rec.games.bridge
- Pleading ignoranceRe: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Lucky 7?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Lucky 7?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: One or four
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Lucky 7?
- Re: One or four
- Re: One or four
- Re: Lucky 7?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Lucky 7?
- Re: Lucky 7?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Lucky 7?
- Re: Lucky 7?
- Re: Lucky 7?
- Re: Lucky 7?
- Re: Lucky 7?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Lucky 7?
- Re: One or four
- Re: One or four
- Re: One or four
- Re: One or four
- Re: One or four
- Re: One or four
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
- Re: One or four
- Re: One or four
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: One or four
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- Re: One or four
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- One or four
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Question for the statisticians
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Question for the statisticians
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Question for the statisticians
- From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Re: Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Should all 14 HCP hands be opened?
- Looking for sympathy. Am I getting any?
- Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Question for the statisticians
- Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- Re: Distributional evaluation: Kaplan and the point counters
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Question for the statisticians
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
- From: dannysprung@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- Data on frequency of slams/games/partscores; and what it means
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Distributional evaluation: Kaplan and the point counters
- Re: Distributional evaluation: Kaplan and the point counters
- Re: Distributional evaluation: Kaplan and the point counters
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- Re: European Champs/Mind Sport Champs
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Question for the statisticians
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Question for the statisticians
- Re: Question for the statisticians
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question for the statisticians
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- Re: Distributional evaluation: Kaplan and the point counters
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Question for the statisticians
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Jacoby transfers over 15 - 17 NT
- Re: Strong jump shifts
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Question for the statisticians
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Strong jump shifts
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Another basic (SAYC) bidding question
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- European Champs/Mind Sport Champs
- Is this a superaccept of a transfer to spades
- Re: Another basic (SAYC) bidding question
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Play problem from a regional team championship
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Puma caps D&G series Nike air Jordan shoes Prada bags-----OK!
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Play problem from a regional team championship
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Board 6, Round 16 from Pau
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Board 6, Round 16 from Pau
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: limit raise or preemptive raise?
- limit raise or preemptive raise?
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: histograms
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: histograms
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Board 6, Round 16 from Pau
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: What call would you make?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: histograms
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Another basic (SAYC) bidding question
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Another basic (SAYC) bidding question
- Re: Another basic (SAYC) bidding question
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Another basic (SAYC) bidding question
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: histograms
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Too inventive?
- Re: Another basic (SAYC) bidding question
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Another basic (SAYC) bidding question
- Too inventive?
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Another basic (SAYC) bidding question
- Another basic (SAYC) bidding question
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Continuation of "SAYC question" thread (how forcing is a 2/1?)
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Bidding Challenge
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Balancing decision
- Bidding Challenge
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Slam hand
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Help us save usenet news for Time-Warner customers
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: histograms
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: Self-Published Books/Pamphlets
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Zero Tolerance issue
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: histograms
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Balancing decision
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Balancing decision
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Slam hand
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: What call would you make?
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: What call would you make?
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Self-Published Books/Pamphlets
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Self-Published Books/Pamphlets
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Slam hand
- Re: Zero Tolerance issue
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: Zero Tolerance issue
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: What call would you make?
- Re: Slam hand
- Re: What call would you make?
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: histograms
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: What call would you make?
- Re: What call would you make?
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: histograms
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: What call would you make?
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: What call would you make?
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Oppertunity to access blame
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: What call would you make?
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Slam hand
- Re: What call would you make?
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: What call would you make?
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: SAYC question
- What call would you make?
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Slam hand
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: histograms
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: histograms
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: histograms
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Slam hand
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: histograms
- Re: Slam hand
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: Slam hand
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Slam hand
- Re: Slam hand
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Slam hand
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: What is your rebid
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Can not leading partners suit be construed as fielding a psyche?
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- What is your rebid
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: histograms
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: Your call?
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Can not leading partners suit be construed as fielding a psyche?
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: histograms
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: histograms
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: histograms
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Can not leading partners suit be construed as fielding a psyche?
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: histograms
- Re: histograms
- Re: histograms
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Childhood card game
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: histograms
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: histograms
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: histograms
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Can not leading partners suit be construed as fielding a psyche?
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: histograms
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Distributional evaluation
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Can not leading partners suit be construed as fielding a psyche?
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Distributional evaluation
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: histograms
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: Your call?
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Can not leading partners suit be construed as fielding a psyche?
