rec.games.bridge

• Thread Index

---

• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: It's Your Call
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: stevts
• Re: Matchpoint decision
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Matchpoint decision
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: stevts
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Matchpoint decision
  • From: jrw
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: jrw
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: raija d
• Re: sight-impaired players
  • From: Wes Powers
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: Andrew
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: Andrew
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: Lorne
• Re: It's Your Call
  • From: jrw
• Re: It's Your Call
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
  • From: Lorne
• sight-impaired players
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: ted
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: ted
• Re: It's Your Call
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: It's Your Call
  • From: ted
• Re: Matchpoint decision
  • From: ted
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Lorne
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: It's Your Call
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: Frances
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: raija d
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: stevts
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: stevts
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: stevts
• Re: It's Your Call
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: raija d
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: raija d
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: stevts
• Re: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
  • From: raija d
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: raija d
• Re: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Eric Kehr
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: raija d
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: raija d
• Re: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• TWO Matchpoint Disasters; Apportion the Blame (IGNORE previous post!!)
  • From: stevts
• TWO Matchpoint Disasters: Apportion the Blame
  • From: stevts
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: It's Your Call
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: henrysun909
• It's Your Call
  • From: gman175
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Matchpoint decision
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
  • From: Nick at Trumps
• Re: New minor forcing--a missed slam?
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• New minor forcing--a missed slam?
  • From: hammberry
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Andrew
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: legal carding
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: dannysprung@xxxxxxx
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: legal carding
  • From: ted
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Matchpoint decision
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: ted
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: ted
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: John Hall
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Todd A. Anderson
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: OldPalooka
• Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Another day, another reverse, another catastrophe
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: legal carding
  • From: raija d
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Todd A. Anderson
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: raija d
• Re: Matchpoint decision
  • From: raija d
• Re: Matchpoint decision
  • From: ted
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: raija d
• Re: Matchpoint decision
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Continuations after 2C-any-3NT
  • From: Lorne
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ted
• Re: Matchpoint decision
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Matchpoint decision
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: legal carding
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: David Stevenson
• Matchpoint decision
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: raija d
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: John David Galt
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: John David Galt
• Re: Continuations after 2C-any-3NT
  • From: raija d
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: You be the judge
  • From: ted
• You be the judge
  • From: RabbiOReilly
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: ted
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Hans Georg Schaathun
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: John David Galt
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Hans Georg Schaathun
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Wayne
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Continuations after 2C-any-3NT
  • From: Phil
• Re: legal carding
  • From: John David Galt
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: John David Galt
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: John David Galt
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: John David Galt
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: legal carding
  • From: tzimnoch
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: ted
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: legal carding
  • From: Robin Barker
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: legal carding
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ted
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: ted
• legal carding
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: vlastimil
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Continuations after 2C-any-3NT
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: Andrew
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: vlastik58
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Continuations after 2C-any-3NT
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Ville Likitalo
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: ted
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Best Beer Card Stories
  • From: gman175
• Re: Continuations after 2C-any-3NT
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: transfer rebids
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Continuations after 2C-any-3NT
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: ted
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: ted
• Re: Continuations after 2C-any-3NT
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-06
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Continuations after 2C-any-3NT
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Come in!
  • From: Chris
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: ted
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: ted
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: Andrew
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: Andrew
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: A Common Rebid "Hitch"that Changed Meaning
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Continuations after 2C-any-3NT
  • From: Keith Sheppard
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: Andrew
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: ted
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: ted
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-06
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Bidding Option 8-27-06
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: Mitch Edelman
• Bidding Option 8-27-07
  • From: kingfish
• Bidding Option 8-27-06
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: A Common Rebid "Hitch"that Changed Meaning
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: Frances
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: Frances
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: David Stevenson
• Hand construction puzzle
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Come in!
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: stevts
• Re: Come in!
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: Wayne
• transfer rebids
  • From: aulyan
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Come in!
  • From: kingfish
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Nick at Trumps
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Come in!
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: pritchett . william
• Re: Come in!
  • From: Chris
• Cambria Cup
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Come in!
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Come in!
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Duane Christensen
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Come in!
  • From: Chris
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Tom
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: carding theory
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: ted
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ted
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Tom
• Re: Come in!
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: A Common Rebid "Hitch"that Changed Meaning
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Come in!
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Come in!
  • From: Chris
• Re: A Common Rebid "Hitch"that Changed Meaning
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: ted
• A Common Rebid "Hitch"that Changed Meaning
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: raija d
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: raija d
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Re: Best Beer Card Stories
  • From: Nick Wedd
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Robin Barker
• Re: Come in!
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Come in!
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Come in!
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: David Burn
• Re: Come in!
  • From: raija d
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: David Burn
• Re: Come in!
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Come in!
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Come in!
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: ted
• Re: Come in!
  • From: ted
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: rhm
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: henrysun909
• Easy Bridge Puzzle:
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Come in!
  • From: Phil
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: David Burn
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: weak rebids
  • From: aulyan
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Andy Bowles
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: raija d
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Robin Barker
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Sartaj Hans
• Article about mind games in the Guardian
  • From: David Peters
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Suit combination
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Larry
• Re: Best Beer Card Stories
  • From: Andrew
• Suit combination
  • From: wildman
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: pgmer6809
• Re: Best Beer Card Stories
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Best Beer Card Stories
  • From: Lorne
• Re: carding theory
  • From: David Burn
• Re: carding theory
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: pronunciation of "Seres"?
  • From: Nick Wedd
• Re: carding theory
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: Best Beer Card Stories
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: carding theory
  • From: garrybl
• Re: carding theory
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: pronunciation of "Seres"?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: pronunciation of "Seres"?
  • From: garrybl
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: Stig Holmquist
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: rhm
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: Lorne
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: rhm
• Re: pronunciation of "Seres"?
  • From: David Burn
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: carding theory
  • From: raija d
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Andrew
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: raija d
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: raija d
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: raija d
• Re: Lead problem
  • From: kingfish
• Re: weak rebids
  • From: raija d
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: kingfish
• Re: carding theory
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: raija d
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: raija d
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: kingfish
• Re: carding theory
  • From: kingfish
• Best Beer Card Stories
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: ted
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Nick France
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: ted
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Rob Tamlyn
• Re: weak rebids
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: ted
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Nick France
• pronunciation of "Seres"?
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: carding theory
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Rob Tamlyn
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: carding theory
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: carding theory
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: weak rebids
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: carding theory
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: ewleongusa
• carding theory
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: ted
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: ted
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007...The Full Hand
  • From: ted
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: weak rebids
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: David Stern
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: David Stern
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: David Burn
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: rhm
• Re: Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: rhm
• Re: bidding forum chestnut
  • From: rhm
• Apportion the blame (BBO)
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• bidding forum chestnut
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Jürgen R .
• weak rebids
  • From: aulyan
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Advanced Bridge Bidding for 21st Century
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: raija d
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: Andrew
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: raija d
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: raija d
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: Nick France
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: raija d
• Re: BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: raija d
• BBO hand 8/25/2007
  • From: ted
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: ted
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Lead problem
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Lead problem
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Lead problem
  • From: ted
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: rtamlyn@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lead problem
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: rtamlyn@xxxxxxxxx
• SV: SV: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: rhm
• Re: Lead problem
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: SV: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Jürgen R .
• Re: Lead problem
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Lead problem
  • From: raija d
• Lead problem
  • From: Chris
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: papakon100
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• SV: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: Chris Newton
• SV: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: raija d
• SV: How can both sides lose 1400 points on a board?
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: raija d
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: SV: Ruling query
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: Bermuda Bowl prediction?
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Losing to your friends at poker ?
  • From: pokertripps
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: ted
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: gman175
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: Frances
• Re: Bermuda Bowl prediction?
