rec.games.bridge

• Date Index

---

• bidding decision, Travis Crump
  • Re: bidding decision, Andrew
    • Re: bidding decision, Eddie Grove
  • Re: bidding decision, gandalfnf
  • Re: bidding decision, raija d
  • Re: bidding decision, ewleongusa
  • Re: bidding decision, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: bidding decision, Bob Lipton
• Bid them up, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Bid them up, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Bid them up, alexogan
      • Re: Bid them up, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Bid them up, Sandy E. Barnes
• Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Phil
  • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, pgmer6809
  • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Andrew
  • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Nick Hughes
  • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, gandalfnf
  • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Derek Broughton
    • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Adam Beneschan
  • Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, raija d
    • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Phil
      • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Phil
  • Re: Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable + Reasonable = Total Disaster, Thomas Dehn
• What if they ignore the GCC?, pgmer6809
  • Re: What if they ignore the GCC?, Barry Margolin
    • Re: What if they ignore the GCC?, pgmer6809
      • Re: What if they ignore the GCC?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: What if they ignore the GCC?, David Stevenson
      • Re: What if they ignore the GCC?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: What if they ignore the GCC?, Mark Brader
      • Re: What if they ignore the GCC?, David Babcock
  • Re: What if they ignore the GCC?, David Stevenson
  • Re: What if they ignore the GCC?, nige1
    • Re: What if they ignore the GCC?, Alex Martelli
• AQTxx-75-Void-AQxxxx, koen
  • Re: AQTxx-75-Void-AQxxxx, Bob Lipton
  • Re: AQTxx-75-Void-AQxxxx, paulhigh
    • Re: AQTxx-75-Void-AQxxxx, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AQTxx-75-Void-AQxxxx, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: AQTxx-75-Void-AQxxxx, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: AQTxx-75-Void-AQxxxx, Alex Martelli
    • Re: AQTxx-75-Void-AQxxxx, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: AQTxx-75-Void-AQxxxx, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: AQTxx-75-Void-AQxxxx, Frances
  • Re: AQTxx-75-Void-AQxxxx, gandalfnf
  • Re: AQTxx-75-Void-AQxxxx, Sandy E. Barnes
• To slam or not to slam, Mark Dean
  • Re: To slam or not to slam, ewleongusa
  • Re: To slam or not to slam, Bob Lipton
  • Re: To slam or not to slam, jsher
  • Re: To slam or not to slam, Alex Martelli
  • Re: To slam or not to slam, paulhigh
  • Re: To slam or not to slam, Sandy E. Barnes
• dds10.zip available on aleax.it, Alex Martelli
  • Re: dds10.zip available on aleax.it, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: dds10.zip available on aleax.it, Bo Haglund
      • Re: dds10.zip available on aleax.it, Michael Angelo Ravera
• How do you make 4S here?, Adam Lea
  • Re: How do you make 4S here?, mghmaine
    • Re: How do you make 4S here?, David Burn
  • Re: How do you make 4S here?, David Burn
  • Re: How do you make 4S here?, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: How do you make 4S here?, ewleongusa
    • Re: How do you make 4S here?, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: How do you make 4S here?, Tim DeLaney
• Three boards against known sharks, henrysun909
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Three boards against known sharks, henrysun909
      • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, coj
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, mghmaine
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Tim DeLaney
    • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Andrew
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Andrew
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, goffster
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, ewleongusa
    • Re: Three boards against known sharks, ted
      • Re: Three boards against known sharks, ewleongusa
      • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Kent Feiler
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: Three boards against known sharks, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Three boards against known sharks, ted
      • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Travis Crump
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Jyrki Lahtonen
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Charlie
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, Kent Feiler
  • Re: Three boards against known sharks, John R. Mayne
• A Bridge Classic, stevts
  • Re: A Bridge Classic, gandalfnf
  • Re: A Bridge Classic, John Hall
  • Re: A Bridge Classic, Phil
    • Re: A Bridge Classic, alvin
  • Re: A Bridge Classic, pgmer6809
  • Re: A Bridge Classic, Bob Lipton
  • Re: A Bridge Classic, Anton van Uitert
  • Re: A Bridge Classic, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: A Bridge Classic, Bob Lipton
      • Re: A Bridge Classic, Phil
  • Re: A Bridge Classic, stevts
• Free software for a double dummy solver, Bo Haglund
  • Re: Free software for a double dummy solver, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Free software for a double dummy solver, Bo Haglund
      • Re: Free software for a double dummy solver, henrysun909
      • Re: Free software for a double dummy solver, Alex Martelli
• non partnerships, goffster
  • Re: non partnerships, raija d
  • Re: non partnerships, Alex Martelli
    • Re: non partnerships, alvin
  • Re: non partnerships, etsand
    • Re: non partnerships, Derek Broughton
• getting tired of bridge? wanna try Bingo?casino games?....., the poker mob
  • Re: getting tired of bridge? wanna try Bingo?casino games?....., Bill Jacobs
• not a good hand, multguru@xxxxxxx
  • Re: not a good hand, Bob Lipton
  • Re: not a good hand, mghmaine
  • Re: not a good hand, Will in New Haven
  • Re: not a good hand, coj
  • Re: not a good hand, ted
  • Re: not a good hand, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: not a good hand, neilkaz
• play problem, Travis Crump
  • Re: play problem, Bob Lipton
    • Re: play problem, Richard Pavlicek
  • Re: play problem, Travis Crump
  • Re: play problem, nige1
  • Re: play problem, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: play problem, Frances
• Fielded misbid ?, Andreas Stoll
  • Re: Fielded misbid ?, gins
  • Re: Fielded misbid ?, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Fielded misbid ?, gandalfnf
    • Re: Fielded misbid ?, Phil
  • Re: Fielded misbid ?, Lorne
• A Wild Hand, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: A Wild Hand, Bob Lipton
    • Re: A Wild Hand, ewleongusa
      • Re: A Wild Hand, Bob Lipton
  • Re: A Wild Hand, Nick Hughes
    • Re: A Wild Hand, ted
  • Re: A Wild Hand, SCyardman
  • Re: A Wild Hand, Peter Leighton
  • Re: A Wild Hand, Lorne
    • Re: A Wild Hand, Robert Tamlyn
• poker online try it now for free, the poker mob
• Hardy's 2/1 book, David Howorth
  • Re: Hardy's 2/1 book, savanfort
  • Re: Hardy's 2/1 book, ewleongusa
  • Re: Hardy's 2/1 book, paulhigh
• Memorable moments, Anant Rege
  • Re: Memorable moments, Mark Dean
    • Re: Memorable moments, Norman Silverstone
      • Re: Memorable moments, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Memorable moments, ddub47
  • Re: Memorable moments, Steve Grant
    • Re: Memorable moments, Barry Rigal
  • Re: Memorable moments, Andrew
  • Re: Memorable moments, Mmbridge
  • Re: Memorable moments, Charlie
  • Re: Memorable moments, ewleongusa
  • Re: Memorable moments, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Memorable moments, mghmaine
      • Re: Memorable moments, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Memorable moments, ddub47
  • Re: Memorable moments, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Memorable moments, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Memorable moments, John Crinnion
    • Re: Memorable moments, John R. Mayne
      • Re: Memorable moments, John Crinnion
  • Re: Memorable moments, Geraint
  • Re: Memorable moments, David Goldfarb
• ruling please - self incrimination, Nick Hughes
  • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, ted
    • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, Stu Goodgold
  • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, gandalfnf
    • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, raija d
      • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, mghmaine
      • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, Barry Margolin
      • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, mghmaine
      • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, gandalfnf
      • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, David Stevenson
    • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, David Stevenson
  • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, nige1
    • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, mghmaine
    • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, Sven Pran
    • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: ruling please - self incrimination, David Stevenson
• Defending vs NT - cash an ace?, Phil
  • Re: Defending vs NT - cash an ace?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Defending vs NT - cash an ace?, Dave Flower
    • Re: Defending vs NT - cash an ace?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Defending vs NT - cash an ace?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Defending vs NT - cash an ace?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: Defending vs NT - cash an ace?, Stephen Tu
  • Re: Defending vs NT - cash an ace?, goffster
    • Re: Defending vs NT - cash an ace?, Phil
    • Re: Defending vs NT - cash an ace?, Stephen Tu
  • Re: Defending vs NT - cash an ace?, Doug Avery
• Advertisement: New version of Duplicate Scorer released, Keith Sheppard
• where did the auction go wrong?, henrysun909
  • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, pfriedmanNoSpam
  • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, Nick at Trumps
    • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, John Schuler
    • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, stevts
      • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, John Schuler
      • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, Rik ter Veen
  • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, Dave Flower
  • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, ted
  • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, Andrew
  • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, ewleongusa
    • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, Arend Bayer
  • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, Will in New Haven
    • Message not available
      • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, mghmaine
    • Message not available
      • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, rhm
    • Message not available
      • Re: where did the auction go wrong?, Sandy E. Barnes
• today's trump squeeze, Nick at Trumps
  • Re: today's trump squeeze, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: today's trump squeeze, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: today's trump squeeze, nige1
  • Re: today's trump squeeze, Peterh
  • Re: today's trump squeeze, Nick at Trumps
    • Re: today's trump squeeze, Peterh
  • Re: today's trump squeeze, Bob Lipton
• The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 38, Richard Lawson
  • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 38, anon
  • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 38, Eddie Grove
    • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 38, Richard Lawson
  • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 38, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 38, Tom S
• Suggestions about how to bid this hand, djohn
  • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, Otis Bricker
    • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, djohn
      • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, ted
      • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, John R. Mayne
      • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, ewleongusa
      • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, ewleongusa
      • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, Sid Ismail
      • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Suggestions about how to bid this hand, mghmaine
• Ekren 2D - What would you bid, Charlie Baylis
  • Re: Ekren 2D - What would you bid, mghmaine
  • Re: Ekren 2D - What would you bid, Sid Ismail
  • Re: Ekren 2D - What would you bid, David Stevenson
  • Re: Ekren 2D - What would you bid, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Ekren 2D - What would you bid, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Ekren 2D - What would you bid, ted
    • Re: Ekren 2D - What would you bid, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Ekren 2D - What would you bid, ted
      • Re: Ekren 2D - What would you bid, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Ekren 2D - What would you bid, Chris Ryall
    • Re: Ekren 2D - What would you bid, Free
• General Bidding question, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: General Bidding question, Travis Crump
    • Re: General Bidding question, raija d
    • Re: General Bidding question, Alan Lee
  • Re: General Bidding question, pfriedmanNoSpam
  • Re: General Bidding question, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: General Bidding question, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: General Bidding question, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: General Bidding question, ted
      • Re: General Bidding question, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: General Bidding question, ted
  • Re: General Bidding question, goffster
    • Re: General Bidding question, ted
      • Re: General Bidding question, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: General Bidding question, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: General Bidding question, Tom S
  • Re: General Bidding question, underruff
• Your input, zara
  • Re: Your input, ted
    • Re: Your input, zara
      • Re: Your input, mghmaine
  • Re: Your input, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Your input, Kieran Dyke
• Time for full disclosure in bridge, Phil
  • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Mmbridge
    • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Phil
      • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Wayne
      • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, gins
      • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Dave Flower
  • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Barry Rigal
    • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Eric Landau
    • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Eric Landau
  • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Wes P
    • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Phil
  • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, anon
  • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, nige1
  • Re: Time for full disclosure in bridge, Charlie
• 7-2-2-2 simulation, henrysun909
  • Re: 7-2-2-2 simulation, Frances
  • Re: 7-2-2-2 simulation, gandalfnf
  • Re: 7-2-2-2 simulation, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: 7-2-2-2 simulation, gandalfnf
    • Re: 7-2-2-2 simulation, ted
      • Re: 7-2-2-2 simulation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: 7-2-2-2 simulation, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: 7-2-2-2 simulation, Derek Broughton
      • Re: 7-2-2-2 simulation, mghmaine
    • Re: 7-2-2-2 simulation, henrysun909
  • Re: 7-2-2-2 simulation, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: 7-2-2-2 simulation, ted
• For amusement only - declarer play, Dave Flower
  • Re: For amusement only - declarer play, Frances
    • Re: For amusement only - declarer play, Dave Flower
  • Re: For amusement only - declarer play, Lorne
• 1NT(Alert!) Strong balanced hand percentages, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: 1NT(Alert!) Strong balanced hand percentages, Otis Bricker
  • Re: 1NT(Alert!) Strong balanced hand percentages, Frances
    • Re: 1NT(Alert!) Strong balanced hand percentages, Will in New Haven
    • Re: 1NT(Alert!) Strong balanced hand percentages, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: 1NT(Alert!) Strong balanced hand percentages, Frances
  • Re: 1NT(Alert!) Strong balanced hand percentages, gandalfnf
    • Re: 1NT(Alert!) Strong balanced hand percentages, Michael Angelo Ravera
• Misleading declarer, Eric Kehr
  • Re: Misleading declarer, Richard Lawson
    • Re: Misleading declarer, Andrew
      • Re: Misleading declarer, David Stevenson
    • Re: Misleading declarer, Eric Kehr
      • Re: Misleading declarer, Andrew
      • Re: Misleading declarer, Eric Kehr
      • Re: Misleading declarer, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: Misleading declarer, Andrew
      • Re: Misleading declarer, Eric Kehr
      • Re: Misleading declarer, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Misleading declarer, David Stevenson
      • Re: Misleading declarer, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Misleading declarer, Jon Siegel
  • Re: Misleading declarer, Ron Johnson
  • Re: Misleading declarer, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Misleading declarer, Steve Grant
      • Re: Misleading declarer, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Misleading declarer, Ron Johnson
  • Re: Misleading declarer, Andrew
• Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 4, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 4, Andrew
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 4, Frances
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 4, ewleongusa
    • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 4, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 4, Tim DeLaney
• Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3, Andrew
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3, Dave Flower
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3, ewleongusa
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3, mghmaine
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3, gandalfnf
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3 - part 2, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3 - part 2, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3 - part 2, ted
  • Re: Matchpoints 05-22-06 - hand 3, goffster
• Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, Andrew
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, Dave Flower
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, Rik ter Veen
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, Nick Hughes
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, gandalfnf
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, ewleongusa
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, ted
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 2, goffster
• Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, Andrew
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, Dave Flower
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, Nick Hughes
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, ewleongusa
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, mghmaine
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, gandalfnf
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, goffster
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-22-06 - hand 1, Thomas Dehn
• 1C 1S 3H ?, Ashok
  • Re: 1C 1S 3H ?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: 1C 1S 3H ?, Travis Crump
  • Re: 1C 1S 3H ?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: 1C 1S 3H ?, Andrew
    • Re: 1C 1S 3H ?, henrysun909
      • Re: 1C 1S 3H ?, ted
  • Re: 1C 1S 3H ?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: 1C 1S 3H ?, henrysun909
      • Re: 1C 1S 3H ?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: 1C 1S 3H ?, Lorne
  • Re: 1C 1S 3H ?, ewleongusa
• Congratulations to...., henrysun909
  • Re: Congratulations to...., Ashok
    • Re: Congratulations to...., Alex Martelli
    • Re: Congratulations to...., Lorne
      • Re: Congratulations to...., alvin
• Is this worth suggesting an alternative to 3NT?, Phil
  • Re: Is this worth suggesting an alternative to 3NT?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Is this worth suggesting an alternative to 3NT?, mghmaine
    • Re: Is this worth suggesting an alternative to 3NT?, Wayne
      • Re: Is this worth suggesting an alternative to 3NT?, Andrew
      • Re: Is this worth suggesting an alternative to 3NT?, mghmaine
• bypass Unusual NT bidding question, ted
  • Re: bypass Unusual NT bidding question, Bob Lipton
  • Re: bypass Unusual NT bidding question, John R. Mayne
  • Re: bypass Unusual NT bidding question, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: bypass Unusual NT bidding question, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: bypass Unusual NT bidding question, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: bypass Unusual NT bidding question, Andrew
  • Re: bypass Unusual NT bidding question, Will in New Haven
  • Re: bypass Unusual NT bidding question, ewleongusa
  • Re: bypass Unusual NT bidding question, Thomas Dehn
• is this forcing?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: is this forcing?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: is this forcing?, Frances
  • Re: is this forcing?, ewleongusa
  • Re: is this forcing?, gandalfnf
  • Re: is this forcing?, Andrew
  • Re: is this forcing?, Sandy E. Barnes
• early draft version of new research and programs, Alex Martelli
  • Re: early draft version of new research and programs, Otis Bricker
    • Re: early draft version of new research and programs, Alex Martelli
      • Re: early draft version of new research and programs, henrysun909
      • Re: early draft version of new research and programs, Tysen Streib
  • Re: early draft version of new research and programs, David Collier
  • Re: early draft version of new research and programs, Otis Bricker
    • Re: early draft version of new research and programs, Alex Martelli
      • Re: early draft version of new research and programs, Alex Martelli
• To sashay to 3NT or not, Bob Richardson
  • Re: To sashay to 3NT or not, rhm
  • Re: To sashay to 3NT or not, paulhigh
    • Re: To sashay to 3NT or not, Alex Martelli
      • Re: To sashay to 3NT or not, Chris Ryall
      • Re: To sashay to 3NT or not, Alex Martelli
• To bash or not to bash - study of 1NT-3NT auctions, Bob Richardson
  • Re: To bash or not to bash - study of 1NT-3NT auctions, Jeff Miller
    • Re: To bash or not to bash - study of 1NT-3NT auctions, Dave Flower
      • Re: To bash or not to bash - study of 1NT-3NT auctions, Chris Ryall
  • Re: To bash or not to bash - study of 1NT-3NT auctions, ewleongusa
    • Re: To bash or not to bash - study of 1NT-3NT auctions, Chris Ryall
      • Re: To bash or not to bash - study of 1NT-3NT auctions, ewleongusa
      • Re: To bash or not to bash - study of 1NT-3NT auctions, Otis Bricker
  • Re: To bash or not to bash - study of 1NT-3NT auctions, Bo Haglund
    • Re: To bash or not to bash - study of 1NT-3NT auctions, Otis Bricker
      • Re: To bash or not to bash - study of 1NT-3NT auctions, Bo Haglund
• Who's to blame?, petkob
  • Re: Who's to blame?, scyardman
  • Re: Who's to blame?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Who's to blame?, gandalfnf
  • Re: Who's to blame?, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Who's to blame?, Richard L. Hall
    • Re: Who's to blame?, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Who's to blame?, Bud H
    • Re: Who's to blame? (correcting 14 cards....), Bud H
    • Re: Who's to blame?, petkob
      • Re: Who's to blame?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Who's to blame?, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Who's to blame?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Who's to blame?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Who's to blame?, ted
      • Re: Who's to blame?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Who's to blame?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Who's to blame?, goffster
• Good-Bad 2NT and Transfer/Rubens advances, Michiel
  • Re: Good-Bad 2NT and Transfer/Rubens advances, Jan Veerbeek
    • Re: Good-Bad 2NT and Transfer/Rubens advances, Michiel
      • Re: Good-Bad 2NT and Transfer/Rubens advances, Newroad
      • Re: Good-Bad 2NT and Transfer/Rubens advances, Jan Veerbeek
      • Re: Good-Bad 2NT and Transfer/Rubens advances, bgsesq
• From best to worst, amat
  • Re: From best to worst, mghmaine
  • Re: From best to worst, ted
  • Re: From best to worst, Bob Lipton
  • Re: From best to worst, gandalfnf
  • Re: From best to worst, Bob Richardson
    • Re: From best to worst, Todd Zimnoch
  • Re: From best to worst, Lorne
  • Re: From best to worst, Dave Flower
    • Re: From best to worst, Bob Lipton
      • Re: From best to worst, Dave Flower
  • Re: From best to worst, Sandy E. Barnes
• Theoretical discussion, henrysun909
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, Karen Walker
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, John Hall
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, gandalfnf
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, Sid Ismail
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, ted
    • Re: Theoretical discussion, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, Kent Feiler
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, alvin
    • Re: Theoretical discussion, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, stevts
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, Lorne
    • Re: Theoretical discussion, gandalfnf
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, henrysun909
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, Kent Feiler
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, Lorne
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, Lorne
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, Tim DeLaney
    • Re: Theoretical discussion, Sid Ismail
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, Kent Feiler
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, stevts
    • Re: Theoretical discussion, henrysun909
      • Re: Theoretical discussion, stevts
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Theoretical discussion, Michael Angelo Ravera
• Choice of calls, henrysun909
  • Re: Choice of calls, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Choice of calls, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Choice of calls, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Choice of calls, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Choice of calls, gandalfnf
  • Re: Choice of calls, Sid Ismail
  • Re: Choice of calls, ted
    • Re: Choice of calls, Lorne
  • Re: Choice of calls, Bud H
    • Re: Choice of calls, mghmaine
  • Re: Choice of calls, John R. Mayne
    • Re: Choice of calls, mghmaine
      • Re: Choice of calls, henrysun909
      • Re: Choice of calls, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Choice of calls, ewleongusa
      • Are you kidding me?, stevts
      • Re: Are you kidding me?, ted
      • Re: Are you kidding me?, ewleongusa
      • Re: Are you kidding me?, stevts
      • Re: Are you kidding me?, ewleongusa
      • Re: Are you kidding me?, stevts
      • Re: Are you kidding me?, ewleongusa
      • Re: Choice of calls, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Choice of calls, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Choice of calls, Sandy E. Barnes
• Interesting lead problem, henrysun909
  • Re: Interesting lead problem, gandalfnf
    • Re: Interesting lead problem, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Interesting lead problem, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Interesting lead problem, ted
    • Re: Interesting lead problem, mghmaine
  • Re: Interesting lead problem, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Interesting lead problem, scyardman
    • Re: Interesting lead problem, henrysun909
      • Re: Interesting lead problem, stevts
      • Re: Interesting lead problem, henrysun909
      • Re: Interesting lead problem, ewleongusa
  • Re: Interesting lead problem, Free
    • Re: Interesting lead problem, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: Interesting lead problem, stevts
• good used-bridge-book sellers?, Alex Martelli
  • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Sid Ismail
  • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Nigel
    • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, mghmaine
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Nigel
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Denis O'Kane
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, mghmaine
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Mmbridge
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Jürgen R .
