Re: Bidding Theorists Please
- From: Nick Hughes <nhughes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:44:04 GMT
<much snipping>
I bid out your hand as an exercise
Qx AKT9x
xx AKxx
AJxx KQxx
AKJxx --
1C 1H spades, 8+
1S* 1N hearts
2C* 2D 3-suited
2H* 2S diamonds
2N* 3S 5-4-4-0
3N 4NT 13 SPs (3-2-1)
5C* 5D S - 0 or 2 cards including A
5H* 5S H - 0 or 2 cards including A
5NT 6D D - yes, no 3rd spade
?
Now West has a problem because East could equally have
AKxxx, AKQx, Kxxx, ---
There is no solution in our (crude) relay method.
7D is a reasonable gamble. It's about 35% opposite the wrong hand but 85%+ opposite the actual.
Note that the actual is more likely statistically.
How much more likely?
H-AKxx + D-KQxx is about 3 times as likely as HAKQx + D-Kxxx.
What follows is crufe but close enough ..
Consider H-AKQx. The x can be 1 of 8 pips, in can be dealt 8 ways.
However, H-AKxx can be dealt 8C2 = 8!/(2!6!) ways = 28 ways.
It's true that D-Kxxx is a bit more common that D-KQxx
(7C3 = 35, 7C2 = 21)
but the actual hand is about 3 times as common. I Bgen-ed 32 hands and got just 8 with H-AKQx, as expected.
Relay bidders need a simple understanding of combination theory to make effective decisions on hands like this - when space and their flavour of denial cue-bidding doesn't quite work
Nick
.
- References:
- Bidding Theorists Please
- From: Hank Youngerman
- Re: Bidding Theorists Please
- From: Nick Hughes
- Bidding Theorists Please
- Prev by Date: Re: Tough 6NT contract
- Next by Date: Re: Tough 6NT contract
- Previous by thread: Re: Bidding Theorists Please
- Next by thread: Re: Bidding Theorists Please
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|