Re: Women

obaivasc@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

obaivasc@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Ruckers +5 over VOLS (matchbook)


It's tough picking the winningest coach in
NCAA history to fail to cover in the title
game on which they've focussed their entire
season, but Ruckers looks VERY strong right
now, Having dispatched a GOOD Mich St team
*ON THE ROAD* by 13, then crushed an even
better Sun Devils team by 19, then DOMINATED
another top 10 team, LSU Tigers, by 24!!!
These teams appear to be VERY CLOSELY matched!
Should be a GOOD game to watch, easily the
best game on tap today of any sport...

Note the following contradictory bull*** by coward:
From: Gary Collard (garycoll...@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: 2003-07-14 21:45:46 PST
"The rule is [stated by collard, AFTER-the-fact]
if I DON'T say in ADVANCE it's NOT a real play, **IT COUNTS** - no ambiguity."
Well collard did *NOT* say in ADVANCE that his posted 03/04 NBA picks were NOT plays (in fact he labelled them "plays"!!) So AFTER coward ran up a LOSING NBA record of 39-55-5, -20.98 units coward LIES about the record! Brian points out gary's LIE...coward then utters this completely contradictory BS to HIS own statement above (note the last line):
"And it's all a non sequitur line of reasoning
anyway, since I **ONLY** post "my picks" in some
contests (PNGC, Hilton, RS, the late great ART).
The rest of the stuff I have POSTED the last YEAR OR TWO has been tech stuff, it
*DOESN'T REFLECT ON ME* one way or the other!"
- gary "the arrogant-FRAUD" collard
---

"...you (Brian) are just once again trying to *LIE* your way out of a mistake. Hey, when caught with your pants down...redefine words and phrases to try to weasel out of it. In the rest of the world, CAREER MINOR LEAGUER means a guy who has spent his **ENTIRE CAREER** in the minor leagues!"
- gary "100 units" collard, July 8, 2002
the pompous, arrogant, know-it-all,
just prior to being *PROVEN* dead wrong!
(facts of his blunder revealed below)

Tuesday, July 9, 2002
Lynx Player Profile: LUIS ORTIZ
@Ottawa Lynx Weekly Feature
By Bryan Blom
"... the 32-year-old Lynx outfielder and *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER* would be the first to tell you that he's content with his role in the game, as long as it helps him to provide for his family...Though he has had brief stints in the big leagues - 16 games with Boston, 44 with Texas, one with Arizona..."
http://www.canoe.ca/LynxPressBox02/ortiz.html
Luis Ortiz MLB stats for 60 games spread over 4 seasons:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/o/ortizlu01.shtml
******************************************************

Author says that Paul LoDuca "Went from "career minor leaguer" to one of the top catchers in the majors overnight.
Lo Duca played sparingly in the 1998, 1999 and 2000 seasons so can't be referring to that...must be referring to his 2001 season, but of course, BY THAT TIME, he had played parts of 3 MLB seasons http://www.baseball-reference.com/l/loducpa01.shtml
*********************************************************
May 2003 An author calls Raul Gonzalez a "CAREER MINOR LEAGUER"
despite him having played in the Majors in 2000 with the
Cubs and with Cinci in 2001 and 2002:
http://www.baseballguru.com/archives/entries/00000287.htm
http://bigleaguers.yahoo.com/mlbpa/players/6478/career
*********************************************************
April 9, 2003
"A former first round pick by the Cubs, Kieschnick was a great hitter and pitcher in college. The Cubs decided they needed a power-hitting outfielder more than a pitcher and Kieschnick was put in one position. He"s had a couple cups of coffee in the big leagues but somewhere along the way Kieschnick was saddled with a tag that"s very tough to shake in the eyes of old-school baseball scouts: "career minor leaguer."
http://www.nuvo.net/news/archive/003566.html
Kieschnick's MLB stats dating back several years:
http://bigleaguers.yahoo.com/mlbpa/players/5559/career
*********************************************************
Quote:
"Adam Hyzdu is a baseball player with the Pirates at the time of this writing. For the most part, he's a *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER*. Regularly, he tears up in the minors, then gets called up to the bigs,where he invariably has one or two attention-grabbing big games, then returns to a disappointing slate and gets sent back down to resume his ruling of the kiddie roost. A *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER* yep -- but a solid one."
http://www.choler.com/reviews/fisher_uppers.shtml Hyzdu's MLB stats dating back to 2000:
http://bigleaguers.yahoo.com/mlbpa/players/6596/career
********************************************************
Monday, May 19, 2003
"Before last spring Roberts had been a *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER* in the Cleveland Indian organization."
http://www.dodgerplace.com/Roberts.htm
Dave Roberts MLB stats dating back thru 1999:
http://bigleaguers.yahoo.com/mlbpa/players/6305/career
*******************************************************

