rec.games.bridge

• Thread Index

---

• Re: THE STIG COUNT
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Double-dummy solving
  • From: ahri
• Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double)
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Cherishing Novices
  • From: Tim
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Tim
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Double-dummy solving
  • From: Carl
• Re: Double-dummy solving
  • From: Nick Wedd
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Double-dummy solving
  • From: Alex Ogan
• Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double)
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: THE STIG COUNT
  • From: Carl
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Describe the second double
  • From: ahri
• Re: Double-dummy solving
  • From: ahri
• Re: Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double)
  • From: metobillc
• Re: THE STIG COUNT
  • From: Larry
• Double-dummy solving
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Cherishing Novices
  • From: Nick Wedd
• Ruling question (Re: Describe the second double)
  • From: Jeff Ford
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: vincit
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Cherishing Novices
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: vincit
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: THE STIG COUNT
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: vincit
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: vspoker
• Re: THE STIG COUNT
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: Player
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Player
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: THE STIG COUNT
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Tim
• Re: Cherishing Novices
  • From: Tim
• Re: Cherishing Novices
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Cherishing Novices
  • From: Nick Wedd
• Re: THE STIG COUNT
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: Cherishing Novices
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: dranon
• Re: THE STIG COUNT
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Cherishing Novices
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: dranon
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: dranon
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: dranon
• Cherishing Novices
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: dake50
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: dake50
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Describe the second double
  • From: raija d
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Bob
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Describe the second double
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: dranon
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: dranon
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: vspoker
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Describe the second double
  • From: metobillc
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Wayne
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Wayne
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels - The Rest of the Story
  • From: Herb
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: rhm
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: boblipton
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Describe the second double
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Describe the second double
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Describe the second double
  • From: Jeff Ford
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: Herb
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: dfm
• Re: Describe the second double
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Describe the second double
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Describe the second double
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Describe the second double
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Describe the second double
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Describe the second double
  • From: Jeff Ford
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: raija d
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: Stu G
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: rubberduck
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: raija d
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: vincit
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: dranon
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: dranon
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: raija d
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: Ross
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: Tim
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: henrysun909
• Bidding after opponent's Michaels
  • From: Herb
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: jameson
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: vincit
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: jameson
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: vincit
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: Tim
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: vincit
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Carl
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Tim
• Re: 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: rhm
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: boblipton
• 1NT after RHO opens 1H is this a correct bid?
  • From: vincit
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: vincit
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: vincit
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: raija d
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: raija d
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: vincit
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: vincit
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: raija d
• Re: What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Player
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: vspoker
• What would you bid with K106 KQ954 - AKQJ8 after RHO opens 1H ?
  • From: vincit
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Tim
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Gromov Team
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• 1956 World Championship Book For Sale . . .
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: ahri
• Re: What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: Dave Flower
• What do you open with A542 A43 9873 AK playing a strong NT?
  • From: vincit
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: dranon
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: dranon
• Re: Gromov Team
  • From: Paul Gipson
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Best instructional software on defence: Kantar, Lawrence or ?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: vspoker
• Re: 2008 Laws in ACBL-land
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Best instructional software on defence: Kantar, Lawrence or ?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Best instructional software on defence: Kantar, Lawrence or ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Wayne
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: dranon
• Re: Clubs and/or partner in the Bay Area
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: Tim F-W
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: Clubs and/or partner in the Bay Area
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Gromov Team
  • From: JoeB
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: dranon
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: dranon
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: dranon
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: metobillc
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Gromov Team
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Gromov Team
  • From: Mark B.
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: Gromov Team
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: markhj111
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: markhj111
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
  • From: markhj111
• Re: Best instructional software on defence: Kantar, Lawrence or ?
  • From: henrysun909
• Best instructional software on defence: Kantar, Lawrence or ?