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Can not leading partners suit be construed as fielding a psyche?
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Can not leading partners suit be construed as fielding a psyche?
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Slam hand
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Kaplan Quote? Re: Balancing bid
- Re: histograms
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- From: Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Kaplan Quote? Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Your call?
- Re: Your call?
- Re: Your call?
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: Kaplan Quote? Re: Balancing bid
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Rules question on alerts
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- What Do You Lead Against 5D?
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- From: Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
- Re: Your call?
- Re: Kaplan Quote? Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: Your call?
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Your call?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: Your call?
- Re: Your call?
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: histograms
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: Your call?
- Re: Your call?
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: histograms
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- level of detail in alert explanations
- Re: Kaplan Quote? Re: Balancing bid
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- What's alertable in ACBL? List of example auctions with yes/no?
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: Ethics question
- IMP Pairs no one Vul
- Re: Kaplan Quote? Re: Balancing bid
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Your call?
- Re: Your call?
- Re: Your call?
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Kaplan Quote? Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Your call?
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Rules question on alerts
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Your call?
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Your call?
- Re: Your call?
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Your call?
- Kaplan Quote? Re: Balancing bid
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Your call?
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Your call?
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: SAYC question
- Your call?
- Re: SAYC question
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- SAYC question
- Re: histograms
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: histograms
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: histograms
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- From: Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: histograms
- Re: Childhood card game
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: histograms
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: histograms
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- histograms
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Rules question on alerts
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Rules question on alerts
- Re: Rules question on alerts
- Re: Disclosure
- Rules question on alerts
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Childhood card game
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Childhood card game
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- Disclosure of teammates system?
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Balancing bid
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Balancing bid
- Balancing bid
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: further mathematics
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Pau
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- From: Hans Georg Schaathun
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- QT9xxxx A J KJxx hand again
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- Zero Tolerance issue
- Re: further mathematics
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: SUNDAY FUN: DO NOT TAKE AS A SERIOUS PROPOSAL
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: And an apology Re: Posting complaint Was: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: Pau
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Pau
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- further mathematics
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Acol sequence
- English Translation patch for Wbridge5
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- From: Hans Georg Schaathun
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- From: Hans Georg Schaathun
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- From: Hans Georg Schaathun
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: And an apology Re: Posting complaint Was: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Posting complaint Was: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- And an apology Re: Posting complaint Was: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please: full deal
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Pau
- Re: Pau
- Re: Pau
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Childhood card game
- Posting complaint Was: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Childhood card game
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Ethics question
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Ethics question
- Re: Pau
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Pau
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Childhood card game
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Pau
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Acol sequence
- From: Hans Georg Schaathun
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Pau
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Pau
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Would you accept a Long Suit Trial on this hand ?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Victor Mollo Pic
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Victor Mollo Pic
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: how to get to 6 clubs
- Re: how to get to 6 clubs
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Your lead to 3NT please
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: support doubles
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: how to get to 6 clubs
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- I don't believe that Rubens wrote this
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Childhood card game
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: how to get to 6 clubs
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: how to get to 6 clubs
- Re: support doubles
- Re: how to get to 6 clubs
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- how to get to 6 clubs
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Interesting Play Hand (3NT)
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Standard meaning of this bid please ?
- Re: Declare 6h
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Childhood card game
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: support doubles
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Childhood card game
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Declare 6h
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Childhood card game
- Re: Declare 6h
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Standard meaning of this bid please ?
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Ompetitive bidding question
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: support doubles
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Declare 6h
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Standard meaning of this bid please ?
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Declare 6h
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: support doubles
- Re: support doubles
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: support doubles
- support doubles
- Re: Declare 6h
- Re: Childhood card game
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Question for Bridge Historians
- Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Childhood card game
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: what's your call? The full deal
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Question for Bridge Historians
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- From: Hans Georg Schaathun
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Standard meaning of this bid please ?
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Standard meaning of this bid please ?
- Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D
- Re: Standard meaning of this bid please ?
- Re: Standard meaning of this bid please ?
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- US Seniors Bridge championship
- Re: what's your call? The full deal
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D
- Re: Looking at your CC
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Is it just me or ...
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Is it just me or ...
- Re: Looking at your CC
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- From: Hans Georg Schaathun
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- From: Hans Georg Schaathun
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Declare 6h
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- From: Hans Georg Schaathun
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Standard meaning of this bid please ?
- Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Declare 6h
- Re: Is it just me or ...
- Re: Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Question for Bridge Historians
- Bad bidding breeds interesting play problems
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Is it just me or ...
- Declare 6h
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Acol sequence
- Pass, Double, 1NT, or something else?
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D
- Re: Question for Bridge Historians
- From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D
- Re: what's your call? The full deal
- Re: Question for Bridge Historians
- Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Is it just me or ...
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D
- Re: Standard meaning of this bid please ?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Competing against a nebulous 1D
- Re: Is it just me or ...
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Standard meaning of this bid please ?
- Competing against a nebulous 1D
- Standard meaning of this bid please ?
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Is it just me or ...
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is it just me or ...
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Acol sequence
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Acol sequence
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Question for Bridge Historians
- From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Test your Defensive Play at Money Bridge
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Question for Bridge Historians
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: Question for Bridge Historians
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: what's your call? The other hand...
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Is it just me or ...
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: Disclosure
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Is this a takeout double?
- Re: Disclosure
- Is this a takeout double?
- Disclosure
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Looking at your CC
- Re: what's your call? The other hand...
- Re: ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Is it just me or ...
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: what's your call? The other hand...
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: what's your call? The other hand...
- ACBL 2007 Law change date
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Looking at your CC
- Re: Interesting Play Hand (3NT)
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: what's your call? The other hand...
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Interesting Play Hand (3NT)
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: what's your call? The other hand...
- Re: what's your call? The other hand...
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Looking at your CC
- Re: Looking at your CC
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Question for Bridge Historians
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Looking at your CC
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: Interesting Play Hand (3NT)
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Looking at your CC
- Re: Interesting Play Hand (3NT)
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Good books for beginners?
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Good books for beginners?
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: what's your call?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Interesting Play Hand (3NT)
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Interesting Play Hand (3NT)
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Interesting Play Hand (3NT)
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Poll - Which Player WAS Was Watching Golf?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: what's your call?
- Re: what's your call?
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: what's your call?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: what's your call?
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: what's your call?
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: what's your call?
- Pass, compete, invite, or bid game
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: Bidding cards played singly
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: what's your call?
- Re: Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Is it forcing and do you violate?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: what's your call?
- Re: what's your call?
- Re: Individual movements for 8-20 players?
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: what's your call?
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: what's your call?
- Re: what's your call?
- Re: General query on disclosure
- what's your call?
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: Bidding cards played singly
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: Individual movements for 8-20 players?
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: Bidding cards played singly
- Re: What's your call after partner's balance of 1NT opening?
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: 2/1 question
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- 2/1 question
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation (ruling at the table)
- Re: Individual movements for 8-20 players?
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: What's your call after partner's balance of 1NT opening?
- Individual movements for 8-20 players?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: New suit jumps by opener after 2/1 game forcing response
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: New suit jumps by opener after 2/1 game forcing response
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Bidding cards played singly
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: Bidding cards played singly
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: What's your call after partner's balance of 1NT opening?
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: What's your call after partner's balance of 1NT opening?
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: New suit jumps by opener after 2/1 game forcing response
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: What's your call after partner's balance of 1NT opening?
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: Bidding cards played singly
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- Re: Ruling after change of explanation correction - made EIGHT tricks for +110
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- Ruling after change of explanation
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Call after making a DONT bid
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Call after making a DONT bid
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: What's your call after partner's balance of 1NT opening?
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: What's your call after partner's balance of 1NT opening?
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: What's your call after partner's balance of 1NT opening?
- Re: 4-level bidding decision
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: What's your call after partner's balance of 1NT opening?
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- 4-level bidding decision
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: General query on disclosure
- What's your call after partner's balance of 1NT opening?
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: Bidding cards played singly
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: A "truly random" spade
- Re: New suit jumps by opener after 2/1 game forcing response
- A "truly random" spade
- Re: New suit jumps by opener after 2/1 game forcing response
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: New suit jumps by opener after 2/1 game forcing response
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: New suit jumps by opener after 2/1 game forcing response
- New suit jumps by opener after 2/1 game forcing response
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Bidding cards played singly
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Bidding cards played singly (was: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?)
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Bidding cards played singly (was: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?)
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Law 88 . . .
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Swiss team bidding
- Re: Law 88 . . .
