rec.games.bridge

• Date Index

---

• Would you use Gerber?, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Would you use Gerber?, ted
  • Re: Would you use Gerber?, Stu Goodgold
  • Re: Would you use Gerber?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Would you use Gerber?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Would you use Gerber?, PriorKnowledge
    • Re: Would you use Gerber?, PriorKnowledge
  • Re: Would you use Gerber?, Gerben Dirksen
• To slam, or not to slam? That is the question, henrysun909
  • Re: To slam, or not to slam? That is the question, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: To slam, or not to slam? That is the question, Bob Lipton
  • Re: To slam, or not to slam? That is the question, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: To slam, or not to slam? That is the question, ted
  • Re: To slam, or not to slam? That is the question, PriorKnowledge
• Test your slam play, Richard Lawson
  • Re: Test your slam play, bboinquiry
  • Re: Test your slam play, ewleongusa
  • Re: Test your slam play, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Test your slam play, nige1
  • Re: Test your slam play (results), Richard Lawson
    • Re: Test your slam play (results), nige1
    • Re: Test your slam play (results), nige1
    • Re: Test your slam play (results), thissteve
• 1987 Bermuda Bowl final at Vugraph Project site, Nikos Sarantakos
• EBU Orange Book - Alerts, Steve Wright
  • Re: EBU Orange Book - Alerts, Frances
    • Re: EBU Orange Book - Alerts, Ron Johnson
      • Re: EBU Orange Book - Alerts, nige1
      • Re: EBU Orange Book - Alerts, David Collier
• Intermediate bridge players in Houston interested in a partnership?, GIRISH NATHAN
  • Re: Intermediate bridge players in Houston interested in a partnership?, John D'Errico
• What is your bid?, frisbieinstein
  • Re: What is your bid?, mghmaine
  • Re: What is your bid?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: What is your bid?, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: What is your bid?, mghmaine
      • Re: What is your bid?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: What is your bid?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: What is your bid? More detail., frisbieinstein
    • Re: What is your bid? More detail., Dave Flower
      • Re: What is your bid? More detail., frisbieinstein
      • Re: What is your bid? More detail., Dave Flower
      • Re: What is your bid? More detail., mghmaine
• A Borrowed Horse, Dave Flower
  • Re: A Borrowed Horse, frisbieinstein
    • Re: A Borrowed Horse, thissteve
  • Re: A Borrowed Horse, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: A Borrowed Horse, David Stevenson
  • Re: A Borrowed Horse, Jyrki Lahtonen
  • Re: A Borrowed Horse, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A Borrowed Horse, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: A Borrowed Horse, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: A Borrowed Horse, Marvin French
• Overcalls, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Overcalls, Andrew
    • Re: Overcalls, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Overcalls, ted
      • Re: Overcalls, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Overcalls, raija d
      • Re: Overcalls, Bas van Gils
  • Re: Overcalls, John Schuler
    • Re: Overcalls, Bas van Gils
  • Re: Overcalls, Free
    • Re: Overcalls, frisbieinstein
• 8/29/2006 What is your call?, ted
  • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, henrysun909
  • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, raija d
  • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Mark Dean
  • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, ewleongusa
      • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, ewleongusa
  • For those choosing 1NT Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, ted
    • Re: For those choosing 1NT Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, raija d
    • Re: For those choosing 1NT Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, John R. Mayne
    • Re: For those choosing 1NT Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, ewleongusa
    • Re: For those choosing 1NT Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Mark Dean
    • Re: For those choosing 1NT Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: For those choosing 1NT Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: For those choosing 1NT Re: 8/29/2006 What is your call?, Gary Seckinger
• Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, kristyleigh
  • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, djneill
    • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, etsand
  • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Todd A. Anderson
    • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Todd A. Anderson
  • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, David Stevenson
  • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, mghmaine
  • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Travis Crump
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Derek Broughton
    • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Robin Barker
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Todd A. Anderson
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Hank Youngerman
    • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, raija d
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, raija d
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, ted
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, kristyleigh
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, ted
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, raija d
  • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Ron Johnson
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Just the facts Ma'am, or Rampant cheating on BBO tournaments, or how naive can you be?, Ron Johnson
• The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 42, Richard Lawson
  • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 42, Bud H
• ACBL alert of direct cuebids, etsand
  • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, mghmaine
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, raija d
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, Marvin French
    • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, henrysun909
    • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, David Stevenson
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, Eric Landau
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, henrysun909
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, raija d
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, Eric Landau
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, henrysun909
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, Mark Brader
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, David Stevenson
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, Barry Margolin
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, David Stevenson
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, Eric Landau
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, Phil C
      • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, David Stevenson
  • Re: ACBL alert of direct cuebids, Hank Youngerman
• Splinter or JS?, Phil C
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, mghmaine
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, neilkaz
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, ted
    • Re: Splinter or JS?, ted
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, Andrew
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Splinter or JS?, ttw
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, David Stevenson
    • Re: Splinter or JS?, Phil C
      • Re: Splinter or JS?, Chris Newton
      • Re: Splinter or JS?, Craig
      • Re: Splinter or JS?, ted
      • Re: Splinter or JS?, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: Splinter or JS?, ted
      • Re: Splinter or JS?, PriorKnowledge
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, raija d
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Splinter or JS?, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Splinter or JS?, PriorKnowledge
• How good is this slam?, Nikos Sarantakos
  • Re: How good is this slam?, Dave Flower
  • Re: How good is this slam?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: How good is this slam?, ewleongusa
• Jacobs nips Ekeblad (results unofficial at this point) on last hand, Bud H
  • Re: Jacobs nips Ekeblad (results unofficial at this point) on last hand, Ed
• 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Bud H
  • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Pubkeybreaker
      • Message not available
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, neilkaz
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Adam Beneschan
      • Message not available
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Chris Ryall
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Bob Lipton
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Arthur Hoffman
  • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, raija d
  • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Bob Lipton
  • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, ewleongusa
    • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Alex Martelli
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Andrew
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Alex Martelli
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Andrew
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Alex Martelli
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Andrew
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Alex Martelli
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Bud H
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Alex Martelli
  • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, scyardman
  • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Andrew
    • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Andrew
  • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Chris Ryall
    • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, ewleongusa
      • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, PriorKnowledge
  • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, ted
  • Re: 1=4=4=4 13-count with stiff king, Phil C
• Hand Simulations, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Hand Simulations, gandalfnf
  • Re: Hand Simulations, henrysun909
    • Re: Hand Simulations, henrysun909
      • Re: Hand Simulations, Michael Angelo Ravera
• Leading from xxxx and xxxxx when holding a sequence - and what card do you play next?, Bud H
  • Re: Leading from xxxx and xxxxx when holding a sequence - and what card do you play next?, David Stevenson
  • Re: Leading from xxxx and xxxxx when holding a sequence - and what card do you play next?, thissteve
    • Re: Leading from xxxx and xxxxx when holding a sequence - and what card do you play next?, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: Leading from xxxx and xxxxx when holding a sequence - and what card do you play next?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Leading from xxxx and xxxxx when holding a sequence - and what card do you play next?, Eric Landau
• Was I too conservative?, Bill Lentz
  • Re: Was I too conservative?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: Was I too conservative?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Was I too conservative?, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Was I too conservative?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Was I too conservative?, rhm
  • Re: Was I too conservative?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Was I too conservative?, neilkaz
• Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), Phil
  • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), scyardman
    • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), ewleongusa
      • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), scyardman
  • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), Nick Hughes
  • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), raija d
  • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), Charles Brenner
  • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), Will in New Haven
  • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), neilkaz
    • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), Bob Lipton
  • Re: Does this meet the requirements? (converting a double), Phil C
• Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", henrysun909
  • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", Andrew
    • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", henrysun909
  • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", henrysun909
      • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", mghmaine
      • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", henrysun909
      • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", mghmaine
      • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", henrysun909
  • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", gandalfnf
  • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", henrysun909
    • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", mghmaine
      • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", henrysun909
      • Re: Bergen raises and "I Fought The Law", Andrew
• Phils get Veteran Leadership, Mitch Edelman
• 2NT as minor PRE, Jerome_ckf
  • Re: 2NT as minor PRE, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: 2NT as minor PRE, mghmaine
    • Re: 2NT as minor PRE, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: 2NT as minor PRE, David Stevenson
      • Re: 2NT as minor PRE, Chris Ryall
  • Re: 2NT as minor PRE, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: 2NT as minor PRE, freebridge
• Jean Rene Vernes' "Canape Majeure d'Abord", Alex Martelli
  • Re: Jean Rene Vernes' "Canape Majeure d'Abord", ttw
    • Re: Jean Rene Vernes' "Canape Majeure d'Abord", Alex Martelli
      • Re: Jean Rene Vernes' "Canape Majeure d'Abord", ttw
      • Re: Jean Rene Vernes' "Canape Majeure d'Abord", Alex Martelli
      • Re: Jean Rene Vernes' "Canape Majeure d'Abord", Chris Ryall
      • Re: Jean Rene Vernes' "Canape Majeure d'Abord", Alex Martelli
  • Re: Jean Rene Vernes' "Canape Majeure d'Abord", rhm
    • Re: Jean Rene Vernes' "Canape Majeure d'Abord", Alex Martelli
      • Re: Jean Rene Vernes' "Canape Majeure d'Abord", rhm
      • Re: Jean Rene Vernes' "Canape Majeure d'Abord", Alex Martelli
    • Re: Jean Rene Vernes' "Canape Majeure d'Abord", Chris Ryall
• Competitive bidding problem, Chris
  • Re: Competitive bidding problem, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Competitive bidding problem, stephen . mcdevitt
  • Re: Competitive bidding problem, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Competitive bidding problem, henrysun909
  • Re: Competitive bidding problem, Andrew
  • Re: Competitive bidding problem, scyardman
  • Re: Competitive bidding problem, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Competitive bidding problem, neilkaz
  • Re: Competitive bidding problem, ewleongusa
• Who erred?, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Who erred?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Who erred?, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Who erred?, raija d
  • Re: Who erred?, neilkaz
  • Re: Who erred?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Who erred?, scyardman
  • Re: Who erred?, Phil C
  • Re: Who erred?, Andrew
    • Re: Who erred?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Who erred?, Andrew
      • Re: Who erred?, Charles Brenner
• Re: bidding decision, Steve Willner
  • Re: bidding decision, rhm
• Good Lead, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
• Follow ups after 3 minor rebid, Craig
  • Re: Follow ups after 3 minor rebid, alvin
    • Re: Follow ups after 3 minor rebid, Craig
      • Re: Follow ups after 3 minor rebid, alvin
      • Re: Follow ups after 3 minor rebid, henrysun909
  • Re: Follow ups after 3 minor rebid, David Stevenson
  • Re: Follow ups after 3 minor rebid, paulhigh
  • Re: Follow ups after 3 minor rebid, djneill
    • Re: Follow ups after 3 minor rebid, David Stevenson
      • Re: Follow ups after 3 minor rebid, henrysun909
  • Re: Follow ups after 3 minor rebid, Kieran Dyke
• I know how to get to 4s but, multguru@xxxxxxx
  • Re: I know how to get to 4s but, Bob Lipton
  • Re: I know how to get to 4s but, rhm
  • Re: I know how to get to 4s but, Lorne
  • Re: I know how to get to 4s but, ewleongusa
  • Re: I know how to get to 4s but, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: I know how to get to 4s but, Andrew
  • Re: I know how to get to 4s but, paulhigh
• A Warsaw disaster (info, please?), Nikos Sarantakos
• Test Your Slam Bidding, ewleongusa
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, scyardman
    • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, Travis Crump
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, henrysun909
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, Frances
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, paulhigh
  • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, bboinquiry
    • Re: Test Your Slam Bidding, Pubkeybreaker
• Moscito in contested auctions, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Moscito in contested auctions, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Moscito in contested auctions, Free
  • Re: Moscito in contested auctions, frisbieinstein
• problem slam hand, Adam Lea
  • Re: problem slam hand, Bob Lipton
  • Re: problem slam hand, Alex Martelli
    • Re: problem slam hand, Charles Brenner
      • Re: problem slam hand, Alex Martelli
      • Re: problem slam hand, Charles Brenner
      • Re: problem slam hand, Alex Martelli
  • Re: problem slam hand, frisbieinstein
  • Re: problem slam hand, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: problem slam hand, ewleongusa
  • Re: problem slam hand, Andrew
• Advice sought from Gazzilli/Ambra players, BobPark
  • Re: Advice sought from Gazzilli/Ambra players, michael
  • Re: Advice sought from Gazzilli/Ambra players, Elianna
  • Re: Advice sought from Gazzilli/Ambra players, Hasse
• Special term required, John Crinnion
  • Re: Special term required, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Special term required, Lorne
  • Re: Special term required, ewleongusa
• Newbie - advice sought, D Ramapriya
  • Re: Newbie - advice sought, Dave Flower
  • Re: Newbie - advice sought, ted
    • Re: Newbie - advice sought, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Newbie - advice sought, ted
  • Re: Newbie - advice sought, Eddie Grove
    • Re: Newbie - advice sought, D Ramapriya
      • Re: Newbie - advice sought, Andrew
      • Re: Newbie - advice sought, D Ramapriya
      • Re: Newbie - advice sought, Andrew
  • Re: Newbie - advice sought, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Newbie - advice sought, lessmit
  • Re: Newbie - advice sought, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Newbie - advice sought, D Ramapriya
    • Re: Newbie - advice sought, Peterh
  • Re: Newbie - advice sought, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Newbie - advice sought, raija d
  • Re: Newbie - advice sought, Vladimir
• Fredin & Zidane, Onno Eskes
  • Re: Fredin & Zidane, peter koch
    • Re: Fredin & Zidane, Joost Boswijk
      • Re: Fredin & Zidane, peter koch
  • Re: Fredin & Zidane, frisbieinstein
• In 5 of a minor at matchpoints....unfortunately....twice!, Bud H
  • Re: In 5 of a minor at matchpoints....unfortunately....twice!, Bob Lipton
    • Re: In 5 of a minor at matchpoints....unfortunately....twice!, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: In 5 of a minor at matchpoints....unfortunately....twice!, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: In 5 of a minor at matchpoints....unfortunately....twice!, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: In 5 of a minor at matchpoints....unfortunately....twice!, ewleongusa
  • Re: In 5 of a minor at matchpoints....unfortunately....twice!, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: In 5 of a minor at matchpoints....unfortunately....twice!, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: In 5 of a minor at matchpoints....unfortunately....twice!, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: In 5 of a minor at matchpoints....unfortunately....twice!, Will in New Haven
  • Re: In 5 of a minor at matchpoints....unfortunately....twice!, Steve Willner
• Precedence?, Everett M. Greene
  • Re: Precedence?, mghmaine
  • Re: Precedence?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Precedence?, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Precedence?, raija d
    • Re: Precedence?, Everett M. Greene
      • Re: Precedence?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Precedence?, raija d
      • Re: Precedence?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Precedence?, raija d
      • Re: Precedence?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Precedence?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Precedence?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Precedence?, Everett M. Greene
      • Re: Precedence?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Precedence?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Precedence?, Everett M. Greene
      • Re: Precedence?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Precedence?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Precedence?, John Crinnion
• Honolulu Nationals--Questions Answered, Mark B.