  • From: Ron
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: raija d
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Clubs and/or partner in the Bay Area
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: boblipton
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: raija d
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Clubs and/or partner in the Bay Area
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Wild auction from team match
  • From: SCyardman
• Wild auction from team match
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Honors in long vs short suis
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Carl
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Robin Barker
• Re: Should i have taken the push?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Sid
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: raija d
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: smn
• Re: Que bids after suit agreement
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: ahri
• Re: 2008 Laws in ACBL-land
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: raija d
• Re: 2008 Laws in ACBL-land
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Axxx or KQxx
  • From: smn
• Axxx or KQxx
  • From: jameson
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: dranon
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: 2008 Laws in ACBL-land
  • From: Wayne
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: dranon
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Partner Wanted Near San Francisco
  • From: Mike S
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: 2008 Laws in ACBL-land
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: 2008 Laws in ACBL-land
  • From: Herb
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Should i have taken the push?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: 2008 Laws in ACBL-land
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: 2008 Laws in ACBL-land
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Should i have taken the push?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Should i have taken the push?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: rhm
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: 2008 Laws in ACBL-land
  • From: blackshoe
• 2008 Laws in ACBL-land
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Que bids after suit agreement
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Que bids after suit agreement
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Que bids after suit agreement
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Que bids after suit agreement
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Que bids after suit agreement
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Que bids after suit agreement
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: Andrew
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Andrew
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Que bids after suit agreement
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Que bids after suit agreement
  • From: sofos
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: chas . 08
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Herb
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: raija d
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: raija d
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: ahri
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Should i have taken the push?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Should i have taken the push?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Should i have taken the push?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Player
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Should i have taken the push?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: jameson
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Should i have taken the push?
  • From: jameson
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: jameson
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Should i have taken the push?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Sid
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: Lorne
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Should i have taken the push?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: raija d
• Re: What does this double mean?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Player
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: what this bid mean
  • From: vlastimil
• what this bid mean
  • From: chas . 08
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• What does this double mean?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Should i have taken the push?
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Bob
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: raija d
• Should i have taken the push?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Herb
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: vincit
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: vincit
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: dranon
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: vincit
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: vincit
• Re: Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: vincit
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: Player
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Player
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Andrew
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Player
• Re: Clubs and/or partner in the Bay Area
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Player
• Imagine that you are in the finals of the Spingold
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psychinn
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: dr
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Nick Wedd
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Jon Siegel
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Wayne
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Andrew
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: p3t3r.f0rd
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Carl
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Bob
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Clubs and/or partner in the Bay Area
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Herb
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Herb
• Re: Magnus Lindkvist email?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: dranon
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: dranon
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: dranon
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: dranon
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: vincit
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Magnus Lindkvist email?
  • From: Claus P. Hastrup
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Magnus Lindkvist email?
  • From: Hasse
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Bob
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Jon Siegel
• Re: WBridge5 English language help file
  • From: popad bug
• Clubs and/or partner in the Bay Area
  • From: Jannes
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Magnus Lindkvist email?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: ahri
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: ahri
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: vincit
• Re: Defensive Problem, Board 30, 7/22/08
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: vincit
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Magnus Lindkvist email?
  • From: Hasse
• Re: Magnus Lindkvist email?
  • From: Hasse
• Re: Magnus Lindkvist email?
  • From: Hasse
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: vincit
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: dranon
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: dranon
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: dranon
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: raija d
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: vincit
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: vincit
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: raija d
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Herb
• Re: Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Magnus Lindkvist email?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: vincit
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Passed Out Pair of Boards
  • From: Herb
• Re: New Laws 27D
  • From: Bob
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Player
• Magnus Lindkvist email?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Wayne
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: raija d
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Free tutors?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Tim
• Free tutors?
  • From: John
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Tim
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: vspoker
• WBridge5 English language help file
  • From: George Priest
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Play this hand
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Play this hand
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• A more focused proposition re: psyching
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: rubberduck
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: p3t3r.f0rd
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Bob
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: BBO expert
• New Laws 27D
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Tim
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: ahri
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: ahri
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: ahri
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: guenther@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Player
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand 16 07/19/2008
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• computer championship
  • From: none
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: vincit
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Bob
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Play this hand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Defensive Problem, Board 30, 7/22/08
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Defensive Problem, Board 30, 7/22/08
  • From: jameson
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Play this hand
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Wayne
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: jameson
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: raija d
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Play this hand
  • From: raija d
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 14 07/21/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Play this hand
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Tim
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: ahri
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: rhm
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Play this hand
  • From: rhm
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Play this hand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Play this hand
  • From: rhm
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Play this hand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Play this hand
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Which grand at mps?
