Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
- From: "Richard Pavlicek" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:42:06 -0400
Opener Responder
1C 1S
2H 3H
3S 4C
What is responder's basic shape?
I answered:
: Unclear. Natural bidding is sometimes based on concentrated
: strength, e.g., I would bid that way with Axxx KQx xxxx Kx,
: assuming 3H is game-forcing.
Andrew asked:
I am curious why. You could bid a forcing 3C or 3D on the above hand.
3C or 3D allows pard to cheaply show 5-6 shape if he has it, and
allows you to reserve 3H for hands with 4-card support. What is the
counter argument?
Raising a suit does not mean, "We have 8 trumps."
Raising a suit means, "I think this is the proper strain."
Over 2H, I judge hearts to be the right spot (we belong in 6H
opposite x AJ10x AKx AQxxx). Over 3S, I can rule out that hand
and suggest clubs (maybe partner has KQJ Axxx x AQJ10x) -- and
when he passes 4C, I rule out a game and slam bonus. :)
--
Richard Pavlicek
Web site: http://www.rpbridge.net
Hurry! Closes Friday at midnight GMT...
August contest: http://www.rpbridge.net/8y57.htm
.
- References:
- Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
- From: henrysun909
- Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
- From: Richard Pavlicek
- Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
- From: Andrew
- Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
- Prev by Date: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
- Next by Date: Re: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
- Previous by thread: Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
- Next by thread: Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
- Index(es):