  • Re: Honolulu Nationals--Questions Answered, Mmbridge
    • Re: Honolulu Nationals--Questions Answered, Mark B.
• An XXXXXXX auction, frisbieinstein
  • Re: An XXXXXXX auction, Charlie
• London Times bridge column, 24th August, Dave Flower
  • Re: London Times bridge column, 24th August, stefan f.
• Nickell Team Disbanding?, Mark Jones
  • Re: Nickell Team Disbanding?, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Nickell Team Disbanding?, Mmbridge
    • Re: Nickell Team Disbanding?, Nadreck
      • Re: Nickell Team Disbanding?, John Schuler
      • Re: Nickell Team Disbanding?, Nadreck
      • Re: Nickell Team Disbanding?, mghmaine
      • Re: Nickell Team Disbanding?, Nadreck
• Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", ted
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Bob Lipton
    • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Bob Lipton
      • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", coj
    • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Knemon
      • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", coj
      • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Knemon
      • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", coj
      • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Knemon
      • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Stephen Fischer
    • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Charles Brenner
    • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", John R. Mayne
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", raija d
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", ewleongusa
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", mghmaine
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", neilkaz
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", coj
    • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Andrew
    • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", mghmaine
    • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Will in New Haven
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Andrew
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", ted
    • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Andrew
    • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", Will in New Haven
    • Re: Yet another "What do you do against this preempt?", ewleongusa
• 12-14 NT auction, David Breton
  • Re: 12-14 NT auction, Travis Crump
  • Re: 12-14 NT auction, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: 12-14 NT auction, Bob Lipton
  • Re: 12-14 NT auction, mghmaine
  • Re: 12-14 NT auction, ewleongusa
  • Re: 12-14 NT auction, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: 12-14 NT auction, Will in New Haven
    • Re: 12-14 NT auction, Kent Feiler
  • Re: 12-14 NT auction, David Breton
• Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Phil
  • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Ron Johnson
  • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", ewleongusa
  • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Stu Goodgold
  • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Dave Flower
    • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Ron Johnson
  • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Dave Flower
  • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", raija d
  • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Lorne
    • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", gandalfnf
  • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Dave Flower
      • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Fielding "Garbage Stayman", Michael Angelo Ravera
• Best games in San Francisco and Palo Alto area??, Neill Currie
  • Re: Best games in San Francisco and Palo Alto area??, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: Best games in San Francisco and Palo Alto area??, WurfWeiten
    • Re: Best games in San Francisco and Palo Alto area??, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Best games in San Francisco and Palo Alto area??, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Best games in San Francisco and Palo Alto area??, Elianna
      • Re: Best games in San Francisco and Palo Alto area??, Phil C
      • Re: Best games in San Francisco and Palo Alto area??, Collins
      • Re: Best games in San Francisco and Palo Alto area??, Steve Willner
• Penalties - European Team Championships, etsand
  • Re: Penalties - European Team Championships, raija d
    • Re: Penalties - European Team Championships, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Penalties - European Team Championships, Lorne
    • Re: Penalties - European Team Championships, David Stevenson
• Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, Jordan
  • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, henrysun909
  • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, scyardman
  • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, Andrew
  • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, Phil C
  • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, ewleongusa
    • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, Jordan
      • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, henrysun909
      • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Decisions from a Matchpoint Session, 8/22/06, henrysun909
• Lead against 5Dx, jas1959
  • Re: Lead against 5Dx, mghmaine
  • Re: Lead against 5Dx, Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: Lead against 5Dx, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Lead against 5Dx, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Lead against 5Dx, neilkaz
  • Re: Lead against 5Dx, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Lead against 5Dx, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Lead against 5Dx, ewleongusa
  • Re: Lead against 5Dx (the full deal), jas1959
    • Re: Lead against 5Dx (the full deal), Robert Tamlyn
    • Re: Lead against 5Dx (the full deal), Bob Lipton
    • Re: Lead against 5Dx (the full deal), ewleongusa
  • Re: Lead against 5Dx, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Lead against 5Dx, Free
• Relays over 1C in ACBL, Nick Hughes
  • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, mghmaine
    • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, PriorKnowledge
      • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, Nick Hughes
      • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, David Stevenson
    • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, mghmaine
      • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, gandalfnf
    • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, Nick Hughes
  • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, Eric Landau
      • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, David Stevenson
      • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Relays over 1C in ACBL, Steve Willner
• Two bidding problems from local club......, Bud H
  • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, Jyrki Lahtonen
  • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, Dave Flower
  • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, mghmaine
  • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, David Stevenson
  • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, MadDragon
  • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, Jeffrey Turner
  • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, Richard Lawson
  • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, ewleongusa
    • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, ewleongusa
      • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, Bud H
      • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, frisbieinstein
    • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, Bud H
  • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, Chris Newton
  • Re: Two bidding problems from local club......, rhm
• quick revoke ruling question, Phil
  • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Barry Margolin
  • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Steve Willner
    • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Steve Willner
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Tamuel
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Sven Pran
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Tamuel
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, David Stevenson
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, David Stevenson
  • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Dave Flower
    • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Phil
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Dave Flower
    • Re: quick revoke ruling question, David Stevenson
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Barry Margolin
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, David Stevenson
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Barry Margolin
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Sven Pran
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, David Stevenson
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Barry Margolin
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, raija d
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, David Stevenson
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Steve Willner
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Sven Pran
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, raija d
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Sven Pran
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, David Stevenson
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Sven Pran
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, David Stevenson
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Sven Pran
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Eddie Grove
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Sven Pran
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Amarande
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Sven Pran
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, David Stevenson
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, David Stevenson
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, raija d
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, David Stevenson
      • Re: quick revoke ruling question, Tamuel
• agreements on bids opposite a support double, David Babcock
  • Re: agreements on bids opposite a support double, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: agreements on bids opposite a support double, David Babcock
      • Re: agreements on bids opposite a support double, Slammer
      • Re: agreements on bids opposite a support double, Bud H
      • Re: agreements on bids opposite a support double, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: agreements on bids opposite a support double, raija d
• Is it "HUM"???, Histriadogsilver
  • Re: Is it "HUM"???, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: Is it "HUM"???, Sven Pran
    • Re: Is it "HUM"???, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Is it "HUM"???, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Is it "HUM"???, Piotr Radzikowski
    • Re: Is it "HUM"???, Sven Pran
    • Re: Is it "HUM"???, henrysun909
      • Re: Is it "HUM"???, MartinRJCarpenter
      • Re: Is it "HUM"???, Piotr Radzikowski
• pls fill in the gaps here, Nick Hughes
  • Re: pls fill in the gaps here, Dave Flower
    • Re: pls fill in the gaps here, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: pls fill in the gaps here, Bob Lipton
  • Re: pls fill in the gaps here, Andrew
  • Re: pls fill in the gaps here, henrysun909
    • Re: pls fill in the gaps here, Nick Hughes
      • Re: pls fill in the gaps here, henrysun909
• What now?, Michiel
  • Re: What now?, ewleongusa
    • Re: What now?, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: What now?, Frances
  • Re: What now?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: What now?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: What now?, ted
      • Re: What now?, Travis Crump
      • Re: What now?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: What now?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: What now?, Michiel
    • Re: What now?, frisbieinstein
  • Re: What now?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What now?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: What now?, Kieran Dyke
• another support double or not., Douglas Newlands
  • Re: another support double or not., Bob Lipton
  • Re: another support double or not., Gary Seckinger
    • Re: another support double or not., Douglas Newlands
      • Re: another support double or not., Barry Margolin
      • Re: another support double or not., Frances
      • Re: another support double or not., Steve Willner
  • Re: another support double or not., Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: another support double or not., Arthur Hoffman
  • Re: another support double or not., Andrew
• The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 41, Richard Lawson
  • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 41, Bud H
    • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 41, Richard Lawson
• about prism signals, underruff@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: about prism signals, Lorne
  • Re: about prism signals, mghmaine
    • Re: about prism signals, John Sheehan
      • Re: about prism signals, John Sheehan
      • Re: about prism signals, John Sheehan
    • Re: about prism signals, Lorne
    • Re: about prism signals, jsher
      • Re: about prism signals, Lorne
      • Re: about prism signals, henrysun909
• Transfer to the opponent's suit, raija d
  • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, Free
  • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, scyardman
  • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, Lorne
  • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, Frances
  • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, Neill Currie
    • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Transfer to the opponent's fruit, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, Douglas Newlands
      • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, Marvin French
      • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, Marvin French
      • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, Kent Feiler
      • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, David Stevenson
  • Re: Transfer to the opponent's suit, David Stevenson
• Moscito 2005: 2D and 2NT opening., frisbieinstein
  • Re: Moscito 2005: 2D and 2NT opening., Free
    • Re: Moscito 2005: 2D and 2NT opening., frisbieinstein
      • Re: Moscito 2005: 2D and 2NT opening., Free
  • Re: Moscito 2005: 2D and 2NT opening., Denis O'Kane
  • Re: Moscito 2005: 2D and 2NT opening., richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Moscito 2005: 2D and 2NT opening., Alex Martelli
  • Re: Moscito 2005: 2D and 2NT opening., Ivan Popivanov
• books about bidding,play...!, underruff@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: books about bidding,play...!, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: books about bidding,play...!, underruff@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: books about bidding,play...!, Bas van Gils
      • Re: books about bidding,play...!, Dave Flower
      • Re: books about bidding,play...!, Bob Lipton
  • Re: books about bidding,play...!, frisbieinstein
  • Re: books about bidding,play...!, Gary Seckinger
• To open or not, Your rating?, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, coj
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, scyardman
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, petkob
    • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Otis Bricker
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, ted
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Phil
    • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, raija d
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, John R. Mayne
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, ewleongusa
    • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Dave Flower
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, gandalfnf
    • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Andrew
      • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Otis Bricker
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, rhm
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Lorne
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Phil C
  • Re: To open or not, Your rating?, Andrew
• Supportdouble or not?, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: Supportdouble or not?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Supportdouble or not?, scyardman
  • Re: Supportdouble or not?, coj
  • Re: Supportdouble or not?, raija d
  • Re: Supportdouble or not?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Supportdouble or not?, Lorne
    • Re: Supportdouble or not?, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Supportdouble or not?, Adam Beneschan
• Is this a preemptive call?, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, coj
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, scyardman
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, ted
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, raija d
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, John R. Mayne
    • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Lorne
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, MartinRJCarpenter
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, mghmaine
    • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, mghmaine
      • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, raija d
      • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Charlie
    • Re: Is this a preemptive call?, Chris Ryall
• Drury, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: Drury, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Drury, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Drury, Barry Margolin
      • LOTT (was Re: Drury), Alex Martelli
  • Re: Drury, scyardman
  • Re: Drury, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Drury, coj
    • Re: Drury, John D'Errico
  • Re: Drury, paulhigh
  • Re: Drury, raija d
  • Re: Drury, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Drury, frisbieinstein
    • Re: Drury, raija d
  • Re: Drury, Andrew
  • Re: Drury, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Drury, raija d
      • Re: Drury, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Drury, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Drury, Kent Feiler
      • Re: Drury, Andrew
      • Re: Drury, Kent Feiler
      • Re: Drury, Andrew
      • Re: Drury, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Drury, raija d
  • Re: Drury, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Drury, Sid
  • Re: Drury - 4th seat?, Kent Feiler
    • Re: Drury - 4th seat?, Andrew
  • Re: Drury, Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: Drury, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Drury, Robert Tamlyn
• bridge club design, fred
  • Re: bridge club design, Chris Newton
  • Re: bridge club design, ted
    • Re: bridge club design, Marvin French
      • Re: bridge club design, Otis Bricker
      • Re: bridge club design, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: bridge club design, David Stevenson
  • Re: bridge club design, stefan f.