"Career minor-leaguer has good opportunity"
Tuesday, March 8, 2005. Associated Press

SURPRISE, Ariz. -- Chris Clapinski has played in 1,168
minor-league games over 13 years but has had scant time in the majors. In the majors, he has played second, third, shortstop and leftield. The Royals are Clapinski's fourth organization in five years after spending 10 years with the Florida Marlins. His time in the big leagues was in 1999, hitting .232 in 36 games, and in 2000, hitting .306 in 34 games. Clapinski's only home run in the majors was as a pinch hitter on Sept. 6, 2000, off Lima at Houston.
http://www.nevadadailymail.com/story/1091296.html
********************************************************
GotowarMissAgnes
Fantasy Expert
PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:19 pm
LBJackal wrote:
"And as for his potential I guess it's there, but
he's never shown much in the majors. He had a great year
in AAA but he's been a *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER* and he's
old enough that the AAA stats don't mean as much, even
though it was the IL, not the PCL."

That's simply not a defensible statement. I'll use OPS+ as a summary stat. At age 21, the Orioles gave him 21 ABs. His OPS+ was 21 percent better than league average. At age 22, they gave him another 40 ABs, and this time he really struggled, posting a lousy .125 batting average.
However, those ABs were spread out over close to 15 weeks, as the Orioles would play him for a game, sit him for a week. At age 24, Boston and Cincy gave him another 21 ABs, and he again performed about 20% better than league average. Last year, KC gave him 122ABs and he again performed 20% better than league average. So, in short, he's hit well in the majors three of the four times he was given a chance, and the one time he failed was in a situation that many players fail at. He's been a "CAREER MINOR LEAGUER" for the same reasons Ruby Durazo was a *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER* and David Ortiz was a career back-up---not because of lack of talent, but because of the fact that no one was willing to give him an opportunity. http://www.fantasybaseballcafe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=94385
********************************************************** White Sox, #27 Jamie Burke March 10, 2005
"A *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER*, Burke finally got a chance in 2004." Stats showing that Burke did in fact play numerous games in the MAJORS and yet was still refered to after that time as a *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER*
Career statistics
Team G AB '01 LAA 9 5 '03 CHW 6 8 '04 CHW 57 120 http://fantasy.sportingnews.com/baseball/players/6717/popup.html
**********************************************************

Aug 27, 2004 By Adam Miller Senior Writer
Crystal Ball - A look at 1B/DH in 2005 -
Part 3 - Part Three examines *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER* Graham Koonce. [Koonce played 28 games with OAKLAND "A's" in 2003.] http://athletics.scout.com/4/8.html
********************************************************* Lime
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:32 pm
There's a reason I pointed out Gross is a 25 year old former 1st round pick. I think what he's doing right now carries alot more meaning than what 30 year old *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER* Simon Pond did last Spring.
[Pond had 49 at bats with the JAYS last year]
http://www.fantasybaseballcafe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=101852
*********************************************************

January 01, 2005!