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Player
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: henrysun909
• Play this hand
  • From: raija d
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: raija d
• Which grand at mps?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: raija d
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: raija d
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Bridge in Thailand
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: dfm
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: BBO expert
• Bridge in Thailand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: ahri
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Mephistopheles Jones
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: p3t3r.f0rd
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Andrew
• Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 17 07/23/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand 16 07/19/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: vincit
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Tim
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Eight 07/19/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: raija d
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: raija d
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand 16 07/19/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand 16 07/19/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Eight 07/19/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Phil
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand 16 07/19/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: vincit
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Nick Wedd
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand 16 07/19/2008
  • From: Frances
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: rhm
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Player
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 14 07/21/2008
  • From: rhm
• Re: Psyching against novices
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Psyching against novices
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: ahri
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: ahri
• Re: Ritter 2C response to 1NT?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Ritter 2C response to 1NT?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Eight 07/19/2008
  • From: StevieTee
• Two psyches with one hand?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand 16 07/19/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 14 07/21/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 14 07/21/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 14 07/21/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: rubberduck
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 14 07/21/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: rubberduck
• Re: Truscott "asset' count
  • From: rubberduck
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand 16 07/19/2008
  • From: richlp
• Truscott "asset' count
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand 16 07/19/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Ritter 2C response to 1NT?
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: Tim
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: Tim
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: Tim
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: Tim
• Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand 16 07/19/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 15 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Ritter 2C response to 1NT?
  • From: Alex Ogan
• Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 14 07/21/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: Frank
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: Dave Flower
• Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 13 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand 12 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: boblipton
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: ahri
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• 1973 World Championship book for sale...
  • From: Dave Flower
• Ritter 2C response to 1NT?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: Lorne
• Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand 10 07/20/08
  • From: Eric Leong
• Las Vegas Werner Open Pairs Hand Ten 07/22/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: Chris
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: alvin
• Re: Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Eight 07/19/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand Nine 07/20/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand Nine 07/20/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand Nine 07/20/2008
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand Nine 07/20/2008
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand Nine 07/20/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand Nine 07/20/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand Nine 07/20/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Actions in 4th seat after 1x - 1y sequence by opponents?
  • From: SemiMike
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: richlp
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand Nine 07/20/2008
  • From: dancle16
• Las Vegas Open Pairs Hand Nine 07/20/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: thissteve
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Seven 07/19/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Tim
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• AW: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: rhm
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: rhm
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Seven 07/19/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: darint
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: alvin
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: darint
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: darint
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: richlp
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Tim
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Eight 07/19/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Eight 07/19/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: darint
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Eight 07/19/2008
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Seven 07/19/2008
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: Dave Flower
• success of your life
  • From: sex
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: Quonkie
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Wayne
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: pgmer6809
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: henrysun909
• A new kind of 'whose to blame' post?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Seven 07/19/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: boblipton
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: Carl
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Seven 07/19/2008
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: Fluxman
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Seven 07/19/2008
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: dranon
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Eight 07/19/2008
  • From: Lorne
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: rubberduck
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Eight 07/19/2008
  • From: rubberduck
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Eight 07/19/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• 1D - 2C and 1D - 1NT in a 2/1 Game Forcing System
  • From: Carl
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Seven 07/19/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: popad bug
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Eight 07/19/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Seven 07/19/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Eight 07/19/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Seven 07/19/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Seven 07/19/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: The NABC E-Ban
  • From: John Crinnion
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Six 07/19/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Four 07/18/2008
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Four 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Player
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Player
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Four 07/18/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: System development: strong club, balanced hands
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Four 07/18/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Four 07/18/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: rhm
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Four 07/18/2008
  • From: rhm
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: rhm
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: rhm
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: rhm
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: rhm
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Andrew
• Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Five 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Four 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: John Hall
• Re: Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: SCyardman
• Must a 5M be bid before a 4m?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Tim
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Tim
• Re: Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Tim
• Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Three 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand Two 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Las Vegas LM Pairs Hand One 07/18/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• The NABC E-Ban
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: Andrew
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: raija d
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: vspoker
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: vspoker
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: raija d
• looking for Las Vegas NABC Swiss partner: 7/26-7.27
  • From: john . elusive
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: raija d
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: raija d
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: Sid
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: smn
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: What do you bid here?