  • Re: bridge club design, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: bridge club design, Mark Brader
      • Re: bridge club design, Dave Flower
      • Re: bridge club design, David Babcock
      • Re: bridge club design, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: bridge club design, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: bridge club design, raija d
  • Re: bridge club design, Elianna
• computer bidding, denizyuret
  • Re: computer bidding, frisbieinstein
• How good is this Grand Slam (and how to play it)?, Martin Reid
  • Re: How good is this Grand Slam (and how to play it)?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: How good is this Grand Slam (and how to play it)?, Eddie Grove
  • Re: How good is this Grand Slam (and how to play it)?, rhm
    • Re: How good is this Grand Slam (and how to play it)?, rhm
    • Re: How good is this Grand Slam (and how to play it)?, rhm
      • Re: How good is this Grand Slam (and how to play it)?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: How good is this Grand Slam (and how to play it)?, rhm
      • Re: How good is this Grand Slam (and how to play it)?, Charles Brenner
  • Re: How good is this Grand Slam (and how to play it)?, Charles Brenner
  • Re: How good is this Grand Slam (and how to play it)?, ewleongusa
    • Re: How good is this Grand Slam (and how to play it)?, rhm
• Was it luck?, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Was it luck?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Was it luck?, ewleongusa
• Bidding Box Query, r_lane_c_contacos
  • Re: Bidding Box Query, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Bidding Box Query, Hank Youngerman
    • Re: Bidding Box Query, Sven Pran
  • Re: Bidding Box Query, David Stevenson
• St Louis NABC, Marvin French
• Sensing a pattern, Kevin Podsiadlik
  • Re: Sensing a pattern, ewleongusa
    • Re: Sensing a pattern, Kevin Podsiadlik
      • Re: Sensing a pattern, ewleongusa
      • Re: Sensing a pattern, Kevin Podsiadlik
      • Re: Sensing a pattern, paulhigh
    • Re: Sensing a pattern, Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: Sensing a pattern, ewleongusa
    • Re: Sensing a pattern, gandalfnf
      • Re: Sensing a pattern, ewleongusa
  • Re: Sensing a pattern, coj
    • Re: Sensing a pattern, mghmaine
  • Re: Sensing a pattern, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Sensing a pattern, raija d
  • Re: Sensing a pattern, gandalfnf
  • Re: Sensing a pattern, Phil C
    • Re: Sensing a pattern, Kevin Podsiadlik
      • Re: Sensing a pattern, ewleongusa
  • Re: Sensing a pattern, paulhigh
  • Re: Sensing a pattern, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Sensing a pattern, Free
• MP strategy?, Everett M. Greene
  • Re: MP strategy?, Phil C
  • Re: MP strategy?, ewleongusa
    • Re: MP strategy?, mghmaine
    • Re: MP strategy?, peter koch
      • Re: MP strategy?, ewleongusa
  • Re: MP strategy?, gandalfnf
  • Re: MP strategy?, Bud H
  • Re: MP strategy?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: MP strategy?, Sandy E. Barnes
• Bidding problem - 8/19/06, Amarande
  • Re: Bidding problem - 8/19/06, henrysun909
  • Re: Bidding problem - 8/19/06, ewleongusa
    • Re: Bidding problem - 8/19/06, ted
      • Re: Bidding problem - 8/19/06, ewleongusa
  • Re: Bidding problem - 8/19/06, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Bidding problem - 8/19/06, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Bidding problem - 8/19/06, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Bidding problem - 8/19/06, Sandy E. Barnes
• What is your action?, Craig
  • Re: What is your action?, coj
    • Re: What is your action?, Craig
  • Re: What is your action?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: What is your action?, mghmaine
  • Re: What is your action?, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: What is your action?, ewleongusa
      • Re: What is your action?, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: What is your action?, ewleongusa
    • Re: What is your action?, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: What is your action?, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: What is your action?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: What is your action?, Travis Crump
  • Re: What is your action?, ted
  • Re: What is your action?, raija d
    • Re: What is your action?, coj
  • Re: What is your action?, Phil C
    • Re: What is your action?, Craig
      • Re: What is your action?, ted
      • Re: What is your action?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: What is your action?, Phil C
      • Re: What is your action?, ewleongusa
      • Re: What is your action?, ewleongusa
      • Re: What is your action?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: What is your action?, gandalfnf
    • Re: What is your action?, ewleongusa
      • Re: What is your action?, rhm
  • Re: What is your action?, frisbieinstein
    • Re: What is your action?, ewleongusa
      • Re: What is your action?, frisbieinstein
      • Re: What is your action?, ewleongusa
      • Re: What is your action?, frisbieinstein
      • Re: What is your action?, Craig
      • Re: What is your action?, Phil C
      • Re: What is your action?, ewleongusa
      • Re: What is your action?, Phil C
      • Re: What is your action?, Craig
      • Re: What is your action?, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: What is your action?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: What is your action?, Sandy E. Barnes
• Accepting a transfer :), Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Accepting a transfer :), Bob Lipton
  • Re: Accepting a transfer :), Gary Seckinger
    • Re: Accepting a transfer :), Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Accepting a transfer :), Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Accepting a transfer :), Phil C
  • Re: Accepting a transfer :), ted
  • Re: Accepting a transfer :), ewleongusa
    • Re: Accepting a transfer :), Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: Accepting a transfer :), ewleongusa
      • Re: Accepting a transfer :), Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: Accepting a transfer :), ewleongusa
      • Re: Accepting a transfer :), Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: Accepting a transfer :), ewleongusa
    • Re: Accepting a transfer :), axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Accepting a transfer :), John D'Errico
  • Re: Accepting a transfer :), scyardman
  • Re: Accepting a transfer :), henrysun909
  • Re: Accepting a transfer :), Sandy E. Barnes
• Which major raise should I choose?, mauer@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, gandalfnf
      • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, Robert Tamlyn
    • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, coj
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, mghmaine
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, ttw
    • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, gandalfnf
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, ted
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, raija d
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, gandalfnf
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, Phil C
    • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, hammberry
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, Fitzroy
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, scyardman
    • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, Phil C
    • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Which major raise should I choose?, Sandy E. Barnes
• Assess the blame...., Slammer
  • Re: Assess the blame...., ted
  • Re: Assess the blame...., Andrew
  • Re: Assess the blame...., Bob Lipton
    • Re: Assess the blame...., Bob Lipton
  • Re: Assess the blame...., ewleongusa
  • Re: Assess the blame...., coj
    • Re: Assess the blame...., Chris Newton
  • Re: Assess the blame...., Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Assess the blame...., Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Assess the blame...., Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Assess the blame...., John D'Errico
  • Re: Assess the blame...., Steve Willner
  • Re: Assess the blame...., Mitch Edelman
• ., John Crinnion
• Yuch!, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Yuch!, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Yuch!, ted
    • Re: Yuch!, coj
    • Re: Yuch!, gandalfnf
      • Re: Yuch!, ted
      • Re: Yuch!, Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: Yuch!, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Yuch!, Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: Yuch!, Travis Crump
    • Re: Yuch!, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Yuch!, ewleongusa
      • Re: Yuch!, Nick Hughes
      • Re: Yuch!, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Yuch!, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Yuch!, coj
  • Re: Yuch!, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Yuch!, henrysun909
  • Re: Yuch!, Phil C
  • Re: Yuch!, scyardman
  • Re: Yuch!, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Yuch!, raija d
  • Re: Yuch!, ewleongusa
  • Re: Yuch!, Steve Willner
  • Re: Yuch!, akhare1@xxxxxxxxxxx
• How would You rate this?, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: How would You rate this?, Dave Flower
    • Re: How would You rate this?, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: How would You rate this?, Lorne
  • Re: How would You rate this?, rhm
  • Re: How would You rate this?, rhm
  • Re: How would You rate this?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: How would You rate this?, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: How would You rate this?, ted
  • Re: How would You rate this?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: How would You rate this?, Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: How would You rate this?, Ville Likitalo
    • Re: How would You rate this?, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: How would You rate this?, mghmaine
  • Re: How would You rate this?, ewleongusa
    • Re: How would You rate this?, Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: How would You rate this?, ewleongusa
  • Re: How would You rate this?, Phil C
  • Re: How would You rate this?, scyardman
    • Re: How would You rate this?, Dave Flower
      • Re: How would You rate this?, rhm
      • Re: How would You rate this?, rhm
      • Re: How would You rate this?, scyardman
      • Re: How would You rate this?, darint
      • Re: How would You rate this?, rhm
      • Re: How would You rate this?, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: How would You rate this?, rhm
      • Re: How would You rate this?, rhm
      • Re: How would You rate this?, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: How would You rate this?, rhm
      • Re: How would You rate this?, Dave Flower
      • Re: How would You rate this?, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: How would You rate this?, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: How would You rate this?, Dave Flower
  • Re: How would You rate this?, Steve Willner
  • Re: How would You rate this?, Dave Flower
    • Re: How would You rate this?, rhm
• CRO (Ghesthem?) vs Michaels, jas1959
  • Re: CRO (Ghesthem?) vs Michaels, Lorne
  • Re: CRO (Ghesthem?) vs Michaels, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: CRO (Ghesthem?) vs Michaels, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: CRO (Ghesthem?) vs Michaels, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: CRO (Ghesthem?) vs Michaels, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: CRO (Ghesthem?) vs Michaels, Chris Ryall
      • Re: CRO (Ghesthem?) vs Michaels, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: CRO (Ghesthem?) vs Michaels, Bas van Gils
• Part-Score Play Problem, jas1959
  • Re: Part-Score Play Problem, ted
    • Re: Part-Score Play Problem, Charles Brenner
• Follow ups to weak 2s in competition, Collins
  • Re: Follow ups to weak 2s in competition, scyardman
  • Re: Follow ups to weak 2s in competition, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Follow ups to weak 2s in competition, henrysun909
  • Re: Follow ups to weak 2s in competition, Phil C
  • Re: Follow ups to weak 2s in competition, John Schuler
    • Re: Follow ups to weak 2s in competition, Lorne
    • Re: Follow ups to weak 2s in competition, Phil C
• Why is SAYC good?, tomsalinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, tomsalinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, ted
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, tomsalinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Hans Georg Schaathun
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Gerardo Malazdrewicz
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Hans Georg Schaathun
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Otis Bricker
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, tomsalinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, John Hall
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, tomsalinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, tomsalinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Hans Georg Schaathun
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Amarande
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, tomsalinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, tomsalinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, John D'Errico
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, pgmer6809
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, henrysun909
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Neil
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, tomsalinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Hans Georg Schaathun
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Nigel
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Free
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Sid
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Derek Broughton
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, raija d
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Free
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Lorne
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Hans Georg Schaathun
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Amarande
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Hans Georg Schaathun
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Amarande
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Hans Georg Schaathun
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, raija d
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, paulhigh
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, tomsalinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Steve Willner
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Marvin French
      • Re: Why is SAYC good?, Steve Willner
    • Re: Why is SAYC good?, tomsalinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Any ideas on what this bid means?, henrysun909
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, pfriedmanNoSpam
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Andrew
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, ted
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, raija d
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Ron Johnson
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, ewleongusa
      • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Lorne
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, henrysun909
    • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, scyardman
      • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, henrysun909
      • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Duane Christensen
      • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, Lorne
    • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, frisbieinstein
    • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, henrysun909
  • Re: Any ideas on what this bid means?, PriorKnowledge
• Re: Bart Question, Micha Keijzers
• Re: Controlled psyche?, Micha Keijzers
  • Re: Controlled psyche?, mghmaine
• A puzzling bid... Full Disclosure, frisbieinstein
  • Re: A puzzling bid... Full Disclosure, nige1
  • Re: A puzzling bid... Full Disclosure, ted
• Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, henrysun909
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Mark Dean
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, coj
    • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Andrew
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, jrw
    • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Piotr Radzikowski
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Dave Flower
    • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Dave Flower
      • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, raija d
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Ville Likitalo
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, mghmaine
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, ted
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Derek Broughton
    • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, raija d
    • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Lorne
    • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, ewleongusa
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, scyardman
    • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Phil C
      • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, scyardman
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, henrysun909
    • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Phil C
    • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, ewleongusa
    • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, scyardman
      • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, raija d
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Free
    • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, ted
      • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Free
  • Re: Rate this MPs preempt, red vs red, Piotr Radzikowski
• another mysterious double, Mark Dean
  • Re: another mysterious double, mghmaine
    • Re: another mysterious double, coj
  • Re: another mysterious double, raija d
  • Re: another mysterious double, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: another mysterious double, Bob Lipton
      • Re: another mysterious double, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: another mysterious double, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: another mysterious double, paulhigh
    • Re: another mysterious double, Kent Feiler
  • Re: another mysterious double, Andrew
  • Re: another mysterious double, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: another mysterious double, MadDragon
  • Re: another mysterious double, ted
  • Re: another mysterious double, ewleongusa
• Opener's rebid after a pre-empt, Phil
  • Re: Opener's rebid after a pre-empt, scyardman
  • Re: Opener's rebid after a pre-empt, Phil C
  • Re: Opener's rebid after a pre-empt, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Opener's rebid after a pre-empt, raija d
  • Re: Opener's rebid after a pre-empt, ewleongusa
    • Re: Opener's rebid after a pre-empt, Eddie Grove
  • Re: Opener's rebid after a pre-empt, Mark Dean
  • Re: Opener's rebid after a pre-empt, Andrew
• "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Phil
  • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, raija d
      • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, ted
    • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Barry Margolin
  • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Sid
    • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Phil
      • Re: "Invisible cuebids" alertable in ACBL?, Adam Beneschan
• Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, outsourcingbusiness
  • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, outsourcingbusiness
  • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, Hank Youngerman
    • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, outsourcingbusiness
  • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, Kamal
    • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, outsourcingbusiness
  • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, raija d
    • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, outsourcingbusiness
  • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, usawargamer@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, ted
      • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, outsourcingbusiness
      • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, peter koch
    • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, outsourcingbusiness
      • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, Phil C
      • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, outsourcingbusiness
      • Re: Can anyone please suggest the Best bridge software available, Alex Martelli
• A hand from the past, Dave Flower
  • Re: A hand from the past, John Hall
  • Re: A hand from the past, Bob Lipton
  • Re: A hand from the past, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: A hand from the past, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: A hand from the past, Dave Flower
    • Re: A hand from the past, ewleongusa
  • Re: A hand from the past, Piotr Radzikowski
  • Re: A hand from the past, mghmaine
  • Re: A hand from the past, frisbieinstein
  • Re: A hand from the past, ted
  • Re: A hand from the past, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: A hand from the past, raija d
  • Re: A hand from the past, nige1
  • Re: A hand from the past, Pubkeybreaker
• A puzzling bid, frisbieinstein
  • Re: A puzzling bid, Dave Flower
    • Re: A puzzling bid, Sid
      • Re: A puzzling bid, Dave Flower
      • Re: A puzzling bid, John D'Errico
  • Re: A puzzling bid, John Hall
    • Re: A puzzling bid, Piotr Radzikowski
    • Re: A puzzling bid, frisbieinstein
      • Re: A puzzling bid, John Hall
    • Re: A puzzling bid, raija d
      • Re: A puzzling bid, Phil C
  • Re: A puzzling bid, Bob Lipton
  • Re: A puzzling bid, mghmaine
  • Re: A puzzling bid, Piotr Radzikowski
  • Re: A puzzling bid, ted
  • Re: A puzzling bid, ewleongusa
  • Re: A puzzling bid, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: A puzzling bid, Arthur Hoffman
  • Re: A puzzling bid: the rebid, frisbieinstein
    • Re: A puzzling bid: the rebid, Dave Flower
• Play problem from European, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Play problem from European, Nick at Trumps
  • Re: Play problem from European, Lorne
    • Re: Play problem from European: outcome, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: Play problem from European: outcome, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Play problem from European, Slammer
• Miscounting in European Championships, Sid
  • Re: Miscounting in European Championships, Ted Hwa
  • Re: Miscounting in European Championships, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Miscounting in European Championships, Lorne
    • Re: Miscounting in European Championships, raija d
      • Re: Miscounting in European Championships, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Disclosure, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Disclosure, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: Disclosure, mghmaine
    • Re: Disclosure, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: Disclosure, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Disclosure, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Message not available
      • Re: Disclosure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Disclosure, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Disclosure, Lorne
    • Re: Disclosure, Andrew
  • Re: Disclosure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Disclosure, Steve Willner
• Bidding, 8-14-06, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, neilkaz
  • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, Bud H
  • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, John R. Mayne
    • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, Phil C
  • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, paulhigh
  • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, gandalfnf
  • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, MadDragon
  • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, ted
  • Re: Bidding, 8-14-06, Sandy E. Barnes
• Rebid Problem, 8-14-06, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06, coj
  • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06, gandalfnf
  • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06, mghmaine
  • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06, MadDragon
  • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06, ted
  • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06 - partner's hand, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06 - partner's hand, Phil C
    • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06 - partner's hand, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06 - partner's hand, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06 - partner's hand, coj
    • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06 - partner's hand, mghmaine
      • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06 - partner's hand, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Rebid Problem, 8-14-06 - partner's hand, ewleongusa
• Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Kapil Bhalla
  • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Marvin French
    • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Hans Georg Schaathun
      • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, raija d
      • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Kapil Bhalla
      • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, raija d
      • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Kapil Bhalla
  • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Dave Flower
    • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, mghmaine
    • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Dave Flower
  • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Bud H
    • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Nigel
  • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Hank Youngerman
    • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Lorne
  • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, gandalfnf
  • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, nige1
  • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, jrw
    • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, nige1
  • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Steve Willner
    • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Mike Amos
      • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Director's and Appeal's committee ruling, Steve Willner
• Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, mghmaine
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, coj
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, ewleongusa
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, Lorne
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, coj
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, paulhigh
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, Bud H
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06, ted
  • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06 - the result, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06 - the result, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Bidding Hand, 8-14-06 - the result, coj
• Interesting play problem, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Interesting play problem, mghmaine
  • Re: Interesting play problem, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: Interesting play problem, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Interesting play problem, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Interesting play problem, rhm
  • Re: Interesting play problem, rhm
  • Re: Interesting play problem - the result, Sandy E. Barnes
• Mind Sports Olympiad - "Russian" bridge events, andy . bowles
  • Re: Mind Sports Olympiad - "Russian" bridge events, Hank Youngerman
• Unblock?, Phil C
  • Re: Unblock?, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: Unblock?, ted
  • Re: Unblock?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Unblock?, Phil C
      • Re: Unblock?, ewleongusa
      • Re: Unblock?, Phil C
• BLML, Marvin French
  • Re: BLML, Adam Beneschan
• What do you return?, lifemonster
  • Re: What do you return?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: What do you return?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: What do you return?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: What do you return?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: What do you return?, ted
    • Re: What do you return?, lifemonster
  • Re: What do you return?, ted
  • Re: What do you return?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: What do you return?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What do you return?, Dave Flower
  • Re: What do you return?, Phil C
  • Re: What do you return?, ewleongusa
    • Re: What do you return?, Phil C
      • Re: What do you return?, ewleongusa
      • Re: What do you return?, Phil C
    • Re: What do you return?, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: What do you return?, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: What do you return?, Tim DeLaney
    • Re: What do you return?, raija d
      • Re: What do you return?, ewleongusa
      • Re: What do you return?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: What do you return?, Eddie Grove
  • Re: What do you return?, Lorne
  • Re: What do you return?, Tim DeLaney
• Bridge Today, David Babcock
  • Re: Bridge Today, Denis O'Kane
    • Re: Bridge Today, coj
      • Re: Bridge Today, David Babcock
• This bid...., frisbieinstein
  • Re: This bid...., Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: This bid...., frisbieinstein
    • Re: This bid...., Kieran Dyke
  • Re: This bid...., vlastimil
  • Re: This bid...., ewleongusa
• Your bid - part 1, Michiel
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, frisbieinstein
    • Re: Your bid - part 1, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Your bid - part 1, mghmaine
    • Re: Your bid - part 1, raija d
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Ville Likitalo
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Your bid - part 1, ted
    • Re: Your bid - part 1, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, ted
    • Re: Your bid - part 1, Phil C
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, neilkaz
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, ewleongusa
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, raija d
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Lorne
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Dave Flower
    • Re: Your bid - part 1, Michiel
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Your bid - part 1, Michiel
      • Re: Your bid - part 1, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Your bid - part 1, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Your bid - part 1, mghmaine
      • Re: Your bid - part 1, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Your bid - part 1, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Your bid - part 1, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Your bid - part 1, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Your bid - part 1, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Your bid - part 1, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Bud H
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Your bid - part 1, Kamal
• Dealing the cards, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Dealing the cards, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: Dealing the cards, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Tamuel
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Hans Georg Schaathun
  • Re: Dealing the cards, Stig Holmquist
    • Re: Dealing the cards, Stu Goodgold
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Ron Johnson
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Tamuel
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Dealing the cards, ted
    • Re: Dealing the cards, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Dealing the cards, ted
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Steve Willner
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Sven Pran
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Sven Pran
  • Re: Dealing the cards, Everett M. Greene
    • Re: Dealing the cards, John Gabbriel
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Dealing the cards, frisbieinstein
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Everett M. Greene
  • Re: Dealing the cards, Travis Crump
    • Re: Dealing the cards, Free
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Sven Pran
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Amarande
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Dealing the cards, dtouie
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Sven Pran
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Mark Brader
      • Re: Dealing the cards, frisbieinstein
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Steve Willner
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Sven Pran
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Sven Pran
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Steve Willner
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Dealing the cards, Phil
    • Re: Dealing the cards, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Dealing the cards, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Dealing the cards, Barry Margolin
• European Championships, Michiel
  • Re: European Championships, Leo Jongens
    • Re: European Championships, Michiel
  • Re: European Championships, Richard Pavlicek
    • Re: European Championships, Michiel
    • Re: European Championships, Ron Johnson
• A few local Swiss team questions, Bud H
  • A few local Swiss team questions (correction to #4), Bud H
    • Re: A few local Swiss team questions (correction to #4), Bill Jacobs
    • Re: A few local Swiss team questions (correction to #4), John R. Mayne
    • Re: A few local Swiss team questions (correction to #4), ted
    • Re: A few local Swiss team questions (correction to #4), Ronald J Koshoshek
  • Re: A few local Swiss team questions, Otis Bricker
  • Re: A few local Swiss team questions, Bob Lipton
  • Re: A few local Swiss team questions, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: A few local Swiss team questions, Phil C
• Swiss Teams with Hand records logistics, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Swiss Teams with Hand records logistics, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Swiss Teams with Hand records logistics, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Swiss Teams with Hand records logistics, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Swiss Teams with Hand records logistics, Michael Angelo Ravera
• Do much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid?, Bud H
  • How much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid? (correction), Bud H
    • Re: How much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid? (correction), scyardman
      • Re: How much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid? (correction), Will in New Haven
    • Re: How much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid? (correction), Ronald J Koshoshek
  • Re: Do much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid?, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Do much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid?, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Do much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid?, John Blubaugh
    • Re: Do much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid?, scyardman
  • Re: Do much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Do much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid?, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Do much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid?, Ron Johnson
    • Re: Do much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid?, Bud H
  • Re: Do much do you adjust your standards for invitations after partner's overcall instead of opening bid?, paulhigh
• Bidding game with Russian Scoring, frisbieinstein
• A couple of matchpoint problems, Travis Crump
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, coj
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, scyardman
    • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, coj
      • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, scyardman
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Alex Martelli
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Bud H
    • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Alex Martelli
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, John R. Mayne
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, raija d
    • Re: Oops! A couple of matchpoint problems, raija d
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, mghmaine
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, ted
    • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Otis Bricker
      • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, ted
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Phil C
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Hank Youngerman
    • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Sid
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Otis Bricker
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Bob Lipton
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Charles Brenner
    • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Otis Bricker
      • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Charles Brenner
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Travis Crump
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, frisbieinstein
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, ewleongusa
      • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: A couple of matchpoint problems, Sid
• How to Bid the Following?, IF
  • Re: How to Bid the Following?, mghmaine
    • Re: How to Bid the Following?, Bud H
      • Re: How to Bid the Following?, rhm
  • Re: How to Bid the Following?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: How to Bid the Following?, raija d
  • Re: How to Bid the Following?, Ron Sperber
  • Re: How to Bid the Following?, Sandy E. Barnes
• What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, rhm
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, scyardman
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Otis Bricker
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, John Blubaugh
    • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, henrysun909
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, John Blubaugh
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Andrew
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Otis Bricker
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Will in New Haven
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, mghmaine
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Otis Bricker
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Andrew
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, John Blubaugh
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, John Blubaugh
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Will in New Haven
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, henrysun909
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Will in New Haven
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Bob Lipton
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Kent Feiler
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Will in New Haven
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, David Stevenson
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, ted
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Bob Lipton
    • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Will in New Haven
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, John Blubaugh
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Andrew
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, raija d
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, coj
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Mark Dean
    • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, John Blubaugh
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, ted
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, John Blubaugh
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, ewleongusa
    • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, rhm
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, ewleongusa
      • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, Otis Bricker
  • Re: What do you bid, part 2 . Apportion of blame, dmatt
• The Jassem Convention, frisbieinstein
  • Re: The Jassem Convention, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: The Jassem Convention, Robert Tamlyn
    • Re: The Jassem Convention, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: The Jassem Convention, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: The Jassem Convention, Marvin French
      • Re: The Jassem Convention, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: The Jassem Convention, Travis Crump
      • Re: The Jassem Convention, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: The Jassem Convention, nige1
    • Re: The Jassem Convention, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: The Jassem Convention, djneill
• How would you get to the "right" slam?, Ashok
  • Re: How would you get to the "right" slam?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: How would you get to the "right" slam?, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: How would you get to the "right" slam?, raija d
  • Re: How would you get to the "right" slam?, ewleongusa
  • Re: How would you get to the "right" slam?, goffster
  • Re: How would you get to the "right" slam?, frisbieinstein
• How would you continue after this interference?, Ashok
  • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, gandalfnf
  • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, ted
    • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, Bud H
  • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, raija d
    • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, Sven Pran
      • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, raija d
    • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, mghmaine
      • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, Alex Martelli
  • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, ewleongusa
  • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, goffster
  • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: How would you continue after this interference?, Tom S
• Too high, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: Too high, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Too high, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Too high, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Too high, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Too high, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Too high, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Too high, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Too high, Michiel
      • Re: Too high, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Too high, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Too high, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Too high, Phil C
    • Re: Too high, Michiel
      • Re: Too high, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Too high, Michiel
      • Re: Too high, Hans Georg Schaathun
    • Re: Too high, Mark Dean
    • Re: Too high, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Too high, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Too high, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Too high, gandalfnf
    • Re: Too high, Hans Georg Schaathun
  • Re: Too high, goffster
  • Re: Too high, ewleongusa
    • Re: Too high, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Too high, ted
  • Re: Too high, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Too high, mghmaine
  • Re: Too high, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Too high, Hans Georg Schaathun
      • Re: Too high, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Too high, Hans Georg Schaathun
      • Re: Too high, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Too high, KWSchneider
    • Re: Too high, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Too high, KWSchneider
      • Re: Too high, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Too high, coj
      • Re: Too high, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Too high, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Too high, ewleongusa
    • Re: Too high, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Too high, ewleongusa
  • Re: Too high, Mark Dean
  • Re: Too high, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Too high, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Too high, nige1
• What would you bid?, rhm
  • Re: What would you bid?, vlastimil
    • Re: What would you bid?, gandalfnf
  • Re: What would you bid?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What would you bid?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: What would you bid?, raija d
    • Re: What would you bid?, rhm
      • Re: What would you bid?, Andrew
      • Re: What would you bid?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: What would you bid?, ewleongusa
    • Re: What would you bid?, Phil C
  • Re: What would you bid?, ted
  • Re: What would you bid?, coj
  • Re: What would you bid?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: What would you bid?, Andrew
  • Re: What would you bid?, goffster
  • Re: What would you bid?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: What would you bid?, Sandy E. Barnes
• Squeeze or no squeeze?, Bud H
  • Re: Squeeze or no squeeze?, Andrew
  • Re: Squeeze or no squeeze?, Nick at Trumps
    • Re: Squeeze or no squeeze?, Bud H
• A Theory that is Mine, Will in New Haven
  • Re: A Theory that is Mine, Derek Broughton
  • Re: A Theory that is Mine, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: A Theory that is Mine, stevts
  • Re: A Theory that is Mine, rhm
    • Re: A Theory that is Mine, Will in New Haven
      • Re: A Theory that is Mine, mghmaine
      • Re: A Theory that is Mine, paulhigh
  • Re: A Theory that is Mine, ewleongusa
• Poll: Preempt or not?, Tom S
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, John Hall
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, coj
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, goffster
    • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, goffster
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Chris Newton
  • Re: Preempt or not?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Phil C
    • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, gandalfnf
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, scyardman
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, coj
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, nige1
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, coj
    • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, coj
      • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Tom S
      • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Preempt or not?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Preempt or not?, Richard Pavlicek
    • Re: Preempt or not?, coj
      • Re: Preempt or not?, John Hall
    • Re: Preempt or not?, coj
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, LowerLine
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, rich johnson
    • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Preempt or not?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, coj
    • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, John Hall
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Eric Kehr
    • Re: Poll: Preempt or not?, Phil C
• Similar hand, Arthur Hoffman
  • Re: Similar hand-Repost, Arthur Hoffman
• Lead asked, Micha Keijzers
  • Re: Lead asked, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Lead asked, ted
  • Re: Lead asked, KWSchneider
  • Re: Lead asked, coj
    • Re: Lead asked, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Lead asked, coj
      • Re: Lead asked, Travis Crump
      • Re: Lead asked, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Lead asked, Micha Keijzers
      • Re: Lead asked, Micha Keijzers
      • Re: Lead asked, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Lead asked, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Lead asked, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Lead asked, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Lead asked, raija d
  • Re: Lead asked, Michiel
  • Re: Lead asked, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Lead asked, ted