- From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Swiss team bidding
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Bidding cards played singly
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: General query on disclosure
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: General query on disclosure
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- General query on disclosure
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Re: Lots of pointed suits
- Lots of pointed suits
- 1NT, 2C, or other?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Law 88 . . .
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Bidding cards played singly
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Bidding cards played singly (was: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?)
- ACBL Library Used Bridge Books
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Bidding cards played singly (was: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?)
- Re: Law 88 . . .
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Bidding cards played singly (was: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?)
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Law 88 . . .
- Re: bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- bidding problem, or not..
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Law 88 . . .
- From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Law 88 . . .
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: two questions
- Re: Law 88 . . .
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Bidding cards played singly
- Re: Law 88 . . .
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Law 88 . . .
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: two questions
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Law 88 . . .
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: two questions
- Re: Play hand from the BBO.
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: two questions
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Play hand from the BBO.
- Re: Play hand from the BBO.
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Play hand from the BBO.
- Re: Bidding cards played singly
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Play hand from the BBO.
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Play hand from the BBO.
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: quirky suicide triple squeeze
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Play hand from the BBO.
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Bidding cards played singly (was: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?)
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SPAM
- Re: two questions
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Bidding cards played singly (was: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?)
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Play hand from the BBO.
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: quick poll
- Re: Blackout Sucks
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Play hand from the BBO.
- Re: Blackout Sucks
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: two questions
- Re: Play hand from the BBO.
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Play hand from the BBO.
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: Defensive problem at trick 5
- Re: two questions
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Re: Wanting to learn KS
- Re: Slam missed at Swiss
- Defensive problem at trick 5
- Slam missed at Swiss
- Holding 4 A's,what will partner hold?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- SPAM
- Please chat with me by cnbbiz2008@hotmail.com to get the price and more photos, we take paypal payment $28/pairsas payment. please see the photo album below for our product list.
- Re: two questions
- Re: Play question 6-11-08
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: two questions
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: two questions
- Re: two questions
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- two questions
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Play question 6-11-08
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Play question 6-11-08
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Play question 6-11-08
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Play question 6-11-08
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- A Scoring Program and Average Plus
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens (other hand)
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Do you bid game, return to 3S or something else?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens (other hand)
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: 5th call of the auction - When does opener show extras?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Play question 6-11-08
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: 5th call of the auction - When does opener show extras?
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: What do you bid?
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- What do you bid?
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Thanks much to all who responded.
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens (other hand)
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: quirky suicide triple squeeze
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Play question 6-11-08
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Play question 6-11-08
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: Play question 6-11-08
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Play question 6-11-08
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: 5th call of the auction - When does opener show extras?
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Requesting an explanation vs. looking at CC
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: 5th call of the auction - When does opener show extras?
- Re: Balancing with 4 sevens
- Picking a suit after opener's balancing double
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Balancing with 4 sevens
- Re: 5th call of the auction - When does opener show extras?
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: 5th call of the auction - When does opener show extras?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: 5th call of the auction - When does opener show extras?
- Re: 5th call of the auction - When does opener show extras?
- 5th call of the auction - When does opener show extras?
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- quirky suicide triple squeeze
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: What The????
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Bidding after a redouble
- Re: Seeding points
- Bidding after a redouble
- Re: What The????
- Re: What The????
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: opponent's hand
- play games and win exciting prizes
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: BAM teams strategy
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- BAM teams strategy
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: Oppertunity
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Oppertunity
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: opponent's hand
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: opponent's hand
- opponent's hand
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: What The????
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: Who should have taken the push?
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Who should have taken the push?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- 2D - 2C (insufficient) How do you rule?
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: What The????
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: What The????
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: What The????
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: What The????
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: E-Ban Update
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: TD Advice please: Messed up Boards (or How to Apply L15 correctly?)
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: What The????
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: What The????
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: What The????
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: What The????
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: 1S-1NT and followups, both hands now.
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- June 2008 bidding forum and bridge newsletter
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Seeding points
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: What The????
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: What The????
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: What The????
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: What The????
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: What The????
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Couple of questions
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: What do you bid? 06/07/2008
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: What The????
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: What do you bid? 06/07/2008
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: What do you bid? 06/07/2008
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Seeding points
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Couple of questions
- Seeding points
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: What The????
- Re: Couple of questions
- Re: Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Masterpoint awards in ACBL regional KO events
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Hand From World Wide Bridge Contest
- Re: What The????
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: What The????