  • From: Andrew
• What do you bid here?
  • From: Mohit
• Re: System development: strong club, balanced hands
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: 2007 Laws
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: pattayabridge
• 2007 Laws
  • From: Chris
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: raija d
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: raija d
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: vspoker
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: dake50
• Re: System development: strong club, balanced hands
  • From: dake50
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: sofos
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: sofos
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: Mark B.
• What is Pard's Shape?
  • From: pgmer6809
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Logical alternative
  • From: Rob Morris
• Logical alternative
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: Mark B.
• Re: defensive thinking
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: dancle16
• Re: defensive thinking
  • From: Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: System development: strong club, balanced hands
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: System development: strong club, balanced hands
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: Lebensohl followups
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: Lorne
• System development: strong club, balanced hands
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Sid
• Re: Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: An online bidding choice
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: An online bidding choice
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: An online bidding choice
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Play problem: 4HX
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: An online bidding choice
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: An online bidding choice
  • From: Dave Flower
• An online bidding choice
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: defensive thinking
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: CBFalconer
• defensive thinking
  • From: Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: vspoker
• Is This Just a Guess?
  • From: Mark B.
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: raija d
• Re: A BBO Bidding question
  • From: dranon
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: dranon
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Player
• Re: Lebensohl followups
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Lebensohl followups
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: scyardman
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Partnership disagreement--what do you think?
  • From: sofos
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Stu G
• A Lebensohl auction: conclusion
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Wes Powers
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Lebensohl followups
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Lebensohl followups
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Lebensohl followups
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: More fun in Poland
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Lebensohl followups
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: Sid
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Sid
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Sid
• Re: Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Sven Pran
• Odd-Even Carding, sort of...
  • From: Wes Powers
• Re: More fun in Poland
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008 -- Result
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: More fun in Poland
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: raija d
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Lebensohl followups
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: vspoker
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: Nick France
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: richlp
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Lebensohl followups
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: Andrew
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: wheaties
• Re: Lebensohl followups
  • From: wheaties
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: Andrew
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: boblipton
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: A Lebensohl auction
  • From: wheaties
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• A Lebensohl auction
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: blackshoe
• Lebensohl followups
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: scyardman
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: John David Galt
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: John David Galt
• Re: Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: Kevin Podsiadlik
• Assign blame from the Hood River OR Sectional
  • From: hummer
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: hummer
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: A BBO Bidding question
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Superacceptance of Jacoby transfer
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: Denis O'Kane
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: Tim
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Followup to: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: raija d
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Sid
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: Sid
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: Sid
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: Sid
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: John Armstrong - London Times Obituary
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Followup to: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: More fun in Poland
  • From: Will in New Haven
• John Armstrong - London Times Obituary
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: More fun in Poland
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Followup to: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Lorne
• Followup to: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: More fun in Poland
  • From: rhm
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• More fun in Poland
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: henrysun909
• Possible missed alert over a strong club
  • From: hummer
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Tim
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Vegas
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: What restrictions apply after accepting an insufficient bid? (ACBL land)
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: scyardman
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: sofos
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: rhm
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: sofos
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Vegas
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: scyardman
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: sofos
• Re: A BBO Bidding question
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: A BBO Bidding question
  • From: dranon
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: dranon
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: dranon
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: dranon
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: dranon
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Tim
• Re: A BBO Bidding question
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: sofos
• Matchpoints play problem.
  • From: sofos
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Is this a "fourth suit" situation?