  • Re: Lead asked, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Lead asked, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: Lead asked, Phil C
  • Re: Lead asked, scyardman
  • Re: Lead asked, alvin
    • Re: Lead asked, Micha Keijzers
      • Re: Lead asked, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Lead asked, Adam Beneschan
• Re: Good-Bad 2NT and Transfer/Rubens advances, Micha Keijzers
• 6-table Howell (ACBL land), Tim DeLaney
  • Re: 6-table Howell (ACBL land), Peter Smulders
    • Re: 6-table Howell (ACBL land), Adam Beneschan
  • Re: 6-table Howell (ACBL land), David Babcock
    • Re: 6-table Howell (ACBL land), Marvin French
  • Re: 6-table Howell (ACBL land), Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Drury as psych control, Steve Willner
• On-line partnership arranging, r_lane_c_contacos
  • Re: On-line partnership arranging, Barry Margolin
• Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Micha Keijzers
  • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, raija d
• The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 40, Richard Lawson
• how to bid this better?, Adam Lea
  • Re: how to bid this better?, coj
  • Re: how to bid this better?, ewleongusa
    • Re: how to bid this better?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: how to bid this better?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: how to bid this better?, Eddie Grove
  • Re: how to bid this better?, Bud H
  • Re: how to bid this better?, coj
    • Re: how to bid this better?, Alex Martelli
    • Re: how to bid this better?, Will in New Haven
    • Re: how to bid this better?, Chris Newton
  • Re: how to bid this better?, darcy . goff
    • Re: how to bid this better?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: how to bid this better?, Alex Martelli
  • Re: how to bid this better?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: how to bid this better?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: how to bid this better?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: how to bid this better?, coj
  • Re: how to bid this better?, John Schuler
  • Re: how to bid this better?, KWSchneider
  • Re: how to bid this better?, frisbieinstein
  • Re: how to bid this better?, Andrew
    • Re: how to bid this better?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: how to bid this better?, Andrew
      • Re: how to bid this better?, Bob Lipton
  • Message not available
    • Re: how to bid this better?, Adam Lea
      • Re: how to bid this better?, henrysun909
• Re: Boycott Gettysburg, mghmaine
• Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, MilesG
  • Re: Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, Frances
    • Re: Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, MilesG
      • Re: Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, mghmaine
    • Re: Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, MilesG
      • Re: Rosenblum Teams hand: 3NT+1?, Kieran Dyke
• Good/bad 2nt, coj
  • Re: Good/bad 2nt, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Good/bad 2nt, Andrew
    • Re: Good/bad 2nt, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Good/bad 2nt, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Good/bad 2nt, Phil C
  • Re: Good/bad 2nt, coj
    • Re: Good/bad 2nt, Bud H
  • Re: Good/bad 2nt, David Stevenson
    • Re: Good/bad 2nt, David Stevenson
• resolve a dispute:, Mitch Edelman
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, coj
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Bob Lipton
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, mghmaine
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, ewleongusa
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Lorne
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, raija d
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, KWSchneider
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Bud H
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, goffster
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, darint
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Frances
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: resolve a dispute:, Frances
      • Re: resolve a dispute:, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: resolve a dispute:, Frances
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: resolve a dispute:, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: resolve a dispute:, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Phil C
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: resolve a dispute:, raija d
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Free
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, jrw
  • Re: resolve a dispute:, Ron Johnson
• neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., kristyleigh
  • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., ted
    • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., KWSchneider
      • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., Alex Martelli
      • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., John D'Errico
      • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., Alex Martelli
  • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., mghmaine
  • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., Lorne
  • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., raija d
  • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., Bud H
    • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., Alex Martelli
  • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., goffster
  • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., kristyleigh
    • Re: neg double vs forcing 2s responding bid...., Stephen Fischer
• Deutschland's Vienna Coup -- results, Richard Pavlicek
• Dubious, To Say The Least...., stevts
  • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., coj
    • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., stevts
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., coj
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., stevts
    • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Eric Landau
  • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., coj
    • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., stevts
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Barry Margolin
  • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Lorne
    • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., coj
    • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., David Stevenson
  • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Travis Crump
    • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., stevts
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., coj
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Derek Broughton
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Pubkeybreaker
      • Message not available
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Pubkeybreaker
      • Message not available
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Ian Payn
      • Message not available
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., David Stevenson
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Steve Willner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., KWSchneider
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., stevts
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., David Stevenson
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Ian Payn
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., stevts
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., David Stevenson
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., stevts
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Ron Johnson
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., stevts
  • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., dake50
    • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., henrysun909
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Elianna
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., coj
    • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., henrysun909
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Otis Bricker
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., henrysun909
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Otis Bricker
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., henrysun909
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Otis Bricker
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Frances
      • Message not available
      • Re: Dubious, To Say The Least...., Derek Broughton
• 3/4 howell for 5 tables, Nick Hughes
  • Re: 3/4 howell for 5 tables, Robin Barker
    • Re: 3/4 howell for 5 tables, Nick Hughes
  • Re: 3/4 howell for 5 tables, David Stevenson
    • Re: 3/4 howell for 5 tables, Nick Hughes
      • Re: 3/4 howell for 5 tables, David Stevenson
      • Re: 3/4 howell for 5 tables, Sid
  • Re: 3/4 howell for 5 tables, Sid
• Rubensohl, Bas van Gils
  • Re: Rubensohl, Free
    • Re: Rubensohl, John Schuler
• Flight A Sectional, Problem 3, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 3, ted
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 3, mghmaine
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 3, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 3, mghmaine
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 3, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 3, coj
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 3, ewleongusa
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 3, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 3, goffster
    • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 3, Phil C
• Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, ted
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, mghmaine
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, Steve Willner
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, raija d
      • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, Frances
      • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, coj
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, ewleongusa
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, raija d
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, goffster
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, Phil C
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, nige1
    • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 2, Phil C
• Do you or don't you?, henrysun909
  • Re: Do you or don't you?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Do you or don't you?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Do you or don't you?, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Do you or don't you?, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Do you or don't you?, stevts
    • Re: Do you or don't you?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Do you or don't you?, stevts
      • Re: Do you or don't you?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Do you or don't you?, stevts
  • Re: Do you or don't you?, Sid
  • Re: Do you or don't you?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Do you or don't you?, ted
  • Re: Do you or don't you?, mghmaine
  • Re: Do you or don't you?, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Do you or don't you?, stevts
      • Re: Do you or don't you?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Do you or don't you?, henrysun909
    • Re: Do you or don't you?, goffster
      • Re: Do you or don't you?, stevts
      • Re: Do you or don't you?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Do you or don't you?, goffster
• AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, Bud H
  • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, raija d
  • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, Bob Lipton
    • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, Bud H
      • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, Bob Lipton
  • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, goffster
  • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, Arthur Hoffman
  • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, Free
    • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, Sid
  • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, ewleongusa
    • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, raija d
      • Re: AKJxxx 10xxx Q Kx in balance after opening, ewleongusa
• Second Match from the 1962 Bermuda Bowl, Denis O'Kane
• Jack demo, catch22
• Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, neilkaz
    • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, neilkaz
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, ewleongusa
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, goffster
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, multguru@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, raija d
      • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Bud H
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, raija d
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Flight A Sectional, Problem 1, Phil C
• How to bid a simple hand, part 1, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, multguru@xxxxxxx
  • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, coj
  • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, Bob Lipton
    • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, neilkaz
      • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, ted
  • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, Otis Bricker
  • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, ewleongusa
  • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, raija d
  • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, goffster
    • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, raija d
  • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 1, Kent Feiler
  • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 2, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 2, anon
    • Re: How to bid a simple hand, part 2, raija d
• My partner and I disagree, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, stephen . mcdevitt
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, Roger Clough
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, goffster
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, coj
    • Re: My partner and I disagree, goffster
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, John Blubaugh
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, Charles Brenner
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: My partner and I disagree, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: My partner and I disagree, coj
      • Re: My partner and I disagree, raija d
      • Re: My partner and I disagree, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: My partner and I disagree, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: My partner and I disagree, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: My partner and I disagree, raija d
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: My partner and I disagree, coj
      • Re: My partner and I disagree, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: My partner and I disagree, coj
    • Re: My partner and I disagree, Charles Brenner
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, Bob Lipton
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, neilkaz
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, ted
    • Re: My partner and I disagree, Chris Newton
    • Re: My partner and I disagree, coj
    • Re: My partner and I disagree, John Blubaugh
      • Re: My partner and I disagree, neilkaz
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, Bud H
    • Re: My partner and I disagree, Chris Newton
      • Re: My partner and I disagree, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, ewleongusa
    • Re: My partner and I disagree, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: My partner and I disagree, ewleongusa
    • Re: My partner and I disagree, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, raija d
  • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Hank Youngerman
    • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, ewleongusa
    • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Bob Lipton
    • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, John Blubaugh
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Chris Newton
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, John Blubaugh
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Chris Newton
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, anon
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Chris Newton
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, anon
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Chris Newton
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, goffster
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, John Blubaugh
    • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Travis Crump
    • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: My partner and I disagree - the actual hand, Andrew
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: My partner and I disagree, Thomas Dehn
• August newsletter and bidding forum, Karen Walker
• Play problem, Michiel
  • Re: Play problem, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Play problem, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Play problem, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: Play problem, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Play problem, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Play problem, rhm
    • Re: Play problem, Michiel
  • Re: Play problem, rhm
  • Re: Play problem, rhm
  • Re: Play problem, rhm
    • Re: Play problem, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Play problem, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Play problem, rhm
      • Re: Play problem, rhm
  • Re: Play problem, rhm
    • Re: Play problem, Michiel
      • Re: Play problem, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Play problem, Michiel
      • Re: Play problem, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Play problem, Michiel
      • Re: Play problem, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Play problem, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Play problem, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Play problem, goffster
    • Re: Play problem, Michiel
      • Re: Play problem, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Play problem, Bob Lipton
• 1959 Bermuda Bowl match now complete at Vugraph project, Nikos Sarantakos
  • Re: 1959 Bermuda Bowl match now complete at Vugraph project, mghmaine
    • Re: 1959 Bermuda Bowl match now complete at Vugraph project, Denis O'Kane
      • Re: 1959 Bermuda Bowl match now complete at Vugraph project, mghmaine
      • Re: 1959 Bermuda Bowl match now complete at Vugraph project, Denis O'Kane
      • Re: 1959 Bermuda Bowl match now complete at Vugraph project, mghmaine
      • Re: 1959 Bermuda Bowl match now complete at Vugraph project, Denis O'Kane
      • Re: 1959 Bermuda Bowl match now complete at Vugraph project, mghmaine
      • Re: 1959 Bermuda Bowl match now complete at Vugraph project, Denis O'Kane
  • Re: 1959 Bermuda Bowl match now complete at Vugraph project, Charles Brenner
    • Re: 1959 Bermuda Bowl match now complete at Vugraph project, Denis O'Kane
• Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, henrysun909
  • Re: Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, mghmaine
    • Re: Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, henrysun909
      • Re: Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, mghmaine
  • Re: Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, bridgematters
  • Re: Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, KWSchneider
  • Re: Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, raija d
      • Re: Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, Travis Crump
      • Re: Opinions on ACBL/GCC legality, Adam Beneschan
• Pick a bid, any bid, stephen . mcdevitt
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, ewleongusa
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, coj
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, neilkaz
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, John D'Errico
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, John Blubaugh
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, John D'Errico
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Phil C
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, John D'Errico
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, neilkaz
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Ron Sperber
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, neilkaz
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, dowatson
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, John D'Errico
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, John D'Errico
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, raija d
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, John Schuler
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, goffster
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, goffster
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Pick a bid, any bid - result, stephen . mcdevitt
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid - result, ewleongusa
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid - result/hand corrected, stephen . mcdevitt
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid - result/hand corrected, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid - result/hand corrected, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid - result/hand corrected, stephen . mcdevitt
      • Re: Pick a bid, any bid - result/hand corrected, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid - result, raija d
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid - result, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid - result, Chris Ryall
    • Re: Pick a bid, any bid - result, John D'Errico
• Returns on Time, dake50
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Returns on Time, dake50
    • Re: Returns on Time, Michael Angelo Ravera
• United States Bridge Federation, mghmaine
  • Re: United States Bridge Federation, John Blubaugh
  • Re: United States Bridge Federation, goffster
  • Re: United States Bridge Federation, Barry Margolin
  • Re: United States Bridge Federation, Hank Youngerman
    • Re: United States Bridge Federation, Adam Wildavsky
      • Re: United States Bridge Federation, John Crinnion
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: United States Bridge Federation, Eric Landau
• Bulletins from Bangkok?, Nikos Sarantakos
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Bulletins from Bangkok?, Nikos Sarantakos
    • Re: Bulletins from Bangkok?, John D'Errico
• A splinter idea, frisbieinstein
  • Re: A splinter idea, Michael Angelo Ravera
• 2NT openings, Steve Willner
  • Re: 2NT openings, neilkaz
  • Re: 2NT openings, mghmaine
    • Re: 2NT openings, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: 2NT openings, Steve Willner
  • Re: 2NT openings, henrysun909
  • Re: 2NT openings, raija d
    • Re: 2NT openings, Chris Ryall
  • Re: 2NT openings, John Blubaugh
  • Re: 2NT openings, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: 2NT openings, John Blubaugh
      • I liked it: was: 2NT openings, Otis Bricker
      • Re: I liked it: was: 2NT openings, John Blubaugh
      • Re: I liked it: was: 2NT openings, Otis Bricker
      • Retitled: Discussion of Picture Bidding, Sandy E. Barnes
• 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, Bud H
  • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, scyardman
    • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, ewleongusa
  • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, David Stevenson
  • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, neilkaz
      • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, Tim DeLaney
  • Message not available
    • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, ewleongusa
  • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, John Schuler
    • Message not available
      • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, John Schuler
  • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, John Schuler
    • Re: 1X-(1Y)-P-(1NT)-Double -- shape and strength?, David Stevenson
• OT: Britons on U.S. TV: Long live the snark!, Mmbridge
  • Re: OT: Britons on U.S. TV: Long live the snark!, Mark B.
    • Re: OT: Britons on U.S. TV: Long live the snark!, Eric Kehr
      • Re: OT: Britons on U.S. TV: Long live the snark!, Mark B.
