
  • Re: Do You Balance?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Do You Balance?, Eric Leong
  • Re: Do You Balance?, OldPalooka
  • Re: Do You Balance?, raija d
  • Re: Do You Balance?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Do You Balance?, paulhigh
  • Re: Do You Balance?, vspoker
  • Re: Do You Balance?, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Do You Balance?, Lorne
    • Re: Do You Balance?, StevieTee
• Alert a missunerstood bid ?, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Alert a missunerstood bid ?, Henry Lockwood
    • Re: Alert a missunerstood bid ?, StevieTee
      • Re: Alert a missunerstood bid ?, Henry Lockwood
  • Re: Alert a missunerstood bid ?, blackshoe
  • Re: Alert a missunerstood bid ?, Nick France
  • Re: Alert a missunerstood bid ?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Alert a missunerstood bid ?, Lorne
    • Re: Alert a missunerstood bid ?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Alert a missunerstood bid ?, Adam Beneschan
• Re: Describe the second double, Lorne
• Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), Eric Leong
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), Rob Morris
    • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), blackshoe
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), Rob Morris
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), blackshoe
  • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), henrysun909
    • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), Kent Feiler
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), Andrew
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), Kent Feiler
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), robert_seki
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), henrysun909
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), robert_seki
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), henrysun909
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), robert_seki
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), henrysun909
  • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), OldPalooka
    • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), henrysun909
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), Andrew
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), henrysun909
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), raija d
      • Message not available
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), robert_seki
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), henrysun909
      • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), raija d
  • Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double), Steve Willner
• Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, Eric Leong
  • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, ian . payn
    • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, dranon
      • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, Andrew
      • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, dranon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, Dave Flower
  • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, darint
    • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, vspoker
  • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, Nick France
    • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, Player
    • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, Player
      • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, dranon
      • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, boblipton
      • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, dranon
      • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, CBFalconer
      • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, CBFalconer
      • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, henrysun909
      • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, Player
      • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, dranon
    • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, CBFalconer
  • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, metobillc
  • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, paulhigh
    • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d (properly formatted)?, dranon
• Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d, raija d
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d, CBFalconer
    • Message not available
      • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d, CBFalconer
  • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d, dranon
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d IGNORE THIS THREAD, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What's your rebid after 1h 1s 3d, boblipton
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards, Barry Margolin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards, Eric Leong
  • Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards, David Stevenson
      • Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards, David Stevenson
      • Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards, Frances
  • Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards, Steve Willner
    • Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards, BBO expert
• Dual message carding, again, henrysun909
  • Re: Dual message carding, again, Lorne
• Re: New Laws 27D, Steve Willner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New Laws 27D, Steve Willner
    • Re: New Laws 27D, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Steve Willner
  • Re: New Laws 27D, Steve Willner
  • Re: New Laws 27D, David Stevenson
    • Re: New Laws 27D, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: New Laws 27D, blackshoe
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Dave Flower
      • Re: New Laws 27D, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: New Laws 27D, John David Galt
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Dave Flower
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Dave Flower