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Sid Ismail
  • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, alvin
    • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Alex Martelli
  • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Woodsey
    • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Alex Martelli
  • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Carl
    • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Dave Flower
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, mghmaine
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Carl
      • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Alex Martelli
  • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, usawargamer@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: good used-bridge-book sellers?, Alex Martelli
• A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Sam
  • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, ted
  • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, John Hall
  • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, scyardman
    • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, henrysun909
      • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Will in New Haven
      • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Kent Feiler
  • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Lorne
  • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Peter Leighton
    • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Alex Martelli
  • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Andrew
  • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Alex Martelli
    • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Chris Ryall
      • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Andrew
  • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Newroad
  • Re: A53 AKQJ987 4 98- rebid after 1D-1H-1S-?, Sandy E. Barnes
• google question, multguru@xxxxxxx
  • Re: google question, ted
  • Re: google question, Herb
    • Re: google question, multguru@xxxxxxx
      • Re: google question, John Crinnion
• A simple defensive card combination: Q10x in dummy with 3rd hand holding Kxx, Bud H
  • Re: A simple defensive card combination: Q10x in dummy with 3rd hand holding Kxx, mghmaine
  • Re: A simple defensive card combination: Q10x in dummy with 3rd hand holding Kxx, Bill Jacobs
• 2H-(X)-XX, koen
  • Re: 2H-(X)-XX, Andrew
    • Re: 2H-(X)-XX, henrysun909
    • Re: 2H-(X)-XX, mghmaine
      • Re: 2H-(X)-XX, Free
      • Re: 2H-(X)-XX, mghmaine
      • Re: 2H-(X)-XX, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: 2H-(X)-XX, mghmaine
  • Re: 2H-(X)-XX, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: 2H-(X)-XX, John R. Mayne
  • Re: 2H-(X)-XX, gandalfnf
  • Re: 2H-(X)-XX, Lorne
    • Re: 2H-(X)-XX, gandalfnf
• What call strikes your fancy? No. 2, ted
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy? No. 2, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy? No. 2, mghmaine
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy? No. 2, John R. Mayne
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy? No. 2, Travis Crump
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy? No. 2, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy? No. 2, gandalfnf
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy? No. 2, Dave Flower
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy? No. 2, Thomas Dehn
• What call strikes your fancy?, ted
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy?, mghmaine
    • Re: What call strikes your fancy?, John R. Mayne
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy?, henrysun909
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy?, coj
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: What call strikes your fancy?, Thomas Dehn
• Coincidental (and Educational), stevts
  • Re: Coincidental (and Educational), mghmaine
    • Re: Coincidental (and Educational), ted
  • Re: Coincidental (and Educational), nige1
  • Re: Coincidental (and Educational), vida
    • Re: Coincidental (and Educational), henrysun909
      • Re: Coincidental (and Educational), Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Coincidental (and Educational), Andrew
  • Re: Coincidental (and Educational), Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Coincidental (and Educational), Sid Ismail
    • Re: Coincidental (and Educational), Bob Lipton
  • Re: Coincidental (and Educational), Lorne
  • Re: Coincidental (and Educational), stevts
• what is your call?, peter seidnitzer
  • Re: what is your call?, ted
  • Re: what is your call?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: what is your call?, mghmaine
  • Re: what is your call?, Andrew
  • Re: what is your call?, paulhigh
    • Re: what is your call?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: what is your call?, Mmbridge
  • Re: what is your call?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: what is your call?, henrysun909
      • Re: what is your call?, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: what is your call?, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: what is your call?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: what is your call?, henrysun909
      • Re: what is your call?, Alex Martelli
      • Re: what is your call?, henrysun909
  • Re: what is your call?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: what is your call?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: what is your call?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: what is your call?, Lorne
    • Re: what is your call?, ted
    • Re: what is your call?, Herb
  • Re: what is your call?, gandalfnf
  • Re: what is your call?, al
• WWW.CasinoPalms.Net, thebronzmonkey
• Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, coj
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, coj
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, coj
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, coj
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, rhm
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, rhm
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, gandalfnf
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, John Blubaugh
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, Andrew
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued, Lorne
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued - the result, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued - the result, Lorne
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued - the result, John R. Mayne
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued - the result, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-05 - continued - the result, gandalfnf
• nice trump squeeze, Nick at Trumps
  • Re: nice trump squeeze, Tim DeLaney
• Re: Chicago NABC, Craig
• Partnership Bidding Question, Bernard Schneder
  • Re: Partnership Bidding Question, gandalfnf
  • Re: Partnership Bidding Question, mghmaine
  • Re: Partnership Bidding Question, stephen . mcdevitt
    • Re: Partnership Bidding Question, bgsesq
  • Re: Partnership Bidding Question, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Partnership Bidding Question, Dave Flower
    • Re: Partnership Bidding Question, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Partnership Bidding Question, Lorne
    • Re: Partnership Bidding Question, stephen . mcdevitt
      • Re: Partnership Bidding Question, mghmaine
      • Re: Partnership Bidding Question, bgsesq
  • Re: Partnership Bidding Question, henrysun909
• To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Richard Lawson
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, ted
    • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Arend Bayer
      • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, raija d
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Newroad
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, gandalfnf
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Ville Likitalo
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, mghmaine
    • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, gandalfnf
      • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, mghmaine
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, ewleongusa
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Bob Lipton
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, paulhigh
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, raija d
    • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, bgsesq
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Alex Martelli
      • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Bob Lipton
      • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Alex Martelli
    • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Ville Likitalo
      • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Alex Martelli
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Alex Martelli
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Rik ter Veen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, Richard Lawson
    • Re: To jump or not to jump, that is the question, henrysun909
• Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Newroad
  • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Newroad
      • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, henrysun909
      • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Sid Ismail
      • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, henrysun909
    • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Bo Haglund
      • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Tim DeLaney
    • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, gandalfnf
    • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, RonH
      • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Mmbridge
  • Re: Bridge Simulator/Dealer, Nigel
• What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Sam
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Andrew
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, goffster
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Tim DeLaney
    • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Ville Likitalo
    • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, ted
      • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Andrew
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, jas1959
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Sid Ismail
    • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Will in New Haven
      • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Sid Ismail
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Lorne
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, ted
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, ewleongusa
    • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Sid Ismail
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, paulhigh
    • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Andrew
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, John R. Mayne
  • Re: What do you rebid? AQT62 AQ3 K94 K2, Tom S
• Final Hands -- Will You win ?, mghmaine
  • Re: Final Hands -- Will You win ?, John R. Mayne
    • Re: Final Hands -- Will You win ?, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Final Hands -- Will You win ?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Final Hands -- Will You win ?, Richard Lawson
  • Re: Final Hands -- Will You win ?, ted
  • Re: Final Hands -- Will You win ?, nige1
  • Re: Final Hands -- Will You win ?, raija d
  • Re: Final Hands -- Will You win ?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Final Hands -- Will You win ?, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Final Hands -- Will You win ?, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Final Hands -- Will You win ?, mghmaine
• responder problem:, Mitch Edelman
  • Re: responder problem:, Bob Lipton
  • Re: responder problem:, ted
  • Re: responder problem:, Frances
  • Re: responder problem:, Marvin French
  • Re: responder problem:, John Blubaugh
  • Re: responder problem:, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: responder problem:, Tim DeLaney
• Responsive double, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Responsive double, raija d
  • Re: Responsive double, Marvin French
  • Re: Responsive double, Nick Hughes - notebook
  • Re: Responsive double, paulhigh
    • Re: Responsive double, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Responsive double, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Responsive double, raija d
      • Re: Responsive double, mghmaine
      • Re: Responsive double, multguru@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Responsive double, gandalfnf
      • Re: Responsive double, Andrew
      • Re: Responsive double, gandalfnf
      • Re: Responsive double, Andrew
      • Re: Responsive double, gandalfnf
      • Re: Responsive double, Andrew
• I'm probably the strongest, amat
  • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: I'm probably the strongest, amat
      • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Free
  • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Bob Lipton
  • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Dave Flower
  • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Lorne
  • Re: I'm probably the strongest, gandalfnf
  • Re: I'm probably the strongest, John R. Mayne
    • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Alex Martelli
  • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Bob Lipton
  • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Dave Flower
    • Re: I'm probably the strongest, amat
      • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Neill Currie
      • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Neill Currie
  • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Nick Hughes - notebook
  • Re: I'm probably the strongest, ewleongusa
    • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Dave Flower
      • Re: I'm probably the strongest, ewleongusa
      • Re: I'm probably the strongest, Dave Flower
  • Re: I'm probably the strongest, paulhigh
• An opening bid problem, Daisy
  • Re: An opening bid problem, Lorne
    • Re: An opening bid problem, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: An opening bid problem, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: An opening bid problem, Bob Lipton
  • Re: An opening bid problem, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: An opening bid problem, Steve Willner
  • Re: An opening bid problem, goffster
    • Re: An opening bid problem, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: An opening bid problem, raija d
• fourth of hand, none
  • Re: fourth of hand, Andrew
• 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, henrysun909
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Andrew
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Lorne
    • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, mghmaine
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Lorne
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, mghmaine
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Bob Lipton
    • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Derek Broughton
      • Message not available
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Derek Broughton
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Lorne
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Alex Martelli
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, John R. Mayne
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Andrew
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Arend Bayer
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, mghmaine
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, ted
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Derek Broughton
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Andrew
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, mghmaine
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, ted
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Derek Broughton
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Alex Martelli
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, ted
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Alex Martelli
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Andrew
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, mghmaine
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, mghmaine
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Lorne
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, mghmaine
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, gandalfnf
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, nige1
    • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Andrew
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, ted
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Dave Flower
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Kent Feiler
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, stevts
    • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, mghmaine
    • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Bob Lipton
    • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, gandalfnf
    • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, nige1
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, stevts
    • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Bob Lipton
    • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Lorne
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, goffster
  • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, ewleongusa
    • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, ewleongusa
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: 2 hands i screwed up at MPs, Bob Lipton
• Matchpoints 5-15-06, Hand 3, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, Hand 3, gandalfnf
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, Hand 3, Lorne
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, Hand 3 - mistake corrected, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, Hand 3, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, Hand 3, ewleongusa
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, Hand 3, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, Hand 3, ted
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, Hand 3, goffster
• seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, 2006April
  • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, ewleongusa
    • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, Ian Payn
      • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, ted
      • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, 2006April
  • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, 2006April
      • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, Stephen Tu
      • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, 2006April
      • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, Stephen Tu
      • Re: seek local brige games in Fremont and Milpitas areas, Michael Angelo Ravera
• Stiff A, Void, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Stiff A, Void, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Stiff A, Void, ewleongusa
  • Re: Stiff A, Void, ted
  • Re: Stiff A, Void, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Stiff A, Void, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Stiff A, Void, Lorne
  • Message not available
    • Re: Stiff A, Void, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
• MP Lead, Eric Kehr
  • Re: MP Lead, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: MP Lead, ewleongusa
  • Re: MP Lead, Ville Likitalo
  • Re: MP Lead, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: MP Lead, Bob Lipton
  • Re: MP Lead, Lorne
  • Re: MP Lead, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: MP Lead, gandalfnf
  • Re: MP Lead, Eric Kehr
• Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, gandalfnf
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, ewleongusa
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, ewleongusa
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, ewleongusa
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, ewleongusa
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, ewleongusa
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, bruno
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, ewleongusa
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, ewleongusa
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, ewleongusa
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, ted
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, mghmaine
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Ville Likitalo
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Lorne
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2 - the result, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2 - the result, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2 - the result, bruno
  • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, goffster
    • Re: Matchpoints 5-15-06, hand 2, Sandy E. Barnes
• Matchpoint bidding problem, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, Richard Lawson
  • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, Frances
  • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, gandalfnf
  • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, Lorne
    • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, gandalfnf
      • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, Lorne
      • Message not available
      • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Message not available
      • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, mghmaine
  • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, raija d
  • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, mghmaine
    • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, ted
      • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, mghmaine
  • Re: Matchpoint bidding problem, goffster
• Suggest an auction, Bill Lentz
  • Re: Suggest an auction, henrysun909
    • Re: Suggest an auction, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Suggest an auction, raija d
  • Re: Suggest an auction, ewleongusa
  • Re: Suggest an auction, Lorne
    • Re: Suggest an auction, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Suggest an auction, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Suggest an auction, Bob Lipton
• Declarer Play Problem, stevts
  • Re: Declarer Play Problem, Ville Likitalo
    • Re: Declarer Play Problem, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Declarer Play Problem, Ville Likitalo
      • Re: Declarer Play Problem, Steven Gibbs
  • Re: Declarer Play Problem, Lorne
    • Re: Declarer Play Problem, Frances
      • Re: Declarer Play Problem, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Declarer Play Problem, Lorne
  • Re: Declarer Play Problem, ewleongusa
  • Re: Declarer Play Problem, ted
  • Re: Declarer Play Problem, stevts
    • Re: Declarer Play Problem, ewleongusa
  • Re: Declarer Play Problem, nige1
  • Re: Declarer Play Problem, nige1
• AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Sam
  • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Alex Martelli
    • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Alex Martelli
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, raija d
  • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, John Hall
  • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, smn
  • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Bob Lipton
  • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Lorne
    • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, henrysun909
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Alex Martelli
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, henrysun909
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Alex Martelli
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, henrysun909
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, John Blubaugh
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, henrysun909
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, John Blubaugh
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Alex Martelli
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, John Blubaugh
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Alex Martelli
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Andrew
  • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, ted
    • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, John Blubaugh
  • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, John Blubaugh
    • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, ted
    • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, smn
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, henrysun909
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, John Blubaugh
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, henrysun909
      • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, Alex Martelli
  • Re: AQ3 86 KQJ52 A96 Please bid this, ewleongusa
• 1S/2C(GF)/2H/2NT/3D, dannysprung@xxxxxxx
  • Re: 1S/2C(GF)/2H/2NT/3D, vida
    • Re: 1S/2C(GF)/2H/2NT/3D, ewleongusa
      • Re: 1S/2C(GF)/2H/2NT/3D, vida
      • Re: 1S/2C(GF)/2H/2NT/3D, ewleongusa
  • Re: 1S/2C(GF)/2H/2NT/3D, raija d
  • Re: 1S/2C(GF)/2H/2NT/3D, Bob Lipton
    • Re: 1S/2C(GF)/2H/2NT/3D, Bob Lipton
  • Re: 1S/2C(GF)/2H/2NT/3D --variant, Barry Rigal
• Response Structure to 1NT, Newroad
• The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 37, Richard Lawson
  • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 37, Bob Richardson
    • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 37, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 37, nige1
• Best defense/lead, Sam
  • Re: Best defense/lead, Sam
  • Re: Best defense/lead, ted
  • Re: Best defense/lead, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Best defense/lead, mghmaine
  • Re: Best defense/lead, peter koch
    • Re: Best defense/lead, ted
  • Re: Best defense/lead, ewleongusa
  • Re: Best defense/lead, vida
    • Re: Best defense/lead, Phil
      • Re: Best defense/lead, raija d
      • Re: Best defense/lead, vida
  • Re: Best defense/lead, Tim DeLaney
    • Re: Best defense/lead, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Best defense/lead, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: Best defense/lead, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Best defense/lead, nige1
    • Re: Best defense/lead, Travis Crump
      • Message not available
      • Re: Best defense/full hand, raija d
      • Message not available
      • Re: Best defense/full hand, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: Best defense/full hand, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Best defense/full hand, Tim DeLaney
      • Message not available
      • Re: Best defense/full hand, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: Best defense/full hand, ted
      • Re: Best defense/full hand, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: Best defense/lead, Alex Martelli
• rkc 1430, larry
  • Re: rkc 1430, ted
  • Re: rkc 1430, dfm
  • Re: rkc 1430, Lorne
  • Re: rkc 1430, mghmaine
    • Re: rkc 1430, alvin
      • Re: rkc 1430, alvin
• the balance, Peter Smulders
  • An improbable occurance, frisbieinstein
    • Re: An improbable occurance, Richard Lawson
      • Re: An improbable occurance, mghmaine
      • Re: An improbable occurance, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: An improbable occurance, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: An improbable occurance, nige1
• Chicago hotels, Steve Willner
  • Re: Chicago hotels, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Chicago hotels, Richard Lawson
    • Re: Chicago hotels, Stu Goodgold
      • Re: Chicago hotels, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Chicago hotels, Kent Feiler
• What have you agreed on this sequence, raija d
  • Re: What have you agreed on this sequence, Rik ter Veen
  • Re: What have you agreed on this sequence, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: What have you agreed on this sequence, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: What have you agreed on this sequence, Lorne
  • Re: What have you agreed on this sequence, gandalfnf
  • Re: What have you agreed on this sequence, Will in New Haven
  • Re: What have you agreed on this sequence, BobPark
    • Re: What have you agreed on this sequence, Alex Martelli
      • Re: What have you agreed on this sequence, Newroad
• Please Comment, ted
  • Re: Please Comment, stephen . mcdevitt
    • Re: Please Comment, rhm
  • Re: Please Comment, henrysun909
  • Re: Please Comment, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Please Comment, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Please Comment, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Please Comment, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Please Comment, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Please Comment, rhm
      • Re: Please Comment, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Please Comment, Travis Crump
  • Re: Please Comment, Peter Clinch
  • Re: Please Comment, Andrew
  • Re: Please Comment, raija d
    • Re: Please Comment, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Please Comment, raija d
      • Re: Please Comment, ted
  • Re: Please Comment, nige1
    • Re: Please Comment, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Please Comment, nige1
  • Re: Please Comment, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: Please Comment, ted
      • Re: Please Comment, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Please Comment, Lorne
  • Re: Please Comment, ewleongusa
  • Re: Please Comment, gandalfnf
  • Re: Please Comment, gandalfnf
  • Re: Please Comment, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Please Comment, Eddie Grove
      • Re: Please Comment, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Please Comment, mghmaine
    • Re: Please Comment, ted
      • Re: Please Comment, raija d
  • Re: Please Comment, ted
    • Re: Please Comment, ewleongusa
      • Re: Please Comment, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: Please Comment, Mitch Edelman
      • Re: Please Comment, ewleongusa
      • Re: Please Comment, ted
      • Re: Please Comment, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Please Comment, Alex Martelli
• 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Newroad
  • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Newroad
      • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Newroad
      • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Free
      • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Newroad
      • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Mike Bell
      • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Newroad
      • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Newroad
    • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Chris Ryall
      • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, mghmaine
  • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Greg
    • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Newroad
      • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Greg
  • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, akhare1@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Newroad
  • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Nick Hughes - notebook
    • Re: 1H fert, 2D Jammer, Nick Hughes - notebook
• Newsreader problems, BobPark
  • Re: Newsreader problems, John Crinnion
    • Re: Newsreader problems, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Newsreader problems, John Crinnion
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Newsreader problems, John Crinnion
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Newsreader problems, John Crinnion
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Mmbridge
      • Re: Newsreader problems, John Crinnion
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Ian Payn
  • Re: Newsreader problems, mghmaine
    • Re: Newsreader problems, John Crinnion
      • Re: Newsreader problems, raija d
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Eddie Grove
      • Re: Newsreader problems, David Peters
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Newsreader problems, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Newsreader problems, Lorne
    • Re: Newsreader problems, BobPark
      • Re: Newsreader problems, veryeavy
      • Re: Newsreader problems, Steven Gibbs
      • Re: Newsreader problems, veryeavy
      • Re: Newsreader problems, John Crinnion
• Just the right amount of information, help please!, Janice
  • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, raija d
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, raija d
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Lorne
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Wayne
  • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, paulhigh
  • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Andrew
    • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Steve Willner
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, raija d
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Steve Willner
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Marvin French
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Andrew
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Douglas Newlands
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Andrew
    • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Rik ter Veen
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Rik ter Veen
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Andrew
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Steve Willner
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Rik ter Veen
  • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Wayne
      • Re: Just the right amount of information, help please!, Michael Angelo Ravera
• Searching for Bo Derek, ted
  • Re: Searching for Bo Derek, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Searching for Bo Derek, ewleongusa
  • Re: Searching for Bo Derek, nige1
    • Re: Searching for Bo Derek, nige1
  • Re: Searching for Bo Derek, Erik Stoffer
  • Re: Searching for Bo Derek, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Searching for Bo Derek, Andrew
  • Re: Searching for Bo Derek - The whole hand, ted
    • Re: Searching for Bo Derek - The whole hand, nige1
• Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, paulhigh
  • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, paulhigh
  • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, paulhigh
    • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, paulhigh
      • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, Eddie Grove
      • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, paulhigh
      • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, mghmaine
      • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, paulhigh
    • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, gandalfnf
    • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, Frances
      • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, gandalfnf
      • Re: Alex Martelli data on invitational 2NT, Otis Bricker
• What Should Opener Do?, Jack Presser
  • Re: What Should Opener Do?, stephen . mcdevitt
  • Re: What Should Opener Do?, paulhigh
  • Re: What Should Opener Do?, Lorne
  • Re: What Should Opener Do?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What Should Opener Do?, ted
  • Re: What Should Opener Do?, nige1
  • Re: What Should Opener Do?, ewleongusa
    • Re: What Should Opener Do?, henrysun909
  • Re: What Should Opener Do?, goffster
• Bridge on line, Norman Silverstone
  • Re: Bridge on line, henrysun909
  • Re: Bridge on line, Nigel
    • Re: Bridge on line, Norman Silverstone
      • Re: Bridge on line, Neil
  • Re: Bridge on line, helpless
    • Re: Bridge on line, ted
    • Re: Bridge on line, raija d
• Re: Do you open (and what)?, Steve Willner
  • Re: Do you open (and what)?, Chris Ryall
• Re: To think when you have no problem at the moment, Steve Willner
  • Re: To think when you have no problem at the moment, David Stevenson
    • Re: To think when you have no problem at the moment, Steve Willner
      • Re: To think when you have no problem at the moment, Kent Feiler
      • Re: To think when you have no problem at the moment, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: To think when you have no problem at the moment, David Stevenson
  • Re: To think when you have no problem at the moment, Tamuel
    • Re: Leaving card face down, raija d
      • Re: Leaving card face down, nige1
      • Re: Leaving card face down, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Leaving card face down, gandalfnf
      • Re: Leaving card face down, David Stevenson
      • Re: Leaving card face down, gandalfnf
      • Re: Leaving card face down, David Stevenson
      • Re: Leaving card face down, David Stevenson
      • Re: Leaving card face down, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Leaving card face down, David Stevenson
• Re: Competitive Bidding- Having It All, Or At Least More, Steve Willner
• Re: the decline of ACBL bridge, Steve Willner
  • Re: the decline of ACBL bridge, Derek Broughton
• Re: Open this hand?, Steve Willner
  • Re: Open this hand?, Peter Smulders
    • Re: Open this hand?, Steve Willner
• Re: A problem for advancer, Steve Willner
• Semi-serious psyche query, henrysun909
  • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, ewleongusa
  • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, pfriedmanNoSpam
  • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, Tamuel
  • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, David Stevenson
    • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, henrysun909
      • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, Tamuel
      • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, Free
      • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, Lorne
  • Re: Semi-serious psyche query, Tamuel
• Dummy's Rights, Nigel
  • Re: Dummy's Rights, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Dummy's Rights, Nigel
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, scyardman
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, David Stevenson
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, David Babcock
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, David Stevenson
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Mark Brader
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Sven Pran
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, raija d
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Dummy's Rights, David Stevenson
  • Re: Dummy's Rights, Travis Crump
    • Re: Dummy's Rights, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, David Stevenson
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Sven Pran
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, David Babcock
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Sven Pran
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, David Babcock
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, David Stevenson
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, David Stevenson
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, mghmaine
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, David Stevenson
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, mghmaine
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, David Stevenson
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Peter Smulders
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Dummy's Rights, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Dummy's Rights, mghmaine
  • Re: Dummy's Rights, gandalfnf
    • Re: Dummy's Rights, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, gandalfnf
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, raija d
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, Steve Willner
      • Re: Dummy's Rights, David Stevenson
  • Re: Dummy's Rights, nige1
  • A Duty on Dummy ?, Dave Flower
    • Re: A Duty on Dummy ?, Sven Pran
      • Re: A Duty on Dummy ?, Dave Flower
      • Re: A Duty on Dummy ?, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: A Duty on Dummy ?, Derek Broughton
      • Re: A Duty on Dummy ?, Sven Pran
      • Re: A Duty on Dummy ?, Dave Flower
• 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, Larry Lowell
  • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, Mike Bell
    • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, David Stevenson
  • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, John R. Mayne
  • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, jll
  • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, paulhigh
    • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, henrysun909
  • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, Jack Sheet
  • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, paulhigh
    • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, henrysun909
      • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, paulhigh
  • Re: 3-level responses to 1NT Opening, Chris Ryall
• Suspicious??, stevts
  • Re: Suspicious??, dancle16
    • Re: Suspicious??, thissteve
      • Re: Suspicious??, Richard Lawson
      • Re: Suspicious??, Lorne
      • Re: Suspicious??, John D'Errico
      • Re: Suspicious??, thissteve
      • Re: Suspicious?? (LOTT analysis), John D'Errico
  • Re: Suspicious??, Travis Crump
  • Re: Suspicious??, Richard Lawson
  • Re: Suspicious??, ted
  • Re: Suspicious??, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Suspicious??, stevts
      • Re: Suspicious??, Richard Lawson
      • Re: Suspicious??, Andrew
      • Re: Suspicious??, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Suspicious??, mghmaine
  • Re: Suspicious??, Lorne
    • Re: Suspicious??, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: Suspicious??, Lorne
      • Re: Suspicious??, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Suspicious??, raija d
• Interpreter needed, ted
  • Re: Interpreter needed, henrysun909
  • Re: Interpreter needed, Lorne
  • Re: Interpreter needed, mghmaine
  • Re: Interpreter needed, Ian Payn
  • Re: Interpreter needed, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Interpreter needed, ewleongusa
    • Re: Interpreter needed, John Blubaugh
    • Re: Interpreter needed, ted
      • Re: Interpreter needed, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Interpreter needed, ted
      • Re: Interpreter needed, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Interpreter needed, ewleongusa
      • Re: Interpreter needed, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Interpreter needed, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Interpreter needed, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Interpreter needed, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Interpreter needed, raija d
    • Re: Interpreter needed, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Interpreter needed, Free
  • Re: Interpreter needed, Lorne
    • Re: Interpreter needed, ewleongusa
      • Re: Interpreter needed, Lorne
  • Re: Interpreter needed, paulhigh
• How much pre-information?, Daisy
  • Re: How much pre-information?, Greg
    • Re: How much pre-information?, Daisy
  • Re: How much pre-information?, mghmaine
    • Re: How much pre-information?, Daisy
      • Re: How much pre-information?, mghmaine
• Hardball, nige1
  • Re: Hardball, Ian Payn
    • Re: Hardball, Andrew
    • Re: Hardball, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Hardball, james1071
  • Re: Hardball, Lorne
    • Re: Hardball, ted
      • Re: Hardball, David Stevenson
      • Re: Hardball, ted
      • Re: Hardball, David Stevenson
      • Re: Hardball, ted
      • Re: Hardball, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Hardball, ted
      • Re: Hardball, Steven Gibbs
      • Re: Hardball, David Stevenson
      • Re: Hardball, ted
      • Re: Hardball, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Hardball, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Hardball, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Hardball, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Hardball, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Hardball, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Hardball, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Hardball, Wayne
      • Re: Hardball, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Hardball, Wayne
      • Re: Hardball, Derek Broughton
      • Re: Hardball, Wayne
      • Re: Hardball, Peter Smulders
      • Re: Hardball, Derek Broughton
  • Re: Hardball, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Hardball, Jon Siegel
    • Re: Hardball, ted
    • Re: Hardball, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Hardball, mghmaine
  • Re: Hardball, Mike Bell
    • Re: Hardball, Andrew
  • Re: Hardball, Charles Brenner
• Re: Gerard Cohen 1 year Later, drfillmycarwithgas
  • Re: Gerard Cohen 1 year Later, Mitch Edelman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gerard Cohen 1 year Later, Steve Willner
    • Re: Gerard Cohen 1 year Later, John Crinnion
• Re: Interference over Jacoby 2NT, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Interference over Jacoby 2NT, paulhigh
    • Re: Interference over Jacoby 2NT, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Interference over Jacoby 2NT, paulhigh
• Would you act?, Tamuel
  • Re: Would you act?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Would you act?, Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: Would you act?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Would you act?, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Would you act?, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: Would you act?, Lorne
      • Re: Would you act?, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Would you act?, Tamuel
      • Re: Would you act?, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: Would you act?, Tamuel
      • Re: Would you act?, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: Would you act?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Would you act?, ted
    • Re: Would you act?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Would you act?, mghmaine
      • Re: Would you act?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Would you act?, raija d
  • Re: Would you act?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Would you act?, Phil
  • Re: Would you act?, Gary Seckinger
  • Re: Would you act?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Would you act?, goffster
  • Re: Would you act?, John Schuler
  • Re: Would you act?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Would you act?, smn
    • Re: Would you act?, Andrew
      • Re: Would you act?, Tamuel
      • Re: Would you act?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Would you act?, Andrew
      • Re: Would you act?, raija d
  • Re: Would you act?, Lorne
  • Re: Would you act?, Phil
• Two or Three redux, ted
  • Re: Two or Three redux, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Two or Three redux, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Two or Three redux, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Two or Three redux, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Two or Three redux, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Two or Three redux, ewleongusa
  • Re: Two or Three redux, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Two or Three redux, John R. Mayne
    • Re: Two or Three redux, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Two or Three redux, ewleongusa
      • Re: Two or Three redux, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Two or Three redux, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Two or Three redux, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Two or Three redux, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Two or Three redux, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Two or Three redux, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Two or Three redux, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Two or Three redux, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Two or Three redux, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Two or Three redux, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Two or Three redux, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Two or Three redux, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Two or Three redux, David Stevenson
  • Re: Two or Three redux, ted
    • Re: Two or Three redux, ewleongusa
      • Re: Two or Three redux, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Two or Three redux, ewleongusa
      • Re: Two or Three redux, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Two or Three redux, ewleongusa
    • Re: Two or Three redux, raija d
    • Re: Two or Three redux, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Two or Three redux, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Two or Three redux, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Two or Three redux, nige1
  • Re: Two or Three redux, raija d
  • Re: Two or Three redux, goffster
  • Re: Two or Three redux, Charles Brenner
• Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Steven Gibbs
    • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, David Collier
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, raija d
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Keith Sheppard
      • No I don't !!, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Steve Willner
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Mmbridge
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, raija d
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Steve Willner
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Mmbridge
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, nige1
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, nige1
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Nick Hughes - notebook
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Frances
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, David Collier
    • Re: Future extension to announcing in EBU land?, Michael Angelo Ravera
• you're up, Mitch Edelman
  • Re: you're up, Nigel
  • Re: you're up, Bob Richardson
  • Re: you're up, Erik Stoffer
  • Re: you're up, ted
    • Re: you're up, ewleongusa
      • Re: you're up, ted
  • Re: you're up, Bob Lipton
  • Re: you're up, ewleongusa
  • Re: you're up, nige1
  • Re: you're up, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: you're up, John Blubaugh
  • Re: you're up, raija d
  • Re: you're up, donnybradley
  • Re: you're up, John R. Mayne
  • Re: you're up, akhare1@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: you're up, Arthur Hoffman
  • Re: you're up, Sandy E. Barnes
• Your bid 5-9-06, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, Tyler Eaves
  • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, Nigel
  • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, ted
  • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, Tom S
    • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, Dave Flower
      • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, Andrew
      • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, Tom S
  • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, henrysun909
  • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, donnybradley
  • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, raija d
  • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, ewleongusa
  • Re: Your bid 5-9-06, goffster
• Just learned that....., henrysun909
  • Re: Just learned that....., pfriedmanNoSpam
    • Re: Just learned that....., Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Just learned that....., Mike Bell
      • Re: Just learned that....., Wayne
      • Re: Just learned that....., Wayne
  • Re: Just learned that....., Frances
    • Re: Just learned that....., ttw
    • Re: Just learned that....., David Stevenson
      • Re: Just learned that....., Peter Smulders
      • Re: Just learned that....., David Stevenson
      • Re: Just learned that....., Peter Smulders
      • Re: Just learned that....., Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Just learned that....., Frances
      • Re: Just learned that....., ted
      • Re: Just learned that....., David Stevenson
      • Re: Just learned that....., raija d
      • Re: Just learned that....., David Stevenson
      • Re: Just learned that....., richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Just learned that....., David Stevenson