Elephants in Oakland has an interview with *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER* Matt Watson of the A's farm system. Wherever Matt has received significant playing time, he's gotten on base very well, yet at age 26 in 2005 he's only gotten 17 days of MLB experience(2003 Mets) Posted by David Pinto at 09:45 AM
http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/008194.php
*********************************************************
"Tim Fortugno, a *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER* pitched for fifteen different teams. During his baseball career, Fortugno was the "property" of six different major-league clubs."
http://www.athomeplate.com/bizarre.shtml
http://www.baseball-reference.com/f/fortuti01.shtml
*********************************************************

Ramon Nivar, 2B/OF, Baltimore Orioles
"The Orioles traded away Jerry Hairston in the Sammy Sosa deal, but they may have found a player who can play the same kind of role when they acquired Nivar from the Rangers for Matt Riley...If he doesn't develop those skills, he'll REMAIN a *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER* who gets an occasional callup when things get desperate."
http://tilyoureblueintheface.blogspot.com/
http://www.baseball-reference.com/n/nivarra01.shtml
************************************************************
Tuesday, July 9, 2002
Lynx Player Profile: LUIS ORTIZ
Ottawa Lynx Weekly Feature
By Bryan Blom
"... the 32-year-old Lynx outfielder and *CAREER MINOR LEAGUER would the first to tell you that he's content with his role in the game, long as it helps him to provide for his family. ...Though he *has* brief stints in the big leagues -16 games with Boston 44 with Texas,one with Arizona http://www.canoe.ca/LynxPressBox02/ortiz.html
Luis Ortiz MLB stats for 60 MLB games spread over 4 seasons:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/o/ortizlu01.shtml
**********************************************************
May 2003,
.....author calls Raul Gonzalez a "CAREER MINOR LEAGUER"
despite him having played in the Majors in 2000 with the
Cubs and with Cinci in 2001 and 2002:
http://www.baseballguru.com/archives/entries/00000287.htm
http://bigleaguers.yahoo.com/mlbpa/players/6478/career

***********************************************************

"Until the 2005 season, Ardoin was primarily a "career minor leaguer". Always possessing excellent defensive skills, Ardoin's weakness has always been his offense. His first season was a short one in 2000 with the Minnesota Twins, appearing in 15 games. He would not see Major League action again until the 2004 campaign, playing in only 6 games with the Texas Rangers."
NOTE: he was referrd to as a "career minor leaguer" DESPITE
having played 15 games for Minnesota Twins in 2000!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Ardoin
**********************************************************

"Aaron James Small (born November 23, 1971 in Oxnard, California) is a relief pitcher in the Seattle Mariners organization.
He previously played for the Toronto Blue Jays, the Florida Marlins, the Oakland Athletics, the Arizona Diamondbacks, Atlanta Braves and the New York Yankees. Regarded as a "career minor leaguer," he has played for a total of more than 20 teams, including his major and minor league stops, during his professional career."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Small
**********************************************************

Open Thread: Cubs vs. Reds, Saturday 9/16, 3:05 CT
By Al Section: Game Threads
Posted on Saturday, September 16, 2006 at 11:30 AM CT
http://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/story/2006/9/16/6952/47508

"And you think the CUB pitching staff is bad.
Here's a team (REDS) in the wild-card race, trailing by only 3.5 games, and they are starting a 35-year-old *career minor leaguer* with a lifetime WHIP of 1.62, and more walks than strikeouts this year (and nearly so in his career), and who before this year hadn't pitched in the major leagues since 2002. Chris Michalak is a Chicago
-area native, having attended Joliet Catholic High School and gone to college at Notre Dame. Check out his career stats -- he was originally drafted by the A's in 1993, and has played for twelve different major league organizations (A's, Diamondbacks, Rangers, Angels, Devil Rays, Dodgers, Blue Jays, Red Sox, Rockies, Reds, Marlins, and Brewers, and some of those more than once).
********************************************************

Posted May 3, 2005 1 :29 AM
"Graham Koonce - He may be a *career minor-leaguer,* but how do we know he can't be a career major-leaguer? Koonce had eight at-bats with Oakland in 2003 and that's been it for the former Pacific Coast League MVP."
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/sports/pirateslive/buccoblog/email.php?entry_id=594

********************************************************


Bubba wrote:
"Of course don't forget to look at Brian's plays during the season"

To which Gary coward "the ***-FRAUD" mocked:
"Contest plays, you mean, as his "official" plays are getting hammered as usual."