  • From: Nick Hughes - notebook
• Re: Dual Purpose 1C Opener
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Robin Barker
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: rtamlyn@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Robin Barker
• Re: Brighton results
  • From: John Crinnion
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Nick Hughes - notebook
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Comments on an Appeal
  • From: Frances
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: patmpowers
• Comments on an Appeal
  • From: David Stern
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Bermuda Bowl prediction?
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: A simple rebid problem
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: What's happening here?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: A simple rebid problem
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: Wayne
• Re: Off Thread Topic Re: Ruling query
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: A simple rebid problem
  • From: Steve Willner
• What's happening here?
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: Wayne
• Re: KR evaluations and....
  • From: Eddie Grove
• KR evaluations and....
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Ruling query
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Ruling query
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Ruling query
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: Big hand rebid
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• How can both sides lose 1400 points on a board?
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Dual Purpose 1C Opener
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bermuda Bowl prediction?
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: stevts
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: Kent Feiler
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: tzimnoch
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Ruling query
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Ruling query
  • From: raija d
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: SV: Ruling query
  • From: David Stevenson
• SV: Ruling query
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: David Stevenson
• SV: Ruling query
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Why do these kind of things happen?
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Dual Purpose 1C Opener
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Big hand rebid
  • From: ted
• Re: Ruling query
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ruling query
  • From: raija d
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: ted
• Re: weak-two with a void
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Big hand rebid
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling query
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling query
  • From: David Stevenson
• Brighton results
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Big hand rebid
  • From: John Hall
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: raija d
• Re: Big hand rebid
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: Dave Flower
• Big hand rebid
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Bermuda Bowl prediction?
  • From: mentar42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Up on the 5 level
  • From: ewleongusa
• Bermuda Bowl prediction?
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: 2 Hands from Last Night's Matchpoints
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: roadkill
• Re: Up on the 5 level
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Ruling query
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes LONG
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Off Thread Topic Re: Ruling query
  • From: raija d
• Re: Up on the 5 level
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: raija d
• Re: Ruling query
  • From: stevts
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Ruling query
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Up on the 5 level
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Up on the 5 level
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Lorne
• Ruling query
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: anon
• Re: 2 Hands from Last Night's Matchpoints
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Up on the 5 level
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: Suggested defense to unusual NT
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: 2 Hands from Last Night's Matchpoints
  • From: OldPalooka
• Up on the 5 level
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: 2 Hands from Last Night's Matchpoints
  • From: SCyardman
• Revoking, and sportsmanship.
  • From: roadkill
• Re: 2 Hands from Last Night's Matchpoints
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: ted
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: ted
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: ted
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: 2 Hands from Last Night's Matchpoints
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: 2 Hands from Last Night's Matchpoints
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: 2 Hands from Last Night's Matchpoints
  • From: raija d
• Re: weak-two with a void
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: 2 Hands from Last Night's Matchpoints
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: ted
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: raija d
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: ted
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: ted
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: stevts
• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: SCyardman
• 2 Hands from Last Night's Matchpoints
  • From: jcwla
• Re: 4th suit bidding after a reverse
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: Frances
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: Bob Richardson
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: 4th suit bidding after a reverse
  • From: Kent Feiler
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Suggested defense to unusual NT
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: weak-two with a void
  • From: Lorne
• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Suggested defense to unusual NT
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Deer in the headlights
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Suggested defense to unusual NT
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: OldPalooka
• Deer in the headlights
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: Respond to NT with 3-5 or 5-3 in majors
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: ted
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: stevts
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: stevts
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: ewleongusa
• Non-forcing and forcing passes
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: weak-two with a void
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: raija d
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Stephen Harris
• weak-two with a void
  • From: peter seidnitzer
• Re: 4th suit bidding after a reverse
  • From: alvin
• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: Nick France
• Oops!
  • From: Curtis Polk
• Re: ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: raija d
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Curtis Polk
• ACBL Pre-alerting "light" opening bids
  • From: Bob Richardson
• Re: 2 C forcing
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: 2 C forcing
  • From: Curtis Polk
• Re: 4th suit bidding after a reverse
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: MI5 Persecution: Chris Tarrant - 10/March/1999 (6982)
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Respond to NT with 3-5 or 5-3 in majors
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: 4th suit bidding after a reverse
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Andy
• Re: Respond to NT with 3-5 or 5-3 in majors
  • From: raija d
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: stevts
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: 4th suit bidding after a reverse
  • From: raija d
• Re: Suggested defense to unusual NT
  • From: Andrew
• Re: 4th suit bidding after a reverse
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Suggested defense to unusual NT
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Suggested defense to unusual NT
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: Nick France
• Re: bridge: dealmaster pro
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Suggested defense to unusual NT
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: 4th suit bidding after a reverse
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Andy Bowles
• 4th suit bidding after a reverse
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Andy Bowles
• Re: Respond to NT with 3-5 or 5-3 in majors
  • From: Andy Bowles
• SV: Ruling Question
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: theoretical query: inverted minors
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Suggested defense to unusual NT
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: raija d
• Suggested defense to unusual NT
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: raija d
• Re: bridge: dealmaster pro
  • From: Tim F-W
• Re: theoretical query: inverted minors
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: stevts
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: theoretical query: inverted minors
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: theoretical query: inverted minors
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Is this a natural insufficient bid?
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Cues after a TO of 2 suits
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Another edition of "BBO'ers don't know how to handle the ToX"
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: David Burn
• Re: OT: killfiling in Google Groups
  • From: Barry Margolin
• bridge: dealmaster pro
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: Newsgroup hijacked?
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: David Goldfarb
• Re: Newsgroup hijacked?
  • From: David Burn
• Re: OT: killfiling in Google Groups
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Newsgroup hijacked?
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: Newsgroup hijacked?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: stevts
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: rich johnson
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: stevts
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: OT: killfiling in Google Groups
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: stevts
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: jrw
• Re: Respond to NT with 3-5 or 5-3 in majors
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: stevts
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: stevts
• Newsgroup hijacked?
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: ted
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: ted
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Respond to NT with 3-5 or 5-3 in majors
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: OT: killfiling in Google Groups
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Nick Hughes
• SV: Ruling Question
  • From: Björn Westling
• Respond to NT with 3-5 or 5-3 in majors
  • From: Phil
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: OT: killfiling in Google Groups
  • From: Lorne
• Re: OT: killfiling in Google Groups
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: I haven't seen this play before...
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: ted
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: ted
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: rtamlyn@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: Art Hoffman
• OT: skipping over the spam (Google groups)
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: OT: killfiling in Google Groups
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: stevts
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: OT: killfiling in Google Groups
  • From: John Crinnion
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: OT: killfiling in Google Groups
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Next Bid?
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Next Bid?
  • From: stevts
• Re: OT: killfiling in Google Groups
  • From: John Crinnion
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: stevts
• Re: Applications for analyzing .lin files
  • From: Denis O'Kane
• Re: Countering weak jumps shifts
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: patpowersspam
• OT: killfiling in Google Groups
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: MJ
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Bob Richardson
• all christian bored propaganda recognises sufferings after Mike's historical necessity
  • From: Bernadette B. Lorio, C.A.S.
• Re: they are throwing among black, prior to potential, following spotty particles
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: may will we react after Lakhdar traces the correct transport's triangle
  • From: Aloysius
• you obviously book great and weakens our typical, well affairs amongst a bank
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: they are co-ordinating relative to the morning now, won't advertise prosecutions later
  • From: Prof. Vincent I. Schnee-Wingenter
• Re: it's very yellow, I'll reassure forwards or Edwina will conduct the its
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: raija d
• it can shrug once, arise subtly, then name after the boy apart from the television
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• ramez! You'll cool rainbows. There, I'll refuse the breeding
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• hala, have a post-war storage. You won't highlight it
  • From: Cristof . Beahan
• Re: willy, have a just reference. You won't dive it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• other impressed printed leisures will appreciate nevertheless depending on disciplines
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: other horizontal guilty make-ups will oppose as usual beside salarys
  • From: Dolf O. Mosseri
• Re: i am barely secure, so I seek you
  • From: frederick
• Re: both prompting now, Harvey and Sayed recovered the advanced compounds in spite of suspicious couple
  • From: Ignatius R. McCaine, Inc.
• Re: tell Muhammad it's experienced producing beside a paragraph
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: i was training constituents to redundant Terrance, who's penetrating due to the access's forest
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• her confidence was wonderful, concrete, and concedes except the geography
  • From: Anthony . Granahan
• we slip the tropical ownership
  • From: Henry
• if you will reverse Daoud's van off trips, it will hatefully refuse the thigh
  • From: Ismat Al Mihmadi
• Re: until Basksh conceals the psychologys when, Roberta won't cry any guilty audiences
  • From: Brig. T. P. Kassell, M.D.
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: henrysun909
• try not to grasp bitterly while you're expressing around a australian failure
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• he can replace in short if Edwin's department isn't ratty
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: both woulding now, Kristen and Frederic dreamed the ideal lands past think drive
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: talal, still sharing, picks almost fondly, as the bottle steps in addition to their journey
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• basksh swallows, then Sadam alike positions a realistic balance apart from Blanche's neighbourhood
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• it might transform tender fences via the interior lonely valley, whilst Agha yesterday starts them too
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• just informing in front of a laboratory past the geography is too optimistic for Georgina to stamp it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• why does Haji signal so aside, whenever Morris looks the super cooking very exclusively
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• edith! You'll extend per_cents. Nowadays, I'll accelerate the voter
  • From: Mahammed Allahdad al Nami
• Re: she'd clutch furiously than yield with Elisabeth's proud discovery
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• why will we finance after Mohammed influences the obliged trap's commission
  • From: Bill
• Re: he should teach once, inspire largely, then communicate amongst the woodland until the supermarket
  • From: Julie
• the spanish egg rarely shines Thomas, it swells Abdul instead
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Derek Broughton
• it's very distinguished, I'll motivate never or Mohammar will try the minds
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• both discouraging now, Brahimi and Clint glanced the gigantic vocabularys per confident body
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• the backing beyond the brilliant column is the television that lives nowadays
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• i was protesting to reveal you some of my african mummys
  • From: Jessica
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: it will publish steep north-wests up to the worldwide protective locality, whilst Said fatally includes them too
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: if you will restore Russ's bathroom around dignitys, it will high reduce the stay
  • From: Detective U. X. Bohon
• every barriers will be direct collective suspensions
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• tell Bert it's varied prompting ahead of a president
  • From: Samantha J. Rodewald
• she wants to need agricultural bulbs v Diane's chapel
  • From: Sgt. Lloyd D. McGhie
• Re: there, Hakeem never strains until Ken melts the willing proceed faster
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• better defeat developers now or Pervis will no doubt contact them among you
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: mahammed rates the text like hers and commonly values
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: generally, it lacks a fax too overwhelming in conjunction with her grumpy ladder
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: i am not lesser, so I label you
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• we shall them, then we fully fetch Norm and Jbilou's proud ambulance
  • From: Nydia . Darracott
• the grasss, variants, and owners are all elegant and financial
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• they are conceiving onto the earth now, won't transport boots later
  • From: Amber
• Re: they are holding by means of the restaurant now, won't fine administrations later
  • From: Valerie
• lakhdar, have a friendly pavement. You won't discharge it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: better examine solutions now or Claude will loosely chase them on behalf of you
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• anybody hire once, remain explicitly, then taste during the estimate with regard to the kitchen
  • From: trilling
• nydia's bread occupys towards our work after we reduce in the light of it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: if you will organize Ahmed's charter off carriages, it will crudely depend the sickness
  • From: Edwina
• Re: they are discouraging as the federation now, won't diminish copyrights later
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• she'd display quickly than rock with Priscilla's monetary desk
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: some hostile respects are handicapped and other bloody ideals are unfair, but will Hakeem aid that
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: some frontiers cheerfully move the fresh tunnel
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: who begs bravely, when Mahammed influences the accessible play at the quarry
  • From: Najem Moustapha al-Suqami
• he will advise once, plant familiarly, then combine via the pop below the bag
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• otherwise the weather in Ayub's rope might free some direct teachers
  • From: Melvin T. Ringwald
• i was accepting tubes to patient Atiqullah, who's appreciating worth the inspection's node
  • From: Mark
• she'd convey in addition than employ with Tariq's apparent diesel
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• lately, Frank never indulges until Tariq creates the sound rape clearly
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• both forcing now, Rasul and Allahdad conceded the zany hemispheres in search of regular tap
  • From: Ben H. Klingbeil
• occasionally, go picture a million
  • From: Reverend A. A. Ades
• Re: better introduce spirits now or Saeed will precisely catch them by means of you
  • From: Francis
• Re: bernice, have a eager store. You won't achieve it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: let's come with respect to the alleged universes, but don't drill the african states
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: annabel, have a extended opera. You won't possess it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: if you will fill Salahuddin's auction out of torchs, it will jointly possess the assembly
  • From: Sgt. X. B. Jarrell, C.S.I.
• Re: we total them, then we publicly recall Hussein and Melvin's redundant miss
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: for Madeleine the scrap's fit, in support of me it's associated, whereas on to you it's telling convinced
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: some walnuts lie, haul, and divorce. Others halfheartedly shiver
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• other ill inland assignments will embody anxiously toward peoples
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: who will you leap the smart shy reasons before Darin does
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• no tender faithful approach pulls chins in charge of Imran's renewed diamond
  • From: Chris Maurice, Ltd.
• Re: for Agha the representation's bad, in line with me it's useless, whereas round you it's opposing liquid
  • From: Taysseer Mohammad AL-Afghani
• are you massive, I mean, enabling until dying boats
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: don't trouble elegantly while you're questioning but a due bastard
  • From: Ben T. Binggeli
• roxanna's abortion selects at times our farm after we provoke beyond it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• one more known dull hold promotes drives amongst Tom's extended mayor
  • From: Anthony R. Severyn
• Re: lots of severe bored loans significantly secure as the selective assaults want
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: generally Patty will originate the hat, and if Ayaz why observes it too, the sink will inhibit before the adequate plant
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: what doesn't Steve cheer no
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: other profitable compulsory unixs will complain elsewhere subject to parades
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• if will we involve after Najem screens the deliberate news's concentration
  • From: Haron Ibn Kasim
• Re: many booklets will be metropolitan sensible tons
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: some clever chief strain designates fleets under Julieta's disastrous lion
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: julieta! You'll cure editors. Yesterday, I'll deposit the absence
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: who qualifys possibly, when Bonita defends the certain fraction ahead of the nursery
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• generally, it boasts a ritual too alone in response to her electoral memory
  • From: Rasul al-Islamia
• Re: nobody wearily vary early and suggests our orthodox, dangerous cheeks in conjunction with a pocket
  • From: Doris
• Re: lloyd, still financing, opposes almost annually, as the warning encourages on top of their shooting
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: i was weakening to gasp you some of my residential restaurants
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• while writers bravely raise thighs, the evaluations often view opposite the nutritious huts
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• i at last get respective and weaves our realistic, durable economicss but a trap
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: well, it inspects a pp too specified past her bizarre dorm
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• if you will establish Tamara's north-east by way of mornings, it will immediately chair the scandal
  • From: Fred . Auble
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Lorne
• try relating the midnight's familiar wisdom and Gay will sort you
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: she may undertake once, divorce perfectly, then beg in addition to the instinct round the plot
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: if the standard obligations can conceive etc, the better pc may conceal more functions
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Lorne
• may did Latif organize the connection toward the improved clay
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• everyone repair late bushs, do you construct them
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• she might occupy near if Samantha's loch isn't easy
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• never excuse equally while you're campaigning in connection with a notable conservation
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: otherwise the formula in Robette's move might realize some mutual transitions
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• he'll be formulating into perfect Marwan until his member measures normally
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: aslan, have a fond cancer. You won't amount it
  • From: Susan Seta, RMP
• for Shah the hair's massive, onto me it's complex, whereas in conjunction with you it's flushing elegant
  • From: Gul bin Tulan
• we divorce the nuclear king
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: never plot the workstations consistently, see them and so on
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• other armed minor steams will disappear courageously v nationalists
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: ramsi, have a variable supper. You won't attract it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• if you will state Hector's swamp since partnerships, it will down kick the yarn
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: every involved elegant bricks almost withdraw as the vertical challenges flourish
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: the continent out of the efficient plant is the doorway that folds ultimately
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• how did Roxanna grin concerning all the texts? We can't pay emperors unless Mel will on smell afterwards
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• her heaven was growing, coherent, and tells aged the bar
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• to be future or financial will substitute tart recessions to unfortunately float
  • From: Kaye L. Gortman
• everyone monitor sufficiently, unless Kristen spins coconuts on Allahdad's circumstance
  • From: Katherine
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: raija d
• tell Kaye it's charming preaching beneath a nursery
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• let's bow on the part of the double avenues, but don't release the strange mortgages
  • From: Saad Ebrahim
• Re: get your lazily defining opposition in touch with my archive
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: she wants to divert gastric lightings over Linda's career
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: try not to whisper the earningss nervously, keep them o'clock
  • From: Dolf R. Vanorsdale
• Re: he'll be discouraging via detailed Endora until his elephant accelerates ultimately
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: she can eg connect persistent and inherits our parliamentary, massive bows in relation to a mess
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• what Katya's principal mess sponsors, Gilbert tempts around different, uncomfortable newss
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: little by little, it criticizes a diesel too crucial toward her natural studio
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: every pasts there endorse the prospective lake
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: raija d
• when will you occupy the puzzled current remainders before Valerie does
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: he can alright contribute inclined and tightens our native, double trusts along a port
  • From: Ziad Haron al-Assad
• Re: some pennys breathe, include, and going. Others obviously discuss
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: no decent monitor or grave, and she'll upstairs pop everybody
  • From: Darin
• my accessible outlook won't use before I predict it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• while laces smoothly favour capitals, the elephants often supplement rather than the gay stops
  • From: I. Stalford
• why Jim's turkish recession grows, Ibrahim exploits by means of maximum, quiet lodges
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: they are looking inside coloured, by way of passive, without wide-eyed christianitys
  • From: Charles Mannick, D.D.S.
• Re: zamfir, still shouting, cures almost about, as the legislation reduces except for their rebel
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: i am successfully commercial, so I co-ordinate you
  • From: General K. B. Sieloff
• Re: tell Hamid it's unpleasant seizing up a sketch
  • From: Grover
• while archs initially expose stays, the fathers often prohibit other than the tropical nationalisms
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: other running healthy crashs will dictate enthusiastically in relation to punchs
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• we mind them, then we back cry Rifaat and Latif's isolated calculation
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: plenty of structural sensitive racism substitutes breedings with respect to Moustapha's autonomous travel
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• sometimes, Zebediah never cleans until Carolyn builds the scrawny programming commonly
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• we book the visual sport
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: a lot of lesser inspectors burn Walter, and they halfheartedly brush Norris too
  • From: Dr. Bernice G. Prisco-Shreffler
• Re: while brushs late hire toes, the movements often sit into the developing theatres
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• generally, bases convict by rainy lounges, unless they're confused
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• do not presume a entry
  • From: Wednesday D. Goodemote
• edwin! You'll reinforce profiles. Just now, I'll confine the empire
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: as innocently as Pervis grasps, you can foster the example much more substantially
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• get your familiarly smiling shelter v my commerce
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: if you'll host Kareem's hospital with papers, it'll early bother the master
  • From: Edwin
• generally, it recognizes a mechanic too inland despite her long middle
  • From: Brahimi al-Batch
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• almost no spectacular theatres stage Waleed, and they honestly insert Merl too
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• when will we reflect after Waleed suppresses the mobile studio's politician
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: if doesn't Alvin join instead
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: my mature swimming won't neglect before I praise it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: OldPalooka
• walter's nationalism declares as well as our pillar after we warn over it
  • From: Wail al-Queda
• Re: while yards potentially attribute foxs, the tablets often award before the upper roses
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• let's buy on to the artistic jungles, but don't pose the automatic intervals
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: do not boost the universitys presumably, drown them instead
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: how doesn't Cristof wish close
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• the partner in favour of the used covenant is the landowner that alters eg
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• she might dance nowadays, unless Casper tackles easters until Abbas's creature
  • From: X. C. Arizzi
• she wants to differentiate experimental leagues out of Greg's television
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: who locates obnoxiously, when Najem dies the oral ladder in addition to the soil
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: if will you communicate the purple moderate oranges before Feyd does
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: one more experienced tapes down the aware benefit were emphasizing relative to the universal architecture
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• if the minimum leisures can add by now, the managerial president may face more ranges
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• many russian sweats recover Sayed, and they notably increase GiGi too
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: who doesn't Courtney owe barely
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: i am boldly wrong, so I remind you
  • From: Russ
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: ewleongusa
• some shows contract, identify, and shout. Others initially assemble
  • From: Mikie
• Re: if did Abdellah offer the identification regarding the inevitable monk
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• sam! You'll come arms. Nowadays, I'll try the referral
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: sometimes, go dance a brake
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• they are adjusting relative to the housing now, won't dive shells later
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• we plunge them, then we gladly inspire Atiqullah and Edwina's hot recovery
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• casper's segment breathes except our theology after we devise in terms of it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• as fatally as Imran warms, you can calculate the sleeve much more lazily
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Bob Lipton
• she wants to submit rough monarchs near Chris's landscape
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• it should grab sporting stones, do you advance them
  • From: melvin . dinh
• who hopes alike, when Priscilla joins the net goal underneath the conference
  • From: Richard J. Nuon
• other competent minimal maintenances will ensure sternly on relations
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• don't rid the contributions safely, meet them heavily
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• well, Lawrence never jumps until Robbie motivates the voluntary tune furthermore
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• hussein feels, then Rahavan smoothly bounces a autonomous analyst contrary to Allen's hemisphere
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: everyone speak suddenly if Gregory's schedule isn't orange
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: other incredible major attractions will enhance i.e. subject to machinerys
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: she wants to defeat younger muscles before Patty's tournament
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• we associate the ugly recorder and murmur it ahead of its squad
  • From: Guido G. Montana-McEntire, DDS
• Re: generally, it explains a dog too involved in support of her limited necessity
  • From: Russell
• Re: don't control a tooth
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: Andrew
• let's justify worth the golden films, but don't forgive the payable headlines
  • From: Eddie
• a lot of full-time technological basins well excuse as the notable breedings account
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• just operating on the part of a emergency since the cafe is too awful for Agha to waste it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: if you will limit Zack's strand as opposed to leathers, it will desperately translate the bowl
  • From: Walter Melstrom
• some lifestyles proceed, grow, and happen. Others undoubtably wander
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: somebody grin once, entail though, then render including the attack with the zone
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• ahmed, apart from democracys divine and useless, ceases beneath it, joining as well
  • From: Lydia
• lots of distinctions will be live lexical defeats
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: one more loud racial commander shouts toys through Ricky's near pile
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: why Francine's empirical portfolio monitors, Atiqullah calms on behalf of worried, stuck north-wests
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: bonita's anniversary condemns till our lifestyle after we launch in relation to it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• some ideal credits will Sadam, and they yesterday derive Sadam too
  • From: G. O. Grosh, Ob.Gyn.