      • Re: Just learned that....., richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Just learned that....., Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Just learned that....., richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Just learned that....., henrysun909
      • Re: Just learned that....., Steve Grant
  • Re: Just learned that....., Jon Siegel
  • Re: Just learned that....., Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Just learned that....., Anton van Uitert
    • Re: Just learned that....., Herb
      • Re: Just learned that....., anon
      • Re: Just learned that....., pgmer6809
      • Re: Just learned that....., Otis Bricker
      • Re: Just learned that....., Otis Bricker
      • Re: Just learned that....., Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Just learned that....., anon
      • Re: Just learned that....., Anton van Uitert
  • Re: Just learned that....., Bob Lipton
    • Re: Just learned that....., mghmaine
      • Re: Just learned that....., Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Just learned that....., Bob Lipton
      • Re: Just learned that....., nige1
      • Re: Just learned that....., Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Just learned that....., David Stevenson
  • Re: Just learned that....., ewleongusa
    • Re: Just learned that....., David Stevenson
      • Re: Just learned that....., ewleongusa
• Responding to a take out double, Tyler Eaves
  • Re: Responding to a take out double, Tyler Eaves
    • Re: Responding to a take out double, mghmaine
    • Re: Responding to a take out double, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Responding to a take out double, paulhigh
    • Re: Responding to a take out double, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Responding to a take out double, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Responding to a take out double, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Responding to a take out double, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Responding to a take out double, Andrew
  • Re: Responding to a take out double, goffster
  • Re: Responding to a take out double, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Responding to a take out double, mghmaine
  • Re: Responding to a take out double, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Responding to a take out double, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Responding to a take out double, raija d
  • Re: Responding to a take out double, gandalfnf
  • Re: Responding to a take out double, Lorne
  • Re: Responding to a take out double, Nigel
• 11 player individual ?, Dave Flower
  • Re: 11 player individual ?, Michael Angelo Ravera
• The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 36, Richard Lawson
  • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 36, henrysun909
    • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 36, Ange1o DePa1ma
      • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 36, Will in New Haven
      • Re: The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 36, henrysun909
• Settle an argument (2), Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), nige1
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), nige1
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), Dave Flower
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), Ian Payn
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), ted
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), Frances
    • Re: Settle an argument (2), Ian Payn
    • Re: Settle an argument (2), Alex Martelli
    • Re: Settle an argument (2), Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), ewleongusa
    • Re: Settle an argument (2), Ian Payn
      • Re: Settle an argument (2), ewleongusa
      • Re: Settle an argument (2), Ian Payn
      • Re: Settle an argument (2), Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Settle an argument (2), Keith Sheppard
    • Re: Settle an argument (2), Lorne
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), mghmaine
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), jas1959
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), donnybradley
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), raija d
    • Re: Settle an argument (2), Aztec_Bill
  • Re: Settle an argument (2), paulhigh
    • Re: Settle an argument (2), Dave Flower
• Settle an argument (1), Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Settle an argument (1), nige1
    • Re: Settle an argument (1), ted
    • Re: Settle an argument (1), dowatson
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Will in New Haven
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Otis Bricker
  • Re: Settle an argument (1), Ian Payn
  • Re: Settle an argument (1), Frances
  • Re: Settle an argument (1), ewleongusa
    • Re: Settle an argument (1), Alex Martelli
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), ewleongusa
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Alex Martelli
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), ewleongusa
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Alex Martelli
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), ted
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), vida
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Alex Martelli
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), ewleongusa
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), ewleongusa
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), jsher
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Alex Martelli
  • Re: Settle an argument (1), Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: Settle an argument (1), Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Settle an argument (1), Will in New Haven
  • Re: Settle an argument (1), Lorne
  • Re: Settle an argument (1), Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Settle an argument (1), Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Settle an argument (1), pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Settle an argument (1), Will in New Haven
  • Re: Settle an argument (1), donnybradley
  • Re: Settle an argument (1), raija d
  • Re: Settle an argument (1), Alex Martelli
    • Re: Settle an argument (1), raija d
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Alex Martelli
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), raija d
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Otis Bricker
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Will in New Haven
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Alex Martelli
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Will in New Haven
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Alex Martelli
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), ted
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), Alex Martelli
      • Re: Settle an argument (1), raija d
• Two or three?, anon
  • Re: Two or three?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Two or three?, smn
  • Re: Two or three?, raija d
  • Re: Two or three?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Two or three?, anon
    • Re: Two or three?, Tom S
  • Re: Two or three?, ted
  • Re: Two or three?, Søren Justesen
  • Re: Two or three?, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Two or three?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Two or three?, Lorne
  • Re: Two or three?, Andrew
  • Re: Two or three?, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Two or three?, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: Two or three?, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Two or three?, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Two or three?, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Two or three?, donnybradley
  • Re: Two or three?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Two or three?, paulhigh
  • Re: Two or three?, goffster
  • Re: Two or three?, Tom S
• Pass or not?, Bud H
  • Re: Pass or not?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Pass or not?, ted
      • Re: Pass or not?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Pass or not?, raija d
  • Re: Pass or not?, smn
  • Re: Pass or not?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Pass or not?, mghmaine
  • Re: Pass or not?, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Pass or not?, Lorne
  • Message not available
    • Re: Pass or not?, Aztec_Bill
  • Re: Pass or not?, goffster
  • Re: Pass or not?, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Pass or not?, donnybradley
• Tough hand, Bob Richardson
  • Re: Tough hand, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Tough hand, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Tough hand, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Tough hand, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Tough hand, mghmaine
  • Re: Tough hand, raija d
    • Re: Tough hand, John R. Mayne
      • Re: Tough hand, raija d
      • Re: Tough hand, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Tough hand, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: Tough hand, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Tough hand, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: Tough hand, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Tough hand, ewleongusa
    • Re: Tough hand, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Tough hand, ewleongusa
  • Re: Tough hand, Lorne
  • Re: Tough hand, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Tough hand, paulhigh
  • Re: Tough hand, goffster
    • Re: Tough hand, ewleongusa
  • Re: Tough hand - more, Bob Richardson
    • Re: Tough hand - more, raija d
    • Re: Tough hand - more, Bill Jacobs
• A Question of History (Psych Month), John Crinnion
  • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), ted
    • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), henrysun909
      • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), Greg
      • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), ted
      • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), henrysun909
      • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), Kent Feiler
      • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), henrysun909
      • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), Rik ter Veen
      • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), David Stevenson
      • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), raija d
    • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), John Crinnion
  • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), John Crinnion
    • Re: A Question of History (Psych Month), henrysun909
• Accept/invite heavy/light, raija d
  • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, raija d
    • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, multguru@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, John Blubaugh
    • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, henrysun909
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, David Stevenson
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Barry Rigal
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Mike Bell
  • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Lorne
  • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Andrew
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, John R. Mayne
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, paulhigh
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, David Stevenson
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, paulhigh
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, David Stevenson
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, John R. Mayne
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Tysen Streib
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Free
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, paulhigh
  • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Greg
    • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, raija d
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, David Stevenson
    • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Mike Bell
      • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Greg
  • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Travis Crump
  • Re: Accept/invite heavy/light, Michael Angelo Ravera
• second bid help, helpless
  • Re: second bid help, ted
  • Re: second bid help, Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: second bid help, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: second bid help, mghmaine
  • Re: second bid help, Lorne
• mea culpa, Barry Rigal
  • Re: mea culpa, ewleongusa
    • Re: mea culpa, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: mea culpa, ewleongusa
  • Re: mea culpa, ted
    • Re: mea culpa, ewleongusa
      • Re: mea culpa, ted
  • Re: mea culpa, Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: mea culpa, Jyrki Lahtonen
  • Re: mea culpa, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: mea culpa, Eddie Grove
      • Re: mea culpa, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: mea culpa, Eddie Grove
  • Re: mea culpa - follow up, Barry Rigal
    • Re: mea culpa - follow up, Paul Marston
• Lead and Signaling conventions, usawargamer@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Sarah Oliver
      • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, David Stevenson
    • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Lorne
      • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, David Stevenson
    • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Alex Martelli
      • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, David Stevenson
      • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Alex Martelli
    • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, alvin
  • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, John Blubaugh
    • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, henrysun909
      • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Steve Grant
      • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, John Schuler
    • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, usawargamer@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, henrysun909
    • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, John Blubaugh
    • Re: Lead and Signaling conventions, smitty123 at comcast dot net
• IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, raija d
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, Tom S
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, smn
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, Sid Ismail
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, Lorne
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, Bob Lipton
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, ted
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, Mark Dean
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, ewleongusa
    • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, mghmaine
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, Alex Martelli
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2 - rebuttal to 4S., Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, Arthur Hoffman
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, raija d
  • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 1 of 2, goffster
    • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 2, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: IMP Pairs hand Part 2, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Devious deviance, nige1
  • Re: Devious deviance, henrysun909
    • Re: Devious deviance, nige1
      • Re: Devious deviance, stevts
      • Re: Devious deviance, nige1
      • Re: Devious deviance, raija d
      • Re: Devious deviance, Sarah Oliver
      • Re: Devious deviance, nige1
      • Re: Devious deviance, Nick Wedd
  • Re: Devious deviance, Dave Flower
    • Re: Devious deviance, nige1
  • Re: Devious deviance, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Devious deviance, Nigel
• A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, ted
  • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, henrysun909
  • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, raija d
  • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, Andrew
  • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, Tom S
  • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, Lorne
  • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, Bob Lipton
    • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, henrysun909
      • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, ewleongusa
      • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, raija d
      • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, Tom S
      • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, henrysun909
      • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, raija d
      • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, henrysun909
      • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, raija d
  • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, ewleongusa
  • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: A sad story of a negative double for the minors without a psyche, Adam Beneschan
• Bridge Webpage Utilities, google1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Bridge Webpage Utilities, Sid Ismail
• larry asks, larry
  • Re: larry asks, donnybradley
  • Re: larry asks, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: larry asks, Lorne