But how could the mocker/ridiculer *** gary coward
have any opinion on that whatsoever, as he is on record assert ing he DOES NOT READ Brian's posts?!!!!
There is no way unless he LIED and *DOES* read Brian's
posts! So once again, this PROVES WHY gary collard *is* a LYING-***, and unworthy of respect...
Previously I corrected collard's CHEATING, as everyone here witnessed. I pointed out his OUTRIGHT cheating on a game he claimed as a push BUT HE NEVER POSTED A LINE FOR IT!
Yet the verifiable archives show CLEARLY the game was NOT
available at the push line collard waited to claim AFTER
THE FACT!!!!!! GARY COLLARD LIED!
"On the game in question (PHX/SA, Apr 21, 2003),
a line of 8 was **CLEARLY** savailable **ALL DAY**
(8ev later in the day), so by (Brian's) own logic, if
anybody played it at other than 8 they did so by choice."
- gary coward, LIAR/cheater/MORON/***
Check it out and see if his claim that "8" was (quote) "clearly available ALL DAY"

Had coward posted a line **BEFORE** the game, even if different from the prevailing lines, that would be one thing. We could've verified it at the time, or at least had the opportunity...Same for anyone. But collard DID *NOT* POST a LINE!!!!
So claiming some bogus UNVERIFIABLE line, AFTERTHEFACT, to his benefit *is* cheating!
It's only one of three glaring examples in his NBA bounce CHEATING! And CONCEALING his "alleged" criterion used for the "NBA bounce theory" he was tracking, then later REFUSING to count into that theory two INDICATED PLAYS which LOST, is also cheating!
And this is the WHOLE POINT --> AFTER-THE-PHUCKN-FACT!!!!!!!
AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN with collard.
ALWAYS AFTERTHEFACT!!!!! NEVER STATED UPFRONT/beforehand!!!
THAT is cheating!!!!


"...the only unposted borderline pick was a winner, Por G4 vs Dal"

Below, collard the LIAR states that certain UNPOSTED picks which LOST weren't counted because they "didn't fit" his "now alleged" criterion which, of course, none of us are able to verify *because* he deliberately concealed the criterion, JUST LIKE HE DID WITH HIS CLAIMED "faves" WINNER ON SF (July 06) **POSTED A DAY LATE** and claimed it to his advantage! But on closer examination of collard's AFTERTHEFACT bull*** - which he just made up, of course - read closely his two entire statements below...
Keep in mind also that collard NEVER SAID ANYTHING AT THE TIME when these were first pointed out...he's only made up this BS recently, almost 2.5 months AFTERTHEFACT...
5/14: Det (-13 pts on road) LOSS <--INDICATED play; collard failed to list...

"...it did not fit the method! Det still had a chance
to win down by 9 with under 3.5 minutes left,
thus NOT a blowout."

5/23: Dal(-13 pt loss) LOSS <---INDICATED play; collard REFUSED to list

"...it did not fit the method! Dal still had a chance to win down 8 with under 5 minutes left and still only down 9 at the 3 minute mark,
thus NOT a blowout."


Both Detroit (May 11) and Dallas (May 21) lost by 13 pts.
Those results should've indicated subsequent "bounce" plays
in their next games...
On May 11 Detroit losses by 13, but despite counting other 13 pt and even 10 pt losers as "blowouts" he claims NOW
this game was "thus NOT a blowout" ***because*** [quote]

"Det still had a chance to win
down by 9 with under 3.5 minutes left"


And on May 21 Dallas losses by 13, but despite counting
other 13 pt and even 10 pt losers as "blowouts" he claims NOW this game was "thus not a blowout" **because** [quote]

"Dal still had a chance to win
down 8 with under 5 minutes left and
still only down 9 at the 3 minute mark"


