Re: 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
- From: patmpowers@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:41:24 -0700
On Jul 31, 6:59 pm, Mika Sandstrom <ptm...@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi!
I played (natural, RKCB) for the very first time with this guy and this
came up. He had KQ86, AJ9, AQ632, 7 and I had A732, 4, J95, AQT84. MPs,
non-vul, opponents silent, bidding (not the most scientific one) went
1D - 2C
2S - 4NT
5C - 6S
6NT
Down four.
Me: "Hmm...?"
He: "I thought you might have only 3 spades since your first round bid
wasn't spades."
Might I?
Mika
Well, if what you are looking for is confirmation that partner is a
dingbat, then you have it. What is all this guessing about? On the
other hand that 4NT bid is wildly overoptimistic, so you haven't done
any better. I seldom go to slam with a 4-4 fit. If you have some way
to show that heart singleton then do so, otherwise settle for the
spade game.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
- From: Mika Sandström
- Re: 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
- References:
- 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
- From: Mika Sandstrom
- 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
- Prev by Date: Re: 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
- Next by Date: Re: bidding a grand slam
- Previous by thread: Re: 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
- Next by thread: Re: 4cM vs. 5(or something)cm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|