  • Re: larry asks, Robert Tamlyn
• Computer program that bids Precision *well*?, Tyler Eaves
  • Re: Computer program that bids Precision *well*?, Jon
    • Re: Computer program that bids Precision *well*?, Tyler Eaves
      • Re: Computer program that bids Precision *well*?, Larry Lowell
  • Re: Computer program that bids Precision *well*?, Bob Richardson
• 4 spade opener?, Ari
  • Re: 4 spade opener?, ted
    • Re: 4 spade opener?, Ari
  • Re: 4 spade opener?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: 4 spade opener?, Otis Bricker
  • Re: 4 spade opener?, donnybradley
  • Re: 4 spade opener?, peter koch
    • Re: 4 spade opener?, Ari
      • Re: 4 spade opener?, Stephen Tu
  • Re: 4 spade opener?, ewleongusa
  • Re: 4 spade opener?, raija d
  • Re: 4 spade opener?, Tom S
  • Re: 4 spade opener?, Lorne
    • Re: 4 spade opener?, Ari
• AB online bidding forum - try it!, Paul Marston
• Re: Where Should an Artificial Club Start?, Steve Willner
  • Re: Where Should an Artificial Club Start?, Tysen Streib
    • Re: Where Should an Artificial Club Start?, Michael Angelo Ravera
• In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, ted
  • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, Bob Lipton
  • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, raija d
  • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, Nick at Trumps
  • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, ewleongusa
    • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, Charlie
      • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, Free
    • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, ewleongusa
  • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, Lorne
    • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, Marvin French
      • Re: In honor Psyche Month - Yet another psyche, Peter Clinch
• Six Against The Rock -- results, Richard Pavlicek
• 3rd Hand Decision, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, donnybradley
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, Lorne
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, Bob Lipton
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, ted
    • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, ted
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, arthhh
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, Mark Dean
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, raija d
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, Tom S
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, Tyler Eaves
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, mghmaine
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, ewleongusa
    • Re: 3rd Hand Decision - the result, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision - the result, ewleongusa
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision - the result, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision - the result, raija d
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision - the result, raija d
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision - the result, donnybradley
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision - the result, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision - the result, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision - the result, nige1
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision - the result, stevts
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, David Collier
  • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, John R. Mayne
    • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, Free
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, Free
    • Re: 3rd Hand Decision, Robert Tamlyn
• http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, henrysun909
  • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, donnybradley
  • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, David Stevenson
    • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, David Stevenson
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, henrysun909
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Chris Ryall
  • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, nige1
  • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Nick at Trumps
    • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, David Stevenson
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Nick Hughes
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, David Stevenson
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Nick Hughes
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, David Stevenson
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Nick at Trumps
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, henrysun909
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Julian Lighton
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, David Stevenson
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Julian Lighton
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, David Stevenson
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Nick Hughes
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, raija d
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Nick Hughes
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Nick Hughes
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Chris Ryall
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, raija d
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, henrysun909
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, David Stevenson
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Peter Smulders
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, nige1
  • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Steve Willner
    • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, David Stevenson
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, Steve Willner
      • Re: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/wbf_cop.htm#psychic, David Stevenson
• Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami, Otis Bricker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami, Otis Bricker
    • Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami, ted
  • Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami, David Stevenson
  • Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami, Peace Crusader
• sorted, John D'Errico
  • Re: sorted, Lorne
    • Re: sorted, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: sorted, ewleongusa
  • Re: sorted, Bob Lipton
  • Re: sorted, arthhh
    • Re: sorted, shuster
• Pidro card game, Niklas
• Re: Is this legal where you live?, Nick Hughes
• Object lesson, Everett M. Greene
  • Re: Object lesson, ted
    • Re: Object lesson, Everett M. Greene
• My own sad story, ACBL response, henrysun909
  • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, ted
    • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, raija d
  • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, Jürgen R .
    • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, jsher
    • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, henrysun909
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, Bob Lipton
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, henrysun909
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, David Stevenson
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, David Stevenson
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, henrysun909
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, David Stevenson
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, Steve Willner
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, Frances
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, Mmbridge
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, Ian Payn
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, Steve Willner
  • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, Barry Margolin
    • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, pgmer6809
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, David Stevenson
  • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, Peter Smulders
    • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, henrysun909
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, Barry Margolin
    • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, pgmer6809
      • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: My own sad story, ACBL response, shuster
• responding to a 3NT overcall, Trumps - Derrick Browne
  • Re: responding to a 3NT overcall, Jan Veerbeek
  • Re: responding to a 3NT overcall, raija d
  • Re: responding to a 3NT overcall, Lorne
    • Re: responding to a 3NT overcall, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: responding to a 3NT overcall, Lorne
    • Re: responding to a 3NT overcall, David Stevenson
      • Re: responding to a 3NT overcall, Lorne
      • Re: responding to a 3NT overcall, Chris Ryall
  • Re: responding to a 3NT overcall, Wayne
    • Re: responding to a 3NT overcall, Paul Marston
  • Re: responding to a 3NT overcall, Adam Beneschan
• question, none
  • Re: question, Nigel
  • Re: question, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: question, none
  • Re: question, Lorne
  • Re: question, goffster
• simple, jump or pass?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: simple, jump or pass?, Nigel
  • Re: simple, jump or pass?, John Schuler
  • Re: simple, jump or pass?, Dave Flower
  • Re: simple, jump or pass?, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: simple, jump or pass?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: simple, jump or pass?, goffster
  • Re: simple, jump or pass?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: simple, jump or pass?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: simple, jump or pass?, goffster
  • Re: simple, jump or pass?, Thomas Dehn
• Raising partner's 3rd seat opener in competition...., Bud H
  • Re: Raising partner's 3rd seat opener in competition...., mghmaine
  • Re: Raising partner's 3rd seat opener in competition...., Bob Lipton
  • Re: Raising partner's 3rd seat opener in competition...., paulhigh
  • Re: Raising partner's 3rd seat opener in competition...., Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Raising partner's 3rd seat opener in competition...., goffster
  • Re: Raising partner's 3rd seat opener in competition...., Bill Jacobs
    • Re: Raising partner's 3rd seat opener in competition...., John R. Mayne
  • Re: Raising partner's 3rd seat opener in competition...., Nigel
  • Re: Raising partner's 3rd seat opener in competition...., Lorne
  • Re: Raising partner's 3rd seat opener in competition...., donnybradley
  • Re: Raising partner's 3rd seat opener in competition...., ted
• Lead to 3NT, Bud H
  • Re: Lead to 3NT, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Lead to 3NT, smn
  • Re: Lead to 3NT, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Lead to 3NT, paulhigh
  • Re: Lead to 3NT, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Lead to 3NT, goffster
    • Re: Lead to 3NT, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Lead to 3NT, Dave Flower
  • Re: Lead to 3NT (result), Bud H
    • Re: Lead to 3NT (result), nige1
• Heavy raise, Bud H
  • Re: Heavy raise, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Heavy raise, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Heavy raise, paulhigh
  • Re: Heavy raise, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Heavy raise, goffster
  • Re: Heavy raise, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Heavy raise, Lorne
  • Re: Heavy raise, ted
  • Re: Heavy raise, raija d
  • Re: Heavy raise, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Heavy raise, donnybradley
  • Re: Heavy raise, jsher
  • Re: Heavy raise, Arthur Hoffman
• Assign the Blame, Richard Lawson
  • Re: Assign the Blame, ewleongusa
  • Re: Assign the Blame, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Assign the Blame, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Assign the Blame, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Assign the Blame, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Assign the Blame, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Assign the Blame, ted
      • Re: Assign the Blame, John R. Mayne
      • Re: Assign the Blame, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: Assign the Blame, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Assign the Blame, Eddie Grove
    • Re: Assign the Blame, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Assign the Blame, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Assign the Blame, Bud H
  • Re: Assign the Blame, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Assign the Blame, Richard L. Hall
    • Re: Assign the Blame, Alex Martelli
  • Re: Assign the Blame, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Assign the Blame, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: Assign the Blame, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Assign the Blame, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: Assign the Blame, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Assign the Blame, Richard Lawson
  • Re: Assign the Blame, John Schuler
  • Re: Assign the Blame, Lorne
  • Re: Assign the Blame, Damo Nair
    • Re: Assign the Blame, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Assign the Blame, raija d
  • Re: Assign the Blame, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Assign the Blame, nige1
    • Re: Assign the Blame, Alex Martelli
• New deals generator with graphical user interface, Andrew
  • Re: New deals generator with graphical user interface, henrysun909
    • Re: New deals generator with graphical user interface, Andrew
  • Re: New deals generator with graphical user interface, ted
    • Re: New deals generator with graphical user interface, Andrew
• Is this a problem ?, mghmaine
  • Re: Is this a problem ?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Is this a problem ?, donnybradley
  • Re: Is this a problem ?, Andrew
    • Re: Is this a problem ?, Travis Crump
  • Re: Is this a problem ?, nige1
  • Re: Is this a problem ?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Is this a problem ?, raija d
  • Re: Is this a problem ?, Lorne
  • Re: Is this a problem ?, goffster
  • Re: Is this a problem ?, Thomas Dehn
• Re: "Lorenzo" weak twos, EBU level, Bruce . Moore
  • Re: "Lorenzo" weak twos, EBU level, Chris Ryall
  • Re: "Lorenzo" weak twos, EBU level, Steve Willner
• Re: Bidding Puzzle, Jon Siegel
• what would you bid (2 cases), parag . usenet
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Sid Ismail
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Bob Lipton
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), ted
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Justin Lall
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Alex Martelli
      • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Bob Lipton
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), paulhigh
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Lorne
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), ewleongusa
    • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Sid Ismail
      • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), ewleongusa
    • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), raija d
      • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), ewleongusa
    • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Lorne
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Richard Lawson
    • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Eddie Grove
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), jas1959
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), raija d
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), donnybradley
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), John R. Mayne
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), goffster
  • Re: what would you bid (2 cases), Sandy E. Barnes
• Re: How would you rule?, Hans Georg Schaathun
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How would you rule?, Steve Willner
    • Re: How would you rule?, mghmaine
  • Re: How would you rule?, nige1
    • Re: How would you rule?, Chris Ryall
• Ethics Question, UI etc., Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Dave Flower
  • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Sven Pran
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Lorne
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., David Stevenson
    • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Keith Sheppard
    • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., mghmaine
    • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., mghmaine
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Kent Feiler
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Kent Feiler
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Keith Sheppard
    • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., paulhigh
    • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., David Stevenson
  • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., henrysun909
    • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Keith Sheppard
    • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., David Stevenson
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., henrysun909
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Julian Lighton
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Mark Brader
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Jürgen R .
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Jürgen R .