- Re: Couple of questions
- Re: TD Advice please: Messed up Boards (or How to Apply L15 correctly?)
- Re: What The????
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: What The????
- Re: advancer's bids
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: What The????
- Re: It's up to you
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Couple of questions
- Re: It's up to you
- Re: 1S-1NT and followups, both hands now.
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: What The????
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08 - Repost - Corrected auction
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08 - Repost - Corrected auction
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- What The????
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: What do you bid? 06/07/2008
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: What do you bid? 06/07/2008
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: What do you bid? 06/07/2008
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: What do you bid? 06/07/2008
- Re: advancer's bids
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08 - Repost - Corrected auction
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: What do you bid? 06/07/2008
- Re: Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: What do you bid? 06/07/2008
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Opening bid or rebid problem?
- Re: What do you bid? 06/07/2008
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- From: Hans Georg Schaathun
- What do you bid? 06/07/2008
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: advancer's bids
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: The other hand....
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: 1S-1NT and followups, both hands now.
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08 - Repost - Corrected auction
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: advancer's bids
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Must HCP count method be disclosed?
- Re: advancer's bids
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08 - Repost - Corrected auction
- Re: For takeout of for penalties?
- Re: The other hand....
- Re: 1S-1NT and followups, both hands now.
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Enough already?
- Re: advancer's bids
- Re: Enough already?
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: The other hand....
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: advancer's bids
- Re: The other hand....
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Enough already?
- Re: Enough already?
- Re: "Meckwell never cue bid above game"
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Enough already?
- Re: For takeout of for penalties?
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08 - Repost - Corrected auction
- 1S-1NT and followups, both hands now.
- Re: Enough already?
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: advancer's bids
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: advancer's bids
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08 - Repost - Corrected auction
- advancer's bids
- Re: For takeout of for penalties?
- Re: The other hand....
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Enough already?
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: The other hand....
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08 - Repost - Corrected auction
- Re: For takeout of for penalties?
- Re: The other hand....
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: The other hand....
- Re: For takeout of for penalties?
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: The other hand....
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- The other hand....
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Enough already?
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Enough already?
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: "Meckwell never cue bid above game"
- Re: For takeout of for penalties?
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: For takeout of for penalties?
- Re: "Meckwell never cue bid above game"
- For takeout of for penalties?
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: "Meckwell never cue bid above game"
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- "Meckwell never cue bid above game"
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Hi everybody...
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- TD Advice please: Messed up Boards (or How to Apply L15 correctly?)
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08 - Repost - Corrected auction
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Access blame 6-4-08 - Repost - Corrected auction
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Enough already?
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Enough already?
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: The most effective bid is ........?
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: The most effective bid is ........?
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- what do you bid: QT98xx, QT, K9x, AT
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- From: Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
- Re: The most effective bid is ........?
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Best team trail pair?
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: It's up to you
- Re: The most effective bid is ........?
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: The most effective bid is ........?
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: The most effective bid is ........?
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: It's up to you
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: It's up to you
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: The most effective bid is ........?
- Re: It's up to you
- Re: The most effective bid is ........?
- Re: It's up to you
- Re: It's up to you
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: It's up to you
- Re: It's up to you
- Re: The most effective bid is ........?
- Re: It's up to you
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: The most effective bid is ........?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- The most effective bid is ........?
- Re: It's up to you
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: Your bid please
- It's up to you
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: balancing act
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Another 5-card rebid problem
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: balancing act
- Re: balancing act
- Re: balancing act
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: balancing act
- Re: balancing act
- Re: balancing act
- Re: balancing act
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: balancing act
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: Your bid please
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Your bid please
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: balancing act
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Nickell-Welland - Closer than the score
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: balancing act
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Access blame 6-4-08
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Last Deal 3.1 release post
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: balancing act
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Preemption headaches
- Re: balancing act
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: balancing act
- Re: balancing act
- From: Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Preemption headaches
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Skip bid warnings
- Re: Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Skip bid warnings
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: balancing act
- Goren, Menley-Lawrence, and Stig
- Re: balancing act
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: balancing act
- Re: balancing act
- Re: balancing act
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: balancing act
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: balancing act
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: E-Ban Update
- Re: balancing act
- Re: balancing act
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: balancing act
- Re: balancing act
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Is Mike Seamon in the Trials?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: balancing act
- E-Ban Update
- Re: balancing act
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- balancing act
- From: Lone Locust of the Apocalypse
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: frequency of occurrence questions
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: frequency of occurrence questions
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: frequency of occurrence questions
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: frequency of occurrence questions
- Re: frequency of occurrence questions
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: Directorial input
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: frequency of occurrence questions
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: Directorial input
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: frequency of occurrence questions
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- Re: NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: frequency of occurrence questions
- frequency of occurrence questions
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- NEW ACBL Conventions Charts posted
- From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Ax, ATx, AKT9xx, KQ
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: Ax, ATx, AKT9xx, KQ
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Ax, ATx, AKT9xx, KQ
- Re: Ax, ATx, AKT9xx, KQ
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Ax, ATx, AKT9xx, KQ
- Re: Ax, ATx, AKT9xx, KQ
- Re: Ax, ATx, AKT9xx, KQ
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: Ax, ATx, AKT9xx, KQ
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Bill Hughes Simultaneous Pairs 2008
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: Deal 3.1 now on Windows
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- New bridge vocabulary on rec?
