Re: Anyone want to talk about "equity" in this position?
- From: David C. Ullrich <dullrich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:30:06 -0600
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:21:12 -0800 (PST), monty1945@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Naughty, naughty, Philippe and David - didn't I say you should give
the novices a chance first, or are the two of you novices?
Um. Your challenge to novices was to explain something that's simply
not so, namely that the move which is "superior in every way" has
smaller equity.
David C. Ullrich
.
- References:
- Anyone want to talk about "equity" in this position?
- From: monty1945
- Re: Anyone want to talk about "equity" in this position?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Anyone want to talk about "equity" in this position?
- From: Philippe Michel
- Re: Anyone want to talk about "equity" in this position?
- From: monty1945
- Anyone want to talk about "equity" in this position?
- Prev by Date: Re: Anyone want to talk about "equity" in this position?
- Next by Date: Re: Anyone want to talk about "equity" in this position?
- Previous by thread: Re: Anyone want to talk about "equity" in this position?
- Next by thread: Re: Anyone want to talk about "equity" in this position?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