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., nige1
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Ian Payn
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., Mark Brader
      • Re: Ethics Question, UI etc., David Collier
• The exception that proves the rule ?, Dave Flower
  • Re: The exception that proves the rule ?, Lorne
  • Re: The exception that proves the rule ?, raija d
  • Re: The exception that proves the rule ?, ted
  • Re: The exception that proves the rule ?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: The exception that proves the rule ?, Justin Lall
    • Re: The exception that proves the rule ?, Steve Willner
  • Re: The exception that proves the rule ?, ewleongusa
    • Re: The exception that proves the rule ?, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: The exception that proves the rule ?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: The exception that proves the rule ?, Gerben Dirksen
• How to improve declarer play, Adam Lea
  • Re: How to improve declarer play, Free
  • Re: How to improve declarer play, ewleongusa
  • Re: How to improve declarer play, Lorne
  • Re: How to improve declarer play, Andrew
  • Re: How to improve declarer play, Sid Ismail
  • Re: How to improve declarer play, ted
    • Re: How to improve declarer play, henrysun909
  • Re: How to improve declarer play, stevts
    • Re: How to improve declarer play, dallying
    • Re: How to improve declarer play, usawargamer@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How to improve declarer play, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How to improve declarer play, usawargamer@xxxxxxxxx
• Do you sit?, Janice
  • Re: Do you sit?, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Do you sit?, raija d
  • Re: Do you sit?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Do you sit?, Dave Flower
  • Re: Do you sit?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Do you sit?, goffster
  • Re: Do you sit?, donnybradley
• Law Bids Are in Mutiny -- bidding poll, Richard Pavlicek
  • Re: Law Bids Are in Mutiny -- bidding poll, Larry Cohen
• Bidding after a minor suit raise, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, ewleongusa
    • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, ewleongusa
  • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, raija d
    • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, henrysun909
      • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, paulhigh
      • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, henrysun909
  • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, ewleongusa
    • Re: Bidding after a minor suit raise, Robert Tamlyn
• Defense of 3NT II, lifemonster
  • Re: Defense of 3NT II, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Defense of 3NT II, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Defense of 3NT II, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Defense of 3NT II, Dave Flower
  • Re: Defense of 3NT II, ewleongusa
  • Re: Defense of 3NT II, lifemonster
• Defense of 3NT, lifemonster
  • ., Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Defense of 3NT, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Defense of 3NT, Robert Tamlyn
    • Re: Defense of 3NT, lifemonster
• A badly bid hand, morganic2001
  • Re: A badly bid hand, Charlie
    • Re: A badly bid hand, raija d
      • Re: A badly bid hand, mghmaine
      • Re: A badly bid hand, raija d
      • Re: A badly bid hand, John R. Mayne
      • Re: A badly bid hand, William
      • Re: A badly bid hand, John R. Mayne
      • Re: A badly bid hand, raija d
      • Re: A badly bid hand, Robert Tamlyn
      • Re: A badly bid hand, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: A badly bid hand, goffster
  • Re: A badly bid hand, donnybradley
  • Re: A badly bid hand, donnybradley
  • Re: A badly bid hand, Justin Lall
  • Re: A badly bid hand, ewleongusa
  • Re: A badly bid hand, raija d
  • Re: A badly bid hand, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A badly bid hand, Andrew
  • Re: A badly bid hand, Dave Flower
  • Re: A badly bid hand, goffster
  • Re: A badly bid hand, frisbieinstein
• SOS redouble, Phil
  • Re: SOS redouble, Charlie
  • Re: SOS redouble, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: SOS redouble, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: SOS redouble, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: SOS redouble, Justin Lall
    • Re: SOS redouble, Barry Rigal
      • Re: SOS redouble, Justin Lall
  • Re: SOS redouble, goffster
• Re: Proof that bridge is too serious (from Toronto Easter Regional), Elianna
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proof that bridge is too serious (from Toronto Easter Regional), Jack Sheet
• Can this be set?, raija d
  • Re: Can this be set?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Can this be set?, vida
    • Re: Can this be set? 3 hearts in dummy, raija d
  • Re: Can this be set?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Can this be set?, raija d
      • Re: Can this be set?, John R. Mayne
      • Re: Can this be set?, ted
      • Re: Can this be set?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Can this be set?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Can this be set?, Peterh
• Re: The alien or the mental patient, nige1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The alien or the mental patient, Andrew
  • Re: The alien or the mental patient, Charles Brenner
    • Re: The alien or the mental patient, Charles Brenner
  • Re: The alien or the mental patient, ewleongusa
  • Re: The alien or the mental patient, Will in New Haven
• Re: The Problem with Misinformation, nige1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, John R. Mayne
  • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
    • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
    • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
  • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Ian Payn
  • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Jack Sheet
    • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Jack Sheet
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Jack Sheet
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
  • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
  • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
  • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
    • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Jürgen R .
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, nige1
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, nige1
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, nige1
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Peter Clinch
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, ted
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Peter Smulders
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Peter Smulders
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, nige1
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, nige1
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Kehr
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Kehr
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, mghmaine
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Otis Bricker
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, raija d
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Rik ter Veen
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, David Stevenson
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Eric Landau
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, anon
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Steve Willner
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, nige1
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, Wayne
      • Re: The Problem with Misinformation, nige1
• Re: EBU/WBU Orange book 2006, nige1
  • Re: EBU/WBU Orange book 2006, Ian Payn
    • Re: EBU/WBU Orange book 2006, John Crinnion
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: EBU/WBU Orange book 2006, David Collier
  • Re: EBU/WBU Orange book 2006, David Stevenson
• Re: 3rd seat super-light precision, Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: A sad story, jrw
  • Re: A sad story, anon
    • Re: A sad story, jrw
      • Re: A sad story, anon
  • Re: A sad story, raija d
    • Re: A sad story, Eric Kehr
      • Re: A sad story, anon
      • Re: A sad story, Eric Kehr
    • Re: A sad story, jrw
      • Re: A sad story, peter koch
      • Re: A sad story, raija d
      • Re: A sad story, Bob Lipton
      • Re: A sad story, anon
      • Re: A sad story, raija d
      • Re: A sad story, jrw
      • Re: A sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: A sad story, jrw
      • Re: A sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: A sad story, jrw
      • Re: A sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: A sad story, jrw
      • Re: A sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: A sad story, jrw
      • Re: A sad story, Ian Payn
      • Re: A sad story, jrw
      • Re: A sad story, Mmbridge
      • Re: A sad story, ted
      • Re: A sad story, Ian Payn
      • Re: A sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: A sad story, nige1
      • Re: A sad story, Jack Sheet
  • Re: A sad story, David Stevenson
• Do you balance?, Tim DeLaney
  • Re: Do you balance?, henrysun909
  • Re: Do you balance?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Do you balance?, goffster
  • Re: Do you balance?, raija d
  • Re: Do you balance?, Bud H
  • Re: Do you balance?, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Do you balance?, Lorne
    • Re: Do you balance?, ted
  • Re: Do you balance?, Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: Do you balance?, Rik ter Veen
      • Re: Do you balance?, Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: Do you balance?, raija d
      • Re: Do you balance?, Arthur Hoffman
  • Re: Do you balance?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Do you balance?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Do you balance?, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: Do you balance?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Do you balance?, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: Do you balance?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Do you balance?, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: Do you balance?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Do you balance?, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: Do you balance?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Do you balance?, Tim DeLaney
      • Re: Do you balance?, John Blubaugh
      • Re: Do you balance?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Do you balance?, Lorne
  • Re: Do you balance?, John Blubaugh
  • Re: Do you balance?, Justin Lall
  • Re: Do you balance?, Thomas Dehn
• Re: Yet another psychic redouble, Otis Bricker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Yet another psychic redouble, Adam Beneschan
• Re: My own sad story, anon
  • Re: My own sad story, henrysun909
    • Re: My own sad story, anon
  • Re: My own sad story, Lorne
    • Re: My own sad story, anon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: My own sad story, Andrew
  • Re: My own sad story, Ange1o DePa1ma
    • Re: My own sad story, raija d
      • Re: My own sad story, ted
      • Re: My own sad story, anon
      • Re: My own sad story, John Schuler
    • Re: My own sad story, Lorne
    • Re: My own sad story, Charles Brenner
      • Re: My own sad story, Ange1o DePa1ma
    • Re: My own sad story, David Stevenson
  • Re: My own sad story, John Schuler
    • Re: My own sad story, mghmaine
      • Re: My own sad story, henrysun909
  • Re: My own sad story, Lorne
    • Re: My own sad story, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: My own sad story, John Schuler
    • Re: My own sad story, mghmaine
    • Re: My own sad story, henrysun909
      • Re: My own sad story, stevts
      • Re: My own sad story, stevts
      • Re: My own sad story, stevts
      • Re: My own sad story, ted
      • Re: My own sad story, peter koch
      • Re: My own sad story, henrysun909
      • Re: My own sad story, peter koch
      • Re: My own sad story, henrysun909
      • Re: My own sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: My own sad story, stevts
      • Re: My own sad story, Jürgen R .
      • Re: My own sad story, peter koch
      • Re: My own sad story, peter koch
      • Re: My own sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: My own sad story, David Stevenson
    • Re: My own sad story, Andrew
      • Re: My own sad story, raija d
      • Re: My own sad story, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: My own sad story, Eric Kehr
      • Re: My own sad story, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: My own sad story, Eric Kehr
      • Re: My own sad story, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: My own sad story, stefan f.
      • Re: My own sad story, Neil
      • Re: My own sad story, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: My own sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: My own sad story, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: My own sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: My own sad story, Ian Payn
      • Re: My own sad story, Neil
      • Re: My own sad story, Ian Payn
      • Re: My own sad story, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: My own sad story, Ange1o DePa1ma
      • Re: My own sad story, raija d
      • Re: My own sad story, Ange1o DePa1ma
      • Re: My own sad story, raija d
      • Re: My own sad story, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: My own sad story, David Stevenson
  • Re: My own sad story, David Stevenson
    • Re: My own sad story, ted
      • Re: My own sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: My own sad story, Kent Feiler
    • Re: My own sad story, Mmbridge
      • Re: My own sad story, ted
      • Re: My own sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: My own sad story, Mmbridge
      • Re: My own sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: My own sad story, Mmbridge
      • Re: My own sad story, David Stevenson
      • Re: My own sad story, Mmbridge
• Re: Yet another poll on a weak 2 hand, Sandy E. Barnes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Yet another poll on a weak 2 hand, goffster
  • Re: Yet another poll on a weak 2 hand, WarpGammon Director
  • Re: Yet another poll on a weak 2 hand, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Yet another poll on a weak 2 hand, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Yet another poll on a weak 2 hand, paulhigh
• Re: IMP and MP equivalence, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: IMP and MP equivalence, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: IMP and MP equivalence, Lorne
      • Re: IMP and MP equivalence, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: IMP and MP equivalence, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: IMP and MP equivalence, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: IMP and MP equivalence, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: IMP and MP equivalence, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: IMP and MP equivalence, Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Your call 20060426/2, ewleongusa
  • Re: Your call 20060426/2, Justin Lall
    • Re: Your call 20060426/2, ewleongusa
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Your call 20060426/2, Frances
• Re: How to bid this, Alex Martelli
  • Re: How to bid this, Bob Lipton
    • Re: How to bid this, Alex Martelli
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How to bid this, Charlie
  • Re: How to bid this, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: How to bid this, Andrew
    • Re: How to bid this, Alex Martelli
  • Re: How to bid this, Lorne
    • Re: How to bid this, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: How to bid this-the actual hand, Bob Richardson
      • Re: How to bid this-the actual hand, Alex Martelli
  • Re: How to bid this, vida
    • Re: How to bid this, Alex Martelli