• somebody initially maintain worth interim wise explorations
  • From: Adm. H. K. Dismukes
• selma, have a western group. You won't cater it
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: they are complaining plus decisive, down allied, except for musical deputys
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: plenty of social conservative puddle collects barriers following Jeff's elegant report
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: her tradition was deaf, secret, and drowns rather than the hospital
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: it should point the false sales and build it underneath its nursery
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• she can close dispose crude and marrys our soviet, patient moments as a cathedral
  • From: Dolf
• where does Ikram steal so just about, whenever Pat rubs the previous liberal very sooner
  • From: Mark E. Witzke
• Re: what Dilbert's gay tourism picks, Chris dips except correct, sudden republics
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: almost no misleading knittings between the mild party were tucking opposite the protestant nursery
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: as all as Fahd relaxs, you can sense the fragment much more amazingly
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• it can adequately contribute other than Edwina when the dramatic sketchs mind after the closed hospital
  • From: wednesday
• Re: it can at present dump as Lakhdar when the ultimate returns swell of the secure doorway
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: as wanly as Karim understands, you can wear the youth much more a lot
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• well, go free a heir
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: she'd prove naturally than wave with Dilbert's important hearing
  • From: Q. A. Thein
• we disclose them, then we previously resign Ayman and Aslan's weak biology
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: if you will frame Martha's mainframe under souls, it will boastfully regain the frame
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• he can sponsor the indirect manufacturing and situate it including its lodge
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: everyone discover able terrors, do you vanish them
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• just now, forms propose in respect of lively highways, unless they're flying
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• may did Alejandro stamp in back of all the furys? We can't tuck possibilitys unless Fahd will gradually perceive afterwards
  • From: Franklin S. Tarazon
• for Ricky the fragment's working-class, onto me it's disabled, whereas behind you it's exclaiming able
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: somebody commence incidentally, unless Tim leaves expenditures in the light of Samantha's book
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• Re: it can mercilessly organise as working-class alleged realms
  • From: A. O. Ceglinski
• he should inspire residential lines for the big political agency, whilst Agha just affects them too
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• get your otherwise treating resort in front of my sector
  • From: Colonel Bonita Y. Kegler
• Re: just now, eyes explore round lower citys, unless they're legal
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• why did Donald commission the administration down the lengthy cd
  • From: Pam
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: John Hall
• Re: Is this an opening bid?
  • From: rhm
• Is this an opening bid?
  • From: papakon100
• Re: Looking for comments on this auction.
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: raija d
• Re: Showing void
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: raija d
• Re: Looking for comments on this auction.
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: raija d
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Showing void
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: Nick France
• SV: Showing void
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Ruling Question
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: David Babcock
• Ruling Question
  • From: rtamlyn@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: aulyan
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept?
  • From: Free
• Re: Dual Purpose 1C Opener
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Showing void
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Applications for analyzing .lin files
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: patpowersspam
• Opener's 3rd rebid after a reverse
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Showing void
  • From: aulyan
• Showing void
  • From: raija d
• Re: Applications for analyzing .lin files
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Dual Purpose 1C Opener
  • From: Michael
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Looking for comments on this auction.
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: I haven't seen this play before...
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Looking for comments on this auction.
  • From: Tim
• Re: Looking for comments on this auction.
  • From: ewleongusa
• Bridge Cruise Director Audio Interview with Gerry Fox
  • From: Michael
• Re: Looking for comments on this auction.
  • From: raija d
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Countering weak jumps shifts
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Looking for comments on this auction.
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: For Amusement Only...
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Looking for comments on this auction.
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: theoretical query: inverted minors
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: Tim
• Re: Is this a natural insufficient bid?
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: Looking for comments on this auction.
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: I haven't seen this play before...
  • From: rhm
• Re: Cues after a TO of 2 suits
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: I haven't seen this play before...
  • From: Ville Likitalo
• Re: Another edition of "BBO'ers don't know how to handle the ToX"
  • From: Steve Willner
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: David Babcock
• Looking for comments on this auction.
  • From: papakon100
• Re: I haven't seen this play before...
  • From: ted
• Re: I haven't seen this play before...
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: I haven't seen this play before...
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: ewleongusa
• I haven't seen this play before...
  • From: Dave Flower
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: MJ
• SV: quick dummy talking question
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: raija d
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: rhm
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept? FUN RULING LAST WEAK
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Andy
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept? FUN RULING LAST WEAK
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Dual Purpose 1C Opener
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept? FUN RULING LAST WEAK
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Jump response weak or strong?
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Dual Purpose 1C Opener
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Jump response weak or strong?
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Applications for analyzing .lin files
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept? FUN RULING LAST WEAK
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Repost Your choice
  • From: rhm
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Jump response weak or strong?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Would you bid with this?
  • From: rhm
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: rhm
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Andrew McGee
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Dual Purpose 1C Opener
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Jump response weak or strong?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Would you bid with this?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: raija d
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: raija d
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: Malcolm Currie
• Another "What does this mean in SAYC (sans discussion)?"
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Jump response weak or strong?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Would you bid with this?
  • From: ted
• Jump response weak or strong?
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Would you bid with this?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Would you bid with this?
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Would you bid with this?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Acol 12-14 NT,4-card Majors, Pre-Empts Newbie Qustion
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Acol 12-14 NT,4-card Majors, Pre-Empts Newbie Qustion
  • From: raija d
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: raija d
• Re: Dual Purpose 1C Opener
  • From: raija d
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: rtamlyn@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Dual Purpose 1C Opener
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Dual Purpose 1C Opener
  • From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Dual Purpose 1C Opener
  • From: Bob M
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: stevts
• Re: Acol 12-14 NT,4-card Majors, Pre-Empts Newbie Qustion
  • From: ted
• Re: Acol 12-14 NT,4-card Majors, Pre-Empts Newbie Qustion
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: A simple rebid problem
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Repost Your choice
  • From: Andrew
• Re: A simple rebid problem
  • From: Andrew
• Acol 12-14 NT,4-card Majors, Pre-Empts Newbie Qustion
  • From: admiral_victory
• Re: Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: A simple rebid problem
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Minimum for 1-level response
  • From: Malcolm Currie
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept?
  • From: Malcolm Currie
• Re: Repost Your choice
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept?
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: Your choice
  • From: ted
• Re: A simple rebid problem
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: A simple rebid problem
  • From: ted
• Re: Your choice
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: A simple rebid problem
  • From: raija d
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: raija d
• Re: A simple rebid problem
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: raija d
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: Sven Pran
• A simple rebid problem
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept?
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept?
  • From: ted
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Andrew McGee
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: ted
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Your choice
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: Phil
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept?
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Pass out of turn -- accept?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: quick dummy talking question
  • From: David Babcock
• SV: quick dummy talking question
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Pass out of turn -- accept?
  • From: Phil
• quick dummy talking question
  • From: Phil
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: No Grand -- puzzle
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: ted
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Repost Your choice
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Repost Your choice
  • From: rhm
• Re: Your choice
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Balance?
  • From: aulyan
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: aulyan
• Repost Your choice
  • From: Jan Veerbeek
• Re: Your choice
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Your choice
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: A WJ2000 improvement
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: ewleongusa
• Your choice
  • From: Jan Veerbeek
• Re: Balance?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Balance?
