Re: needing a better way to bid these hands:
- From: Bob Lipton <boblipton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:01:22 GMT
Mitch Edelman wrote:
IMPS, only you are vul.
Opener: KJxx, AKxx, AQxx, Q
Responder: AQx, xx, KJ10x, KJxx
The auction (opponents are silent)
Opener Responder
1D 2D (inverted - limit or better)
2H 2S 3S 3N P
2h and 2S both showed extra values;
The hand provoked some discussion, as 6N is ice cold.
Opener: you should try 4C instead of 3N; I showed extras.
Responder: You have about a king and queen more than you showed. It must be safe for you to bid 4C. Since you didnt bid 3C, this must show
second round control . . .
So- who should be moving this hand toward slam? And how should he do it?
(At the other table, the opps had a RKC misunderstanding and reached 7N - thinking they had a slam swing to compensate for, they broke discipline and bid to a couple of hopeless games, resulting in a blitz.)
Once responder has shown better than a limit hand and a club stopper, then opener's hand is worth 19 points. 19 points opposite an opener is worth a slam -- in this case, 6C.
Bob .
- References:
- needing a better way to bid these hands:
- From: Mitch Edelman
- needing a better way to bid these hands:
- Prev by Date: Re: --, AKQxx, Kxx, KJTxx
- Next by Date: Re: What would you bid?
- Previous by thread: Re: needing a better way to bid these hands:
- Next by thread: Re: needing a better way to bid these hands:
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|