[Review] Pepper
- From: "tomvasel@xxxxxxxxx" <tomvasel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Jul 2006 07:54:30 -0700
In elementary school, I played Four Square all the time; it was
something I was fairly good at, and it was simply rather addicting. We
would play in front of my house, at school, anywhere where we could
simply get four squares and any kind of ball that had a semblance of a
bounce. Pepper (Out of the Box Publishing, 2005 - Mark Alan Osterhaus)
is a small card game that uses Four Square as an inspiration to come up
with a game in which players are simply trying to get rid of the ball.
The game does feel slightly like Four Square, but it's also a very
unique card game with mechanics unlike none other that I've seen
before. Memory is the key element, along with skillful card play.
Games are quick and fast, with one mistake causing the fifteen minute
game to end. Clever choices make this more than a simple "take that"
game; it may take a bit to understand how to play well, but a good play
can be very satisfying. I quite enjoy it.
A deck of cards, with five suits (purple, green, yellow, blue, and
orange) - each made up of numbers "1" through "5" (twice), and a blue
and orange "6", is shuffled together. Five cards are dealt face down
to each player with the remainder removed from the game. The dealer
then takes the first turn.
On their turn, a player is "throwing" the ball at another player -
with the number on the card depicting the speed of the ball. To
represent this, the player may place any card from their hand in front
of another player. That player then has two choices.
- They can respond to the throw by placing another card in front of any
other player (including the person who threw the ball to them). This
is done by either playing a card of the same color, or a "faster"
(higher numbered) ball. If a player cannot do this, they must take the
second option.
- They can pick up all the cards in front of them and place them in
their hand, then throw any card from their hand at any other player.
(By "throw", I mean place in front of them, you literalists!)
Play continues with players attempting to get down to only one card in
their hand. When a player is able to throw the last card in their
hand, AND the player they throw it to cannot respond, then they win the
game. Otherwise, they must simply wait until the ball is thrown to
them again to get another chance.
Some comments on the game...
1.) Components: Pepper is being produced in a small tin can with a lid
(as many of the OOTB games are this year), which I've really fallen in
love with - I hope more companies follow this route. The cards
themselves are of decent quality, showing balls moving at various
speeds to match the number on the card. Other than that, I can only
slightly criticize the fact that there's no real way to distinguish
between the colors for color blind folk. Still, it's a nice little
package for the very inexpensive price.
2.) Rules: The rules are rather handy - formatted nicely, because
while they are extremely short, they make mention of the different
basic strategies and tips for new players. The rules are some of the
easiest I've come across, but the implementation of them isn't the
easiest thing I've ever explained, and more than one person has looked
at me with a "huh?" plastered across their face as I've explained the
game.
3.) Speed and Memory: Still, once the game is understood, players
start throwing cards on the table, and the simulation of the ball
bouncing around begins. Playing quickly is more thematic, but players
will suddenly stop and wonder just what cards everyone has. After a
few minutes of play, you MIGHT be able to know where all the cards are;
but since players don't know exactly what cards from the deck are in
play, and a person can hold a card as long as they want, there is no
perfect information. Still, it's rather obvious that having a good
memory counts for a good bit when playing the game. When throwing your
last card, it's important to know who can't block it.
4.) Tactics: Knowing when to throw a card is critical, and sometimes
it's good just to voluntarily pick up the cards in front of you, to
avoid having to throw away a good card. Obviously, it's a good idea to
keep your highest card until the end, then get rid of it - but should
you ever throw it early, just to avoid having to pick up all the cards?
One problem that I often have with games that allow players to choose
their targets is that one person tends to get picked on in many groups.
In Pepper, however, that's a good thing, because a player who has
balls thrown at him has the chance to win more quickly. Conversely, if
everyone avoids throwing a ball to one person, they will find
themselves helping everyone else.
5.) Fun Factor: The game is very interesting, as you constantly throw
balls, pick up cards, and try to get rid of them all. Players are
watching the cards as they cycle throughout the player's hands; because
if you throw the wrong card at the wrong time, you can easily set up
the opponent to win. This keeps the game interesting, as players are
playing cards quickly; but there's a tense atmosphere (not too tense,
mind you). The game might contain a bit too much memory element for
some; but I found it quite fun, and its speed was certainly a point in
its favor.
Pepper is an unusual, fun game in a small package. It looks really
good in its small tin case; and while gameplay is a bit more involved
than most OOTB games, it's still simple and easy and rewards good
memory and clever card-play. I'm not sure I'll ever play Four Square
again, unless I teach it to my own children. But I'll be playing
Pepper for many years to come.
Tom Vasel
"Real men play board games"
www.tomvasel.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pepper
- From: J. Hunter Johnson
- Re: Pepper
- Prev by Date: East Tennessee Gamers website UPDATE
- Next by Date: Re: Pepper
- Previous by thread: East Tennessee Gamers website UPDATE
- Next by thread: Re: Pepper
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