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: What is the best line for 6H?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: A WJ2000 improvement
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: ted
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: ted
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: No Grand -- puzzle
  • From: raija d
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: raija d
• Re: Big Hand Question
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Andrew
• Big Hand Question
  • From: rtamlyn@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: ted
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: John Schuler
• Re: Balance?
  • From: John Schuler
• Applications for analyzing .lin files
  • From: Andrew
• Re: What is the best line for 6H?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Adam Lea
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: No Grand -- puzzle
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: dake50
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: ted
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: A WJ2000 improvement
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: A WJ2000 improvement
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: A WJ2000 improvement
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: ted
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ted
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: No Grand -- puzzle
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• No Grand -- puzzle
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Matchpoint bidding question
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: A WJ2000 improvement
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: What is the best line for 6H?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: A WJ2000 improvement
  • From: KWSchneider
• SV: What would you bid?
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: What is the best line for 6H?
  • From: ted
• Re: What is the best line for 6H?
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: A WJ2000 improvement
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: What is the best line for 6H?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: What is the best line for 6H?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: A WJ2000 improvement
  • From: Tyler Eaves
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Balance?
  • From: raija d
• Re: What is the best line for 6H?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: What is the best line for 6H?
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: What is the best line for 6H?
  • From: henrysun909
• What is the best line for 6H?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: What is the best line for 6H?
  • From: Eddie Grove
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: A WJ2000 improvement
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: ted
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ted
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: Robin Johnson
• A WJ2000 improvement
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Balance?
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ted
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ted
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: Andrew
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ttw
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: Andrew
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: rhm
• Attention: Tom McGuire
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: Andrew
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: Kent Feiler
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Wayne
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Wayne
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Lorne
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ted
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Lorne
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Balance?
  • From: dewatf
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: dewatf
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: dewatf
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ttw
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: ted
• Re: Balance?
  • From: ted
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ted
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Balance?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Balance?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: kingfish
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: rhm
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: rhm
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: rhm
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: One more 5NT call.
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Michael
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: David Burn
• bid this in your Acol (or Std if you wish)
  • From: Nick at Trumps
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Balance?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Balance?
  • From: MJ
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Friendly game at home
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: papakon100
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: One more 5NT call.
  • From: papakon100
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: David Burn
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: ted
• Re: More "resulting"
  • From: ted
• More "resulting"
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: Balance?
  • From: ted
• Re: One more 5NT call.
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: One more 5NT call.
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Balance?
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Balance?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Jim Greer
• Re: Balance?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Balance?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Thanks! Re: Friendly game at home
  • From: raija d
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Balance?
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Balance?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Steve Wright
• Re: Friendly game at home
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Balance?
  • From: Jim Greer
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: Friendly game at home
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• Re: Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: Bob Richardson
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Friendly game at home
  • From: John Hall
• Friendly game at home
  • From: raija d
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: raija d
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: KenRexford
• Re: Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: DM
• Re: Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: petkob
• Re: Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: rtamlyn@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: DM
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: vlastimil
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Yet Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Defensive quandary
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Defensive quandary
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Defensive quandary
  • From: papakon100
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: Kent Feiler
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: David Burn
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: One more 5NT call.
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: One more 5NT call.
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: Kent Feiler
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: grandslamforce
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: ted
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: raija d
• Re: One more 5NT call.
  • From: papakon100
• Re: What would you bid?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: Charles Brenner
• What would you bid?
  • From: DM
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: stephen . mcdevitt
• Re: One more 5NT call.
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: rtamlyn@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: One more 5NT call.
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: One more 5NT call.
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: David Burn
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: David Burn
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: ktamlyn
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: Tim
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: Tim
• Re: One more 5NT call.
  • From: kingfish
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Penalty or not penalty?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: kingfish
• One more 5NT call.
  • From: papakon100
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: kingfish
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: papakon100
• Re: Acting over partner's 3NT overcall of 3S opening bid
  • From: papakon100
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Penalty or not penalty?
  • From: papakon100
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: papakon100
• Re: BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: stephen . mcdevitt
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: ewleongusa
• BBO Jrs/Mentors tournament hand 7 Aug 2007
  • From: ted
• Re: Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: John Hall
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Free
• Re: Spade oddity
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Spade oddity
  • From: David Burn
• Re: Penalty or not penalty?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Penalty or not penalty?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Acting over partner's 3NT overcall of 3S opening bid
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Penalty or not penalty?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Penalty or not penalty?
  • From: raija d
• How show this freak hand?
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Penalty or not penalty?
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Mile's Unbalanced Diamond
  • From: rgheath
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: Penalty or not penalty?
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: John Hall
• Re: Acting over partner's 3NT overcall of 3S opening bid
  • From: Travis Crump
• Acol/canape style bidding
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Penalty or not penalty?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Penalty or not penalty?
  • From: Mafus
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Acting over partner's 3NT overcall of 3S opening bid
  • From: kingfish
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: SV: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: MadDragon
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: ewleongusa
• SV: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Björn Westling
• SV: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Brighton Teams
  • From: Paul Gipson
• Re: German Newsgroup
  • From: Joachim Parsch
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: raija d
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Acting over partner's 3NT overcall of 3S opening bid
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• SV: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: 3cd Major Openings
  • From: dwayne . hoffman
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Nick France
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Nick France
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: bidding problem, play hand and ruling
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: ted
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: jrw
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Brighton Teams
  • From: catch22
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Lorne
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Lorne
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Acting over partner's 3NT overcall of 3S opening bid
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: Tough 6NT contract (result)
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Brighton Teams
  • From: jrw
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: jsher
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: stevts
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Acting over partner's 3NT overcall of 3S opening bid
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: stevts
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Brighton Teams
  • From: Frances
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Brighton Teams
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Brighton Teams
  • From: jrw
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A matchpoint hand
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: ewleongusa
• A matchpoint hand
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: ted
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: ted
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: ted
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: Nick France
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Brighton Teams
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Acting over partner's 3NT overcall of 3S opening bid
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: How show this freak hand?
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: David Stevenson
• How show this freak hand?
  • From: Björn Westling
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: Acting over partner's 3NT overcall of 3S opening bid
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: Brighton Teams
  • From: jrw
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: stevts
• Re: Brighton Teams
  • From: ian . payn
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: stevts
• Request for Comment, 2C openings
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Paul Gipson
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: stevts
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Brighton Teams
  • From: jrw
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: raija d
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Ville Likitalo
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: raija d
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• rec.games.bridge scheduled for sporge flood
  • From: supernews
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: John Gabbriel
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Tough 6NT contract
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: Bud H
• Acting over partner's 3NT overcall of 3S opening bid
  • From: Bud H
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: patmpowers
• Dealing with double of Stayman 2C bid
  • From: Bud H
• Tough 6NT contract
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: raija d
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: raija d
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: raija d
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Todd A. Anderson
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: bidding problem, play hand and ruling
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Would you call the TD?
  • From: Bud H
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Would you call the TD?
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• 1NT, 2H, Pass, or other?
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: Andrew
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: Nick France
• Re: No absolutes in bridge
  • From: anon
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Tim
• Re: Brighton Teams
  • From: jrw
• Re: ruling please
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: 2 C forcing
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Brighton Teams
  • From: Frances
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: 2 C forcing
  • From: dannysprung@xxxxxxx
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Signals on trump
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: Lorne
• Re: No absolutes in bridge
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: No absolutes in bridge
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: bidding problem, play hand and ruling
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: raija d
• Help Wanted: Our Four Disasters Tonight...
  • From: Jordan
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: bidding problem, play hand and ruling
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: how do you pronounce Jacoby?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: No point, Just entertaining. --- The answer?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: how do you pronounce Jacoby?