  • From: sofos
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: raija d
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: A BBO Bidding question
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008 -- Result
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Free bid of 1NT
  • From: raija d
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: dranon
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: dranon
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: wheaties
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: Nick France
• Free bid of 1NT
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: raija d
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: raija d
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: dranon
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: dranon
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: dranon
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: A BBO Bidding question
  • From: raija d
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: raija d
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008 -- Result
  • From: Tim
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008 -- Result
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008 -- Result
  • From: Tim
• Re: Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Vegas
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Drop-In-Drop-Out Tourneys!
  • From: Lorne
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: BBO expert
• Yet another BBO Hand
  • From: dranon
• A BBO Bidding question
  • From: dranon
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008 -- Result
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008 -- Result
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008 -- Result
  • From: Tim
• Drop-In-Drop-Out Tourneys!
  • From: Neil
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008 -- Result
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: David Goldfarb
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008 -- Result
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: vspoker
• Another nutso hand from Poland
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: scyardman
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: raija d
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: henrysun909
• Play this suit combination (Richard are you listening??)
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: scyardman
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: What restrictions apply after accepting an insufficient bid? (ACBL land)
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Swiss teams decision 07/13/2008
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: dake50
• Re: What restrictions apply after accepting an insufficient bid? (ACBL land)
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Bob
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Vegas
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Vegas
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Carl
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Carl
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Carl
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Carl
• Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Vegas
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Vegas
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Carl
• Vegas
  • From: raija d
• Re: What restrictions apply after accepting an insufficient bid? (ACBL land)
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: What restrictions apply after accepting an insufficient bid? (ACBL land)
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: MI ruling
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: MI ruling
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D, continued
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Andrew B.
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: MI ruling
  • From: Nick France
• Re: MI ruling
  • From: ahri
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: ahri
• Re: MI ruling
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D, continued
  • From: dake50
• Re: MI ruling
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: What restrictions apply after accepting an insufficient bid? (ACBL land)
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: What restrictions apply after accepting an insufficient bid? (ACBL land)
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: What restrictions apply after accepting an insufficient bid? (ACBL land)
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Short club versus convenient minor?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D, continued
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: raija d
• Re: MI ruling
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: MI ruling
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: ahri
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Bob
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Carl
• Re: MI ruling
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: MI ruling
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Tim
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: MI ruling
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: What restrictions apply after accepting an insufficient bid? (ACBL land)
  • From: Sven Pran
• MI ruling
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: What restrictions apply after accepting an insufficient bid? (ACBL land)
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Short club versus convenient minor?
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: Bob
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Carl
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: BAM teams strategy
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D, continued
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: bgsesq
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Short club versus convenient minor?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Carl
• Re: Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: blackshoe
• What restrictions apply after accepting an insufficient bid? (ACBL land)
  • From: BobPark
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: bgsesq
• Table of Possible Quick Tricks vs. HCPs
  • From: Carl
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Short club versus convenient minor?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Short club versus convenient minor?
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: John R. Mayne
• ACBL on new laws: their Web page
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Short club versus convenient minor?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Funny ( I think )
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: brsrichter
• Henry and Steven missed a slam, so what else is new?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Funny ( I think )
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Funny ( I think )
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Funny ( I think )
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Funny ( I think )
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Funny ( I think )
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: BBO 6S
  • From: ahri
• Re: Short club versus convenient minor?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Funny ( I think )
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: shuster
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D, continued
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: Bob
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D, continued
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Funny ( I think )
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Short club versus convenient minor?
  • From: dake50
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Bob
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: dake50
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D, continued
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Funny ( I think )
  • From: brsrichter
• Flannery vs. weak 2D, continued
  • From: quadratic
• Re: Feeling competitive?
  • From: David Goldfarb
• Re: BBO 6S
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Funny ( I think )
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Funny ( I think )
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Short club versus convenient minor?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Feeling competitive?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Short club versus convenient minor?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Short club versus convenient minor?
  • From: SemiMike
• Re: Funny ( I think )
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Funny ( I think )
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Nick Wedd
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: vspoker
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Is ruling correct? On Inadvertancy.