    • Re: OT: Britons on U.S. TV: Long live the snark!, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: OT: Britons on U.S. TV: Long live the snark!, Andrew
• Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, Jordan
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, ted
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, mghmaine
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, raija d
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, coj
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, scyardman
    • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, jcwla
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, Bud H
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, goffster
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, Frances
  • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, mghmaine
      • Re: Another High-Level Apportion the Blame, Charles Brenner
• Double or pass?, henrysun909
  • Re: Double or pass?, Andrew
  • Re: Double or pass?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Double or pass?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Double or pass?, stevts
      • Re: Double or pass?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Double or pass?, mghmaine
  • Re: Double or pass?, coj
  • Re: Double or pass?, raija d
  • Re: Double or pass?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Double or pass?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Double or pass?, Amarande
  • Re: Double or pass?, goffster
  • Re: Double or pass?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Double or pass?, Andrew
      • Re: Double or pass?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Double or pass?, stevts
      • Re: Double or pass?, Andrew
  • Re: Double or pass?, henrysun909
    • Re: Double or pass?, stevts
      • Re: Double or pass?, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Double or pass?, stevts
• Jacoby 2NT and Polish Club, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Jacoby 2NT and Polish Club, David Stevenson
    • Re: Jacoby 2NT and Polish Club, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Jacoby 2NT and Polish Club, frisbieinstein
• UI?, Jack Presser
  • Re: UI?, Hank Youngerman
    • Re: UI?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: UI?, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: UI?, David Stevenson
      • Re: UI?, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: UI?, David Stevenson
• Interference after Stayman enquiry, Ashok
  • Re: Interference after Stayman enquiry, ted
  • Re: Interference after Stayman enquiry, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Interference after Stayman enquiry, Lorne
  • Re: Interference after Stayman enquiry, ewleongusa
  • Re: Interference after Stayman enquiry, Will in New Haven
• What might partner be up to?, Ashok
  • Re: What might partner be up to?, ted
  • Re: What might partner be up to?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: What might partner be up to?, scyardman
  • Re: What might partner be up to?, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: What might partner be up to?, Lorne
  • Re: What might partner be up to?, goffster
    • Re: What might partner be up to?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: What might partner be up to?, ewleongusa
    • Re: What might partner be up to?, neilkaz
• Would you pass?, Ashok
  • Re: Would you pass?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Would you pass?, ted
  • Re: Would you pass?, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Would you pass?, raija d
  • Re: Would you pass?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Would you pass?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Would you pass?, coj
    • Re: Would you pass?, lygtepael512
  • Re: Would you pass?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Would you pass?, Tim DeLaney
    • Re: Would you pass?, Lorne
      • Re: Would you pass?, ted
      • Re: Would you pass?, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Would you pass?, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Would you pass?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Would you pass?, goffster
  • Re: Would you pass?, Steve Willner
• First the Auction, then the hands, stevts
  • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, David Stevenson
  • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, ewleongusa
  • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, ted
  • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, Bob Lipton
  • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, stevts
    • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, ewleongusa
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, stevts
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, henrysun909
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, Otis Bricker
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, stevts
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, Otis Bricker
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, stevts
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, stevts
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, Otis Bricker
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, ewleongusa
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, stevts
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, stevts
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, stevts
    • Re: First the Auction, then the hands, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Rebid, stevts
  • Re: Rebid, David Stevenson
  • Re: Rebid, ewleongusa
  • Re: Rebid, ted
    • Re: Rebid, neilkaz
  • Re: Rebid, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Rebid, stevts
      • Re: Rebid, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Rebid, stevts
  • Re: Rebid, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Rebid, rhm
    • Re: Rebid, stevts
      • Re: Rebid, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Rebid, stevts
      • Re: Rebid, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Rebid, stevts
      • Re: Rebid, stevts
      • Re: Rebid, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Rebid, stevts
      • Re: Rebid, stevts
      • Re: Rebid, stevts
      • Re: Rebid, stevts
      • Re: Rebid, Steve Willner
      • Re: Rebid, stevts
  • Re: Rebid, Lorne
    • Re: Rebid, mghmaine
      • Re: Rebid, henrysun909
  • Re: Rebid, goffster
• The most unethical habit, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: The most unethical habit, Otis Bricker
  • Re: The most unethical habit, David Stevenson
  • Re: The most unethical habit, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: The most unethical habit, ewleongusa
    • Re: The most unethical habit, Peter Hayes
      • Re: The most unethical habit, raija d
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Peter Hayes
      • Re: The most unethical habit, David Stevenson
      • Re: The most unethical habit, David Stevenson
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: The most unethical habit, David Stevenson
      • Re: The most unethical habit, raija d
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Tamuel
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: The most unethical habit, David Stevenson
      • Re: The most unethical habit, pgmer6809
      • Re: The most unethical habit, David Stevenson
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Sven Pran
      • Re: The most unethical habit, David Stevenson
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Sven Pran
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Derek Broughton
      • Re: The most unethical habit, David Stevenson
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Derek Broughton
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Palooka
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Nick Wedd
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Eric Kehr
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Sven Pran
      • Re: The most unethical habit, John D'Errico
      • Re: The most unethical habit, ttw
      • Re: The most unethical habit, David Stevenson
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Travis Crump
      • Re: The most unethical habit, David Stevenson
      • Re: The most unethical habit, ted
      • Re: The most unethical habit, David Stevenson
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Barry Margolin
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Derek Broughton
  • Re: The most unethical habit, rhm
  • Re: The most unethical habit, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: The most unethical habit, Derek Broughton
    • Re: The most unethical habit, Sven Pran
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: The most unethical habit, Adam Beneschan
• IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, Tim
  • Re: IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, scyardman
  • Re: IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, ewleongusa
    • Re: IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, Bob Lipton
      • Re: IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, ewleongusa
      • Re: IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, Bob Lipton
      • Re: IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, ted
    • Re: IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, scyardman
  • Re: IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, Bob Lipton
  • Re: IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, ted
  • Re: IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Swiss Teams. Your Call, goffster
• I fell flat on my face, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: I fell flat on my face, John Schuler
  • Re: I fell flat on my face, Travis Crump
  • Re: I fell flat on my face, John Gabbriel
  • Re: I fell flat on my face, maom_onet
  • Re: I fell flat on my face, Bob Lipton
    • Re: I fell flat on my face, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: I fell flat on my face, Nick Hughes
      • Re: I fell flat on my face, Frances
      • Re: I fell flat on my face, peter koch
    • Re: I fell flat on my face, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: I fell flat on my face, frisbieinstein
  • Re: I fell flat on my face, ewleongusa
  • Re: I fell flat on my face, Nick at Trumps
  • Re: I fell flat on my face, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: I fell flat on my face, John Schuler
      • Re: I fell flat on my face, ted
      • Re: I fell flat on my face, Bob Lipton
  • Re: I fell flat on my face, John Schuler
• systems after 2NT overcall of weak 2, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: systems after 2NT overcall of weak 2, John Schuler
    • Re: systems after 2NT overcall of weak 2, David Stevenson
  • Re: systems after 2NT overcall of weak 2, raija d
  • Re: systems after 2NT overcall of weak 2, Free
    • Re: systems after 2NT overcall of weak 2, henrysun909
  • Re: systems after 2NT overcall of weak 2, mghmaine
  • Re: systems after 2NT overcall of weak 2, ewleongusa
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: systems after 2NT overcall of weak 2, Eric Landau
• IMP Pairs, Your call?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs, Your call?, coj
    • Re: IMP Pairs, Your call?, mghmaine
    • Re: IMP Pairs, Your call?, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: IMP Pairs, Your call?, coj
  • Re: IMP Pairs, Your call?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: IMP Pairs, Your call?, John Schuler
  • Re: IMP Pairs, Your call?, ewleongusa
  • Re: IMP Pairs, Your call?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: IMP Pairs, Your call?, ted
  • Re: IMP Pairs, Your call?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: IMP Pairs, Your call? - The Result, Sandy E. Barnes
• Bad Decision, Tamuel
  • Re: Bad Decision, coj
    • Re: Bad Decision, Tamuel
  • Re: Bad Decision, John Schuler
    • Re: Bad Decision, Tamuel
      • Re: Bad Decision, scyardman
      • Re: Bad Decision, Tamuel
      • Re: Bad Decision, David Stevenson
      • Re: Bad Decision, coj
      • Re: Bad Decision, John D'Errico
      • Re: Bad Decision, Tamuel
      • Re: Bad Decision, John D'Errico
      • Re: Bad Decision, raija d
  • Re: Bad Decision, Frances
    • Re: Bad Decision, ted
    • Re: Bad Decision, David Stevenson
      • Re: Bad Decision, Steve Willner
      • Re: Bad Decision, Tamuel
      • Re: Bad Decision, John D'Errico
      • Re: Bad Decision, Travis Crump
      • Re: Bad Decision, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Bad Decision, David Stevenson
    • Re: Bad Decision, Tamuel
      • Re: Bad Decision, Frances
      • Re: Bad Decision, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Bad Decision, Tamuel
      • Re: Bad Decision, ted
      • Re: Bad Decision, David Stevenson
      • Re: Bad Decision, Tamuel
  • Re: Bad Decision, raija d
    • Re: Bad Decision, Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: Bad Decision, Tamuel
      • Re: Bad Decision, ted
      • Re: Bad Decision, raija d
      • Re: Bad Decision, Tamuel
      • Re: Bad Decision, John D'Errico
      • Re: Bad Decision, Tamuel
      • Re: Bad Decision, David Stevenson
  • Re: Bad Decision, goffster
    • Re: Bad Decision, Tamuel
• Two rulings, Tamuel
  • Re: Two rulings, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Two rulings, Sven Pran
      • Re: Two rulings, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Two rulings, Sven Pran
      • Re: Two rulings, Tamuel
      • Re: Two rulings, Sven Pran
      • Re: Two rulings, Steve Willner
      • Re: Two rulings, Sven Pran
      • Re: Two rulings, Peter Smulders
• High-level decision, Tamuel
  • Re: High-level decision, Bob Lipton
    • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, Julian Lighton
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, ted
      • Re: High-level decision, Otis Bricker
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, Julian Lighton
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, Julian Lighton
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: High-level decision, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: High-level decision, coj
    • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, scyardman
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, John Schuler
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, raija d
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, raija d
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, John Schuler
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, John Schuler
      • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, ted
      • Re: High-level decision, John Schuler
  • Re: High-level decision, neilkaz
    • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
  • Re: High-level decision, Frances
    • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
  • Re: High-level decision, maom_onet
    • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
  • Re: High-level decision, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: High-level decision, ewleongusa
    • Re: High-level decision, Tamuel
      • Re: High-level decision, ewleongusa
• Your call?, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Your call?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Your call?, scyardman
  • Re: Your call?, Andrew
    • Re: Your call?, scyardman
      • Re: Your call?, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: Your call?, scyardman
      • Re: Your call?, ted
      • Re: Your call?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Your call?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Your call?, neilkaz
  • Re: Your call?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Your call?, Hank Youngerman
• Power Precision Partnership Apart Again?, Larry Lowell
  • Re: Power Precision Partnership Apart Again?, scyardman
• Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
  • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Mike Amos
    • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, John Crinnion
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Malcolm Currie
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Malcolm Currie
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Neil
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Neil
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Norman Silverstone
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Norman Silverstone
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, nige1
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Frances
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Steven Gibbs
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Steven Gibbs
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Collier
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Steven Gibbs
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Mmbridge
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, nige1
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Frances
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Chris Newton
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Ian Payn
    • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
  • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Charlie Baylis
  • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Rob Morris
    • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, badderzboy
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Steve Wright
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Ian Payn
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Mike Amos
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Frances
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Steven Gibbs
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Steven Gibbs
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Collier
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Frances
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Steven Gibbs
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Steven Gibbs
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Robin Barker
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Mmbridge
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Mmbridge
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, nige1
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Robin Barker
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, nige1
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Frances
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, nige1
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Frances
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Mike Amos
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, nige1
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, nige1
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, John Crinnion
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Howorth
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, David Stevenson
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, nige1
    • Re: Orange book 2006: England and Wales UK, Chris Ryall
• How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, tobias . bende
  • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Nick Hughes
    • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Otis Bricker
    • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Lorne
    • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Ian Payn
  • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Bob Lipton
  • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, ted
  • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, raija d
    • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, raija d
  • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, frisbieinstein
    • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Julian Lighton
      • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Tamuel
    • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Chris Ryall
  • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Tamuel
    • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, neilkaz
  • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, coj
    • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Free
  • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, tobias . bende
    • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Free
    • Re: How to open hand with 11 playing tricks, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Meckwell opens light, Bernard Schneder
  • Re: Meckwell opens light, Free
  • Re: Meckwell opens light, Ron Johnson
    • Re: Meckwell opens light, mghmaine
      • Re: Meckwell opens light, Larry Lowell
      • Re: Meckwell opens light, Ron Johnson
      • Re: Meckwell opens light, scyardman
  • Re: Meckwell opens light, Robert Tamlyn
• What's your plan?, henrysun909
  • Re: What's your plan?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What's your plan?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: What's your plan?, neilkaz
    • Re: What's your plan?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: What's your plan?, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: What's your plan?, coj
    • Re: What's your plan?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: What's your plan?, ewleongusa
  • Re: What's your plan?, Lorne
  • Re: What's your plan?, Otis Bricker
    • Re: What's your plan?, Gary Seckinger
      • Re: What's your plan?, Otis Bricker
  • Re: What's your plan?, Andrew
    • Re: What's your plan?, coj
    • Re: What's your plan?, coj
      • Message not available
      • Re: What's your plan?, coj
      • Message not available
      • Re: What's your plan?, coj
      • Re: What's your plan?, Andrew
  • Re: What's your plan?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: What's your plan?, Will in New Haven
  • Message not available
    • Re: What's your plan?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: What's your plan?, henrysun909
• The Twelfth of Never -- play contest, Richard Pavlicek
  • Re: The Twelfth of Never -- play contest, Frances
• Is this obvious?, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Is this obvious?, Andrew
  • Re: Is this obvious?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Is this obvious?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Is this obvious?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Is this obvious?, Chris Newton
    • Re: Is this obvious?, anon
      • Re: Is this obvious?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Is this obvious?, scyardman
    • Re: Is this obvious?, Tamuel
  • Re: Is this obvious?, ted
  • Re: Is this obvious?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Is this obvious?, Andrew
  • Re: Is this obvious?, Chris Newton
  • Re: Is this obvious?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is this obvious?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Is this obvious?, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Is this obvious?, Andrew
      • Re: Is this obvious?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Is this obvious?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Is this obvious?, Tamuel
      • Re: Is this obvious?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Is this obvious?, raija d
  • Re: Is this obvious?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Is this obvious?, Lorne
  • Re: Is this obvious?, gandalfnf
    • Re: Is this obvious?, neilkaz
    • Re: Is this obvious?, Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: Is this obvious?, Andrew
  • Re: Is this obvious?, Frances
    • Re: Is this obvious?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Is this obvious?, Chris Newton
• Re: Well Sally how far do you forth?, Chris Ryall
  • Well Sally how far do you forth?, rich johnson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Well Sally how far do you forth?, Ian Payn
• Pre-printed Alert Explanations, KWSchneider
  • Re: Pre-printed Alert Explanations, mrdct
    • Re: Pre-printed Alert Explanations, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Pre-printed Alert Explanations, David Stevenson
      • Re: Pre-printed Alert Explanations, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Pre-printed Alert Explanations, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Pre-printed Alert Explanations, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Pre-printed Alert Explanations, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Pre-printed Alert Explanations, Stefanie Rohan
    • Re: Pre-printed Alert Explanations, ted
  • Re: Pre-printed Alert Explanations, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Pre-printed Alert Explanations, Free
• play line?, Andrzej M
  • Re: play line?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: play line?, Andrzej M
      • Re: play line?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: play line?, Andrzej M
  • Re: play line?, John Schuler
  • Re: play line?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: play line?, Andrzej M
      • Re: play line?, ted
      • Re: play line?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: play line?, Andrzej M
  • Re: play line?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: play line?, ewleongusa
• NAP - Ahead Of It's Time, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: NAP - Ahead Of It's Time, anon
  • Re: NAP - Ahead Of It's Time, Steve Willner
    • Re: NAP - Ahead Of It's Time, Phil C
  • Re: NAP - Ahead Of It's Time, Amarande
    • Re: NAP - Ahead Of It's Time, Alex Martelli
    • Re: NAP - Ahead Of It's Time, Steve Willner
  • Re: NAP - Ahead Of It's Time, etsand
• Pakistani singleton, David Babcock
  • Re: Pakistani singleton, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Pakistani singleton, Ian Payn
    • Re: Pakistani singleton, Steve Willner
      • Re: Pakistani singleton, David Babcock
  • Re: Pakistani singleton, David Stevenson
  • Re: Pakistani singleton, Travis Crump
• Has anybody been able to downlaod "Duplicate Scorer"?, howardrh
  • Re: Has anybody been able to downlaod "Duplicate Scorer"?, Keith Sheppard
    • Re: Has anybody been able to downlaod "Duplicate Scorer"?, howardrh
      • Re: Has anybody been able to downlaod "Duplicate Scorer"?, howardrh
  • Re: Has anybody been able to downlaod "Duplicate Scorer"?, dnp037
    • Re: Has anybody been able to downlaod "Duplicate Scorer"?, Keith Sheppard
• Slam: how interested are you ?, mghmaine
  • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: how interested are you ?, raija d
    • Re: how interested are you ?, Bud H
  • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, scyardman
    • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, goffster
  • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, coj
    • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, John D'Errico
      • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, coj
      • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, John D'Errico
  • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, John D'Errico
    • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, coj
      • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, John D'Errico
      • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, goffster
    • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, henrysun909
    • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, mghmaine
  • Re: how interested are you ?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Chris Newton
  • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Bernard Schneder
      • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, mghmaine
    • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Ivan Popivanov
    • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, neilkaz
      • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, mghmaine
  • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Travis Crump
    • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, mghmaine
  • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Slam: how interested are you ?, rhm
• Lead debate, Martin Holcombe
  • Re: Lead debate, mghmaine
  • Re: Lead debate, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Lead debate, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Lead debate, raija d
  • Re: Lead debate, gandalfnf
  • Re: Lead debate, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Lead debate, neilkaz
  • Re: Lead debate, ewleongusa
• ACOL BIDDING, poet
  • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Nick at Trumps
  • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Neil
  • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Bob Lipton
  • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Chris Newton
      • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Chris Newton
      • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: ACOL BIDDING, poet
  • Re: ACOL BIDDING, ewleongusa
  • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Tamuel
  • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Tamuel
  • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Steve Willner
    • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Marvin French
      • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Hans Georg Schaathun
      • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Kent Feiler
      • Re: ACOL BIDDING, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: ACOL BIDDING, ewleongusa
• Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, Bud H
  • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, Free
  • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, mghmaine
  • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, raija d
    • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, scyardman
  • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence? (correction), Bud H
  • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, Steve Willner
    • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, neilkaz
  • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, frisbieinstein
    • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Is 4NT NOTa Blackwood type bid in this sequence?, ewleongusa
• Chicago 0-5000 spingold, scyardman
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, ted
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, coj
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, coj
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Bernard Schneder
      • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Travis Crump
      • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Bernard Schneder
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, coj
    • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, coj
      • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, coj
      • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Travis Crump
      • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Charlie
      • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, coj
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Bud H
    • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, coj
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, scyardman
      • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Mmbridge
      • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, scyardman
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, coj
    • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, John D'Errico
  • Re: Chicago 0-5000 spingold, Ivan Popivanov
• Rate the contracts, Steve Willner
  • Re: Rate the contracts, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: Rate the contracts, ted
  • Re: Rate the contracts, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Rate the contracts, coj
      • Re: Rate the contracts, mghmaine
    • Re: Rate the contracts, coj
  • Re: Rate the contracts, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Rate the contracts, Steve Willner
• Contract Bridge and Web Publishing, Mark Leonard
• 2H, 3H, or 4H?, henrysun909
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Hank Youngerman
    • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Otis Bricker
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, coj
    • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, mghmaine
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Gary Seckinger
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Will in New Haven
    • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, coj
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, neilkaz
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, ted
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, ewleongusa
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, raija d
  • Re: 2H, 3H, or 4H?, Derek Broughton
• Chicago NABC Report Plus New Photos, Jonathan Steinberg
  • Re: Chicago NABC Report Plus New Photos, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Chicago NABC Report Plus New Photos, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Chicago NABC Report Plus New Photos, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: Chicago NABC Report Plus New Photos, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Chicago NABC Report Plus New Photos, Ivan Popivanov
      • Re: Chicago NABC Report Plus New Photos, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Chicago NABC Report Plus New Photos, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Chicago NABC Report Plus New Photos, John D'Errico
• If it's a splinter then how do I..., Craig
  • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., thissteve
    • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., Will in New Haven
  • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., Adam Beneschan
    • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., Craig
      • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., bboinquiry
  • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., Andrew
    • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., Kieran Dyke
      • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., Andrew
  • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., Will in New Haven
  • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., John D'Errico
  • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., raija d
  • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., neilkaz
  • Re: If it's a splinter then how do I..., David Stevenson
• A coincidence, frisbieinstein
  • Re: A coincidence, Otis Bricker
  • Re: A coincidence, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: A coincidence, frisbieinstein
      • Re: A coincidence, Kieran Dyke
• Chapter and verse!, henrysun909
  • Re: Chapter and verse!, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Chapter and verse!, Frances
    • Re: Chapter and verse!, Tamuel
    • Re: Chapter and verse!, nige1
    • Re: Chapter and verse!, pgmer6809
      • Re: Chapter and verse!, David Stevenson
      • Re: Chapter and verse!, Tamuel
  • Re: Chapter and verse!, dake50
    • Re: Chapter and verse!, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Chapter and verse!, David Stevenson
  • Re: Chapter and verse!, raija d
  • Re: Chapter and verse!, Steve Willner
  • Re: Chapter and verse!, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Chapter and verse!, ted
• KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, henrysun909
  • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, multguru@xxxxxxx
  • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, henrysun909
      • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, mghmaine
  • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, Otis Bricker
    • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, henrysun909
    • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, Adam Wildavsky
  • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, pfriedmanNoSpam
  • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, Will in New Haven
    • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, alvin
      • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, Will in New Haven
      • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, henrysun909
  • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, Adam Wildavsky
    • Re: KS specific query, but all comments appreciated, Pubkeybreaker
• Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, mghmaine
  • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, raija d
  • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, Verne Smith
  • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, Stephen Tu
    • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, raija d
  • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, alvin
    • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Why lead K from AKx and KQx?, Bud H
• Under pressure, icearif
  • Re: Under pressure, ted
  • Re: Under pressure, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Under pressure, Charlie
    • Re: Under pressure, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Under pressure, goffster
      • Re: Under pressure, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Under pressure, goffster
  • Re: Under pressure, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Under pressure, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Under pressure, Kieran Dyke
• Lead Problem, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Lead Problem, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Lead Problem, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Lead Problem, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Lead Problem, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Lead Problem, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Lead Problem, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Lead Problem, ted
  • Re: Lead Problem, goffster
    • Re: Lead Problem, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Lead Problem, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Lead Problem, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Lead Problem, Andrew
• A Wilkosz puzzle, frisbieinstein
  • Re: A Wilkosz puzzle, Charlie
    • Re: A Wilkosz puzzle, Charlie
  • Re: A Wilkosz puzzle, Tamuel
    • Re: A Wilkosz puzzle, frisbieinstein
  • Re: A Wilkosz puzzle, Gerben Dirksen
• To bid, or what to bid?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: To bid, or what to bid?, Charlie
  • Re: To bid, or what to bid?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: To bid, or what to bid?, ted
  • Re: To bid, or what to bid?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: To bid, or what to bid?, Ian Payn
    • Re: To bid, or what to bid?, Andrew
      • Re: To bid, or what to bid?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: To bid, or what to bid?, neilkaz
  • Re: To bid, or what to bid?, John R. Mayne
  • Re: To bid, or what to bid?, goffster
  • Re: To bid, or what to bid?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: To bid, or what to bid?, Andrew
• Is it unethical?, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Is it unethical?, ted
  • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
    • Re: Is it unethical?, Rob Morris
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Anton van Uitert
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, raija d
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, raija d
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Nick Wedd
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Bernard Schneder
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Mike Amos
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Eric Kehr
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Ian Payn
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Tamuel
      • Re: Is it unethical?, raija d
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Tamuel
      • Re: Is it unethical?, raija d
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Tamuel
      • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Mephistopheles Jones
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Travis Crump
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Frans Buijsen
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Tamuel
    • Re: Is it unethical?, gandalfnf
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Nick Wedd
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Nick Wedd
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Tamuel
    • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
  • Re: Is it unethical?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Is it unethical?, Phil
  • Re: Is it unethical?, Tamuel
  • Re: Is it unethical?, Mephistopheles Jones
  • Re: Is it unethical?, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Is it unethical?, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Is it unethical?, icearif
    • Re: Is it unethical?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Kent Feiler
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Is it unethical?, raija d
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Mephistopheles Jones
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Sven Pran
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Everett M. Greene
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Steve Willner
      • Re: Is it unethical?, A. L. Edwards
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Is it unethical?, Steve Willner
  • Re: Is it unethical?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Is it unethical?, Sartaj Hans
• What would you bid/lead?, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: What would you bid/lead?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: What would you bid/lead?, coj
  • Re: What would you bid/lead?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: What would you bid/lead?, goffster
      • Re: What would you bid/lead?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What would you bid/lead?, ted
  • Re: What would you bid/lead?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: What would you bid/lead?, gandalfnf
  • Re: What would you bid/lead?, ewleongusa
  • Re: What would you bid/lead?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: What would you bid/lead?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: What would you bid/lead?, goffster
  • Re: What would you bid/lead?, goffster
  • Re: What would you bid/lead?, jsher
• IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, Mmbridge
    • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, Nick Hughes
  • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, goffster
      • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, coj
  • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, Frances
  • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, Bob Lipton
    • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6 - Opener's hand, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6 - Opener's hand, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6 - Opener's hand, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6 - Opener's hand, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, ted
    • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, ted
  • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, goffster
  • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, Charlie
  • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, mghmaine
  • Re: IMP Pairs 6-25-06 Hand 6, Kieran Dyke
• IMP Pairs, 6-25-06 hand 5, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 6-25-06 hand 5, coj
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 6-25-06 hand 5, icearif
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 6-25-06 hand 5, Bob Lipton
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 6-25-06 hand 5, ewleongusa
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 6-25-06 hand 5, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 6-25-06 hand 5, goffster
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 6-25-06 hand 5, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 6-25-06 hand 5, mghmaine
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 6-25-06 hand 5, Kieran Dyke
• IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 hand 4, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 hand 4, Frances
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 hand 4, ted
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 hand 4, Frances
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 hand 4, ewleongusa
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 hand 4, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 3, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 3, coj
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 3, Bob Lipton
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 3, ted
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 3, ewleongusa
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 3, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 3, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 3, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 3, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 3, ted
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 3, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 3, Kieran Dyke
• IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, coj
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, icearif
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, Bob Lipton
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, Dave Flower
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, ted
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, ewleongusa
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, John R. Mayne
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2 - the result, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2 - the result, coj
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2 - the result, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2 - the result, Frances
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2 - the result, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, neilkaz
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, goffster
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, Charlie
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, coj
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, coj
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, coj
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, ted
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, coj
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, mghmaine
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hnad 2, Kieran Dyke
• IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, coj
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, Frances
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, Bob Lipton
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, ted
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, ewleongusa
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1 - The result, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1 - The result, ewleongusa
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1 - The result, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1 - The result, goffster
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1 - The result, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1 - The result, Travis Crump
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1 - The result, peter koch
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1 - The result, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1 - The result, peter koch
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, neilkaz
  • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, goffster
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: IMP Pairs, 7-25-06 Hand 1, Sandy E. Barnes
• What Should I Do with This?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: What Should I Do with This?, goffster
      • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What Should I Do with This?, coj
  • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Derek Broughton
  • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Charlie
    • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Tamuel
      • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Charlie
      • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Tamuel
      • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Tamuel
      • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: What Should I Do with This?, ewleongusa
  • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Tamuel
  • Re: What Should I Do with This?, goffster
  • Re: What Should I Do with This?, John R. Mayne
    • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Tamuel
      • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: What Should I Do with This?, ewleongusa
  • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Phil
    • Re: What Should I Do with This?, Bob Lipton
• Multi, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Multi, Ian Payn
  • Re: Multi, Frances
    • Re: Multi, David Stevenson
      • Re: Multi, Marvin French
  • Re: Multi, Nick Hughes
    • Re: Multi, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Multi, Chris Newton
      • Re: Multi, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Multi, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Multi, Tamuel
      • Re: Multi, Chris Newton
      • Re: Multi, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Multi, Chris Newton
      • Re: Multi, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Multi, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Multi, Marvin French
      • Re: Multi, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Multi, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Multi, Marvin French
      • Re: Multi, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Multi, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Multi, Marvin French
      • Re: Multi, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Multi, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Multi, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Multi, Marvin French
      • Re: Multi, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Multi, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Multi, Marvin French
      • Re: Multi, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Multi, Frans Buijsen
      • Re: Multi, Marvin French
      • Re: Multi, Frances
      • Re: Multi, Marvin French
      • Re: Multi, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Multi, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Multi, Amarande
      • Re: Multi, Tamuel
  • Re: Multi, jsher
    • Re: Multi, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Multi, Marvin French
  • Re: Multi, Tamuel
  • Re: Multi, Travis Crump
    • Re: Multi, janmartel
      • Re: Multi, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Multi, Douglas Newlands
      • Re: Multi, Frances
      • Re: Multi, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Multi, David Stevenson
  • Re: Multi, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Multi, Gerben Dirksen
• What does this bid mean?, Tamuel
  • Re: What does this bid mean?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: What does this bid mean?, Tamuel
  • Re: What does this bid mean?, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: What does this bid mean?, Tamuel
      • Re: What does this bid mean?, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: What does this bid mean?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: What does this bid mean?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: What does this bid mean?, Tamuel
      • Re: What does this bid mean?, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: What does this bid mean?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: What does this bid mean?, Ron Johnson
  • Re: What does this bid mean?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: What does this bid mean?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: What does this bid mean?, raija d
    • Re: What does this bid mean?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: What does this bid mean?, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: What does this bid mean?, Frances
  • Re: What does this bid mean?, Ron Johnson
  • Re: What does this bid mean?, Thomas Dehn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • What does this bid mean?, Bosco99
    • Re: What does this bid mean?, mghmaine
      • Re: What does this bid mean?, Bosco99
      • Re: What does this bid mean?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: What does this bid mean?, MadDragon
    • Re: What does this bid mean?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: What does this bid mean?, Andrew
      • Re: What does this bid mean?, Andrew