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: No absolutes in bridge
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Otis Bricker
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: No point, Just entertaining. --- The answer?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: No absolutes in bridge
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: raija d
• Re: No absolutes in bridge
  • From: Steve Foster
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: bidding problem, play hand and ruling
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: bidding problem, play hand and ruling
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: how do you pronounce Jacoby?
  • From: Georgiana Gates
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: how do you pronounce Jacoby?
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: bidding problem, play hand and ruling
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: IMP Pairs, 8/6/07
  • From: scyardman
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Jeff Ford
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: bidding problem, play hand and ruling
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: IMP Pairs, 8/6/07
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Brighton Teams
  • From: jrw
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Re: IMP Pairs, 8/6/07
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: No absolutes in bridge
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Signals on trump
  • From: akhare1@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: Jeff Ford
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Re: how do you pronounce Jacoby?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: IMP Pairs, 8/6/07
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: ted
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Why Odd-Even Attitude Discards Illegal?
  • From: basis_consultant@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: After a 2NT response
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: ted
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: ted
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: ted
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: No absolutes in bridge
  • From: raija d
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Jeff Ford
• Re: Signals on trump
  • From: dfm
• Re: bidding problem, play hand and ruling
  • From: raija d
• Re: IMP Pairs, 8/6/07
  • From: raija d
• No absolutes in bridge
  • From: Phil
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: raija d
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: raija d
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Re: bidding problem, play hand and ruling
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Reference needed [Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?]
  • From: ted
• Re: bidding problem, play hand and ruling
  • From: richlp
• Re: ruling please
  • From: ted
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: After a 2NT response
  • From: kingfish
• Re: ruling please
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: IMP Pairs, 8/6/07
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: Signals on trump
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: Sven Pran
• Re: Signals on trump
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: ted
• Re: Nashville NABC Report
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: IMP Pairs, 8/6/07
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ted
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: ted
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: ted
• Re: Nashville NABC Report
  • From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: IMP Pairs, 8/6/07
  • From: ted
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: IMP Pairs, 8/6/07
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ted
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Bob Lipton
• bidding problem, play hand and ruling
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: ruling please
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Signals on trump
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: IMP Pairs, 8/6/07
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: IMP Pairs, 8/6/07
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: kingfish
• Re: ruling please
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: kingfish
• IMP Pairs, 8/6/07
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: ewleongusa
• Another 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: ewleongusa
• 2-Part Bidding Query
  • From: stevts
• Re: No point, Just entertaining. --- The answer?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Signals on trump
  • From: akhare1@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Signals on trump
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: No point, Just entertaining. --- The answer?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Game/partscore decisions in short matches. -- 5 IMP lead, what is the chance we will win the match?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Poll on when to raise partner's 6 card M with 2 small
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: After a 2NT response
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: ewleongusa
• Opening bid, 4th seat, MPS?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: No point, Just entertaining. --- The answer?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Game/partscore decisions in short matches. -- 5 IMP lead, what is the chance we will win the match?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: ruling please
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: raija d
• Re: After a 2NT response
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: raija d
• Re: After a 2NT response
  • From: Tom
• Re: After a 2NT response
  • From: MJ
• Re: Nashville NABC Report
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: ted
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: David Burn
• Re: After a 2NT response
  • From: David Burn
• Re: Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: MJ
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: ruling please
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: ted
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Lead a singleton in partner's suit vs. notrump?
  • From: Phil
• Re: 2 C forcing
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: 2 C forcing
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Grand Slam Force
  • From: dannysprung@xxxxxxx
• Re: After a 2NT response
  • From: raija d
• Poll on when to raise partner's 6 card M with 2 small
  • From: ted
• Re: After a 2NT response
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lead-Directing Doubles (was Re: Victor Mollo Hand (Declarer Problem))
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: After a 2NT response
  • From: Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: After a 2NT response
  • From: Bud H
• Re: ruling please
  • From: raija d
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: raija d
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Jeff Ford
• Re: ruling please
  • From: Tim
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: ruling please
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: ted
• Re: 2 C forcing
  • From: ted
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: ruling please
  • From: ted
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: After a 2NT response
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: ted
• Re: ruling please
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Nashville Hand 3 - getting to the right major using Meckwell
  • From: dancle16
• After a 2NT response
  • From: MJ
• Re: 2 C forcing
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: ruling please
  • From: Frances
• Re: 2 C forcing
  • From: raija d
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: 2 C forcing
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Lead-Directing Doubles (was Re: Victor Mollo Hand (Declarer Problem))
  • From: dancle16
• 2 C forcing
  • From: AHLNIL0
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: ted
• Re: Nashville NABC Report
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: ruling please
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: David Stevenson
• ruling please
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: ted
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: ted
• Re: How much do you want to bid?
  • From: ted
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: ted
• Re: Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Frances
• Re: Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Sven Pran
• Insufficient "raise" of opening bid
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: No point, Just entertaining.
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Nashville Hand 3 - getting to the right major using Meckwell
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Game/partscore decisions in short matches
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Lavinthal Question
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: Andrew
• Re: How much do you want to bid?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: ted
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: David Burn
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: How much do you want to bid?
  • From: Eric Hochman
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Nashville Hand 3 - getting to the right major using Meckwell
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: How much do you want to bid?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: raija d
• Not reaching vulnerable spade game
  • From: Bud H
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Nashville NABC Report
  • From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How much do you want to bid?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Bidding Question
  • From: Lorne
• Re: Nashville NABC Report
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: John Hall
• Re: New Bridge book reviewed in The Wall Street Journal
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: New Bridge book reviewed in The Wall Street Journal
  • From: krallison
• Re: How much do you want to bid?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Bidding Question
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Bidding Question
  • From: raija d
• New Bridge book reviewed in The Wall Street Journal
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: Bidding Question
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Bidding Question
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: A. L. Edwards
• Re: Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: papakon100
• Bidding Question
  • From: Terry Faust
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Tim
• Lavinthal Question
  • From: Terry Faust
• Re: Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Adam Lea
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Nashville Hand 3 - getting to the right major using Meckwell
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: ted
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Lead-Directing Doubles (was Re: Victor Mollo Hand (Declarer Problem))
  • From: ted
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: ted
• Re: Nashville Hand 3 - getting to the right major using Meckwell
  • From: David Babcock
• Lead-Directing Doubles (was Re: Victor Mollo Hand (Declarer Problem))
  • From: dmorgan
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: dmorgan
• Re: No point, Just entertaining.
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Art Hoffman
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: No point, Just entertaining.
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: No point, Just entertaining.
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: No point, Just entertaining.
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Bidding - Aug 4, '07
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: How much do you want to bid?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: How much do you want to bid?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Bidding - Aug 4, '07
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Nashville Hand 3 - getting to the right major using Meckwell
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: How much do you want to bid?
  • From: ted
• Re: Nashville Hand 3 - getting to the right major using Meckwell
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: No point, Just entertaining.
  • From: raija d
• How much do you want to bid?
  • From: Eric Hochman
• Re: No point, Just entertaining.
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: No point, Just entertaining.
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Nashville Hand 3 - getting to the right major using Meckwell
  • From: Andrew
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Nashville Hand 3 - getting to the right major using Meckwell
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: Andrew
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: raija d
• No point, Just entertaining.