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Is ruling correct? On Inadvertancy.
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Bob
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: Jan Veerbeek
• Re: How to play 3S 07/10/2008
  • From: dranon
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: How to play 3S 07/10/2008
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Partner wanted: Hertfordshire Swiss Pairs (England)
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: How to play 3S 07/10/2008
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: How to play 3S 07/10/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• July ACBL Bulletin: Ruling the Game
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: David Stevenson
• BBO 6S
  • From: ahri
• Re: How to play 3S 07/10/2008
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: How to play 3S 07/10/2008
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: How to play 3S 07/10/2008
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: How to play 3S 07/10/2008
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: How to play 3S 07/10/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: How to play 3S 07/10/2008
  • From: OldPalooka
• How to play 3S 07/10/2008
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: John Armstrong
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Bob
• Re: John Armstrong
  • From: col
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Opening lead out of turn
  • From: wheaties
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: brsrichter
• Opening lead out of turn
  • From: mojaveg
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Bob
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Bob
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Options for "stolen bid" interference?
  • From: SemiMike
• Re: Slam sim
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Bob
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Slam sim
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Still need a roomate first three days of Las Vegas
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Slam sim
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: John Armstrong
  • From: David Stevenson
• Partner wanted: Hertfordshire Swiss Pairs (England)
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: Denis O'Kane
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Bob
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: Player
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: shuster
• Re: Play 5H
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Play 5H
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: Carl
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Flannery vs. weak 2D
  • From: quadratic
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Play 5H
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Another one for the strong clubbers
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Play 5H
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Another one for the strong clubbers
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Another one for the strong clubbers
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Another one for the strong clubbers
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: lentulax
• Re: Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: Denis O'Kane
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Hans Georg Schaathun
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Larry
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Another one for the strong clubbers
  • From: wheaties
• Re: Play 5H
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Slam sim
  • From: henrysun909
• Another one for the strong clubbers
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Is ruling correct? On Inadvertancy.
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: meaning of 5NT
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: further mathematics
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Play 5H
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Is ruling correct? On Inadvertancy.
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Slam sim
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Slam sim
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: meaning of 5NT
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: wheaties
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: titanium specialist
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Is ruling correct? On Inadvertancy.
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Play 5H
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Is ruling correct? On Inadvertancy.
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: dmatt
• Re: Is ruling correct? On Inadvertancy.
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Is ruling correct? On Inadvertancy.
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Play 5H
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Is ruling correct? On Inadvertancy.
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: raija d
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Sid
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Sid
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Play 5H
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Frank
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Play 5H
  • From: Dean Stow
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Slam sim
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Larry
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: smn
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: meaning of 5NT
  • From: David Babcock
• Play 5H
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: meaning of 5NT
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Tim
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: meaning of 5NT
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: raija d
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Frank
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Jim Greer
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Nick France
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: thissteve
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Frank
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Tim
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Is ruling correct?
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: Mohit
• Is ruling correct?
  • From: Larry
• Is ruling correct?