Ohhhhh....so after COLLARD was found guilty of CHEATING on the April 21 Spurs LOSER in which he claimed a push despite never having posted a line with that play, now to cover up his FRAUD, he claims reasons for why those two LOSING plays
above were not counted as losses to HIS "alleged" system
Again, such reasoning was NOT posted *BEFORE* the tracking, so it's impossible to verify his claims.
But lo, what the phukk do we have here?!?!?!
On Apr 27, collard *DOES* indicate that PHOENIX (no line, of course) **is** a "bounce" play after they lost by 13 the game before, and in that loss THEY STILL HAD A CHANCE TO WIN LATE, as they were only down by SEVEN (7) with 2:03 left!!! http://cbs.sportsline.com/nba/gamecenter/playbyplay/NBA_20030425_SA@PHO
Yet collard counted THAT April 25 game as a "blowout," subsequently calling the April 27 PHOENIX game a "bounce play"! Funny how THAT 13 pt loss was deemed by collard a "blowout"
but the other two 13 pt losses "allegedly" weren't!

So to summarize collard's bull***, which he just "made up"
2.5 months AFTERTHEFACT to cover up his CHEATING AGAIN:
Detroit's 13 pt loss was allegedly NOT a blowout (even though other 13 pt losses and even a Detroit 10 pt loss *WAS* deemed a blowout) **BECAUSE** Detroit came within 9 pts late in the game...
...and, Dallas' 13 pt loss was allegedly NOT a blowout (even though other 13 pt losses and even a Detroit 10 pt loss *WAS* deemed a blowout) **BECAUSE** Dallas came within 9 pts late in the game...
...but he deemed the Phoenix 13 pt loss *WAS* A BLOWOUT
despite coming within 7 pts late in the game?!?!?!?!?!
WOW! Talk about yer contradictory BULL***!
Come within 7 late, but lose by 13 = *BLOWOUT* according to gary.
Come within 9 late, but lose by 13 = "NOT a blowout" according to him.
Again within 9 late but lose by 13 = "NOT a blowout" according to him.
UN-fuckin-believeable!
And no record of any such criterion stated UPRFRONT! Folks, this is collard lying about it all YET AGAIN!
Apparently he forgot about that Phoenix game he deemed a "bounce" play when he made up the above LIES to try to cover up his cheating! Did you think I wasn't going to bother checking your BULL***, gary? Not surprising though....
This seems applicable:

"...you are just once again trying to *LIE*
your way out of a mistake. Hey, when caught
with your pants down...redefine words and phrases
to try to weasel out of it."
- gary "100 units" coward, the CHEATER/LIAR
Now I ABSOLUTELY GUARANTEE YOU ALL that collard *WILL* now try to spin the above with more *unverifiable* claims!...He'll be lying of course, in a desperate bid to cover up his other lies and cheating....probably some BS about that Phoenix blowout which - despite the contradcitory statements exposing his lies, he will make up NOW to assert why that Phoenix 13 pt loss *WAS* deemed a blowout, but the other 13 pt losses were NOT deemed blowouts. I assure you he WILL, and when he does, ask yourself this IMPORTANT question: when did he state BEFOREHAND any criterion/reasoning for the selection of any "NBA bounce theory" plays so that we
would have a fair chance to verify his claims BEFOREHAND????
How would YOU know he isn't just lying NOW to cover it up???? As usual, collard DELIBERATELY makes it all ambiguous so that he can later see how the results develop then claim whatever he wants AFTERTHEFACT to make him and his capping look good!
There's NOTHING posted *BEFOREHAND* to support his contentions!
He's just making it all up on the fly to cover up his deceptions!
And THAT is the WHOLE freakin point!
NOTHING POSTED UPFRONT, even for reasonable verification, to validate his later claims AFTERTHEFACT!!!!!
gary coward pulls this BS in almost everything!!!!

