Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe



stevts@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Aug 30, 9:03?pm, henrysun...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

After considerable thought, I pictured Henry as having a hand such as:

QJxx
Kxx
xxxx
xx


This picture seems unduly pessimistic.
Even so, it doesn't seem like 4C would
be likely to play that much better than 4H,
well maybe a trick, 8 trick to 9. But the
presumption is when partner raises hearts
immediately, is that he has 4, and your hunch
to the contrary was statistically a long shot.

As bad as my pass
of 4C might be, I believe that Henry's failure to bid:

(1) 1C - 1S - 2H - 4H; or

(2) 1C - 1S - 2H - 3H - 3S - 4S


2H - 4H is certainly reasonable, but is not clear.

The 3S bid and raise to game 4S, by responder, well,
many people thought to be a cuebid... Somebody who
didn't over analyze this would just bid 4H not 3S.

I think that the best scenario is that responder
bids 4H over 3S which you don't mention. Henry has
9 points and so showing a decent hand opposite a
(the DQ is better than just an x)
reverse with 3H is reasonable. But he has shown
this with 3H, he doesn't have anything extra to
add with 4C. So I think 3S->4H is clearly indicated.
But 4C pass; if he had such a weak hand and you
thought you were showing 3 card spade support so
would think he knew that, why wouldn't he pass
your 7 card 3S fit, rather than go a level higher
with the xx you imagined he might have? Does he
often claim you play hand much better than he does? :-)
I suppose one reply is that Henry might have thought
you had 6 clubs so was finding a 6-2 fit. Anyway I
think his 4C bid was poor but not so poor as to be
a good reason for you to pass. Well, just my opinion,
I relish reading your bidding misunderstandings. I get
to dig through my books and discover that 2H-4H is
certainly a logical alternative. DQ on the cusp. Just
16+ point for the reverse improves 2H-4H or 3S-4H.

I guess it shows there are an awful lot of partnership
understandings to work through even with an established
partnership. Still I think Mechwell's 700 pages is a lot!
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Board 5 Instant Matchpoint Game a couple weeks back
    ... I would bid 2H and then support diamonds. ... you want to leave open the partnership option to play 5D ... My initial reaction was to say sure, there is some chance for slam- ... Play in a cold 3NT instead of being in 2NT. ...
    (rec.games.bridge)
  • Re: Serious Beginner--Strong 2 Club--Wheres the limit bid?
    ... wouldn't want to play). ... bid, that is to say one that Responder will not have to play, it can be ... I may not even be able to take ONE STINKING TRICK ... only tricky part of the "2H BUST" option is that you need to have a way ...
    (rec.games.bridge)
  • Re: Copenhagen dreaming
    ... West was willing for you to play 3D on the previous round so he can ... the partnership to play in some major earlier he could have bid it ... himself so he doesn't want the partnership to play in a major now. ... minus score but it is still the same match point zero. ...
    (rec.games.bridge)
  • Re: Limit Raise. Limit Raise Cue-bids
    ... MP scoring I accepted to play Bergen's raises against my will as I ... It was indeed the winning bid ... will get caught or that you will have no defense to compete with. ... Unbalanced hands can sometimes produce an 'undeserved' trick both in ...
    (rec.games.bridge)
  • Re: Possible missed alert over a strong club
    ... The opps are expert but a new partnership ... Asking about an alerted bid is UI. ... bids against strong club, I don't mind if they get cue'd in from my ... I'd rather play bridge than deal with adjustments ...
    (rec.games.bridge)