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Dave Flower
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Dave Flower
      • Re: New Laws 27D, David Stevenson
      • Re: New Laws 27D, David Stevenson
    • Re: New Laws 27D, Steve Willner
      • Re: New Laws 27D, David Stevenson
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Steve Willner
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Sven Pran
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Steve Willner
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Sven Pran
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Steve Willner
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Nick Wedd
      • Re: New Laws 27D, blackshoe
      • Message not available
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Nick Wedd
      • Re: New Laws 27D, Dave Flower
• Re: Psyching against novices, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Psyching against novices, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: Psyching against novices, Player
  • Re: Psyching against novices, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Psyching against novices, Tim
      • Re: Psyching against novices, CBFalconer
      • Re: Psyching against novices, Tim
      • Re: Psyching against novices, blackshoe
      • Re: Psyching against novices, Tim
      • Re: Psyching against novices, OldPalooka
      • Re: Psyching against novices, Charles Brenner
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Psyching against novices, joannem
      • Re: Psyching against novices, Tim
  • Re: Psyching against novices, Wayne
    • Re: Psyching against novices, CBFalconer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Psyching against novices, CBFalconer
    • Re: Psyching against novices, Tim
      • Re: Psyching against novices, CBFalconer
      • Re: Psyching against novices, Tim
• Re: Truscott "asset' count, Mephistopheles Jones
• Re: Wild auction from team match, markhj111
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Wild auction from team match, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Wild auction from team match, scyardman
    • Re: Wild auction from team match, Alan Malloy
      • Re: Wild auction from team match, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Wild auction from team match, CBFalconer
      • Re: Wild auction from team match, Eric Leong
      • Re: Wild auction from team match, Ville Likitalo
  • Re: Wild auction from team match, N. Silver
• Re: Cherishing Novices, dranon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cherishing Novices, henrysun909
  • Re: Cherishing Novices, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Cherishing Novices, Luc Vandenberghe
      • Re: Cherishing Novices, Dave Flower
      • Re: Cherishing Novices, Luc Vandenberghe
      • Re: Cherishing Novices, Peter Smulders
      • Re: Cherishing Novices, BBO expert
  • Re: Cherishing Novices, Rob Morris
  • Re: Cherishing Novices, Rob Morris
    • Re: Cherishing Novices, raija d
      • Re: Cherishing Novices, Tim
      • Re: Cherishing Novices, raija d
      • Re: Cherishing Novices, Rob Morris
      • Re: Cherishing Novices, Dave Flower
      • Re: Cherishing Novices, Rob Morris
      • Re: Cherishing Novices, Tim
      • Re: Cherishing Novices, Dave Flower
      • Re: Cherishing Novices, Tim
  • Re: Cherishing Novices, Steve Foster
• Re: Which grand at mps?, henrysun909
  • Re: Which grand at mps?, StevieTee
    • Re: Which grand at mps?, OldPalooka
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Which grand at mps?, OldPalooka
    • Re: Which grand at mps?, henrysun909
  • Re: Which grand at mps?, Eric Leong
  • Re: Which grand at mps?, Steve Willner
• Re: Double-dummy solving, vspoker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Double-dummy solving, Nick Wedd
  • Re: Double-dummy solving, henrysun909
  • Re: Double-dummy solving, markhj111
    • Re: Double-dummy solving, Lorne
  • Re: Double-dummy solving, Peter Smulders
  • Re: Double-dummy solving, Rob Morris
  • Re: Double-dummy solving, Lorne
• Average number of "Distinguishable cards", Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Average number of "Distinguishable cards", henrysun909
  • Re: Average number of "Distinguishable cards", MrWCF
  • Re: Average number of "Distinguishable cards", Travis Crump
    • Re: Average number of "Distinguishable cards", dranon
  • Re: Average number of "Distinguishable cards", Charles Brenner
  • Re: Average number of "Distinguishable cards", Carl
  • Re: Average number of "Distinguishable cards", Lorne
    • Re: Average number of "Distinguishable cards", Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Average number of "Distinguishable cards", Carl
• Re: Axxx or KQxx, vspoker
  • Re: Axxx or KQxx, brsrichter
    • Re: Axxx or KQxx, vspoker
  • Re: Axxx or KQxx, dranon
  • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Otis Bricker
    • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Otis Bricker
    • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Martin Ambuhl
      • What is a constructive Raise? was: Axxx or KQxx, Otis Bricker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Axxx or KQxx, raija d
    • Re: Axxx or KQxx, vspoker
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, raija d
      • Message not available
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, raija d
      • Message not available
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, vspoker
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, raija d
  • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Player
  • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Otis Bricker
    • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Eric Leong
  • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Andrew
    • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Andrew
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Andrew
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Andrew
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Andrew
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Axxx or KQxx, Andrew
  • Re: Axxx or KQxx, ted