Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: "raija d" <mustikka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:05:28 -0700
<henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:baddfff2-5d97-4bd4-8714-008d92848dbc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 27, 8:15 pm, "John R. Mayne" <jrma...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 27, 5:54 am, Stig Holmquist <stigfjor...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:34:02 +0100, gor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Gordon
Rainsford) wrote:
Stig Holmquist <stigfjor...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gordon and Rubberduck clearly documented their total ignorance of
the
Truscott asset count method. So what is there to apologize for?
I clearly stated that my response was based on what you had told us in
your original post. That I, and one other poster, had misunderstood
it,
may have been entirely our fault or may have been due in small part to
the clarity of your exposition. In neither case does that make me an
ignorant ally of someone else who hadn't responded.
I don't kill-file people, because it's more annoying seeing the
responses of others without the original context, but I certainly
don't
feel any urge to continue reading or responding to Stig's posts. Which
puts him in with only one other person, who no longer posts here.
Gordon Rainsford
Your feeble excuse is not credible. If I never hear from you again it
will bee too soon. Good riddance of bad rubbish. See you
OK, I promise to never involve myself in yet another Stig-Sun thread,
but what is it about Gordon Rainsford that he garners so much overt
hostility?
I mean, I understand hostility to some people. But Gordon has been
slammed by at least four people that I can recall, *and I've never
seen him escalate his tone past about this, which is way below flame.*
Why is Gordon a target? It's utterly mystifying to me. He's sensible
and reasonable. Is it his hosting of
rec.sport.puppymurdering.moderated? Are people mad because he won the
baby-eating contest on ESPN-6? Is there something else I don't know
about?
--JRM, and apart from the unanwerable question, I have the tiny
suggestion to those, unlike Gordon, who don't contain their tone: The
person that stops flaming first looks better.
Stig Holmquist- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
John,
Stig has issues with anyone who has issues with him. Regardless of my
failed attempt at continuing to stay above the fray, I will confess my
own indignation at Stig calling Gordon and Duck "ignorant allies" of
"the evil Sun duo" and expressed it, the same indignation I felt when
someone accused David Goldfarb of being unethical when he played
Unassuming Club with a new partner for the first time and experienced
a system forget. (There's been no apology for that either.) That of
course raised Stig's ire even further and he attempted to pass off his
own name calling by claiming that they were wrong, hence worthy of
being insulted, and obviously I fueled the fire by my own expressed
indignation.
Steven and I and Will and Dranon deserve the flames we get. Our
disagreements with Stig have moved from bridge to the personal (and
that movement has been in both directions), but Stig appears to be so
caught up with the four of us that anyone who takes issue with him now
gets lumped in with us as well.
But Gordon and Rubberduck?
Not a chance, and still not a shred of decency from Stig about his
utterly uncalled for insult of them.
Henrysun909
I bet all who read threads here know that Stig is obsessed with two
subjects: what constitutes an opening hand, and discrediting Audrey Grant.
And that he is not here to learn or to ask for opinions. Just because more
people are not on his blacklist or don't contribute to his threads (which is
almost equivalent to getting on his blacklist), does not mean that the
silent ones agree with him. They just ignore him, why bother.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: Stig Holmquist
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: ian . payn
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: henrysun909
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- References:
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: Stig Holmquist
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: henrysun909
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: Stig Holmquist
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: henrysun909
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: Stig Holmquist
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: henrysun909
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: Stig Holmquist
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: Gordon Rainsford
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: Stig Holmquist
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: John R. Mayne
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- From: henrysun909
- Re: Truscott "asset' count
- Prev by Date: Should i have taken the push?
- Next by Date: Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
- Previous by thread: Re: Truscott "asset' count
- Next by thread: Re: Truscott "asset' count
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|