    • Re: What does this bid mean?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: What does this bid mean?, ewleongusa
• 2NT advance, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • To NT, or not NT, frisbieinstein
    • Re: To NT, or not NT, ewleongusa
      • Re: To NT, or not NT, Otis Bricker
      • Re: To NT, or not NT, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: To NT, or not NT, ewleongusa
    • Re: To NT, or not NT, Bob Lipton
    • Re: To NT, or not NT, frisbieinstein
  • Re: 2NT advance, ewleongusa
• spam 2!, nige1
• Scoring botched movement, Everett M. Greene
  • Re: Scoring botched movement, Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Scoring botched movement, David Stevenson
  • Re: Scoring botched movement, Mike Amos
    • Re: Scoring botched movement, David Stevenson
• spam!, nige1
  • Re: spam!, Sven Pran
  • Re: spam!, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: spam!, Lorne
    • Re: spam!, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: spam!, Barry Margolin
• who overbid?, Mitch Edelman
  • Re: who overbid?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: who overbid?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: who overbid?, ted
  • Re: who overbid?, goffster
  • Re: who overbid?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: who overbid?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: who overbid?, gandalfnf
    • Re: who overbid?, neilkaz
  • Re: who overbid?, ewleongusa
  • Re: who overbid?, mghmaine
  • Re: who overbid?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: who overbid?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: who overbid?, Lorne
  • Re: who overbid?, raija d
  • Re: who overbid?, nige1
• MP Pairs hand 7-24-06, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: MP Pairs hand 7-24-06, Dave Flower
  • Re: MP Pairs hand 7-24-06, Bob Lipton
  • Re: MP Pairs hand 7-24-06, Lorne
  • Re: MP Pairs hand 7-24-06, ted
  • Re: MP Pairs hand 7-24-06, goffster
  • Re: MP Pairs hand 7-24-06, Kieran Dyke
• Re: ACBL mid chart system: New permutation, Geoff Hopcraft
  • Re: ACBL mid chart system: New permutation, mghmaine
  • Re: ACBL mid chart system: New permutation, raija d
  • Re: ACBL mid chart system: New permutation, Frances
    • Re: ACBL mid chart system: New permutation, Nick Hughes
      • Re: ACBL mid chart system: New permutation, David Stevenson
      • Re: ACBL mid chart system: New permutation, Nick Hughes
    • Re: ACBL mid chart system: New permutation, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: ACBL mid chart system: New permutation, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: ACBL mid chart system: New permutation, David Stevenson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ACBL mid chart system: New permutation, Adam Beneschan
• Two problems from the past, henrysun909
  • Re: Two problems from the past, Bud H
    • Re: Two problems from the past, mghmaine
  • Re: Two problems from the past, Dave Flower
  • Re: Two problems from the past, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Two problems from the past, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Two problems from the past, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Two problems from the past, Lorne
  • Re: Two problems from the past, ted
  • Re: Two problems from the past, ted
  • Re: Two problems from the past, nige1
  • Re: Two problems from the past, Nick Hughes
  • Re: Two problems from the past, Charlie
  • Re: Two problems from the past, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Two problems from the past, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Two problems from the past, Sven Pran
      • Re: Two problems from the past, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Two problems from the past, henrysun909
    • Re: Two problems from the past, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Two problems from the past, Sven Pran
      • Re: Two problems from the past, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Two problems from the past, Kieran Dyke
• You Be The Judge, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: You Be The Judge, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, Hank Youngerman
    • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, nige1
    • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, goffster
      • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, Hank Youngerman
      • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, goffster
      • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, Charles Brenner
      • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, Frances
      • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, ewleongusa
    • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, Nick Hughes
    • Re: You Be The Judge - Correction, raija d
  • Re: You Be The Judge, nige1
  • Re: You Be The Judge, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: You Be The Judge, mghmaine
  • Re: You Be The Judge, Travis Crump
  • Re: You Be The Judge, Charles Brenner
  • Re: You Be The Judge, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: You Be The Judge, ted
  • Re: You Be The Judge, goffster
    • Re: You Be The Judge, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: You Be The Judge, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: You Be The Judge, Lorne
  • Re: You Be The Judge, raija d
• Major raises, Amarande
  • Re: Major raises, coj
  • Re: Major raises, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Major raises, henrysun909
    • Re: Major raises, Amarande
      • Re: Major raises, John D'Errico
      • Re: Major raises, henrysun909
  • Re: Major raises, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Major raises, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Major raises, Wayne
  • Re: Major raises, John D'Errico
  • Re: Major raises, Charlie
  • Re: Major raises, Free
  • Re: Major raises, Kieran Dyke
• Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, Bud H
  • Re: Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, vida
  • Re: Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, Todd A. Anderson
      • Re: Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, Todd A. Anderson
      • Re: Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, Bud H
    • Re: Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, Frances
      • Re: Computer question - is dual screen BBO vugraph possible on one computer?, Barry Margolin
• Comments requested, please, henrysun909
  • Re: Comments requested, please, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Comments requested, please, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: Comments requested, please, nige1
  • Re: Comments requested, please, Steve Willner
• Re: Check these sports figures!, John Crinnion
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Check these sports figures!, Eddie Grove
  • Re: Check these sports figures!, ted
• A Polish club auction, frisbieinstein
  • Re: A Polish club auction, djneill
  • Re: A Polish club auction, Lorne
    • weak NT tangent, Travis Crump
      • Re: weak NT tangent, Lorne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • A Polish Club auction, frisbieinstein
    • Re: A Polish Club auction, ted
    • Re: A Polish Club auction, Gary Seckinger
  • A Polish Club auction, frisbieinstein
• Interactive Online Briridge Lessons, Bridge7
• where should a decent /good partnership devote its attention and why, multguru@xxxxxxx
  • Re: where should a decent /good partnership devote its attention and why, ted
  • Re: where should a decent /good partnership devote its attention and why, williamahiggins
  • Re: where should a decent /good partnership devote its attention and why, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: where should a decent /good partnership devote its attention and why, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: where should a decent /good partnership devote its attention and why, Amarande
  • Re: where should a decent /good partnership devote its attention and why, goffster
  • Re: where should a decent /good partnership devote its attention and why, Carl
  • Re: where should a decent /good partnership devote its attention and why, Hank Youngerman
  • Re: where should a decent /good partnership devote its attention and why, Free
  • Re: where should a decent /good partnership devote its attention and why, raija d
  • Re: where should a decent /good partnership devote its attention and why, ewleongusa
• Re: Bill Hughes, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Bill Hughes, Ian Payn
• The Warren Buffet Cup, Neil
  • A play problem, frisbieinstein
    • Re: A play problem, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: A play problem, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: A play problem, Frances
      • Re: A play problem, Eddie Grove
      • Re: A play problem, Bob Lipton
    • Re: A play problem, Bob Lipton
    • Re: A play problem, jrw
    • Re: A play problem, rhm
    • Re: A play problem, rhm
• Reopening/Competing questions, Phil
  • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, stephen . mcdevitt
    • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Lorne
      • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Robin Barker
      • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, stephen . mcdevitt
      • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, goffster
    • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, neilkaz
  • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, ted
  • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Andrew
    • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, ted
      • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Andrew
      • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Andrew
  • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Phil
    • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Andrew
  • Re: Reopening/Competing questions, Kieran Dyke
• Simple NT system, tobias . bende
  • Re: Simple NT system, Free
    • Re: Simple NT system, Lorne
      • Re: Simple NT system, Free
  • Re: Simple NT system, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: Simple NT system, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Simple NT system, anubis3100
    • Re: Simple NT system, Chris Newton
• Re: Bridge Baron 16 or other recommendations?, steve . cpp
• Forcing?, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Forcing?, Mike Amos
  • Re: Forcing?, Lessmit
  • Re: Forcing?, Lorne
  • Re: Forcing?, Chris Newton
    • Re: Forcing?, Chris Newton
  • Re: Forcing?, ted
  • Re: Forcing?, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Forcing?, Andrzej M
    • Re: Forcing?, ted
  • Re: Forcing?, Bob Lipton
• Re: RKC Blackwood Alertable?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• What is your intelligence, Mr.Cool
  • Re: What is your intelligence, Gerben Dirksen
• Re: Any Buffet magabucks for ACBL?, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Any Buffet magabucks for ACBL?, Otis Bricker
• Defensive signals legal?, Patrick Page
  • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Hank Youngerman
    • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Travis Crump
    • Re: Defensive signals legal?, thissteve
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Nick Wedd
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Todd A. Anderson
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Wes P
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Rik ter Veen
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Rik ter Veen
    • Re: Defensive signals legal?, mghmaine
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, ted
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Steve Grant
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, ted
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, ted
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Todd A. Anderson
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, akhare1@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Nadreck
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Steve Willner
    • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Todd A. Anderson
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, mghmaine
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Todd A. Anderson
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, David Stevenson
  • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Nick at Trumps
    • Re: Defensive signals legal?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, rhm
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, rhm
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Steve Willner
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Defensive signals legal?, David Stevenson
  • Re: Defensive signals legal?, raija d
• Senior Swiss Teams, Bernard Schneder
  • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, Bernard Schneder
    • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, Bernard Schneder
    • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, Bernard Schneder
    • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, Andrew
  • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, stephen . mcdevitt
  • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, ted
  • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, Gary Seckinger
    • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, Bernard Schneder
  • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, ewleongusa
    • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, stephen . mcdevitt
  • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, neilkaz
    • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, Andrew
  • Re: Senior Swiss Teams, Bob Lipton
• Systems Off over 1NT overcall, djohn
  • Re: Systems Off over 1NT overcall, Andrew
    • Re: Systems Off over 1NT overcall, neilkaz
    • Re: Systems Off over 1NT overcall, Otis Bricker
    • Re: Systems Off over 1NT overcall, Neil
      • Re: Systems Off over 1NT overcall, Andrew
      • Re: Systems Off over 1NT overcall, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Systems Off over 1NT overcall, Neil
  • Re: Systems Off over 1NT overcall, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Systems Off over 1NT overcall, mghmaine
  • Re: Systems Off over 1NT overcall, jsher
    • Re: Systems Off over 1NT overcall, goffster
  • Re: Systems Off over 1NT overcall, goffster
• Re: Pointless statistical question, jsher
  • Re: Pointless statistical question, Charles Brenner
• system on?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: system on?, raija d
  • Re: system on?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: system on?, LowerLine
  • Re: system on?, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: system on?, Free
  • Re: system on?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: system on?, Frances
  • Re: system on?, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: system on?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: system on?, Douglas Newlands
    • Re: system on?, Charlie
  • Re: system on?, ewleongusa
  • Re: system on?, Gary Seckinger
• Windows interface to Gib double dummy analysis engine, Neal
  • Re: Windows interface to Gib double dummy analysis engine, frisbieinstein
    • Re: Windows interface to Gib double dummy analysis engine, Bob Lipton
• Major(s) or Green Card or?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Nick Hughes
    • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, David Stevenson
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, David Stevenson
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, raija d
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Dave Flower
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, henrysun909
    • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, David Stevenson
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, neilkaz
    • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, mghmaine
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, goffster
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Dave Flower
    • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, akhare1@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Major(s) or Green Card or?, John Hoffman
• Re: Another lacuna in the laws, Steve Willner
  • Re: Another lacuna in the laws, Dave Flower
    • Re: Another lacuna in the laws, Everett M. Greene
• Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Steve Willner
  • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Free
  • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Larry Lowell
    • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Larry Lowell
      • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Larry Lowell
      • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, bridgematters
      • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, bridgematters
      • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Larry Lowell
      • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, David Collier
      • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, Steve Willner
    • Re: Gardner 1NT: Is it legal?, David Stevenson
• Re: For late-comers to Nationals, Steve Willner
• O Tempora! O Mores!, Mark B.
  • Re: O Tempora! O Mores!, John Blubaugh
• Re: Law of Symmetry, FootballWeb
  • Re: Law of Symmetry, ted
    • Re: Law of Symmetry, FootballWeb
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Law of Symmetry, John Crinnion
  • Re: Law of Symmetry, ttw
  • Re: Law of Symmetry, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Law of Symmetry, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Law of Symmetry, Steve Willner
  • Re: Law of Symmetry, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Law of Symmetry, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Law of Symmetry, frisbieinstein
    • Re: Law of Symmetry, ttw
      • Re: Law of Symmetry, Sven Pran
      • Re: Law of Symmetry, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Law of Symmetry, Adam Beneschan
• Modularity, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Modularity, thissteve
  • Re: Modularity, thissteve
  • Re: Modularity, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Modularity, Tyler Eaves
• Re: Movements, Dave Flower
  • Re: Movements, Peter Smulders
    • Re: Movements, Sven Pran
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Movements, David Stevenson
    • Re: Movements, Dave Flower
      • Re: Movements, David Stevenson
      • Re: Movements, Dave Flower
      • Re: Movements, David Stevenson
• Negative Double troubles, Mike S.
  • Re: Negative Double troubles, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Negative Double troubles, alvin
  • Re: Negative Double troubles, ewleongusa
  • Re: Negative Double troubles, raija d
  • Re: Negative Double troubles, Frances
    • Re: Negative Double troubles, nige1
      • Re: Negative Double troubles, neilkaz
• Mexicans Vow To Keep Bidding..., Carl
  • Re: Mexicans Vow To Keep Bidding..., Alex Martelli
    • Re: Mexicans Vow To Keep Bidding..., Carl
• Re: Mechanics of organising Swiss Pairs, Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Mechanics of organising Swiss Pairs, Ron Bouwland
    • Re: Mechanics of organising Swiss Pairs, Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Mechanics of organising Swiss Pairs, David Stevenson
    • Re: Mechanics of organising Swiss Pairs, Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Mechanics of organising Swiss Pairs, David Stevenson
      • Re: Mechanics of organising Swiss Pairs, Sven Pran
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mechanics of organising Swiss Pairs, nige1
  • Re: Mechanics of organising Swiss Pairs, Steve Willner
    • Re: Mechanics of organising Swiss Pairs, trefl44
    • Re: Mechanics of organising Swiss Pairs, David Stevenson
• Re: Longest meaningful auction, Tamuel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Longest meaningful auction, Ian Payn
  • Re: Longest meaningful auction, Nick Hughes
• Interesting bidding decision, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Interesting bidding decision, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Interesting bidding decision, ted
    • Re: Interesting bidding decision, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Interesting bidding decision, John Blubaugh
    • Interesting bidding decision, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Interesting bidding decision, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Interesting bidding decision, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Interesting bidding decision, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Interesting bidding decision, Andrew
    • Re: Interesting bidding decision, Eddie Grove
  • Re: Interesting bidding decision, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Interesting bidding decision, goffster
  • Re: Interesting bidding decision, goffster
  • Re: Interesting bidding decision, ewleongusa
    • Interesting bidding decision - the result, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Interesting bidding decision, John Schuler
• Re: Bidding Poll re 4-4-4-1 12 Count, Tamuel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Bidding Poll re 4-4-4-1 12 Count, Tamuel
    • Re: Bidding Poll re 4-4-4-1 12 Count, Chris
      • Re: Bidding Poll re 4-4-4-1 12 Count, Free
      • Re: Bidding Poll re 4-4-4-1 12 Count, Dave Flower
      • Re: Bidding Poll re 4-4-4-1 12 Count, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Bidding Poll re 4-4-4-1 12 Count, Free
• Re: Another roll it back?, Charles Brenner
• 7-0-0-6 bidding question, Mark
  • Re: 7-0-0-6 bidding question, Dave Flower
  • Re: 7-0-0-6 bidding question, Dave Flower
  • Re: 7-0-0-6 bidding question, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: 7-0-0-6 bidding question, ewleongusa
  • Re: 7-0-0-6 bidding question, raija d
  • Re: 7-0-0-6 bidding question, Gerben Dirksen
• Re: the meaning of "canape" remains a mystery, Larry Lowell
• Re: Defensive problems, 7/6/06, Charles Brenner
• Best seeding method?, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Best seeding method?, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Best seeding method?, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Best seeding method?, ted
• 2 balancing decisions, Sandy E. Barnes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 2 balancing decisions, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: 2 balancing decisions, Alex Martelli
    • Re: 2 balancing decisions, Andrew
      • Re: 2 balancing decisions, Bob Lipton
  • Re: 2 balancing decisions, Lorne
  • Re: 2 balancing decisions, raija d
  • Re: 2 balancing decisions, Charles Brenner
  • Re: 2 balancing decisions, John R. Mayne
    • Re: 2 balancing decisions, neilkaz
  • Re: 2 balancing decisions, goffster
  • Re: 2 balancing decisions, ewleongusa
  • Re: 2 balancing decisions, Mike S.
    • Re: 2 balancing decisions, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: 2 balancing decisions, raija d
      • Re: 2 balancing decisions, Travis Crump
      • Re: 2 balancing decisions, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: 2 balancing decisions, John Schuler
  • Re: 2 balancing decisions, Thomas Dehn
• Re: Richard Pavlicek, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Richard Pavlicek, Ron Johnson
    • Re: Richard Pavlicek, sci stat math
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Richard Pavlicek, FootballWeb
• Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., John R. Mayne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., nige1
  • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., mghmaine
    • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Dave Flower
  • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., goffster
    • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Amarande
  • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Amarande
      • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Dave Flower
      • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Dave Flower
      • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Amarande
      • Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Matchpoints problem - Part 2., Amarande
• Re: Ruling and appeal, ted
  • Re: Ruling and appeal, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Ruling and appeal, ted
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, Adam Beneschan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ruling and appeal, raija d
    • Re: Ruling and appeal, ted
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, raija d
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, ted
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, David Stevenson
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, ted
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, David Stevenson
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, ted
  • Re: Ruling and appeal, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Ruling and appeal, Ron Johnson
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, David Stevenson
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, Ron Johnson
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, David Stevenson
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, Ron Johnson
  • Re: Ruling and appeal, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Ruling and appeal, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Ruling and appeal, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, Travis Crump
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Ruling and appeal, Lorne
  • Re: Ruling and appeal, David Stevenson
  • Re: Ruling and appeal, henrysun909
    • Re: Ruling and appeal, raija d
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, ted
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, raija d
    • Re: Ruling and appeal, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, henrysun909
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, raija d
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, Mike Amos
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, henrysun909
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, raija d
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, David Stevenson
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, Everett M. Greene
      • Re: Ruling and appeal, Ron Johnson
  • Re: Ruling and appeal, David Stevenson
    • Re: Ruling and appeal, nige1