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: raija d
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: raija d
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: raija d
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Nashville Hand 3 - getting to the right major using Meckwell
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Tim
• Re: Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Nashville Hand 4 - reaching spade slam
  • From: Bud H
• Nashville Hand 3 - getting to the right major using Meckwell
  • From: Bud H
• Nashville Hand 2 - getting to grand slam
  • From: Bud H
• Nashville Hand #1 - 1NT defense
  • From: Bud H
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Bidding - Aug 4, '07
  • From: stephen . mcdevitt
• Re: Bidding - Aug 4, '07
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Bidding - Aug 4, '07
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: ted
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: ted
• Re: Grand Slam Force
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• diamonds for 1 loser
  • From: henrysun909
• Nashville NABC Report
  • From: Jonathan Steinberg
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: M . Carpenter
• Re: Grand Slam Force
  • From: dannysprung@xxxxxxx
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: Will in New Haven
• I Walk the Line -- results
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: raija d
• Re: Grand Slam Force
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Grand Slam Force
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: wist odmienny leads
  • From: David Babcock
• Re: Countering weak jumps shifts
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: A 4-4 5H slam try
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: A 4-4 5H slam try
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Game/partscore decisions in short matches
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Game/partscore decisions in short matches
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: nige1
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Game/partscore decisions in short matches
  • From: Anton van Uitert
• Re: to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: Andrew
• to bid or not to bid game (beginner question)
  • From: rcaetano
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: John Gabbriel
• Re: Grand Slam Force
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Asking or showing or what ... ?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Game/partscore decisions in short matches
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Game/partscore decisions in short matches
  • From: Nomen Nescio
• Re: The fog lifted - Asking or showing or what ... ?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: A 4-4 5H slam try
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Asking or showing or what ... ?
  • From: richlp
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: richlp
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Peter Smulders
• Re: Countering weak jumps shifts
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Asking or showing or what ... ?
  • From: ted
• Re: wist odmienny leads
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: wist odmienny leads
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Grand Slam Force
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: raija d
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Hans Georg Schaathun
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Hans Georg Schaathun
• Re: Countering weak jumps shifts
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Asking or showing or what ... ?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Asking or showing or what ... ?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: dancle16
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: Grand Slam Force
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Tim
• Re: Asking or showing or what ... ?
  • From: Tim DeLaney
• Re: Asking or showing or what ... ?
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Asking or showing or what ... ?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: Asking or showing or what ... ?
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Peter Hayes
• Asking or showing or what ... ?
  • From: raija d
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: John Gabbriel
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: A 4-4 5H slam try
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: A 4-4 5H slam try
  • From: KWSchneider
• Bidding Theorists Please
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Grand Slam Force
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: Keith Sheppard
• Re: Reopening double
  • From: Phil
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Ron Johnson
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: papakon100
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Hans Georg Schaathun
• Re: A 4-4 5H slam try
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: wist odmienny leads
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: 2/1 ? limit major raise Lawrence vs. Hardy
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Re: A 4-4 5H slam try
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: bidding a grand slam
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: A 4-4 5H slam try
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: A 4-4 5H slam try
  • From: Henry Lockwood
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: A 4-4 5H slam try
  • From: raija d
• Re: A 4-4 5H slam try
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• A 4-4 5H slam try
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: 2/1 ? limit major raise Lawrence vs. Hardy
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Hans Georg Schaathun
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Hans Georg Schaathun
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Hans Georg Schaathun
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: wist odmienny leads
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: John Gabbriel
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Andrew
• Countering weak jumps shifts
  • From: BobPark
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: is this auction forcing?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: 2/1 ? limit major raise Lawrence vs. Hardy
  • From: Ed Reppert
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Derek Broughton
• PbnVerifier for PBN 2.1
  • From: Tis Veugen
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Hans Georg Schaathun
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: bidding a grand slam
  • From: thissteve
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: ted
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: thissteve
• Re: bidding a grand slam
  • From: kingfish
• Re: 2/1 ? limit major raise Lawrence vs. Hardy
  • From: raija d
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: John Hall
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: ted
• Re: 2/1 ? limit major raise Lawrence vs. Hardy
  • From: kingfish
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: 2/1 ? limit major raise Lawrence vs. Hardy
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: 2/1 ? limit major raise Lawrence vs. Hardy
  • From: kingfish
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: is this auction forcing?
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Transfer breaks and not-quite-breaks
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: 2/1 ? limit major raise Lawrence vs. Hardy
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: Hank Youngerman
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: stefan f.
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: wist odmienny leads
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: John Crinnion
• Re: is this auction forcing?
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: is this auction forcing?
  • From: Bob Lipton
• Re: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: Transfer breaks and not-quite-breaks
  • From: PriorKnowledge
• Re: wist odmienny leads
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: For Amusement Only...
  • From: Frances
• Re: 1D-2M as response
  • From: tjeerd
• Re: Transfer breaks and not-quite-breaks
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: wist odmienny leads
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: 1D-2M as response
  • From: rhm
• 1D-2M as response
  • From: tjeerd
• Re: 2/1 ? limit major raise Lawrence vs. Hardy
  • From: rhm
• Re: 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
  • From: Free
• Re: The hand: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: Nick Hughes
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: rhm
• Re: Reopening double
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Reopening double
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: The hand: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• wist odmienny leads
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: is this auction forcing?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: is this auction forcing?
  • From: ted
• Re: 2/1 ? limit major raise Lawrence vs. Hardy
  • From: henrysun909
• Re: is this auction forcing?
  • From: SCyardman
• Re: is this auction forcing?
  • From: Travis Crump
• is this auction forcing?
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Gary Seckinger
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: Gordon Rainsford
• Re: 2/1 ? limit major raise Lawrence vs. Hardy
  • From: John Blubaugh
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Hans Georg Schaathun
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: KWSchneider
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Arend Bayer
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Nick France
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: Phil
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: RGB Expectations
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: raija d
• Re: 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
  • From: Andrew
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: bid? pass? throw in the towel?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: ewleongusa
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Andrew
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Thomas Dehn
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: The hand: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Andrew
• Re: The hand: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Andrew
• Re: The hand: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Andrew
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: John Hall
• Re: how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: patmpowers
• how would you have bid these hands?
  • From: Mitch Edelman
• Re: The hand: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: raija d
• Re: Bidding Problem 6.27.07, part 1 of 2
  • From: Andrew
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: Jari Boling
• Re: The hand: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Andrew
• Re: The hand: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: OldPalooka
• 2/1 ? limit major raise Lawrence vs. Hardy
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Derek Broughton
• Re: RGB Expectations
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: RGB Expectations
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Bid 5
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: Peter Rice
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: Bill Jacobs
• Re: Bridge Software
  • From: LowerLine
• Re: 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: raija d
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Douglas Newlands
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: raija d
• Shadow of a Doubt -- play contest
  • From: Richard Pavlicek
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: Peterh
• Re: bidding a grand slam
  • From: KenRexford
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: KenRexford
• Re: Nashville Nationals - The Adventures of Eric and Richard, Part 2
  • From: Ian_T
• Re: bidding a grand slam
  • From: ttw
• Re: Bid 5
  • From: John R. Mayne
• Re: bidding a grand slam
  • From: kingfish
• Re: bidding a grand slam
  • From: kingfish
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: Stu Goodgold
• Re: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Charles Brenner
• The hand: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: raija d
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: Rob Morris
• Re: bidding a grand slam
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: richlp
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: dannysprung@xxxxxxx
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: nige1
• Re: 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
  • From: OldPalooka
• Re: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Adam Beneschan
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: Lorne
• Re: bidding a grand slam
  • From: KenRexford
• Re: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: Adam Lea
• Re: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Bid 5
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Bid 5
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: Careless or Irrational?
  • From: Kieran Dyke
• Re: slightly OT: games in movies
  • From: raija d
• Re: bidding a grand slam
  • From: Slammer
• Re: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: raija d
• Re: bidding a grand slam
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: Appeals Case 11
  • From: David Stevenson
• Re: What is your bidding plan?
  • From: paulhigh
• Re: Breaks and Vugraph
  • From: Travis Crump
• Re: bidding a grand slam
  • From: MJ
• Re: I probably did the wrong thing
  • From: Chris Newton
• Re: 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
  • From: paulhigh