  • From: Larry
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Jan Veerbeek
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Sid
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Sid
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: Dean Stow
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Dean Stow
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Dean Stow
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: Dean Stow
• Re: meaning of 5NT
  • From: Dean Stow
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Play this 3NT for me: full hand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Slam sim
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Decision over 2C
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: meaning of 5NT
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Sven Pran
• meaning of 5NT
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Must a reversse bid be strong?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: 6-6 hand
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• 6-6 hand
  • From: Jim Greer
• Decision over 2C
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: peter koch
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: Carl
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: dranon
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: michael
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: dranon
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: dranon
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: dranon
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: FrancesHinden
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Bridge Bookstore in Dublin
  • From: Mohit
• Re: John Armstrong
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• John Armstrong
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: ahri
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Hans Georg Schaathun
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: ACBL Detroit Appeals Casebook Posted
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: ahri
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Player
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: dake50
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: ACBL Detroit Appeals Casebook Posted
  • From: Adam Wildavsky
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Phil
• Re: Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: For strong clubbers
  • From: dmorgan
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: September Tournament in Las Vegas
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Holdings vs weak opponents
  • From: Phil
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: September Tournament in Las Vegas
  • From: Fluxman
• Re: Old bridge magazines
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: How reliable your favorite partner is or better yet how reliable your "lucky" opponents are?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: How reliable your favorite partner is or better yet how reliable your "lucky" opponents are?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Andrew
• Re: How reliable your favorite partner is or better yet how reliable your "lucky" opponents are?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: David Goldfarb
• Re: Another hand from the trenches (bidding question)
  • From: raija d
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Another hand from the trenches (bidding question)
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Another hand from the trenches (bidding question)
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Another hand from the trenches (bidding question)
  • From: Sid
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Another hand from the trenches (bidding question)
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Another hand from the trenches (bidding question)
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Another hand from the trenches (bidding question)
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: ttw6687
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Another hand from the trenches (bidding question)
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Another hand from the trenches (bidding question)
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Nick Wedd
• Re: Play this 3NT for me
  • From: Dave Flower
• Play this 3NT for me
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Old bridge magazines
  • From: dranon
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: Worth a GSF?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Worth a GSF?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: raija d
• Re: For strong clubbers
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: How reliable your favorite partner is or better yet how reliable your "lucky" opponents are?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: For strong clubbers
  • From: dake50
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: nige1
• Re: Youngest Life Masters
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Youngest Life Masters
  • From: Tim
• Re: Youngest Life Masters
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Youngest Life Masters
  • From: Tim
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Youngest Life Masters
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Youngest Life Masters
  • From: henrysun909
• Youngest Life Masters
  • From: Tim
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: How reliable your favorite partner is or better yet how reliable your "lucky" opponents are?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Meaning of Redouble?
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Directorial input solicited`
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: For strong clubbers
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: How reliable your favorite partner is or better yet how reliable your "lucky" opponents are?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: How reliable your favorite partner is or better yet how reliable your "lucky" opponents are?
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: For strong clubbers
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: How reliable your favorite partner is or better yet how reliable your "lucky" opponents are?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: How reliable your favorite partner is or better yet how reliable your "lucky" opponents are?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: How reliable your favorite partner is or better yet how reliable your "lucky" opponents are?
  • From: Bud H
• How reliable your favorite partner is or better yet how reliable your "lucky" opponents are?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Detailed summary of defensive and bidding principles
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Detailed summary of defensive and bidding principles
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: pattayabridge
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Sid
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Sid
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Detailed summary of defensive and bidding principles
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Player
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: The Bridge Shop
• Monogram Canvas Ellipse Backpack M51125 - www.luxury-gift.org
  • From: blog576
• Breitling Aeromarine Chrono Superocean Steel Blue Mens Watch A1334011-C6-271, Best Luxury Watch - www.luxury-gift.org
  • From: blog576
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Nick France
• For strong clubbers
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: September Tournament in Las Vegas
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: BBO expert
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: MINIMUM STANDARDS TO COMPETE
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: MINIMUM STANDARDS TO COMPETE
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Old bridge magazines
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Can 3-card majors be bid?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Turk Malloy Dick Davis Carmine Mancuso http://www.charloteweb.com/divas/nancy-allen.html
  • From: a000vbfgrrteed
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: MINIMUM STANDARDS TO COMPETE
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: Detailed summary of defensive and bidding principles
  • From: Dean Stow
• Re: MINIMUM STANDARDS TO COMPETE
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Detailed summary of defensive and bidding principles
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Bob
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Old bridge magazines
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Detailed summary of defensive and bidding principles
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: Detailed summary of defensive and bidding principles
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Detailed summary of defensive and bidding principles
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: none
• Re: Detailed summary of defensive and bidding principles
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: ACBL Detroit Appeals Casebook Posted
  • From: Tim
• Detailed summary of defensive and bidding principles
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Old bridge magazines
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: Carl
• Re: Old bridge magazines
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Old bridge magazines
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: Dean Stow
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: Sid
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: Sid
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Sid
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: David Breton
• Advice requested on selling World Championship Books
  • From: Dave Flower
• Buying a copy of the new Laws (England)
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: raija d
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: raija d
• Re: ACBL Detroit Appeals Casebook Posted
  • From: Adam Wildavsky
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Bid these hands (MPs, 1 July 08)
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Troublesome 2H Over 1S Auction
  • From: Bob M
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: ACBL Detroit Appeals Casebook Posted
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: CBFalconer
• ACBL Detroit Appeals Casebook Posted
  • From: Adam Wildavsky
• Re: September Tournament in Las Vegas
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: raija d
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: Martin Reid
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: Player
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: dranon
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Sid
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Bid these hands (MPs, 1 July 08)
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bid these hands (MPs, 1 July 08)
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Is this an exception?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Is this an exception?
