Re: Murat's confessions Re: Naught gnubg
- From: David C. Ullrich <dullrich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:07:59 -0500
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 02:50:43 -0700 (PDT), muratk <murat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Mar 8, 6:48 am, David C. Ullrich wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 eu_pira...@xxxxxxx wrote:
[sad story explaining why muratdung was forced to...
Who said it was sad...? It was fun and funny all along... :))
It was nothing more than an explanation for the dim-braineds
who hadn't already figured it out.
It makes no sense that someone should be swearing around
like mad, for no reason....
Exactly... Simply being able to make this observation would
be enough to see that I was making fun of the act of swearing.
politeness seems to be reverse proportional to the size
of the ego. In here a polite reply-wording like "I believe
you are wrong" becomes "you are a complete idiot"
Only if the reader is very childish, with no conception of
the idea that people can debate issues trying to find the
truth of the matter, that being what both parties want.
Also in cases where somebody has a "pencil ***" and goes on
to get a PHD just to call others "math weenies"...
Has someone done that?
As far as I´m concerned, I believe you have a lot of useful
things to say,
Fascinating point of view. What's an example of something he's
had to say that strikes you as useful?
I've slapping you silly here in RGB,
Guffaw. In your imagination you're slapping
me silly, but only in your imagination. In
fact you're just making a fool of yourself,
as usual.
at least for the possible
benefit of beginners whose minds are not totally contaminated
with the "sick residents experts of the gambling establishment".
Giggle. When you say this sort of thing you really do remind
me of a certain wacko over on the sci.* side. He's always
warning students not to believe the things their evil math
professors tell them, because they lie about math.
_He_ thinks he's slapping us all silly too. He thinks
that no matter how loudly people laugh. Very curious.
MK
David C. Ullrich
"Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal proof.
That would make a mockery of everything Godel was up to."
(John Jones, "My talk about Godel to the post-grads."
in sci.logic.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Murat's confessions Re: Naught gnubg
- From: muratk
- Re: Murat's confessions Re: Naught gnubg
- References:
- Murat's confessions Re: Naught gnubg
- From: muratk
- Re: Murat's confessions Re: Naught gnubg
- From: eu_piranha
- Re: Murat's confessions Re: Naught gnubg
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Murat's confessions Re: Naught gnubg
- From: muratk
- Murat's confessions Re: Naught gnubg
- Prev by Date: Re: Naught gnubg
- Next by Date: Re: [FLG] FibsLeaGammon
- Previous by thread: Re: Murat's confessions Re: Naught gnubg
- Next by thread: Re: Murat's confessions Re: Naught gnubg
- Index(es):
Loading