I mean, remember a few years ago his now well documented BULL*** about his "NBA totals" from April, where he waited to see the final results and THEN claimed it was the (winning) "UNDERS" he "was playing and recommending to others" [not the (mediocre) overs, of course] - without having made any indication *BEFOREHAND* and after stating to Steve and rgs that he *NEVER* bets NBA during that time period of the NBA season!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here's collard's INFAMOUS bold-faced LIE:


From: Gary Collard (garycoll...@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: NBA Totals 4/15-16
Date: 2003-04-24 09:11:54 PST

Final Results:
UNDERS 30-18, Overs 39-34, Total 69-52
As I noted earlier, the UNDERS are the ones
that I was ACTUALLY PLAYING (the last two years now)
AND RECOMMENDING AS PLAYS...
The overs I was tracking for curiosity...

Hmmm...collard waits to see which wins then claims AFTERTHEFACT
that he was betting & recommending ONLY that group of NBA picks
which won big -- contradicting what he stated earlier to Steve
Let alone the *FACT* that he NEVER stated upfront ANYTHING to
indicate/specify his bogus assertions regarding the "unders"
That's just another collard deception, AFTER-THE-FACT, as usual!
This is the only thing he's on record saying about it upfront,
and there's NOTHING about "just the unders" (below)


From: Gary Collard (garycoll...@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: NBA Totals 3/31
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.sports
Date: 2003-03-31 11:59:33 PST
"TESTING something for the late season,
will TRACK it here to see how it goes.
EVERY GAME GETS A PLAY."
Phi-Orl U
Hou-NJ U
Mil-Mia O
Mem-LAL O


An AMAZING phuckn LIAR, that gary collard from Texas!!!!!!!!
NEVER posted anything UPFRONT stating that his fART contest
picks were to be part of his *officially documented* MLB record! All along when he was posting & scoring FOR HIS *OFFICIAL* MLB record the picks entitled "MLB faves" - he NEVER mentioned them...But as soon as those *officially* documented MLB "faves" go into the toilet (after he BOASTED he could attain +100 units) collard *THEN* decides to "claim" that those winning contest-picks were part of his *offical* MLB record, and ADDS +18.0 units to his record!!!!!!! Without any declaration UPFRONT!!!!

coward being PROVEN to repeatedly states falsehoods and
to DELIBERATELY CHEAT with regard to his own records is a sure sign the value of that person's opinions are worthless. It is a total lack of credibility.


Gary "the FRAUD" Collard LIED (2004):
"NBA Plays: 67-74-7 -1036"


DELIBERATE DOCUMENTATION FRAUD!!!

I had been posting a dilligent, public recording of collard's official NBA picks posted here since I discovered him CHEATING repeatedly earlier that season, and HIS claimed records are fraudulent! My last posted full update of his documented & verifiable YTD record, which included the season recap of his YTD NBA picks, with lines, and final scores, was on MAR 31, where he was --> 39-55-5, -20.98 (shown below)
http://tinyurl.com/2jf32
So continuing with his *OFFICIAL* documentation from APR 01:

A01 P...Por-Phl U 170-105 88-82
A01 L...Sac-Dal U 220-110 117-127
A01 W...Hou-LAL U 185-105 85-93 ...YTD = 40-56-6, -21.08
A02 W...Tor-Ind U 175 -107 64-84
A02 L...NY-NJ U 174.5 -105 83-108
A02 L...Mia-Det U 175 -108 84-92
A02 W...Cle-Mil U 204.5 -109 89-107
A02 L...Hou-Den U 185.5 -105 100-110
A02 L...SA-Uta U 169 +101 94-81 ..YTD = 42-60-6, -23.26

A03 W...NY-Phi U 175.5-105 86-75
A03 L...NO-Por U 174 -105 94-81...YTD = 43-61-6, -23.31

A04 L...TOR -112 (side) 83-90
A04 L...Sac-Hou U 192.5 -105 99-94
A04 W...Mem-Min U 189-103 82-90
A04 W...SA-LAL U 184.5 -105 95-89
A04 W...Ind-Det U 168 -104 61-79...YTD = 46-63-6, -22.48
A05 W...Mem-Uta U 181-111 81-92....YTD = 47-63-6, -21.48
A06 W...IND -9 -109 (side) 107-86
A06 L...Mil-NJ u191 +104 103-98
A06 L...NY-Ind u178.5 -105 107-86
A06 L...NO-Sac u194.5 -106 105-91
A06 W...Por-LA u185 -115 91-80 ..YTD = 49-66-6, -22.59

