Re: where did the auction go wrong?
- From: "pfriedmanNoSpam" <p.paulfriedmanNoSpam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 00:37:09 -0500
<henrysun909@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1148621315.179746.248610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
red vs red at MPs, and against silent opponents, NS bid as follows:
AQ98732
A5
VOID
K943
K6
T86
AJ54
AJ76
South North
1C 2S
2NT 3C
3D 3S
4S all pass
How do you assess the blame for missing the virtually cold slam, which
has play for 7?
Henrysun909
Henry:
Easy in Blue Team: 1D - 2S
3S - 4C etc
I assume you were not using BTC jump shift definitions. Given that, I think
3D is wrong. Kx, after having denied support is marvelous. The later 4S
sounds like reluctance, not interest.
I also dislike the opening bid of 1C, but that is a somewhat different
issue.
Paul
.
- References:
- where did the auction go wrong?
- From: henrysun909
- where did the auction go wrong?
- Prev by Date: where did the auction go wrong?
- Next by Date: Re: General Bidding question
- Previous by thread: where did the auction go wrong?
- Next by thread: Re: where did the auction go wrong?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading