rec.games.bridge

• Date Index

---

• 1NT-(2C) -- is 2NT Lebensohl or are "systems on"?, Bud H
  • Re: 1NT-(2C) -- is 2NT Lebensohl or are "systems on"?, Chris Ryall
  • Re: 1NT-(2C) -- is 2NT Lebensohl or are "systems on"?, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: 1NT-(2C) -- is 2NT Lebensohl or are "systems on"?, Lorne
  • Re: 1NT-(2C) -- is 2NT Lebensohl or are "systems on"?, Bob Meixner
  • Re: 1NT-(2C) -- is 2NT Lebensohl or are "systems on"?, Todd A. Anderson
    • Re: 1NT-(2C) -- is 2NT Lebensohl or are "systems on"?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: 1NT-(2C) -- is 2NT Lebensohl or are "systems on"?, Robin
  • Re: 1NT-(2C) -- is 2NT Lebensohl or are "systems on"?, Frances
• Multi Game King 800 in 1,400 in 1,300 in 1 for sale., dennylee1177
• Handicapping Club Games, Ken B
  • Re: Handicapping Club Games, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Handicapping Club Games, Lorne
• checking trump quality, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: checking trump quality, ewleongusa
  • Re: checking trump quality, flytoox_2000
  • Re: checking trump quality, Mark Dean
    • Re: checking trump quality, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: checking trump quality, ewleongusa
  • Re: checking trump quality, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: checking trump quality, David Wiltshire
  • Re: checking trump quality, Chris Ryall
    • Re: checking trump quality, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: checking trump quality, Bud H
• Decision Time, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Decision Time, Sid Ismail
    • Re: Decision Time, ewleongusa
      • Re: Decision Time, Frances
      • Re: Decision Time, Sid Ismail
      • Re: Decision Time, ewleongusa
      • Re: Decision Time, the auction ends, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Decision Time, the auction ends, ewleongusa
      • Re: Decision Time, the auction ends, Marcia Masterson
  • Re: Decision Time, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: Decision Time, ewleongusa
  • Re: Decision Time, Frances
  • Re: Decision Time, raija d
  • Re: Decision Time, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Decision Time, nige1
• Harder than it looks?, David Wiltshire
  • Re: Harder than it looks?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: Harder than it looks?, Lorne
    • Re: Harder than it looks?, ewleongusa
      • Re: Harder than it looks?, Lorne
  • Re: Harder than it looks?, nige1
  • Re: Harder than it looks?, Richard Pavlicek
    • Re: Harder than it looks?, nige1
      • Re: Harder than it looks?, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: Harder than it looks?, nige1
    • Re: Harder than it looks?, David Wiltshire
• Katrina, Mmbridge
  • Re: Katrina, Chris Ryall
    • Re: Katrina, Mmbridge
      • Re: Katrina, Peter Leighton
      • Re: Katrina, Mmbridge
  • Re: Katrina, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Katrina, Travis Crump
      • Re: Katrina, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Katrina, Stu Goodgold
      • Re: Katrina, Adam Lea
    • Re: Katrina, Mmbridge
• is it coincidence?, Barry Rigal
  • Re: is it coincidence?, David Stevenson
  • Re: is it coincidence?, Lorne
    • Re: is it coincidence?, Lorne
  • Re: is it coincidence?, Charlie
• English Trials 2005/2006, Frances
• join the greatest chess files group, mohtarefen
  • Re: join the greatest chess files group, David Stevenson
• The match between Goren, Lawrence, LTC, Bergen etc., zarpetkov
• double or not, Nick Hughes
  • Re: double or not, Bob Lipton
  • Re: double or not, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: double or not, Bob Meixner
  • Re: double or not, Charlie
    • Re: double or not, raija d
      • Re: double or not, Charlie
      • Re: double or not, Julian Lighton
      • Re: double or not, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: double or not, goffster
      • Re: double or not, Charlie
      • Re: double or not, Lorne
  • Re: double or not, Ville Likitalo
  • Re: double or not, Frances
  • Re: double or not, Lorne
    • Re: double or not, Mark Brader
  • Re: double or not, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: double or not, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: double or not, goffster
  • Re: double or not, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: double or not, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: double or not, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: double or not, Nigel
  • Re: double or not, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: double or not, John Schuler
    • Re: double or not, Geraint Harker
  • Re: double or not, David Wiltshire
    • Re: double or not, Nick Hughes
• Is this a pass out of turn?, Wolfhart Umlauft
  • Re: Is this a pass out of turn?, Peter Smulders
    • Re: Is this a pass out of turn?, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: Is this a pass out of turn?, Lorne
  • Re: Is this a pass out of turn?, Stu Goodgold
  • Re: Is this a pass out of turn?, David Stevenson
    • Re: Is this a pass out of turn?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Is this a pass out of turn?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is this a pass out of turn?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Is this a pass out of turn?, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Is this a pass out of turn?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Is this a pass out of turn?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Is this a pass out of turn?, David Stevenson
• Leads, Larry Lowell
  • Re: Leads, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Leads, Nick Hughes
  • Re: Leads, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: Leads, Rik ter Veen
  • Re: Leads, Søren Justesen
    • Re: Leads, Lorne
• Responses to 1NT Overcalls, Terry Faust
  • Re: Responses to 1NT Overcalls, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: Responses to 1NT Overcalls, Bud H
      • Re: Responses to 1NT Overcalls, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Responses to 1NT Overcalls, Reef Fish
      • Re: Responses to 1NT Overcalls, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: Responses to 1NT Overcalls, multguru@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Responses to 1NT Overcalls, Lorne
  • Re: Responses to 1NT Overcalls, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Responses to 1NT Overcalls, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: Responses to 1NT Overcalls, David Wiltshire
• Public Accusation of Cheating, lindy
  • Re: Public Accusation of Cheating, David Stevenson
  • Re: Public Accusation of Cheating, David Collier
    • Re: Public Accusation of Cheating, craig
      • Re: Public Accusation of Cheating, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Public Accusation of Cheating, Lorne
• Conventional Wisdom, Marvin French
  • Re: Conventional Wisdom, Travis Crump
    • Re: Conventional Wisdom, Marvin French
      • Re: Conventional Wisdom, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Conventional Wisdom, Carl
      • Re: Conventional Wisdom, David Stevenson
  • Re: Conventional Wisdom, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Conventional Wisdom, David Stevenson
      • Re: Conventional Wisdom, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Conventional Wisdom, David Stevenson
• Swiss miss, Bob Richardson
  • Re: Swiss miss, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Swiss miss, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Swiss miss, Bill Jacobs
• A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, Joshua Sinnett
  • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, nige1
    • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, nige1
      • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, Peter Leighton
      • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, nige1
      • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, Peter Leighton
  • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, Peter Leighton
  • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, ted
  • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, John R. Mayne
  • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, Frances
      • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, Peter Clinch
  • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, Stu Goodgold
  • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, John Schuler
  • Re: A few hands from the Puget Sound regional, Frances
• Online Acol notes, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Online Acol notes, Vladimir
  • Re: Online Acol notes, stefan f.
    • Re: Online Acol notes, Chris Ryall
      • Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, John Hall
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, Frances
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, John Hall
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, pfriedmanNoSpam
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, David Collier
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Online Acol notes -- feedback sought, John Hall
• what's your bid and what's her shape?, henrysun909
  • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, ted
  • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, ewleongusa
    • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, ewleongusa
      • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, Frances
      • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, raija d
  • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, Charles Brenner
  • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, Gautam
  • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, Bud H
  • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, nige1
  • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, goffster
    • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, goffster
  • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, John (MadDog) Probst
    • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, henrysun909
      • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, Peter Clinch
      • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, ewleongusa
  • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, raija d
    • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, jrw
      • Re: what's your bid and what's her shape?, raija d
• 123 No Trump, ted
  • Re: 123 No Trump, Peter Leighton
  • Re: 123 No Trump, nige1
    • Re: 123 No Trump, nige1
  • Re: 123 No Trump, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: 123 No Trump, John (MadDog) Probst
      • Re: 123 No Trump, ewleongusa
      • Re: 123 No Trump, John (MadDog) Probst
      • Re: 123 No Trump, ewleongusa
      • Re: 123 No Trump, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: 123 No Trump, Slammer
  • Re: 123 No Trump, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: 123 No Trump, Bob Lipton
    • Re: 123 No Trump, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: 123 No Trump, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: 123 No Trump, Joshua Sinnett
  • Re: 123 No Trump, David Wiltshire
    • Re: 123 No Trump, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: 123 No Trump, ewleongusa
      • Re: 123 No Trump, Frances
    • Re: 123 No Trump, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: 123 No Trump, Frances
  • Re: 123 No Trump, Lorne
• LM % in ACBL, Angelo DePalma
  • Re: LM % in ACBL, lindy
  • Re: LM % in ACBL, ewleongusa
    • Re: LM % in ACBL, John (MadDog) Probst
    • Re: LM % in ACBL, Patrick Page
    • Re: LM % in ACBL, lindy
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, David Stevenson
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Michael Farebrother
    • Re: LM % in ACBL, alvin
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
    • Re: LM % in ACBL, alvin
  • Re: LM % in ACBL, lotus
    • Re: LM % in ACBL, Angelo DePalma
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Larry Lowell
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
  • Re: LM % in ACBL, Lorne
    • Re: LM % in ACBL, David Stevenson
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Barry Margolin
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Ron Johnson
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Steve Grant
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Georgiana Gates
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Georgiana Gates
      • Re: LM % in ACBL, Reef Fish
• Who is Al Lexperts?, lindy
  • Re: Who is Al Lexperts?, Jenny
  • Re: Who is Al Lexperts?, Rik ter Veen
    • Re: Who is Al Lexperts?, lindy
    • Re: Who is Al Lexperts?, Gordon Rainsford
• Hearing problem, Verne Smith
• Russian Chicago - compensation tables, Nick Wedd
  • Re: Russian Chicago - compensation tables, Lorne
    • Re: Russian Chicago - compensation tables, nige1
  • Re: Russian Chicago - compensation tables, Ivan Popivanov
• What is the best line?, ted
  • Re: What is the best line?, ted
    • Re: What is the best line?, ewleongusa
  • Re: What is the best line?, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: What is the best line?, David Wiltshire
      • Re: What is the best line?, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: What is the best line?, ted
  • Re: What is the best line?, Slammer
  • Re: What is the best line?, nige1
  • Re: What is the best line? The other 2 hands, ted
• what you bid ?, Dragan_A
  • Re: what you bid ?, Charlie
    • Re: what you bid ?, ted
      • Re: what you bid ?, Slammer
      • Re: what you bid ?, Dragan_A
  • Re: what you bid ?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: what you bid ?, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: what you bid ?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: what you bid ?, ewleongusa
    • Re: what you bid ?, Nick Hughes
• Do you bid?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Do you bid?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Do you bid?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Do you bid?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Do you bid?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Do you bid?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Do you bid?, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Do you bid?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Do you bid?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Do you bid?, raija d
  • Re: Do you bid?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Do you bid?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Do you bid?, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Do you bid?, Eddie Grove
  • Re: Do you bid?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Do you bid?, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: Do you bid?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Do you bid?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Do you bid?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Do you bid?, Lorne
  • Re: Do you bid?, vida
    • Re: Do you bid?, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: Do you bid? Part 2., Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Do you bid? Part 2., Bob Lipton
    • Re: Do you bid? Part 2., raija d
    • Re: Do you bid? Part 2., ewleongusa
      • Re: Do you bid? Part 2., Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Do you bid? Part 2., Slammer
      • Re: Do you bid? Part 2., Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Do you bid? Part 2., goffster
  • Re: Do you bid?, John R. Mayne
    • Re: Do you bid?, ted
      • Re: Do you bid?, Slammer
  • Re: Do you bid?, Charlie
  • Re: Do you bid?, Bud H
    • Re: Do you bid?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Do you bid?, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: Do you bid?, goffster
• Multiplayer Poker game on Nokia6630. Is it working?, Wired
• another one of those hesitation thingos, Roger Gillard
  • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, Mark Brader
    • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, raija d
    • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, Barry Rigal
      • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, David Stevenson
  • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, Frances
    • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, Lorne
  • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, Ron Johnson
    • Re: another one of those hesitation thingos, Mark Brader
• Bothersome double, raija d
  • Re: Bothersome double, Stuart M Newberger
  • Re: Bothersome double, ted
  • Re: Bothersome double, Lorne
  • Re: Bothersome double, goffster
  • Re: Bothersome double, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Bothersome double, ewleongusa
  • Re: Bothersome double, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Bothersome double, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Bothersome double, Bud H
  • Re: Bothersome double, kvetcher
• Is this an opening bid?, Chris Pisarra
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Is this an opening bid?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, lindy
    • Re: Is this an opening bid?, balarama98
    • Re: Is this an opening bid?, balarama98
    • Re: Is this an opening bid?, balarama98
      • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Julian Lighton
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, raija d
    • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Ron Lel
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Frances
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, goffster
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, John Crinnion
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Lorne
    • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Bud H
    • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Slammer
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Andrea James
    • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Eric Kehr
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, nige1
  • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Ron Johnson
    • Re: Is this an opening bid?, rhm
      • Re: Is this an opening bid?, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Is this an opening bid?, rhm
• eyesight problem, Nick Hughes
  • Re: eyesight problem, Peterh
  • Re: eyesight problem, Sartaj Hans
    • Re: eyesight problem, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: eyesight problem, lindy
      • Re: eyesight problem, Ron Lel
      • Re: eyesight problem, Sartaj Hans
      • Re: eyesight problem, Charles Brenner
      • Re: eyesight problem, David Stevenson
      • Re: eyesight problem, Charles Brenner
      • Re: eyesight problem, David Stevenson
      • Re: eyesight problem, Charles Brenner
      • Re: eyesight problem, David Stevenson
      • Re: eyesight problem, Charles Brenner
      • Re: eyesight problem, David Stevenson
      • Re: eyesight problem, Charles Brenner
      • Re: eyesight problem, David Stevenson
      • Re: eyesight problem, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: eyesight problem, raija d
    • Re: eyesight problem, Anton van Uitert
      • Re: eyesight problem, raija d
      • Re: eyesight problem, Anton van Uitert
  • Re: eyesight problem, raija d
  • Re: eyesight problem, Frances
    • Re: eyesight problem, Julian Lighton
      • Re: eyesight problem, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: eyesight problem, Frances
      • Re: eyesight problem, Julian Lighton
  • Re: eyesight problem, Lorne
    • Re: eyesight problem, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: eyesight problem, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: eyesight problem, Mark Brader
      • Re: eyesight problem, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: eyesight problem, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: eyesight problem, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: eyesight problem, David Stevenson
  • Re: eyesight problem, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: eyesight problem, David Stevenson
      • Re: eyesight problem, Stu Goodgold
      • Re: eyesight problem, David Stevenson
      • Re: eyesight problem, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Procedural question, Herb
  • Re: Procedural question, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Procedural question, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: Procedural question, Mark Brader
      • Re: Procedural question, Stu Goodgold
      • Re: Procedural question, Mark Brader
      • Re: Procedural question, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Procedural question, John (MadDog) Probst
      • Re: Procedural question, David Stevenson
    • Re: Procedural question, John (MadDog) Probst
      • Re: Procedural question, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Procedural question, David Stevenson
    • Re: Procedural question, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Procedural question, Rik ter Veen
      • Re: Procedural question, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Procedural question, David Stevenson
  • Re: Procedural question, Herb
    • Re: Procedural question, David Stevenson
• Online 2/1 system notes, morganic2001
  • Re: Online 2/1 system notes, ted
  • Re: Online 2/1 system notes, Bud H
  • Re: Online 2/1 system notes, lotus
  • Re: Online 2/1 system notes, jdblaw
• Re: Ping - Mr. Newton, Chris Ryall
• Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Kevin Podsiadlik
  • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Bud H
  • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Chris Ryall
      • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), ted
      • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Travis Crump
      • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Travis Crump
  • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), raija d
  • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Jon
      • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), David Stevenson
    • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), Lorne
    • Re: Hesitation ruling (re: Six-five, come how alive?), auby
• Re: Word to PDF assistance please, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: Word to PDF assistance please, Denis O'Kane
    • Re: Word to PDF assistance please, Andrew Gumperz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Word to PDF assistance please, Glen Ashton
• Bet it every time it can be beaten, Frances
  • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, Frances
  • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, David Wiltshire
  • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, David Wiltshire
    • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, David Wiltshire
      • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, David Wiltshire
      • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, David Wiltshire
  • Re: Bet it every time it can be beaten, ted
• Put the Bols Brilliancy Prize in the post..., Ian Payn
  • Re: Put the Bols Brilliancy Prize in the post..., Jeremy
    • Re: Put the Bols Brilliancy Prize in the post..., Ian Payn
  • Re: Put the Bols Brilliancy Prize in the post..., Chris Ryall
    • Re: Put the Bols Brilliancy Prize in the post..., Ian Payn
      • Re: Put the Bols Brilliancy Prize in the post..., Ashok
• interference over stayman, David Wiltshire
  • Re: interference over stayman, Frances
  • Re: interference over stayman, Chris Ryall
  • Re: interference over stayman, Lorne
  • Re: interference over stayman, Frances
• Six-five, come how alive?, Kevin Podsiadlik
  • Re: Six-five, come how alive?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Six-five, come how alive?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Six-five, come how alive?, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: Six-five, come how alive?, ted
    • Re: Six-five, come how alive?, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Six-five, come how alive?, Charlie
  • Re: Six-five, come how alive?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Six-five, come how alive?, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Six-five, come how alive?, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Six-five, come how alive?, goffster
  • Re: Six-five, come how alive?, Lorne
• Re: The idea of streaks in Bridge was Re: Fabulouse Angelification, Kieran Dyke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The idea of streaks in Bridge was Re: Fabulouse Angelification, Travis Crump
• Lebensohl over weak 2D?, RonH
  • Re: Lebensohl over weak 2D?, raija d
  • Re: Lebensohl over weak 2D?, Lorne
    • Re: Lebensohl over weak 2D?, Stephen Tu
      • Re: Lebensohl over weak 2D?, Jeremy
      • Re: Lebensohl over weak 2D?, raija d
      • Re: Lebensohl over weak 2D?, Stephen Tu
• Transfer Overcalls/Transfers over doubles, Steve Male
  • Re: Transfer Overcalls/Transfers over doubles, David Wiltshire
• IMP problems, 8/22/05, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Bob Lipton
    • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Bud H
    • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Bob Lipton
      • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Bob Lipton
  • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Bud H
  • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Lorne
  • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Travis Crump
      • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, John R. Mayne
    • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, John Schuler
  • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Eric Hochman
  • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Vladimir
  • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, ewleongusa
    • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: IMP problems, 8/22/05, Søren Justesen
• What does this sequence show?, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: What does this sequence show?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What does this sequence show?, Frances
  • Re: What does this sequence show?, ted
  • Re: What does this sequence show?, ewleongusa
    • Re: What does this sequence show?, ted
  • Re: What does this sequence show?, Sid Ismail
    • Re: What does this sequence show?, ted
      • Re: What does this sequence show?, Chris Newton
      • Re: What does this sequence show?, Søren Justesen
  • Re: What does this sequence show?, raija d
  • Re: What does this sequence show?, Lorne
  • Re: What does this sequence show?, Gordon Rainsford
    • Re: What does this sequence show?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: What does this sequence show?, Frances
• Organized defenses against 3-suited openers, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Organized defenses against 3-suited openers, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Organized defenses against 3-suited openers, Julian Lighton
    • Re: Organized defenses against 3-suited openers, John Schuler
      • Re: Organized defenses against 3-suited openers, Chris Ryall
• Who's making what?, Frances
  • Re: Who's making what?, ted
    • Re: Who's making what?, flytoox_2000
      • Re: Who's making what?, ted
  • Re: Who's making what?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Who's making what?, Frances
  • Re: Who's making what?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Who's making what?, Ashok
  • Re: Who's making what?, Clark Millikan
  • Re: Who's making what?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Who's making what?, Frances
      • Re: Who's making what?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Who's making what?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Who's making what?, Douglas Newlands
    • Re: Who's making what?, Frances
      • Re: Who's making what?, Douglas Newlands
    • Re: Who's making what?, Lorne
  • Re: Who's making what?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Who's making what?, David Wiltshire
      • Re: Who's making what?, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Who's making what?, Peter Clinch
    • Re: Who's making what?, David Wiltshire
  • Re: Who's making what?, flytoox_2000
• The Adventures of Sam and Richard - Part 25, Richard Lawson
• Bidding Problem, sphboc
  • Re: Bidding Problem, ted
  • Re: Bidding Problem, ewleongusa
  • Re: Bidding Problem, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Bidding Problem, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: Bidding Problem, raija d
  • Re: Bidding Problem, Lorne
  • Re: Bidding Problem, Søren Justesen
  • Re: Bidding Problem, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Bidding Problem, John R. Mayne
• The Last Word..., Ian Payn
  • Re: The Last Word..., ted
  • Re: The Last Word..., John Crinnion
    • Re: The Last Word..., John Hall
      • Re: The Last Word..., John Crinnion
      • Re: The Last Word..., John Hall
  • Re: The Last Word..., ewleongusa
  • Re: The Last Word..., Ashok
  • Re: The Last Word..., Ashok
  • Re: The Last Last Word..., Ian Payn
• Brighton Swiss Teams, Andrew Symons
  • Re: Brighton Swiss Teams, Travis Crump
    • Re: Brighton Swiss Teams, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Brighton Swiss Teams, David Stevenson
• Biassed Reviews in ACBL Bridge Bulletin?, Ashok
  • Re: Biassed Reviews in ACBL Bridge Bulletin?, raija d
  • Re: Biassed Reviews in ACBL Bridge Bulletin?, Georgiana Gates
    • Re: Biassed Reviews in ACBL Bridge Bulletin?, Barry Rigal
    • Re: Biassed Reviews in ACBL Bridge Bulletin?, John Crinnion
  • Re: Biassed Reviews in ACBL Bridge Bulletin?, BSF Aurora
  • Home cooking...TDs (was Re: Biassed Reviews in ACBL Bridge Bulletin?), Bud H
    • Re: Home cooking...TDs (was Re: Biassed Reviews in ACBL Bridge Bulletin?), ted
• Big Foot - Big Fit?, ted
  • Re: Big Foot - Big Fit?, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: Big Foot - Big Fit?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Big Foot - Big Fit?, Rik ter Veen
  • Re: Big Foot - Big Fit?, Rik ter Veen
  • Re: Big Foot - Big Fit?, Clark Millikan
  • Re: Big Foot - Big Fit?, Søren Justesen
  • Re: Big Foot - Big Fit?, Lorne
• 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, Bud H
  • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, ted
  • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, ewleongusa
  • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, Eric Hochman
    • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, Justin Lall
      • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, ewleongusa
      • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, Justin Lall
      • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, Bud H
      • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, Bud H
  • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, Lorne
  • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, Frances
  • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT, Chris Ryall
  • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT (full hand), Bud H
    • Re: 852 86432 AQ A10x opposite 13-15 1NT (full hand), Adam Beneschan
• Avoiding the double digit imp disaster, Bud H
  • Re: Avoiding the double digit imp disaster, Eric Hochman
  • Re: Avoiding the double digit imp disaster, ewleongusa
    • Re: Avoiding the double digit imp disaster, Bud H
    • Re: Avoiding the double digit imp disaster, Lorne
• Please suggest an intelligent auction for these hands, Eric Hochman
  • Re: Please suggest an intelligent auction for these hands, Bud H
  • Re: Please suggest an intelligent auction for these hands, pfriedmanNoSpam
  • Re: Please suggest an intelligent auction for these hands, Ashok
    • Re: Please suggest an intelligent auction for these hands, Ron Sperber
  • Re: Please suggest an intelligent auction for these hands, Lorne
  • Re: Please suggest an intelligent auction for these hands, ewleongusa
  • Re: Please suggest an intelligent auction for these hands, Geoff Edwards
  • Re: Please suggest an intelligent auction for these hands, Chris Newton
• Re: renege, Jon Siegel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: renege, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: renege, raija d
• Can visitors play the hands you posted?, Bridge7
• Lead Ace against Slams?, Larry Lowell
  • Re: Lead Ace against Slams?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Lead Ace against Slams?, Brian Baresch
  • Re: Lead Ace against Slams?, raija d
  • Re: Lead Ace against Slams?, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Lead Ace against Slams?, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: Lead Ace against Slams?, Richard Pavlicek
      • Re: Lead Ace against Slams?, Fitzroy
      • Re: Lead Ace against Slams?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Lead Ace against Slams?, Charlie
    • Re: Lead Ace against Slams?, Sandy E. Barnes
• Negative free bids problem, part I, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, ewleongusa
    • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, ted
  • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, raija d
  • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, Nick Hughes
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, Chris Newton
  • Negative free bids problem, part II, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, alvin
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, alvin
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, alvin
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, alvin
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, alvin
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, alvin
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, alvin
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, alvin
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Stephen Tu
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, alvin
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, alvin
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, alvin
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, alvin
    • Re: Negative free bids problem, part II, Lorne
  • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Negative free bids problem, part I, Rik ter Veen
  • Negative free bids problem, the resolution, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Negative free bids problem, the resolution, ewleongusa
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, the resolution, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, the resolution, ewleongusa
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, the resolution, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Negative free bids problem, the resolution, Ashok
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, the resolution, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, the resolution, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Negative free bids problem, the resolution, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Negative free bids problem, the resolution, Andrew Gumperz
• Jump bids after 2/1, toddz
  • Re: Jump bids after 2/1, Stuart M Newberger
  • Re: Jump bids after 2/1, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Jump bids after 2/1, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Jump bids after 2/1, raija d
  • Re: Jump bids after 2/1, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: Jump bids after 2/1, Stuart M Newberger
      • Re: Jump bids after 2/1, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: Jump bids after 2/1, ewleongusa
  • Re: Jump bids after 2/1, alvin
• 1NT-2X-2Y-3NT without major, Bud H
• repeating stiffs [for Barry], Eddie Grove
  • Re: repeating stiffs [for Barry], Ian Payn
  • Re: repeating stiffs [for Barry], Reef Fish
    • Re: repeating stiffs [for Barry], Eddie Grove
      • Re: repeating stiffs [for Barry], Reef Fish
      • Re: repeating stiffs [for Barry], Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: repeating stiffs [for Barry], Reef Fish
• What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Ashok
  • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, BSF Aurora
  • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Lorne
    • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Mark Brader
      • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Mark Brader
      • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Mark Brader
      • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Ashok
  • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Charlie
    • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: What a strange way to get a top .. and a flat, Stephen Fischer
• Your bid?, Charlie
  • Re: Your bid?, John Hall
    • Re: Your bid?, Peter Leighton
  • Re: Your bid?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Your bid?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Your bid?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Your bid?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Your bid?, ted
  • Re: Your bid?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Your bid?, BSF Aurora
  • Re: Your bid?, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Your bid?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Your bid?, Bud H
  • Re: Your bid?, jas1959
  • Re: Your bid?, Ian Payn
  • Re: Your bid?, kvetcher
    • Re: Your bid?, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Your bid?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Your bid?, kvetcher
• Re: Fabulouse Angelification, Marvin French
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fabulouse Angelification, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Reef Fish
  • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Ian Payn
    • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Reef Fish
  • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), vida
    • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), ted
  • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Stu Goodgold
  • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Ashok
    • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Reef Fish
      • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Charles Brenner
      • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Reef Fish
      • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Charles Brenner
      • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Reef Fish
      • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Stu Goodgold
      • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Ian Payn
  • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), ted
  • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), Lorne
  • Re: Missed winning a two-session money game by 0.04 MATCH point :-), sphboc
• New Young Chelsea Web Site, Ian Payn
  • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, John Crinnion
    • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, Ian Payn
      • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, John Crinnion
      • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, Ian Payn
      • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, John Crinnion
      • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, John Crinnion
      • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, Ian Payn
      • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, John Crinnion
      • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, Ian Payn
      • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, Ewan McNay
    • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, Sid Ismail
  • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, ewleongusa
    • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, Ian Payn
    • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, David Collier
      • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, David Collier
  • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, Jeremy
    • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: New Young Chelsea Web Site, james1071
• What do you lead from AKxx against 1NT?, Ashok
  • Re: What do you lead from AKxx against 1NT?, Lorne
    • Re: What do you lead from AKxx against 1NT?, Barry Rigal
    • Re: What do you lead from AKxx against 1NT?, etsand
      • Re: What do you lead from AKxx against 1NT?, Lorne
  • Re: What do you lead from AKxx against 1NT?, goffster
    • Re: What do you lead from AKxx against 1NT?, Stuart M Newberger
      • Re: What do you lead from AKxx against 1NT?, goffster
      • Re: What do you lead from AKxx against 1NT?, Stuart M Newberger
      • Re: What do you lead from AKxx against 1NT?, Lorne
  • Re: What do you lead from AKxx against 1NT?, Kieran Dyke
• Negative Inferences, Marvin French
  • Re: Negative Inferences, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: Negative Inferences, Marvin French
      • Re: Negative Inferences, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Negative Inferences, Marvin French
      • Re: Negative Inferences, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Negative Inferences, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Negative Inferences, Marvin French
      • Re: Negative Inferences, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Negative Inferences, Marvin French
      • Re: Negative Inferences, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Negative Inferences, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Negative Inferences, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Negative Inferences, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Negative Inferences, Nick Hughes
    • Re: Negative Inferences, raija d
    • Re: Negative Inferences, Marvin French
  • Re: Negative Inferences, John Schuler
    • Re: Negative Inferences, David Stevenson
  • Re: Negative Inferences, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: Negative Inferences, Stu Goodgold
  • Re: Negative Inferences, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: Negative Inferences, Marvin French
      • Re: Negative Inferences, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Negative Inferences, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• RKCB poll, Stu Goodgold
  • Re: RKCB poll, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: RKCB poll, Travis Crump
  • Re: RKCB poll, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: RKCB poll, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: RKCB poll, Stu Goodgold
      • Re: RKCB poll, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: RKCB poll, Barry Margolin
      • Re: RKCB poll, Charles Brenner
      • Re: RKCB poll, alvin
      • Re: RKCB poll, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: RKCB poll, raija d
      • Re: RKCB poll, Barry Margolin
      • Re: RKCB poll, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: RKCB poll, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: RKCB poll, Bud H
    • Re: RKCB poll, Julian Lighton
      • Re: RKCB poll, Travis Crump
  • Re: RKCB poll, raija d
  • Re: RKCB poll, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: RKCB poll, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: RKCB poll, Nick Hughes
    • Re: RKCB poll, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: RKCB poll, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: RKCB poll, jas1959
  • Re: RKCB poll, Lorne
  • Re: RKCB poll, Jon
  • Re: RKCB poll, Ashok
  • Re: RKCB poll, Chris Newton
  • Re: RKCB poll, David J. Grabiner
  • Re: RKCB poll, Robert Larsson
  • Re: RKCB poll, Andrea James
  • Re: RKCB poll, auby
• My suit or your suit?, Mark Dean
  • Re: My suit or your suit?, ewleongusa
  • Re: My suit or your suit?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: My suit or your suit?, John Hall
  • Re: My suit or your suit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: My suit or your suit?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: My suit or your suit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: My suit or your suit?, ted
  • Re: My suit or your suit?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: My suit or your suit?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: My suit or your suit?, Clark Millikan
    • Re: My suit or your suit?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: My suit or your suit?, raija d
  • Re: My suit or your suit?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: My suit or your suit?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: My suit or your suit?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: My suit or your suit?, ewleongusa
      • Re: My suit or your suit?, raija d
      • Re: My suit or your suit?, ewleongusa
      • Re: My suit or your suit?, Justin Lall
      • Re: My suit or your suit?, Sartaj Hans
      • Re: My suit or your suit?, ted
      • Re: My suit or your suit?, Sartaj Hans
      • Re: My suit or your suit?, ted
      • Re: My suit or your suit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• When is 4C as A asking alertable?, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, Jon Haugsand
  • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, raija d
    • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, Mark Brader
  • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, David Stevenson
      • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, Mark Brader
      • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, David Stevenson
  • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, Nick Hughes
    • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, David Stevenson
  • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, Lorne
  • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: When is 4C as A asking alertable?, Adam Beneschan
• world youth teams comment, Nick Hughes
  • Re: world youth teams comment, Elianna
    • Re: world youth teams comment, Barry Margolin
      • Re: world youth teams comment, Larry Lowell
      • Re: world youth teams comment, Elianna
      • Re: world youth teams comment, Chris Ryall
      • Re: world youth teams comment, Elianna
      • Re: world youth teams comment, Craig Barkhouse
  • Re: world youth teams comment, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: world youth teams comment, raija d
    • Re: world youth teams comment, nick
    • Re: world youth teams comment, nick
  • Re: world youth teams comment, Jonathan
    • Re: world youth teams comment, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: world youth teams comment, raija d
      • Re: world youth teams comment, John Crinnion
      • Re: world youth teams comment, Larry Lowell
      • Re: world youth teams comment, Justin Lall
• Mac software, Barry Rigal
  • Re: Mac software, Vladimir
• your bid over interference after 2NT, Tom Huybrechts
  • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, Bob Lipton
    • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, flytoox_2000
  • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, flytoox_2000
  • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, vlastimil
  • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, ted
  • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, Charlie
    • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, flytoox_2000
  • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, ewleongusa
  • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, John (MadDog) Probst
      • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, ewleongusa
      • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, John (MadDog) Probst
      • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, ewleongusa
  • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, Tom Huybrechts
    • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, Geoff Edwards
      • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, RishiX
      • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, Geoff Edwards
    • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, Ivan Popivanov
    • Re: your bid over interference after 2NT, Jeremy
• 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Bud H
  • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Sartaj Hans
    • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, N. Silver
      • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Player
    • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Lorne
  • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Glen Ashton
    • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Brian Baresch
      • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Glen Ashton
  • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Todd A. Anderson
    • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Andy
      • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, N. Silver
      • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, N. Silver
      • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Brian Baresch
      • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Larry Lowell
      • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Justin Lall
      • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Justin Lall
      • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Mark Bennett
    • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, David Wiltshire
  • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, Nick Hughes
  • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, ewleongusa
    • Re: 6H contract on Board 88 of Junior championship, David Wiltshire
• Swiss pairs problems, Adam Lea
  • Re: Swiss pairs problems, Bud H
    • Re: Swiss pairs problems, Adam Lea
  • Re: Swiss pairs problems, Lorne
  • Re: Swiss pairs problems, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Swiss pairs problems, Nigel
  • Re: Swiss pairs problems, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Swiss pairs problems, Douglas Newlands
    • Re: Swiss pairs problems, Ian Payn
  • Re: Swiss pairs problems, ewleongusa
  • Re: Swiss pairs problems, Frances
  • Re: Swiss pairs problems, Frances
    • Re: Swiss pairs problems, Ashok
      • Re: Swiss pairs problems, Travis Crump
      • Re: Swiss pairs problems, ewleongusa
    • Re: Swiss pairs problems, ewleongusa
• Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, Bud H
  • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, Lorne
    • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, Andy
      • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, Andy
      • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, Lorne
      • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, asdfg2k
      • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, Lorne
  • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, John Schuler
  • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, Bud H
    • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, Andy
  • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, Claus P. Hastrup
  • Re: Board 42 of Junior Championship in Australia - allow the grand?, nick
• Weird situation, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: Weird situation, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Weird situation, Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: Weird situation, Peter Leighton
      • Re: Weird situation, Ivan Popivanov
      • Re: Weird situation, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Weird situation, Eddie Grove
      • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
      • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Weird situation, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Weird situation, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Weird situation, Jürgen R .
      • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
      • Re: Weird situation, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
      • Re: Weird situation, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
      • Re: Weird situation, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
      • Re: Weird situation, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
      • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Weird situation, Adam Beneschan
      • Natural bids, conventional bids, and...? (was: Weird situation), Mark Brader
      • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
      • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
      • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
      • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Weird situation, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Weird situation, Peter Leighton
      • Re: Weird situation, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Weird situation, Brian Baresch
      • Re: Weird situation, Kieran Dyke
      • Re: Weird situation, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Weird situation, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
  • Re: Weird situation, Glen Ashton
  • Re: Weird situation, Lorne
    • Re: Weird situation, Nigel
      • Re: Weird situation, Peter Leighton
    • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Weird situation, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Weird situation, Peter Leighton
      • Re: Weird situation, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Weird situation, Peter Leighton
      • Re: Weird situation, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Weird situation, Peter Leighton
      • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Weird situation, Peter Leighton
      • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Weird situation, Peter Leighton
      • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
    • Re: Weird situation, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Weird situation, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
  • Re: Weird situation, David Stevenson
    • Re: Weird situation, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: Weird situation, Frances
    • Re: Weird situation, Ivan Popivanov
• A hand from last night's club game, morganic2001
  • Re: A hand from last night's club game, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: A hand from last night's club game, ted
    • Re: A hand from last night's club game, morganic2001
      • Re: A hand from last night's club game, Clark Millikan
      • Re: A hand from last night's club game, Chris Newton
  • Re: A hand from last night's club game, dancle16
  • Re: A hand from last night's club game, Bob Lipton
  • Re: A hand from last night's club game, Peter Leighton
  • Re: A hand from last night's club game, Chris Newton
  • Re: A hand from last night's club game, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: A hand from last night's club game, Lorne
  • Re: A hand from last night's club game, raija d
  • Re: A hand from last night's club game, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A hand from last night's club game, Rik ter Veen
  • Re: A hand from last night's club game, ewleongusa
• Defense Problem, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Defense Problem, ewleongusa
    • Re: Defense Problem, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Defense Problem, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Defense Problem, ewleongusa
      • Re: Defense Problem, Ashok
      • Re: Defense Problem, ewleongusa
      • Re: Defense Problem, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Defense Problem, ewleongusa
      • Re: Defense Problem, Ashok
  • Re: Defense Problem, Charles Brenner
• Reopen?, ted
  • Re: Reopen?, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: Reopen?, Peter Leighton
  • Re: Reopen?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Reopen?, Eric Hochman
  • Re: Reopen?, Bud H
  • Re: Reopen?, jrw
    • Re: Reopen?, jrw
      • Re: Reopen?, goffster
  • Re: Reopen?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Reopen?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Reopen?, Nigel
  • Re: Reopen?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Reopen?, Jane F.
  • Re: Reopen?, BSF Aurora
  • Re: Reopen?, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Reopen?, John Schuler
    • Re: Reopen?, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Reopen?, John Schuler
    • Re: Reopen?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Reopen?, John (MadDog) Probst
  • Re: Reopen?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Reopen?, goffster
  • Re: Reopen?, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: Reopen?, ted
  • Re: Reopen?, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Reopen? The full hand, ted
    • Re: Reopen? The full hand, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Reopen? The full hand, ted
      • Re: Reopen? The full hand, Douglas Newlands
      • Re: Reopen? The full hand, ted
      • Re: Reopen? The full hand, Douglas Newlands
      • Re: Reopen? The full hand, Eric Hochman
      • Re: Reopen? The full hand, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Reopen? The full hand, Eric Hochman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Reopen? The full hand, ted
    • Re: Reopen? The full hand, Travis Crump
      • Re: Reopen? The full hand, John Schuler
  • Re: Reopen?, John Schuler
  • Re: Reopen?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Reopen?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Reopen?, goffster
• Scratching my head in wonderment, ted
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Jon Siegel
      • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Bud H
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Charlie
    • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Julian Lighton
    • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, vida
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Eric Hochman
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, ewleongusa
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Ville Likitalo
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Lorne
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment - full hand, ted
    • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment - full hand, Eric Hochman
    • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment - full hand, Bud H
      • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment - full hand, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Scratching my head in wonderment, Kieran Dyke
• In the slam zone, Kevin Podsiadlik
  • Re: In the slam zone, Bob Lipton
  • Re: In the slam zone, ted
  • Re: In the slam zone, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: In the slam zone, Otis Bricker
  • Re: In the slam zone, Bud H
  • Re: In the slam zone, Julian Lighton
  • Re: In the slam zone, Eric Hochman
  • Re: In the slam zone, ewleongusa
    • Re: In the slam zone, flytoox_2000
  • Re: In the slam zone, raija d
  • Re: In the slam zone, Sandy E. Barnes
• Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Jane F.
  • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Stu Goodgold
  • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Michael Farebrother
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, pfriedmanNoSpam
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, John Schuler
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Julian Lighton
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, pfriedmanNoSpam
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Jane F.
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Cliff Allo
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Michael Kopera
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, David Stevenson
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, David Stevenson
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, David Stevenson
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Travis Crump
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Mark Brader
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Lavern Wiebe
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, David Stevenson
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Travis Crump
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, David Stevenson
  • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Lorne
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Lorne
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, raija d
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Ron Johnson
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, David Stevenson
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, David Stevenson
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, raija d
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Julian Lighton
  • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Bud H
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Stu Goodgold
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Div
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Jane F.
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, pfriedmanNoSpam
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Nigel
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, David J. Grabiner
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Adam Ruprecht
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Bud H
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, raija d
  • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, raija d
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, raija d
  • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Bud H
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Jane F.
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, David Stevenson
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Larry Lowell
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Travis Crump
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Peter Leighton
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, David Stevenson
  • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Brian Baresch
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Jane F.
    • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, raija d
  • Re: Precision Players - question re alert procedure, Kieran Dyke
• Is 6H Biddable?, John Schuler
  • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, Jon Haugsand
  • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, Jon Haugsand
      • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, ewleongusa
      • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, David Wiltshire
    • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, ted
  • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, raija d
    • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, raija d
  • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, John Schuler
  • Re: Is 6H Biddable?, Kieran Dyke
• Jacoby 2nt, lsfeinsmith
  • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Bud H
    • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Sid Ismail
    • Re: Jacoby 2nt, John Schuler
    • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Peter Leighton
    • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Lorne
  • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Jacoby 2nt, ewleongusa
  • Re: Jacoby 2nt, pfriedmanNoSpam
  • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Kent Feiler
  • Re: Jacoby 2nt, Kieran Dyke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Jacoby 2nt, lsfeinsmith
• 6-5 come alive?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Julian Lighton
      • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: 6-5 come alive?, ted
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Nigel
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Nigel
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Lorne
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, vida
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, ewleongusa
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Charles Brenner
    • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Charles Brenner
    • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, John R. Mayne
    • Re: 6-5 come alive?, ewleongusa
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Sartaj Hans
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, John Crinnion
    • Re: 6-5 come alive? Partner's mitt, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 6-5 come alive? Partner's mitt, ewleongusa
      • Re: 6-5 come alive? Partner's mitt, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 6-5 come alive? Partner's mitt, ewleongusa
      • Re: 6-5 come alive? Partner's mitt, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 6-5 come alive? Partner's mitt, ewleongusa
      • Re: 6-5 come alive? Partner's mitt, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 6-5 come alive? Partner's mitt, Travis Crump
      • Re: 6-5 come alive? Partner's mitt, ewleongusa
      • Re: 6-5 come alive? Partner's mitt, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 6-5 come alive? Partner's mitt, Charles Brenner
  • Re: 6-5 come alive?, Reef Fish
• What to bid?, Aslam Siddiqui
  • Re: What to bid?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: What to bid?, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: What to bid?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What to bid?, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: What to bid?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: What to bid?, BSF Aurora
      • Re: What to bid?, pfriedmanNoSpam
      • Re: What to bid?, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: What to bid?, Chris Newton
  • Re: What to bid?, Lorne
  • Re: What to bid?, jrw
  • Re: What to bid?, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: What to bid?, raija d
• Convention with no name, ted
  • Re: Convention with no name, ewleongusa
  • Re: Convention with no name, Georgiana Gates
  • Re: Convention with no name, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Convention with no name, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: Convention with no name, Lorne
  • Re: Convention with no name, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Convention with no name, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Convention with no name, Kent Feiler
    • Re: Convention with no name, Adam Beneschan
• Preempted yet again, ted
  • Re: Preempted yet again, ewleongusa
  • Re: Preempted yet again, Peter Leighton
    • Re: Preempted yet again, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: Preempted yet again, henrysun909
    • Re: Preempted yet again, raija d
      • Re: Preempted yet again, Peter Leighton
      • Re: Preempted yet again, raija d
  • Re: Preempted yet again, Jonathan Siegel
  • Re: Preempted yet again, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Preempted yet again, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Preempted yet again, raija d
  • Re: Preempted yet again, Bud H
  • Re: Preempted yet again, alvin
  • Re: Preempted yet again, alvin
  • Re: Preempted yet again, Julian Lighton
  • Re: Preempted yet again, Lorne
  • Re: Preempted yet again STEP 2, ted
    • Re: Preempted yet again STEP 2, raija d
    • Re: Preempted yet again STEP 2, ewleongusa
      • Re: Preempted yet again STEP 2, Bud H
      • Re: Preempted yet again STEP 2, ewleongusa
    • Re: Preempted yet again STEP 2, Julian Lighton
    • Re: Preempted yet again STEP 2, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Preempted yet again STEP 2 Full hand, ted
      • Re: Preempted yet again STEP 2 Full hand, Travis Crump
  • Re: Preempted yet again, Div
  • Re: Preempted yet again, Kieran Dyke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Preempted yet again, Sandy E. Barnes
• To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Eric Hochman
  • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Chris Ryall
  • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, ted
  • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, raija d
  • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Stuart M Newberger
  • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Bud H
  • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Bob Lipton
    • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, BSF Aurora
      • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, raija d
      • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, BSF Aurora
      • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, raija d
      • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, goffster
      • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Chris Ryall
      • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, goffster
  • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Eric Hochman
      • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, ewleongusa
      • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Chris Ryall
  • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: To bid or not to bid, that is the question, goffster
• mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, Barry Rigal
  • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, Charles Brenner
  • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, BSF Aurora
  • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, Reef Fish
    • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, ewleongusa
      • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, Barry Rigal
      • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, ted
      • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, Charles Brenner
      • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, Reef Fish
      • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, ewleongusa
      • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, Reef Fish
      • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, ewleongusa
      • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, Reef Fish
  • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, Jonathan Siegel
  • Re: mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, nige1
• Bridge Yesterday, Stacy
  • Re: Bridge Yesterday, Glen Ashton
    • Re: Bridge Yesterday, alvin
      • Re: Bridge Yesterday, ewleongusa
      • Re: Bridge Yesterday, Glen Ashton
• Straight Flushes (Bridge), John Schuler
  • Re: Straight Flushes (Bridge), Charlie
  • Re: Straight Flushes (Bridge), Chris Ryall
• OFF TOPIC: Horrible New Trojan, craig
  • Re: OFF TOPIC: Horrible New Trojan, Chris Ryall
    • Re: OFF TOPIC: Horrible New Trojan, craig
      • Re: OFF TOPIC: Horrible New Trojan, John Crinnion
      • Re: OFF TOPIC: Horrible New Trojan, Chris Ryall
      • Re: OFF TOPIC: Horrible New Trojan, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: OFF TOPIC: Horrible New Trojan, Glen Ashton
• "Standard" bidding problem, J3
  • Re: "Standard" bidding problem, pfriedmanNoSpam
  • Re: "Standard" bidding problem, goffster
  • Re: "Standard" bidding problem, raija d
  • Re: "Standard" bidding problem, Bob Lipton
    • Re: "Standard" bidding problem, pfriedmanNoSpam
  • Re: "Standard" bidding problem, Stuart M Newberger
    • Re: "Standard" bidding problem, raija d
  • Re: "Standard" bidding problem, Charlie
  • Re: "Standard" bidding problem, ewleongusa
• table feel, raija d
  • Re: table feel, jrw
    • Re: table feel, raija d
      • Re: table feel, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: table feel, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: table feel, lindy
      • Re: table feel, jrw
      • Re: table feel, raija d
      • Re: table feel, Andrew Gumperz
      • Re: table feel, raija d
      • Re: table feel, jrw
      • Re: table feel, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: table feel, ewleongusa
  • Re: table feel, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
• What now?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: What now?, John Hall
  • Re: What now?, goffster
  • Re: What now?, ewleongusa
  • Re: What now?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What now?, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: What now?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: What now?, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: What now?, John Hall
      • Re: What now?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: What now?, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: What now?, raija d
  • Re: What now?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: What now?, ewleongusa
  • Re: What now?, Ashok
  • Re: What now?, Lorne
  • Re: What now?, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: What now?, Lorne
    • Re: What now?, ewleongusa
    • Re: What now?, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: What now?, Kieran Dyke
• System notes for Magic Diamond?, Charlie
  • Re: System notes for Magic Diamond?, henrysun909
  • Re: System notes for Magic Diamond?, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: System notes for Magic Diamond?, Stephen Tu
  • Re: System notes for Magic Diamond?, Bruce . Moore
• Hearts or Spades, jas1959
  • Re: Hearts or Spades, Charlie
  • Re: Hearts or Spades, Peter Leighton
    • Re: Hearts or Spades, Lorne
      • Re: Hearts or Spades, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Hearts or Spades, raija d
      • Re: Hearts or Spades, Lorne
  • Re: Hearts or Spades, Jyrki Lahtonen
  • Re: Hearts or Spades, Lorne
    • Re: Hearts or Spades, raija d
      • Re: Hearts or Spades, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Hearts or Spades, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Hearts or Spades, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Hearts or Spades, ewleongusa
  • Re: Hearts or Spades, Sandy E. Barnes
• two matchpoint queries, henrysun909
  • Re: two matchpoint queries, goffster
  • Re: two matchpoint queries, ted
  • Re: two matchpoint queries, Sartaj Hans
    • Re: two matchpoint queries, goffster
  • Re: two matchpoint queries, Rik ter Veen
  • Re: two matchpoint queries, Lorne
  • Re: two matchpoint queries, jrw
  • Re: two matchpoint queries, ewleongusa
  • Re: two matchpoint queries, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: two matchpoint queries, henrysun909
      • Re: two matchpoint queries, Lorne
      • Re: two matchpoint queries, Sartaj Hans
  • Re: two matchpoint queries, Ashok
  • Re: two matchpoint queries, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: two matchpoint queries, Barry Rigal
  • Re: two matchpoint queries, Richard Pavlicek
    • Re: two matchpoint queries, Sandy E. Barnes
• Victory Points, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Victory Points, ted
  • Re: Victory Points, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Victory Points, John (MadDog) Probst
    • Re: Victory Points, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Victory Points, John (MadDog) Probst
    • Re: Victory Points, David J. Grabiner
  • Re: Victory Points, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: Victory Points, John (MadDog) Probst
    • Re: Victory Points, Bruce McIntyre
  • Re: Victory Points, David Wiltshire
    • Re: Victory Points, John (MadDog) Probst
  • Re: Victory Points, Lorne
• Do you go quietly or not, Stu Goodgold
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Peter Leighton
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, ted
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Chris Newton
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, ewleongusa
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, jrw
    • Re: Do you go quietly or not, John (MadDog) Probst
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, goffster
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: Do you go quietly or not, henrysun909
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, ted
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, raija d
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Charlie
    • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Sartaj Hans
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Lorne
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Do you go quietly or not, jrw
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, jrw
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Dave Flower
    • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Chris Newton
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Do you go quietly or not, ewleongusa
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Bud H
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, raija d
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, ewleongusa
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, ewleongusa
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, ewleongusa
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, ewleongusa
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Bud H
  • Re: Do you go quietly or not, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Do you go quietly or not, Thomas Dehn
• Best Line, Stu Goodgold
  • Re: Best Line, Clark Millikan
  • Re: Best Line, nige1
  • Re: Best Line, Lorne
• What's the PROBABILITY?, Reef Fish
  • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Reef Fish
  • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Lorne
    • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Ashok
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Reef Fish
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Mark Brader
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Reef Fish
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Reef Fish
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Ashok
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Reef Fish
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Ian Payn
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Ashok
      • Re: What's the PROBABILITY?, Reef Fish
• Hmm... I Appeal!, Mika Sandstrom
  • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, dancle16
    • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, dancle16
      • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Giovanni Bobbio
      • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, David Stevenson
      • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, David Stevenson
      • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, raija d
  • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Lorne
  • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Everett M. Greene
      • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, David Stevenson
  • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Henk Uijterwaal
  • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Hank Youngerman
    • Re: Hmm... I Appeal!, Andy
• How would you and your partner have bid this?, Ashok
  • Re: How would you and your partner have bid this?, Frances
  • Re: How would you and your partner have bid this?, goffster
  • Re: How would you and your partner have bid this?, goffster
  • Re: How would you and your partner have bid this?, Julian Lighton
  • Re: How would you and your partner have bid this?, raija d
  • Re: How would you and your partner have bid this?, Clark Millikan
  • Re: How would you and your partner have bid this?, Lorne
    • Re: How would you and your partner have bid this?, Kent Feiler
  • Re: How would you and your partner have bid this?, ewleongusa
    • Re: How would you and your partner have bid this?, henrysun909
  • Re: How would you and your partner have bid this?, Chris Newton
  • Re: How would you and your partner have bid this?, Bud H
• Open what suit?, Sam
  • Re: Open what suit?, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Open what suit?, Gerben Dirksen
    • Re: Open what suit?, Lorne
      • Re: Open what suit?, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Open what suit?, Lorne
      • Re: Open what suit?, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Open what suit?, Frances
      • Re: Open what suit?, Lorne
      • Re: Open what suit?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Open what suit?, Lorne
  • Re: Open what suit?, raija d
  • Re: Open what suit?, Charlie
    • Re: Open what suit?, Julian Lighton
  • Re: Open what suit?, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: Open what suit?, Gerben Dirksen
      • Re: Open what suit?, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: Open what suit?, ted
      • Re: Open what suit?, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: Open what suit?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Open what suit?, nige1
    • Re: Open what suit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Open what suit?, nige1
      • Re: Open what suit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Open what suit?, vida
    • Re: Open what suit?, ted
  • Re: Open what suit?, ted
  • Re: Open what suit?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Open what suit?, ted
      • Re: Open what suit?, ewleongusa
      • Re: Open what suit?, ted
      • Re: Open what suit?, Rik ter Veen
      • Re: Open what suit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Open what suit?, Rik ter Veen
      • Re: Open what suit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Open what suit?, ted
      • Re: Open what suit?, Lorne
      • Re: Open what suit?, ted
      • Re: Open what suit?, Rik ter Veen
      • Re: Open what suit?, ewleongusa
      • Re: Open what suit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Open what suit?, ted
      • Re: Open what suit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Open what suit?, ted
      • Re: Open what suit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Open what suit?, asdfg2k
      • Re: Open what suit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: Open what suit?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Open what suit?, ted
      • Re: Open what suit?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Open what suit?, raija d
  • Re: Open what suit?, Rik ter Veen
    • Re: Open what suit?, nige1
  • Re: Open what suit?, Frances
  • Re: Open what suit?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: Open what suit?, Julian Lighton
    • Re: Open what suit? Full hand, Sam
      • Re: Open what suit? Full hand, ewleongusa
      • Re: Open what suit? Full hand, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Open what suit? Full hand, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Open what suit? Full hand, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Open what suit? Full hand, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Open what suit?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Open what suit?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Open what suit?, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Open what suit?, Dre Ruigrok
• 4th seat system, Sartaj Hans
  • Re: 4th seat system, Chris Ryall
  • Re: 4th seat system, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: 4th seat system, Sartaj Hans
      • Re: 4th seat system, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: 4th seat system, Lorne
• Rate these actions, Kevin Podsiadlik
  • Re: Rate these actions, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Rate these actions, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Rate these actions, John Hall
  • Re: Rate these actions, Jyrki Lahtonen
  • Re: Rate these actions, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Rate these actions, flytoox_2000
    • Re: Rate these actions, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Rate these actions, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Rate these actions, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Rate these actions, Lorne
  • Re: Rate these actions, Søren Justesen
  • Re: Rate these actions, Charlie
  • Re: Rate these actions, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: Rate these actions, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Rate these actions, nige1
  • Re: Rate these actions, ted
  • Re: Rate these actions, ewleongusa
  • Re: Rate these actions, goffster
  • Re: Rate these actions, Sandy E. Barnes
• what do you bid 20050811, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: what do you bid 20050811, Lorne
  • Re: what do you bid 20050811, Bob Lipton
  • Re: what do you bid 20050811, ted
  • Message not available
    • Re: what do you bid 20050811, Martin Ambuhl
  • Message not available
    • Re: what do you bid 20050811, ted
• Responses to transfer bids in France, Barry Rigal
  • Re: Responses to transfer bids in France, Chris Ryall
• What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Sam
  • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Glen Ashton
    • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, flytoox_2000
  • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Lorne
    • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Glen Ashton
  • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Frances
    • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, John (MadDog) Probst
    • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, ewleongusa
    • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Stu Goodgold
  • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, raija d
    • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Chris Ryall
      • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Sid Ismail
  • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, David J. Grabiner
  • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Nigel
  • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, nige1
  • Re: What is the best treatment for 1M 2M 3M, Søren Justesen
• Walsh responses and responder's rebid, Chris
  • Re: Walsh responses and responder's rebid, ewleongusa
    • Re: Walsh responses and responder's rebid, flytoox_2000
    • Re: Walsh responses and responder's rebid, Travis Crump
  • Re: Walsh responses and responder's rebid, Charlie
  • Re: Walsh responses and responder's rebid, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Walsh responses and responder's rebid, Ashok
      • Re: Walsh responses and responder's rebid, kvetcher
  • Re: Walsh responses and responder's rebid, ted
  • Re: Walsh responses and responder's rebid, lindy
  • Re: Walsh responses and responder's rebid, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Walsh responses and responder's rebid, raija d
• Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, raija d
  • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Łukasz Jasiński
      • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, toddz
  • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, John Crinnion
    • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Steve Wright
    • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, John Crinnion
      • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, John Crinnion
      • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Charles Brenner
      • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, David Stevenson
  • Re: Many ways to leave your lover...eh call a card from dummy, Bruce McIntyre
• Do you protect, Nigel
  • Re: Do you protect, raija d
  • Re: Do you protect, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Do you protect, Chris Newton
  • Re: Do you protect, Peter Clinch
    • Re: Do you protect, David Stevenson
  • Re: Do you protect, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Do you protect, Charlie
  • Re: Do you protect, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: Do you protect, flytoox_2000
    • Re: Do you protect, Nigel
      • Re: Do you protect, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Do you protect, Lorne
  • Re: Do you protect, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Do you protect, nige1
  • Re: Do you protect, Nigel
    • Re: Do you protect, Chris Newton
    • Re: Do you protect, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Do you protect, raija d
    • Re: Do you protect, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Do you protect, raija d
      • Re: Do you protect, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Do you protect, goffster
• August bridge newsletter & bidding forum, Karen Walker
• Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., pfriedmanNoSpam
    • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., John Hall
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Ville Likitalo
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., uwe . gebhardt
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., uwe . gebhardt
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., flytoox_2000
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., Ville Likitalo
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Responding with strong hand., raija d
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., John Hall
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Lorne
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., David Stevenson
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Chris Newton
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., Lorne
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., John Hall
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., David Stevenson
    • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., John Hall
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., thissteve
    • Re: Responding with strong hand., Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Lorne
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., ewleongusa
    • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Lorne
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Chris Newton
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Chris Ryall
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Chris Newton
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Chris Ryall
      • Relay systems (was: Responding with strong hand.), Chris Newton
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., Chris Newton
    • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Chris Ryall
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Chris Newton
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Responding with strong hand., David Stevenson
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., Frances
    • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
  • Re: Responding with strong hand., willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Responding with strong hand., Keith Sheppard
• 4333 12-counts, Trumps - Nick
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, J3
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Sartaj Hans
    • Re: 4333 12-counts, J3
    • Re: 4333 12-counts, ted
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Marcel
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, ewleongusa
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, raija d
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, nige1
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, John (MadDog) Probst
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Lorne
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, jas1959
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Peter Leighton
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Bob Lipton
    • Re: 4333 12-counts, Bob Lipton
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: 4333 12-counts, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: 4333 12-counts, John (MadDog) Probst
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: 4333 12-counts, Glen Ashton
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Nigel
    • Re: 4333 12-counts, Marcel
      • Re: 4333 12-counts, Nigel
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Marcel
    • Re: 4333 12-counts, Trumps - Nick
      • Re: 4333 12-counts, pgmer6809
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Frances
  • Re: 4333 12-counts, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: 4333 12-counts, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: 4333 12-counts, Chris Ryall
      • Re: 4333 12-counts, Adam Beneschan
• Another GCC question, J3
  • Re: Another GCC question, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Another GCC question, J3
      • Re: Another GCC question, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Another GCC question, J3
      • Re: Another GCC question, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Another GCC question, Julian Lighton
    • Re: Another GCC question, raija d
    • Re: Another GCC question, Stu Goodgold
      • Re: Another GCC question, J3
      • Re: Another GCC question, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: Another GCC question, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Another GCC question, David Stevenson
      • Re: Another GCC question, Stu Goodgold
      • Re: Another GCC question, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Another GCC question, J3
      • Re: Another GCC question, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Another GCC question, Julian Lighton
    • Re: Another GCC question, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: Another GCC question, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: Another GCC question, raija d
      • Re: Another GCC question, J3
      • Re: Another GCC question, raija d
      • Re: Another GCC question, J3
      • Re: Another GCC question, raija d
      • Re: Another GCC question, David Stevenson
      • Re: Another GCC question, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another GCC question, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Another GCC question, David Stevenson
      • Re: Another GCC question, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Another GCC question, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Another GCC question, raija d
      • Re: Another GCC question, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Another GCC question, raija d
      • Re: Another GCC question, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Another GCC question, raija d
      • Re: Another GCC question, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• please rebid the hand, Sam
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Charlie
    • Re: please rebid the hand, Douglas Newlands
    • Re: please rebid the hand, Lorne
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Marcel
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Eric Hochman
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: please rebid the hand, Gordon Rainsford
      • Re: please rebid the hand, Otis Bricker
      • Re: please rebid the hand, Gordon Rainsford
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: please rebid the hand, raija d
  • Re: please rebid the hand, ewleongusa
    • Re: please rebid the hand, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: please rebid the hand, flytoox_2000
  • Re: please rebid the hand, John Hall
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Bud H
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Peter Leighton
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Bob Lipton
  • Re: please rebid the hand, ted
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Søren Justesen
    • Re: please rebid the hand, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: please rebid the hand, ted
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Adam Beneschan
    • Re: please rebid the hand, ted
  • Re: please rebid the hand, Stephen Fischer
• Alert query, BSF Aurora
  • Re: Alert query, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: Alert query, David Stevenson
  • Re: Alert query, Lorne
  • Re: Alert query, Nigel
  • Re: Alert query, Søren Justesen
    • Re: Alert query, David Stevenson
      • Re: Alert query, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Alert query, raija d
      • Re: Alert query, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Alert query, David Stevenson
      • Re: Alert query, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Alert query, David Stevenson
      • Re: Alert query, Mark Brader
      • Re: Alert query, David Stevenson
      • Re: Alert query, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Alert query, David Stevenson
      • Re: Alert query, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Alert query, Ian Payn
      • Re: Alert query, John Crinnion
      • Re: Alert query, David Stevenson
    • Re: Alert query, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Bridge clubs in Bangkok?, Claus P. Hastrup
  • Re: Bridge clubs in Bangkok?, ewleongusa
    • Re: Bridge clubs in Bangkok?, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Bridge clubs in Bangkok?, ewleongusa
      • Re: Bridge clubs in Bangkok?, goffster
      • Re: Bridge clubs in Bangkok?, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Bridge clubs in Bangkok?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Bridge clubs in Bangkok?, goffster
      • Re: Bridge clubs in Bangkok?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Bridge clubs in Bangkok?, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Bridge clubs in Bangkok?, Otis Bricker
• what do you bid?, william
  • Re: what do you bid?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: what do you bid?, ted
  • Re: what do you bid?, Clark Millikan
    • Re: what do you bid?, Clark Millikan
  • Re: what do you bid?, vida
  • Re: what do you bid?, vida
    • Re: what do you bid?, flytoox_2000
      • Re: what do you bid?, vida
      • Re: what do you bid?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: what do you bid?, vida
      • Re: what do you bid?, flytoox_2000
      • Re: what do you bid?, Charlie
    • Re: what do you bid?, thissteve
  • Re: what do you bid?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: what do you bid?, nige1
  • Re: what do you bid?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: what do you bid?, ewleongusa
  • Re: what do you bid?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: what do you bid?, Bud H
  • Re: what do you bid?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: what do you bid?, goffster
    • Re: what do you bid?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: what do you bid?, Mark Brader
• What is your call?, Sam
  • Re: What is your call?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: What is your call?, raija d
      • Re: What is your call?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: What is your call?, raija d
  • Re: What is your call?, ewleongusa
  • Re: What is your call?, Bud H
  • Re: What is your call?, jrw
  • Re: What is your call?, flytoox_2000
  • Re: What is your call?, Charlie
  • Re: What is your call?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What is your call?, ted
  • Re: What is your call?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: What is your call?, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: What is your call?, Eric Hochman
    • Re: What is your call?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What is your call?, Kieran Dyke
• Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), Bud H
  • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), Patrick Page
  • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), alvin
    • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), Bud H
      • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), thissteve
  • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), Rik ter Veen
  • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), alvin
    • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), Bud H
  • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), alvin
  • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), Chris Ryall
    • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), Bud H
  • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), Ron Johnson
  • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), ted
  • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), ewleongusa
  • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), MilesG
    • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), alvin
      • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), MilesG
    • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), Bud H
      • Re: Playing low-high with a doubleton (standard signal attitude situation), alvin
• There's no such animal, Dave Flower
  • Re: There's no such animal, N. Silver
  • Re: There's no such animal, John (MadDog) Probst
  • Re: There's no such animal, raija d
  • Re: There's no such animal, Chris Newton
• Bidding Decision 08062005, Peter Clinch
  • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Rich
  • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Peter Leighton
  • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, ted
  • Message not available
    • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Bob Lipton
  • Message not available
    • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Bud H
  • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, nige1
  • Message not available
    • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Bud H
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Bud H
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Chris Newton
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Chris Newton
  • Message not available
    • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, nige1
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, raija d
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Bud H
  • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Peter Clinch
    • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Ian Payn
    • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, ted
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Peter Clinch
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, ted
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, ted
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Frances
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Peter Clinch
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, ted
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Chris Newton
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, raija d
    • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Peter Clinch
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Chris Newton
    • Message not available
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Peter Clinch
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Peter Clinch
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Peter Clinch
    • Message not available
      • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, raija d
    • Re: Bidding Decision 08062005, Martin Ambuhl
• transfer rebids after 1m opening bid (lengthy), henrysun909
  • Re: transfer rebids after 1m opening bid (lengthy), Chris Ryall
    • Re: transfer rebids after 1m opening bid (lengthy), henrysun909
  • Re: transfer rebids after 1m opening bid (lengthy), Glen Ashton
  • Re: transfer rebids after 1m opening bid (lengthy), ewleongusa
    • Re: transfer rebids after 1m opening bid (lengthy), Chris Ryall
• easy or difficult?, thissteve
  • Re: easy or difficult?, nige1
  • Re: easy or difficult?, Frances
  • Re: easy or difficult?, Lorne
    • Re: easy or difficult?, thissteve
• Hamman-Soloway precision, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Hamman-Soloway precision, pfriedmanNoSpam
  • Re: Hamman-Soloway precision, ewleongusa
    • Re: Hamman-Soloway precision, Ron Johnson
  • Re: Hamman-Soloway precision, Ivan Popivanov
    • Re: Hamman-Soloway precision, flytoox_2000
      • Re: Hamman-Soloway precision, Ivan Popivanov
• Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Sam
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, J3
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Rich
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Peter Leighton
    • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Rich
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, J3
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, ewleongusa
    • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Chris Ryall
    • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, John (MadDog) Probst
    • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, ted
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Sam
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, raija d
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Bud H
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, ewleongusa
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, raija d
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, raija d
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Craig Barkhouse
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, goffster
    • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Div
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Div
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Stephen Fischer
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Lorne
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, lindy
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, nige1
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Player
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Ivan Popivanov
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, kvetcher
    • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: Rebid AQT 83 AK KQ9862, Andrew Gumperz
• Walsh relay in competition?, Charlie
  • Re: Walsh relay in competition?, ddub47
• probability question, Barry Rigal
  • Re: probability question, J3
    • Re: probability question, thissteve
      • Re: probability question, J3
      • Re: probability question, thissteve
      • Re: probability question, J3
      • Re: probability question, Julian Lighton
      • Re: probability question, J3
      • Re: probability question, Julian Lighton
      • Re: probability question, Julian Lighton
      • Re: probability question, J3
      • Re: probability question, J3
      • Re: probability question, J3
      • Re: probability question, thissteve
      • Re: probability question, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: probability question, Lorne
      • Re: probability question, J3
      • Re: probability question, pgmer6809
      • Re: probability question, Reef Fish
      • Re: probability question, Bud H
      • Re: probability question, Charles Brenner
  • Re: probability question, Charles Brenner
    • Re: probability question, Chris Ryall
      • Re: probability question, Charles Brenner
  • Re: probability question, nige1
  • Re: probability question, Richard Pavlicek
    • Re: probability question, Barry Rigal
      • Re: probability question, nige1
      • Re: probability question, pgmer6809
      • Re: probability question, Stephen Fischer
    • Re: probability question, nige1
    • Re: probability question, nige1
    • Re: probability question, nige1
  • Re: probability question, Ashok
  • Re: probability question, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: probability question, Fitzroy
    • Re: probability question, Sartaj Hans
  • Re: probability question, Lorne
    • Re: probability question, Reef Fish
  • Re: probability question, Clark Millikan
  • Re: probability question, goffster
• Illogical play, Stig Holmquist
  • Re: Illogical play, John Crinnion
    • Re: Illogical play, Eric Hochman
      • Re: Illogical play, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Illogical play, John Crinnion
      • Re: Illogical play, John (MadDog) Probst
      • Re: Illogical play, Stig Holmquist
      • Re: Illogical play, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Illogical play, John (MadDog) Probst
      • Re: Illogical play, Jürgen R .
      • Re: Illogical play, John Crinnion
      • Re: Illogical play, raija d
      • Re: Illogical play, Fitzroy
    • Re: Illogical play, Fitzroy
  • Re: Illogical play, ted
  • Re: Illogical play, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Illogical play, raija d
    • Re: Illogical play, David Stevenson
      • Re: Illogical play, raija d
      • Re: Illogical play, David Stevenson
      • Re: Illogical play, ddub47
  • Re: Illogical play, nige1
  • Re: Illogical play, nige1
  • Re: Illogical play, David Stevenson
• 1NT-3X transfer splinter, koen
  • Re: 1NT-3X transfer splinter, multguru@xxxxxxx
  • Re: 1NT-3X transfer splinter, Bob Lipton
    • Re: 1NT-3X transfer splinter, koen
      • Re: 1NT-3X transfer splinter, Bob Lipton
    • Re: 1NT-3X transfer splinter, Gerben Dirksen
  • Re: 1NT-3X transfer splinter, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: 1NT-3X transfer splinter, koen
      • Re: 1NT-3X transfer splinter, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: 1NT-3X transfer splinter, koen
  • Re: 1NT-3X transfer splinter, Charlie
  • Re: 1NT-3X transfer splinter, ewleongusa
    • Re: 1NT-3X transfer splinter, koen
• Unusual auction - oppo bidding our suits to play, Lorne
• 1955 Bermuda Bowl, Denis O'Kane
  • Re: 1955 Bermuda Bowl, Ron Johnson
    • Re: 1955 Bermuda Bowl, Denis O'Kane
  • Re: 1955 Bermuda Bowl, jrw
    • Re: 1955 Bermuda Bowl, Denis O'Kane
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • 1955 Bermuda Bowl, Denis O'Kane
• Strong/weak relay in Varvel's AUC, J3
  • Re: Strong/weak relay in Varvel's AUC, David Collier
• Canada/Mexico playoffs: the pictures, Glen Ashton
  • Re: Canada/Mexico playoffs: the pictures, Harold Simon
• Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, Sue
  • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, alvin
  • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, alvin
  • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, alvin
  • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, alvin
  • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, N. Silver
    • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, multguru@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, John Crinnion
      • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, Eric Hochman
      • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, John Crinnion
    • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, Lorne
  • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, goffster
  • Re: Serious beginner - Benefit of counting Quick Tricks, pgmer6809
• Opening weak, garst
  • Re: Opening weak, Charlie
  • Re: Opening weak, raija d
  • Re: Opening weak, Stephen Tu
    • Re: Opening weak, Peter Leighton
      • Re: Opening weak, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Opening weak, Stephen Tu
  • Re: Opening weak, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: Opening weak, Lorne
  • Re: Opening weak, pgmer6809
  • Re: Opening weak, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Opening weak, nige1
  • Re: Opening weak, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Opening weak, Lorne
  • Re: Opening weak, Eric Hochman
• downturn in results, Adam Lea
  • Re: downturn in results, Charlie
  • Re: downturn in results, Sid Ismail
    • Re: downturn in results, Adam Lea
  • Re: downturn in results, ewleongusa
  • Re: downturn in results, pgmer6809
  • Re: downturn in results, Todd A. Anderson
    • Re: downturn in results, Charlie
    • Re: downturn in results, Frances
      • Re: downturn in results, John (MadDog) Probst
      • Re: downturn in results, Ian Payn
      • Re: downturn in results, nige1
      • Re: downturn in results, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: downturn in results, Eric Hochman
    • Re: downturn in results, ewleongusa
      • Re: downturn in results, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: downturn in results, ewleongusa
      • Re: downturn in results, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: downturn in results, John Schuler
    • Re: downturn in results, Adam Lea
  • Re: downturn in results, Lorne
  • Re: downturn in results, jrw
  • Re: downturn in results, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: downturn in results, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, rhm
  • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, Giovanni Bobbio
  • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, Lorne
    • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, Frances
  • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, Jon Haugsand
  • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, ted
    • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, Frances
  • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, Charlie
  • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, flytoox_2000
    • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, Rik ter Veen
  • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, Jane F.
  • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Meaning of five notrump after 1NT-2C-2S-3D-3NT-5NT, John Schuler
• GCC question, regarding swapping 1S and 1NT..., J3
  • Re: GCC question, regarding swapping 1S and 1NT..., Travis Crump
    • Re: GCC question, regarding swapping 1S and 1NT..., J3
      • Re: GCC question, regarding swapping 1S and 1NT..., Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: GCC question, regarding swapping 1S and 1NT..., Mark Brader
      • Re: GCC question, regarding swapping 1S and 1NT..., Julian Lighton
      • Re: GCC question, regarding swapping 1S and 1NT..., Charlie
      • Re: GCC question, regarding swapping 1S and 1NT..., Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: GCC question, regarding swapping 1S and 1NT..., Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: GCC question, regarding swapping 1S and 1NT..., Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: GCC question, regarding swapping 1S and 1NT..., raija d
• MP DISASTER, Frank
  • Re: MP DISASTER, Bob Lipton
  • Re: MP DISASTER, raija d
    • Re: MP DISASTER, ted
      • Re: MP DISASTER, Eric Hochman
  • Re: MP DISASTER, Bud H
  • Re: MP DISASTER, Nick Hughes
  • Re: MP DISASTER, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: MP DISASTER, Charlie
  • Re: MP DISASTER, ewleongusa
  • Re: MP DISASTER, Julian Lighton
  • Re: MP DISASTER, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: MP DISASTER, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: MP DISASTER, koen
  • Re: MP DISASTER, Lorne
  • Re: MP DISASTER, Giovanni Bobbio
    • Re: MP DISASTER, henrysun909
      • Re: MP DISASTER, Giovanni Bobbio
      • Re: MP DISASTER, ewleongusa
  • Re: MP DISASTER, goffster
  • Re: MP DISASTER, goffster
• Executed my first Vice Squeeze!, Richard Lawson
  • Re: Executed my first Vice Squeeze!, Travis Crump
    • Re: Executed my first Vice Squeeze!, David Wiltshire
• Fireside Book of Bridge, Bernard Schneder
  • Re: Fireside Book of Bridge, N. Silver
    • Re: Fireside Book of Bridge, Derek Turner
      • Re: Fireside Book of Bridge, Bernard Schneder
• Second Place Rose Garden -- results, Richard Pavlicek
• Swiss Teams - How many teams, Steve Wright
  • Re: Swiss Teams - How many teams, ted
  • Re: Swiss Teams - How many teams, Lorne
    • Re: Swiss Teams - How many teams, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Swiss Teams - How many teams, Lorne
    • Re: Swiss Teams - How many teams, Julian Lighton
    • Re: Swiss Teams - How many teams, David Stevenson
  • Re: Swiss Teams - How many teams, Nigel
  • Re: Swiss Teams - How many teams, Henk Uijterwaal
  • Re: Swiss Teams - How many teams, Michael Angelo Ravera
    • Re: Swiss Teams - How many teams, David Stevenson
• Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Inquiring Mind
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Charlie
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Div
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Ashok
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Ron Johnson
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, raija d
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Clark Millikan
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Lorne
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, nige1
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Nigel
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Dave Flower
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Reef Fish
    • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Reef Fish
      • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Reef Fish
      • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Reef Fish
      • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Chris Newton
      • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Reef Fish
      • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Reef Fish
      • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Chris Newton
      • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Reef Fish
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, goffster
    • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Eddie Grove
  • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: Am I out of my mind, or is my partner?, Robert Tamlyn
• Balancing question, raija d
  • Re: Balancing question, Nigel
  • Re: Balancing question, Dave Flower
  • Re: Balancing question, Stuart M Newberger
  • Re: Balancing question, Lorne
    • Re: Balancing question, ted
  • Re: Balancing question, Charlie
    • Re: Balancing question, Ian Payn
      • Re: Balancing question, Frances
      • Re: Balancing question, Ian Payn
      • Re: Balancing question, raija d
      • Re: Balancing question, Charlie
      • Re: Balancing question, Ian Payn
      • Re: Balancing question, Julian Lighton
    • Re: Balancing question, Lorne
    • Re: Balancing question, Frisco Del Rosario
  • Re: Balancing question, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Balancing question, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Balancing question, ewleongusa
  • Re: Balancing question, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Balancing question, sphboc
  • Re: Balancing question, goffster
  • Re: Balancing question, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Balancing question, Frances
      • Re: Balancing question, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Balancing question, Chris Newton
  • Re: Balancing question, raija d
    • Re: Balancing question, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Balancing question, Charlie
  • Re: Balancing question, John (MadDog) Probst
• amusing director call, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: amusing director call, Barry Margolin
    • Re: amusing director call, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: amusing director call, Dave Flower
    • Re: amusing director call, Douglas Newlands
    • Re: amusing director call, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: amusing director call, Peter Smulders
      • Re: amusing director call, Barry Margolin
      • Re: amusing director call, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: amusing director call, Peter Smulders
• Charlott Regional, Lee
• req Dir response re adjust or not?, Jane F.
  • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, raija d
  • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, ted
  • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Lorne
    • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, raija d
    • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, David Stevenson
  • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Frances
    • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Stu Goodgold
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, David Stevenson
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Jeremy
    • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Jane F.
    • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Lorne
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Jane F.
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Jane F.
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, David Stevenson
    • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, David Stevenson
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Jane F.
  • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Adam Beneschan
  • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Nigel
    • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Jane F.
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, David Stevenson
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Stephen Fischer
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, David Stevenson
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, Adam Beneschan
      • Re: req Dir response re adjust or not?, David Stevenson
• ACBL Demographics, richard_willey@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: ACBL Demographics, Jürgen R .
    • Re: ACBL Demographics, Charles Brenner
      • Re: ACBL Demographics, dfm
      • Re: ACBL Demographics, Otis Bricker
  • Re: ACBL Demographics, John Blubaugh
    • Re: ACBL Demographics, lindy
      • Re: ACBL Demographics, asdfg2k
      • Re: ACBL Demographics, Jürgen R .
      • Re: ACBL Demographics, N. Silver
      • Re: ACBL Demographics, nige1
• What do you bid now?, Sam
  • Re: What do you bid now?, flytoox_2000
  • Re: What do you bid now?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What do you bid now?, Jeffrey Turner
  • Re: What do you bid now?, Otis Bricker
  • Re: What do you bid now?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: What do you bid now?, Bill Jacobs
  • Re: What do you bid now?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What do you bid now?, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: What do you bid now?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What do you bid now?, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What do you bid now?, John R. Mayne
  • Re: What do you bid now?, goffster
  • Re: What do you bid now?, Lorne
• Matchpoint bid #2, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoint bid #2, ted
  • Re: Matchpoint bid #2, Stuart M Newberger
  • Re: Matchpoint bid #2, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Matchpoint bid #2, jrw
  • Re: Matchpoint bid #2, Rich
  • Re: Matchpoint bid #2, nige1
    • Re: Matchpoint bid #2, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: Matchpoint bid #2, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Matchpoint bid #2, goffster
  • Re: Matchpoint bid #2, vida
• Matchpoint play problem, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoint play problem, nige1
  • Re: Matchpoint play problem, Dave Flower
    • Re: Matchpoint play problem - with colors, Sandy E. Barnes
• Matchpoint bid, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Matchpoint bid, ewleongusa
  • Re: Matchpoint bid, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Matchpoint bid, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Matchpoint bid, ted
  • Re: Matchpoint bid, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Matchpoint bid, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Matchpoint bid, goffster
  • Re: Matchpoint bid, jrw
  • Re: Matchpoint bid - THE RESULT, Sandy E. Barnes
• Mid-Event Changes to 2005-06 NAP Conditions of Contest, sphboc
  • Re: Mid-Event Changes to 2005-06 NAP Conditions of Contest, raija d
    • Re: Mid-Event Changes to 2005-06 NAP Conditions of Contest, sphboc
• Play problem, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Play problem, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Play problem, flytoox_2000
      • Re: Play problem, jrw
      • Re: Play problem, Bob Lipton
      • Re: Play problem, Stephen Tu
  • Re: Play problem, nige1
    • Re: Play problem, flytoox_2000
      • Re: Play problem, Dave Flower
  • Re: Play problem, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Play problem, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Play problem, Ashok
    • Re: Play problem, nige1
    • Re: Play problem, flytoox_2000
      • Re: Play problem, Frances
  • Re: Play problem, Frances
• Double when using suction over 1/2C?, Charlie
  • Re: Double when using suction over 1/2C?, Chris Pisarra
  • Re: Double when using suction over 1/2C?, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: Double when using suction over 1/2C?, Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Whats the best bid?, henrysun909
  • Re: Whats the best bid?, craig
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Whats the best bid?, ted
  • Re: Whats the best bid?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Whats the best bid?, Sandy E. Barnes
• After 4N Invite, John Schuler
  • Re: After 4N Invite, ted
    • Re: After 4N Invite, henrysun909
    • Re: After 4N Invite, ted
  • Re: After 4N Invite, Bob Lipton
  • Re: After 4N Invite, lindy
  • Re: After 4N Invite, ewleongusa
  • Re: After 4N Invite; the Post Mortem, John Schuler
• Opening leads vs. 4- and 5-level contracts when our side is strong too, Phil
  • Re: Opening leads vs. 4- and 5-level contracts when our side is strong too, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Opening leads vs. 4- and 5-level contracts when our side is strong too, Charlie
• 5H, double or pass?, Paul Marston
  • Re: 5H, double or pass?, nige1
  • Re: 5H, double or pass?, Stuart M Newberger
  • Re: 5H, double or pass?, David Wiltshire
  • Re: 5H, double or pass?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: 5H, double or pass?, ted
    • Re: 5H, double or pass?, Peter Clinch
      • Re: 5H, double or pass?, ted
  • Re: 5H, double or pass?, ewleongusa
    • Re: 5H, double or pass?, raija d
  • Re: 5H, double or pass?, goffster
    • Re: 5H, double or pass?, Paul Marston
      • Re: 5H, double or pass?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: 5H, double or pass?, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: 5H, double or pass?, ewleongusa
      • Re: 5H, double or pass?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: 5H, double or pass?, Charlie
• Re: LM Qualifying Pairs Atlanta Nationals - Hand 2 - 7/22/2005 2-19, nige1
• Re: Pittsburgh NABC+ Appeal N-02, nige1
• Is it a good slam? How to reach it?, Ashok
  • Re: Is it a good slam? How to reach it?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Is it a good slam? How to reach it?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Is it a good slam? How to reach it?, John Schuler
    • Re: Is it a good slam? How to reach it?, henrysun909
• New Suit at the 4 Level (4C) Part 2, kvetcher
  • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level (4C) Part 2, Frances
  • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level (4C) Part 2, John Schuler
• Re: Two Combinatoric Card Problems - the Answer [Reese-Shapiro], Geoff Edwards
  • Re: Two Combinatoric Card Problems - the Answer [Reese-Shapiro], Charles Brenner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Two Combinatoric Card Problems - the Answer [Reese-Shapiro], t . t . warnock
  • Re: Two Combinatoric Card Problems - the Answer [Reese-Shapiro], t . t . warnock
    • Re: Two Combinatoric Card Problems - the Answer [Reese-Shapiro], Douglas Newlands
  • Re: Two Combinatoric Card Problems - the Answer [Reese-Shapiro], David Wallace
• do you adjust?, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: do you adjust?, henrysun909
    • Re: do you adjust?, nige1
  • Re: do you adjust?, Julian Lighton
  • Re: do you adjust?, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: do you adjust?, Peter Smulders
      • Re: do you adjust?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: do you adjust?, Ron Johnson
    • Re: do you adjust?, Douglas Newlands
  • Re: do you adjust?, Frances
  • Re: do you adjust?, Kieran Dyke
    • Re: do you adjust?, David Stevenson
  • Re: do you adjust?, mike dodson
• bridge master 2000, karamazov
  • Re: bridge master 2000, Sid Ismail
    • Re: bridge master 2000, karamazov
• Atlanta NABC comments, Marvin French
  • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Bernard Schneder
    • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Lollipop
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Chris Pisarra
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Eric Hochman
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Elianna
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, N. Silver
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Everett M. Greene
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Reef Fish
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Brian Baresch
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Eric Hochman
  • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Reef Fish
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Brian Baresch
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Mark Brader
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Reef Fish
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Brian Baresch
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Jürgen R .
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Reef Fish
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Henk Uijterwaal
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Reef Fish
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Reef Fish
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Reef Fish
  • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, David Stevenson
  • Re: Atlanta NABC comments (non-bridge story), John Schuler
  • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Stu Goodgold
    • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Reef Fish
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Stu Goodgold
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Reef Fish
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Travis Crump
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Reef Fish
      • Re: Atlanta NABC comments, Stu Goodgold
• Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, Ashok
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, vida
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, raija d
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, ted
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, ewleongusa
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, BSF Aurora
      • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, Phil
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, goffster
    • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, Lorne
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, David Burn
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, henrysun909
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, Peterh
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, lindy
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, John Schuler
    • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, Bob Lipton
    • eriouly, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, Charlie
  • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, Ashok
    • Re: Bidding poll: Would you look for game?, Thomas Dehn
• What does this bid show?, RonH
  • Re: What does this bid show?, Charlie
    • Re: What does this bid show?, ted
    • Re: What does this bid show?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What does this bid show?, raija d
    • Re: What does this bid show?, ted
  • Re: What does this bid show?, Bob Lipton
  • Re: What does this bid show?, RonH
  • Re: What does this bid show?, Lorne
• Do we have an agreement?, Nick Hughes
  • Re: Do we have an agreement?, N. Silver
  • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Frances
    • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Frances
      • Re: Do we have an agreement?, John Schuler
      • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Julian Lighton
  • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Player
    • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Kieran Dyke
  • Re: Do we have an agreement?, raija d
    • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Nick Hughes
      • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Frances
      • Re: Do we have an agreement?, raija d
  • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Bill Jacobs
    • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Nick Hughes
      • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Bill Jacobs
      • Re: Do we have an agreement?, Nick Hughes
• Re: AN ALTERNATIVE Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Bruce McIntyre
  • Re: AN ALTERNATIVE Re: OKBridge/Ethics, N. Silver
• Re: RGB regulars in Hotlanta, Barry Margolin
• Re: Atlanta NABC ACBL Board of Directors Report, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Atlanta NABC ACBL Board of Directors Report, raija d
    • Re: Atlanta NABC ACBL Board of Directors Report, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Atlanta NABC ACBL Board of Directors Report, Godot
• Re: Pre-empt index, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Pre-empt index, Dave Flower
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pre-empt index, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Pre-empt index, Rob Morris
    • Re: Pre-empt index, Frances
      • Re: Pre-empt index, Rob Morris
      • Re: Pre-empt index, Rob Morris
      • Re: Pre-empt index, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Pre-empt index, James Chapman
    • Re: Pre-empt index, Ian Payn
  • Re: Pre-empt index, Chris Ryall
    • Re: Pre-empt index, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Pre-empt index, Chris Ryall
    • Re: Pre-empt index, Martin Ambuhl
• Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, asdfg2k
    • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Barry Margolin
    • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, craig
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, thissteve
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, asdfg2k
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Chris Ryall
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Frances
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, David Stevenson
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Barry Margolin
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, thissteve
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, craig
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Barry Margolin
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, ddub47
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, lindy
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, craig
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, lindy
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, craig
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, craig
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, N. Silver
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Barry Margolin
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, craig
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Chris Ryall
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Barry Margolin
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Chris Ryall
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, raija d
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Jürgen R .
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Chris Ryall
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, craig
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Neil
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, lotus
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, nige1
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Chris Ryall
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, nige1
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Chris Ryall
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, John (MadDog) Probst
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Chris Ryall
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Ian Payn
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Chris Ryall
  • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Barry Margolin
  • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Barry Margolin
    • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Stephen Bush
  • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Barry Margolin
    • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, David Stevenson
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, N. Silver
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Barry Margolin
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Kent Feiler
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, lindy
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Bruce McIntyre
      • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Kent Feiler
  • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Barry Margolin
  • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, ted
  • Re: OKBridge/Ethics, Chris Ryall
• Re: help on this hand, Bud H
• Re: Challenge the Champs - online resource?, Larry Cohen
• Director's ruling, Arthur Hoffman
  • Re: Director's ruling, Frances
  • Re: Director's ruling, Lorne
    • Re: Director's ruling, Arthur Hoffman
    • Re: Director's ruling, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Director's ruling, Julian Lighton
  • Break in Tempo question Was: Director's ruling, Otis Bricker
    • Re: Break in Tempo question Was: Director's ruling, Arthur Hoffman
      • Re: Break in Tempo question Was: Director's ruling, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Break in Tempo question Was: Director's ruling, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Break in Tempo question Was: Director's ruling, Stu Goodgold
      • Re: Break in Tempo question Was: Director's ruling, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Director's ruling, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Director's ruling, Frances
    • Re: Director's ruling, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Director's ruling, David Stevenson
    • Re: Director's ruling, raija d
  • Re: Director's ruling, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Director's ruling, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: Director's ruling, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Director's ruling, Bernard Schneder
      • Re: Director's ruling, David Stevenson
      • Re: Director's ruling, Robert Tamlyn
  • Re: Director's ruling, Travis Crump
    • Re: Director's ruling, Art Hoffman
  • Re: Director's ruling, David Stevenson
    • Re: Director's ruling, nige1
    • Re: Director's ruling, Barry Rigal
      • Re: Director's ruling, Frances
      • Re: Director's ruling, Mark Brader
      • Re: Director's ruling, Barry Rigal
      • Re: Director's ruling, David Stevenson
      • Re: Director's ruling, dnp037
• Re: Microsoft Excel, David Stevenson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Microsoft Excel, David Stevenson
  • Re: Microsoft Excel, David Stevenson
  • Re: Microsoft Excel, David Stevenson
  • Re: Microsoft Excel, David Stevenson
    • Re: Microsoft Excel, pgmer6809
      • Re: Microsoft Excel, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Microsoft Excel, pgmer6809
      • Re: Microsoft Excel, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Microsoft Excel, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Microsoft Excel, Ko Vijn
  • Re: Microsoft Excel, David Stevenson
  • Re: Microsoft Excel, Frances
• Forcing or not?, asdfg2k
  • Re: Forcing or not?, Frances
  • Re: Forcing or not?, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Forcing or not?, John Schuler
  • Re: Forcing or not?, vida
  • Re: Forcing or not?, Andrew Gumperz
    • Re: Forcing or not?, ted
    • Re: Forcing or not?, Frances
  • Re: Forcing or not?, ted
  • Re: Forcing or not?, Sandy E. Barnes
• Leb or not?, asdfg2k
  • Re: Leb or not?, Frances
  • Re: Leb or not?, flytoox_2000
  • Re: Leb or not?, John Schuler
  • Re: Leb or not?, raija d
  • Re: Leb or not?, David Stevenson
  • Re: Leb or not?, Lorne
    • Re: Leb or not?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Leb or not?, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Leb or not?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Leb or not?, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Leb or not?, Frances
  • Re: Leb or not?, Bud H
    • Re: Leb or not?, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Leb or not?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Leb or not?, Frances
      • Re: Leb or not?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Leb or not?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Leb or not?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Leb or not?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Leb or not?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Leb or not?, David Stevenson
      • Re: Leb or not?, pumpkin_644@xxxxxxxxxxx
• XML bidding system representations, Chris Ryall
• Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, Bud H
  • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, Frances
  • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, John Schuler
  • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, Charlie
  • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, Glen Ashton
  • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, Lorne
    • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, henrysun909
      • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, raija d
      • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, John Schuler
      • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, Frances
      • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, henrysun909
      • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, John Schuler
  • Re: Double of "could be short" 1C and 1D bids of 2+ card length, Glen Ashton
• Listening to the pieces you sent me over the past few weeks, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Listening to the pieces you sent me over the past few weeks, David Stevenson
    • Re: Listening to the pieces you sent me over the past few weeks, ted
    • Re: Listening to the pieces you sent me over the past few weeks, goffster
  • Re: Listening to the pieces you sent me over the past few weeks, Matt Geare
• The Man Who Bid Too Much -- play contest, Richard Pavlicek
• New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, kvetcher
  • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, Bob Lipton
    • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, jdblaw
      • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, jdblaw
  • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, Nigel
    • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, Chris Ryall
      • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, Nigel
  • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, raija d
  • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, beyap
  • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, Frances
  • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, flytoox_2000
  • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, John Schuler
  • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, Andrew Gumperz
  • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, Lorne
    • Re: New Suit at the 4 Level in GF auction, henrysun909
• Re: ACBL Library Book Sale: Late July Update, Carl
• Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, thissteve
  • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, David Stevenson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, Nigel
      • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, Julian Lighton
      • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, Nigel
      • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Calling the directior for intimidation backfires, Stu Goodgold
• a couple of MP slam decision hands, ted
  • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, Bob Lipton
    • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, BSF Aurora
      • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, henrysun909
  • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, kvetcher
  • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, vida
  • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, ewleongusa
  • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, Charles Brenner
  • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, John R. Mayne
  • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, Bud H
  • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, flytoox_2000
    • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, Frances
  • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, John Schuler
  • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, raija d
  • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, Frances
    • Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, henrysun909
  • Results Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, ted
    • Re: Results Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, Frances
    • Re: Results Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, vida
    • Re: Results Re: a couple of MP slam decision hands, John Schuler
• ACBL August Bidding Box #3, NFord
  • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Stig Holmquist
    • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, NFord
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, raija d
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, NFord
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, raija d
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Bob Lipton
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, NFord
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Bob Lipton
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Ron Johnson
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Bob Lipton
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Ron Johnson
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, NFord
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Bob Lipton
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, NFord
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, raija d
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, NFord
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, NFord
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, ted
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Otis Bricker
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Julian Lighton
  • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Julian Lighton
  • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, raija d
    • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, John (MadDog) Probst
  • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Bud H
    • Message not available
      • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Bud H
  • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Frances
  • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Lorne
    • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, ted
  • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, Chris
    • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, henrysun909
  • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3and #8, Glen Ashton
  • Re: ACBL August Bidding Box #3, nige1
• Re: Microsoft Excel (Corrected), John Hall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Microsoft Excel (Corrected), Chris Ryall
    • Re: Microsoft Excel (Corrected), Peter Smulders
      • Re: Microsoft Excel (Corrected), Michael Angelo Ravera
      • Re: Microsoft Excel (Corrected), Peter Smulders
      • Re: Microsoft Excel (Corrected), pgmer6809
• Re: Interesting line of play, Art Hoffman
  • Re: Interesting line of play, Dave Flower
  • Re: Interesting line of play, Ivan Popivanov
• Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Ashok
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Dave Flower
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, John Hall
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Charlie
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Sandy E. Barnes
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, ted
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, pfriedmanNoSpam
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, ewleongusa
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, raija d
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Bud H
    • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Chris Ryall
    • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Otis Bricker
      • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Chris Ryall
      • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Otis Bricker
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Lorne
  • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Ashok
    • Re: Another Bidding Poll: Over Their Preempt, Thomas Dehn
• Opinions please from strong clubbers, Nigel
  • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, Dave Flower
    • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, Nigel
  • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, Michael Angelo Ravera
  • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, Julian Lighton
  • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, Nigel
  • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, Dave Flower
    • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, Eddie Grove
    • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, Nigel
      • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, henrysun909
    • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, John (MadDog) Probst
    • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, Ian_T
      • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, John D'Errico
    • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, John D'Errico
  • Re: Opinions please from strong clubbers, Ivan Popivanov
• Re: A Big hand in 3rd seat and <sigh> partner preempted., John R. Mayne
• Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, Mark Bennett
  • Re: Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, asdfg2k
    • Re: Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, jdblaw
      • Re: Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, David Stevenson
    • Re: Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, Brian Baresch
    • Re: Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, Reef Fish
      • Re: Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, Glen Ashton
      • Re: Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, Reef Fish
      • Re: Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, Ashok
      • Re: Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, asdfg2k
      • Re: Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, Reef Fish
  • Re: Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, asdfg2k
    • Re: Ekeblad-Jacobs Appeal?, Mark Bennett
• Bidding Poll: over their preempt, etsand
  • Re: Bidding Poll: over their preempt, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Bidding Poll: over their preempt, Stuart M Newberger
    • Re: Bidding Poll: over their preempt, ted
  • Re: Bidding Poll: over their preempt, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Bidding Poll: over their preempt, ted
  • Re: Bidding Poll: over their preempt, Bob Lipton
  • Re: Bidding Poll: over their preempt, Charlie
  • Re: Bidding Poll: over their preempt, raija d
  • Re: Bidding Poll: over their preempt, ewleongusa
• Re: A Big hand in 3rd seat and <sigh> partner preempted., John (MadDog) Probst
  • Re: A Big hand in 3rd seat and <sigh> partner preempted., Chris Ryall
• Re: FIVE NO TRUMP??, Joshua Sinnett
• Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, craig
  • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, Dwayne Hoffman
  • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, Julian Lighton
    • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, craig
    • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, Chris Ryall
      • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, Barry Margolin
      • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, Stephen Tu
      • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, Dwayne Hoffman
      • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, craig
      • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, Barry Margolin
    • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, Frances
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, Barry Margolin
    • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, Marcia Masterson
      • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, craig
      • Re: 12-bd OKB MiniTour Stats, Barry Margolin
• Fit-Jumps after opening 1M, My system, koen
  • Re: Fit-Jumps after opening 1M, My system, Chris Ryall
• Re: Five of a minor? revisited, Lorne
  • Re: Five of a minor? revisited, Chris Newton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Five of a minor? revisited, Kay Knapp
• Re: Characterize this bid for me, Lorne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Characterize this bid for me, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Characterize this bid for me, Ron Johnson
      • Re: Characterize this bid for me, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Characterize this bid for me, Ron Johnson
  • Re: Characterize this bid for me, Barry Margolin
• Re: Directing problem: players forget to reshuffle !!??, Mark Brader
  • Re: Directing problem: players forget to reshuffle !!??, David Stevenson
    • Re: Directing problem: players forget to reshuffle !!??, Julian Lighton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Directing problem: players forget to reshuffle !!??, axman22@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Directing problem: players forget to reshuffle !!??, Dave Flower
• Re: Bridge Defense, Matt Geare
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Bridge Defense, Thomas Dehn
  • Re: Bridge Defense, Charlie
    • Re: Bridge Defense, Sid Ismail
    • Re: Bridge Defense, lindy
      • Re: Bridge Defense, barryrigal
  • Re: Bridge Defense, ian . payn
  • Re: Bridge Defense, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Bridge Defense, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
    • Re: Bridge Defense, Ian Payn
  • Re: Bridge Defense, Frances
  • Re: Bridge Defense, Frances
• Re: A Repeat of an "Upset"?, Reef Fish
  • Re: A Repeat of an "Upset"?, asdfg2k
    • Re: A Repeat of an "Upset"?, Reef Fish
    • Re: A Repeat of an "Upset"?, Reef Fish
      • Re: A Repeat of an "Upset"?, Julian Lighton
    • Re: A Repeat of an "Upset"?, Sid Ismail
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A Repeat of an "Upset"?, lindy
    • Re: A Repeat of an "Upset"?, Reef Fish
      • Re: A Repeat of an "Upset"?, barryrigal
      • Re: A Repeat of an "Upset"?, Charles Brenner
      • Re: A Repeat of an "Upset"?, Reef Fish
    • Re: A Repeat of an "Upset"?, Bob Lipton
• Re: 5 of a minor, Chris Ryall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 5 of a minor, Hans Georg Schaathun
  • Re: 5 of a minor, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: 5 of a minor, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: 5 of a minor, Barry Margolin
• Re: Testosterone check (bridge related-no enlargement offers included), Andrew Gumperz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Testosterone check (bridge related-no enlargement offers included), Adam Beneschan
    • Re: Testosterone check (bridge related-no enlargement offers included), ted
• Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, Charlie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, Lorne
  • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, Ron Lel
  • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, Bob Lipton
    • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, ted
  • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, thissteve
  • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, David Stevenson
    • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, ted
  • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, Bud H
    • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, Chris Ryall
  • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, goffster
  • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, Ashok
    • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, Chris Ryall
    • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, Kent Feiler
    • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, David Stevenson
    • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, goffster
  • Re: Does anyone defend at the one level?, Robert Tamlyn
• Re: National Open Pairs - Hand Three - 7/25/2005 S2-10, ewleongusa
  • Re: National Open Pairs - Hand Three - 7/25/2005 S2-10, Thomas Dehn
    • Re: National Open Pairs - Hand Three - 7/25/2005 S2-10, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: National Open Pairs - Hand Three - 7/25/2005 S2-10, Thomas Dehn
      • Re: National Open Pairs - Hand Three - 7/25/2005 S2-10, Sandy E. Barnes
      • Re: National Open Pairs - Hand Three - 7/25/2005 S2-10, Thomas Dehn
• Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, Charles Brenner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, John R. Mayne
  • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, Mark Brader
  • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, Sandy E. Barnes
    • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, Charles Brenner
  • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, Lorne
  • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, ted
  • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, David Burn
    • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, Adam Lea
  • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, ian . payn
    • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, lindy
      • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, ian . payn
  • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, Salokin
  • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, raija d
  • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, David Stevenson
    • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, ted
    • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, Charles Brenner
    • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, dancle16
  • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, Robert Tamlyn
    • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, David Stevenson
      • Re: Nicko Plate - a bridge Movie, Ian Payn