Re: ethical question


David C. Ullrich wrote:
> Multiple choice.
>
> (i) The rule requires the TD to say "play it out".
> (ii) The rule is ambiguous.
> (iii) The rule requires the TD to say "single game".
>

I vote for (i)

Paul Epstein

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: X to play 65
    ... David C. Ullrich wrote: ... Anyway, I don't think _anyone's_ opinion here is of much value, ... certain to play 1. ...
    (rec.games.backgammon)
  • Re: Construct-a-position problem
    ... because then the play doesn't matter. ... David C. Ullrich ... However, at DMP, I ...
    (rec.games.backgammon)
  • Re: Optimal Backgammon (was: Re: Game Theory)
    ... of course that was a typo for "game theory". ... >value regardless of your opponent's play. ... >David C. Ullrich ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
    ... David C. Ullrich wrote: ... I think you are stupid because you think that a term can play a role even though it plays no role. ... B is empty, or that x is an element of A and B can contain things ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Interesting Position
    ... David C. Ullrich wrote: ... and gnubg agrees I did the right thing! ... Just play on. ...
    (rec.games.backgammon)
Loading