Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?

On Jun 15, 5:42 am, Stig Holmquist <stigfjor...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:41:42 -0400, CBFalconer <cbfalco...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:



Stig Holmquist wrote:
henrysun...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

... snip ...

as a scientist, do you think that 48 hcps is enough of a sample
size to get reliable information as to the distribution of the
other honors amongst the other three hands?

This was your 3rd mathematical blunder in a short time, thus
documenting you are suffering from innumeracy. At no place did I
mention 48 HCP. Nor did I in any way imply 48 deals would be
enough to established any kind of valid statistical data. Thus I
asked for a theoretical calculation.

In addition you lack civilized maners, thus confirming my ealier
observation that you are a scumbag.

It would be considerably quieter here if you took your petty
battles to E-mail, where they belong.

Let me review. I posted a simple inoffensive question without any
reference to HS909.Compelled to be the first to enlighten us with his
stupidity, he barged in with an insult in German followed by
distortions and misrepresentations of my post.

This he did in full public view. And you think I should respond to
this f-n swftboating divinity pest in private. Get Real. Here at
r.g.b. one must respond quickly and forcefully to swiftboaters just
like in election politics. I suspect he iwas a disciple of the now
infamous Rev. Wright.

So I'll try to torpedo and sink this divinity fraud, so full of fake
charity, and will make no effort to rescue him when he sinks into his
own muck. There is an old saying: when in a hole, stop digging. But he
is determined to burrow himself in ***, which I suspect he did at
another bridge site. Let him, he is beyond redemtiom. Not even his
brother is able to help him.

Stig Holmquist

Let me add to the review by asking interested parties to read the "do
hcp methos have to be disclosed" and "rebidding 5-card majors" threads
and simply asking whether this description of our history here is
close to being correct.

It is not.

An ideological commitment to Goren resulted in a horrendous misreading
of Goren that resulted not in a 'gee, thanks for pointing out my
mistake," but "God you are such an idiot" from the General.

An interesting question, admitted as much by adversary Will, devolved,
again, into the General being crude and insulting in spite of my own
efforts to return the discourse to a civilized level at Mr. Lipton's
urging.

So bomb away, General. Not only do you have trouble with Goren and
Lawrence, but you seem also to have trouble with the facts of history,
or at least a reasonable interpretation thereof.

Henrysun909
.