  • From: sofos
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: vspoker
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: Mohit
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Herb
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Bid these hands (MPs, 1 July 08)
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Nick France
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Bid these hands (MPs, 1 July 08)
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: September Tournament in Las Vegas
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: akhare1@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bid these hands (MPs, 1 July 08)
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Bid these hands (MPs, 1 July 08)
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Need roommate first 3 days of Las Vegas nationals
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: vspoker
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: Dave Flower
• Bid these hands (MPs, 1 July 08)
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: Bob
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Need roommate first 3 days of Las Vegas nationals
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• 3-1 or 2-2?
  • From: Mohit
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: none
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: blackshoe
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: Player
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: Bob
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Remarkable deal
  • From: N. Silver
• Remarkable deal
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: September Tournament in Las Vegas
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Need roommate first 3 days of Las Vegas nationals
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: dake50
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: hummer
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Jacoby 2 NT follow up
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Obvious attack was: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Obvious attack was: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: StevieTee
• September Tournament in Las Vegas
  • From: greg55042
• Re: 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Obvious attack was: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Need roommate first 3 days of Las Vegas nationals
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Question for the statisticians
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Stu G
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Obvious attack was: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Tim
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Tim
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: raija d
• Re: Question for the statisticians
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Obvious attack was: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Bob
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Dave Flower
• Need roommate first 3 days of Las Vegas nationals
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Sven Pran
• Obvious attack was: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: dmorgan
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Question for the statisticians
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: rhm
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: raija d
• Re: Question for the statisticians
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Player
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: sofos
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: dmatt
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Bud H
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Ruling on failure to alert -- good or bad?
  • From: hummer
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: raija d
• Re: 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: raija d
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: raija d
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: raija d
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: raija d
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: raija d
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: raija d
• Strong pass thread extraction
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: Stu G
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: Phil
• Re: Strong jump shifts
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Strong jump shifts
  • From: raija d
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: Andrew
• Re: 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Be a bridge detective! How did declarer go down?
  • From: sofos
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Strong jump shifts
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: bboinquiry
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: StevieTee
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Stephen Fischer
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: vspoker
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: dake50
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
  • From: bboinquiry
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Your action...?
  • From: rhm
• Re: Play problem from a regional team championship
  • From: rhm
• Re: Play problem from a regional team championship
  • From: rhm
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: Ruling question
  • From: Sven Pran
• Your action...?
  • From: David Goldfarb
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Director's Ruling
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Director's Ruling
  • From: Kapil Bhalla
• Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
  • From: Eric Leong
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: Eric Leong
• Ruling question
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: Phil
• Re: Play problem from a regional team championship
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Play problem from a regional team championship
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: bridge and memory
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Play problem from a regional team championship
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
  • From: Georgiana Gates
• bridge and memory
  • From: john0714
• Re: 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: vspoker
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Player
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Dean Stow
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: Question for the statisticians
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: One or four
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: brsrichter
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: boblipton
• Re: Lucky 7?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: dranon
• Re: Question for the statisticians
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: dranon
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: dranon
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Alan Malloy
• Re: 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: dranon
• 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: Mark B.
• 1D-P-P-X--What does Rdbl, or 1H, by opener show/mean?
  • From: Mark B.
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Question for the statisticians
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
  • From: Tim