Re: yet another you hold.....
- From: "Douglas Newlands" <douglas.newlands@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 23:07:58 GMT
"Bill Jacobs" <bill.jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns992AB382DA354billjacobsozquestcom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Charles Brenner <cbrenner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1178545478.661249.52500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
On May 6, 9:56 pm, "raija d" <musti...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Doug Newlands wrote
[snip}
Partner had
Kxxx
Kx
Kx
Jxxxx
If this opening was in accordance with partnership expectations, then
blast to 7NT isn't the best thing to do. I don't think this is an
opening hand at all.
He did tell us originally that
1S is 10-15, 4 cards, possible minor canape
although the further comment
(if you find it alters your reply, ... but you have enough values
that it doesn't seem to be a concern )
seems rather prejudicial.
Charles
Indeed I have been consulting my lawyer about this post, and he believes
that I can successfully sue Douglas for false advertising.
Hmmm, by way of excuse, I meant "but you have enough value
that it doesn't seem to be a concern " to mean you were safely in the slam
zone
and just had to find the right one.
Re legal action, I don't have enough money to make it worth your while,
Bill!
Douglas,
Tasmania
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: yet another you hold.....
- From: pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: yet another you hold.....
- References:
- yet another you hold.....
- From: Douglas Newlands
- Re: yet another you hold.....
- From: Bill Jacobs
- Re: yet another you hold.....
- From: Douglas Newlands
- Re: yet another you hold.....
- From: raija d
- Re: yet another you hold.....
- From: Charles Brenner
- Re: yet another you hold.....
- From: Bill Jacobs
- yet another you hold.....
- Prev by Date: Re: Laws question
- Next by Date: Re: What would you do?
- Previous by thread: Re: yet another you hold.....
- Next by thread: Re: yet another you hold.....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|