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Ax, ATx, AKT9xx, KQ
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: Ax, ATx, AKT9xx, KQ
- Re: Wanting to learn KS
- Re: Ax, ATx, AKT9xx, KQ
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: Play problem from USBC
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: What's the ruling
- From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Ax, ATx, AKT9xx, KQ
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Play problem from USBC
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Wanting to learn KS
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Jump to 4 Spades
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Norway's team in Pau
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Is Mike Seamon in the Trials?
- Re: Is Mike Seamon in the Trials?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: Is Mike Seamon in the Trials?
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Is Mike Seamon in the Trials?
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Any Other Overbidders?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Sacramento regional, hand 28
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: Wanting to learn KS
- From: Michael Angelo Ravera
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: OT:What's going on here
- Yet ANOTHER "bid or pass" post....
- Meaning of Redouble?
- Re: Rebidding a 5-card suit
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Rebidding a 5-card suit
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: How do you bid this slam?
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: Rebidding a 5-card suit
- Re: OT:What's going on here
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Any good use for used duplicate cards?
- Re: Any good use for used duplicate cards?
- Re: Jump to 4 Spades
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: Directorial input
- Re: Jump to 4 Spades
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Any good use for used duplicate cards?
- Re: How do you bid this slam?
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: Sacramento regional, board 8
- Re: How do you bid this slam?
- Re: How do you bid this slam?
- Re: Sacramento regional, board 30
- Re: Sacramento regional, hand 28
- Re: How do you bid this slam?
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: Any good use for used duplicate cards?
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: Directorial input solicited`
- Directorial input solicited`
- Re: Pairs Disaster - NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Pairs Disaster - NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Sacramento regional, board 8
- Re: Sacramento regional, board 8
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Jump to 4 Spades
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: Rebidding a 5-card suit
- Re: Jump to 4 Spades
- Re: Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: Sacramento regional, hand 28
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Jump to 4 Spades
- Re: Jump to 4 Spades
- Re: Sacramento regional, hand 28
- Re: Jump to 4 Spades
- Re: Jump to 4 Spades
- Re: Sacramento regional, board 8
- Card from dummy card found on floor at end of hand
- Re: Pairs Disaster - NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Rebidding a 5-card suit
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: How do you bid this slam?
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: How do you bid this slam?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: New Generation Dealer
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Rebidding a 5-card suit
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- New Generation Dealer
- Re: Deal 3.1 now on Windows
- Re: news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- news from Italy - Fantoni-Nunes out of the Italian team
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: How do you bid this slam?
- Re: Deal 3.1 now on Windows
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: Rebidding a 5-card suit
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: Sacramento regional, hand 28
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Sacramento regional, board 8
- Re: xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: OT:What's going on here
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: OT:What's going on here
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: How do you bid this slam?
- Re: Jump to 4 Spades
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- xxxx Axxxx x KQx
- Re: OT:What's going on here
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Re: An ethics question -- what would you do?
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: Sacramento regional, board 8
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: Sacramento regional, board 8
- Re: What do you bid? NYC Goldman Pairs 05/24/2008
- Re: Any good use for used duplicate cards?
- Re: Rebidding a 5-card suit
- Re: How do you bid this slam?
- Re: Jump to 4 Spades
- Re: Bid or Pass?
- Re: What's the ruling
- Re: Jump to 4 Spades
- Re: OT:What's going on here