A07 L...Bos-Mia U 194-105 101-104
A07 W...Cle-Mem U 193.5-107 74-92 ...YTD = 50-67-6, -22.64

AO8 L...Uta-Dal U 198.5-107 117-94
A08 W...Min-Sac U 194.5-105 94-86 ..YTD = 51-68-6, -22.71

A09 L...Cle-Mia U 192.5+103 106-91
A09 W...Bos-NO U 188 -105 89-80
A09 W...Por-SA U 184 -108 74-84
A09 W...NJ-Ind U 173 -105 80-90
A09 L...Den-Hou U 186.5-105 106-103
A09 L...Mem-LAL U 190.5-111 103-95 ..YTD = 54-71-6, -22.87
A10 W...NO-Mil U 195-111 92-87
A10 L...Por-Den U 184-108 110-100
A10 W...Hou-Uta U 171.5-112 69-82 ..YTD = 56-72-6, -21.95

A11 L...Tor -8-104 (side) 108-114
A11 W...Phi-NJ U 173.5-105 75-89
A11 W...LAL-Sac U 203 -111 102-85 ..YTD = 58-73-6, -20.99
A12 W...Mia-Bos U 194 -105 84-77
A12 L...Uta-Min U 172 -117 104-90
A12 L...NY-NO U 181.5-105 101-97
A12 W...Sac-Den U 206 -109 97-89
A12 W...SA-Por U 170 -109 78-66...YTD = 61-75-6, -20.21
A13 W...Mem-Dal U 219-115 110-103..YTD = 62-75-6, -19.21
A14 W...NJ-Mia U 186-112 96-84
A14 L...Min-Mem U 185-113 107-90
A14 W...Den-SA U 181-103 67-93
A14 W...Dal-Hou U 205-105 92-89 ...YTD = 65-76-6, -17.34
And there we have it: -17.34 units (or -1734)
All legitimately and publicly documented & verifiable!
But gary coward's FRAUDULENT claim: 67-74-7 -1036
Shame on gary coward for such blatant CHEATING. Again!
A typo or inadvertent caluclation error we could accept
(if subsequently corrected, of course).....But this CHEATING
That collard isn't selling anything here is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.
In fact, as HC has accurately observed in the past, it may be
WORSE! Because if gary coward was a tout nobody would be fooled
or deceived by his claims! We would KNOW to be suspicious!
But when coward passes himself off as a non-tout under the
pretense of a knowledgable & skilled capper, the unsuspecting
may well have little reason to disbelieve any of his claims
including the records which lend support to/provide proof of
ones' "alleged" capping expertise.
CHEATING to reduce the severity of one's LOSING record is as
dispicable as CHEATING to win a game. A CHEATER is an ass.
A person void of HONOUR!
And unworthy of respect from intelligent/honourable people.
I would be embarrassed for coward except he's revealed himself
as such a disingenous, indiscreet, jerk the past two years...
The above recap is but one point that CLEARLY illustrates this.
"Going forward, one continued to perform spectularly, one very well and obviously the April very well. The rest need to be tracked only at the start of next year, in fact one or two may need ot be discarded altogether."

The reader will note that gary coward is making a lame effort
to dismiss his documented LOSING NBA record as some "tracking"
exercise only, allegedly NOT attributable to his skill whatsoever....That claim ONLY *AFTER* he realized he was LOSING badly. But NOT stated upfront at the beginning of the season!
Of course not! Not gary "100 units" coward!
Hell no!
Says NOTHING upfront...and if the record is winning, carry-on
and gloat-on as if he's got capping expertise...but if it
LOSES, just "claim" it was all some "tracking" exercise that
is in no way attributable to him! That's gary, folks! A FRAUD!
And this is only one of several times collard has pulled a
cowardly, deceptive stunt like this!
Remember last summer when coward *BOASTED* he would probably
attain +100.0 units with his MLB picks (which were up +12.18
at the time)...then his BOASTING backfired and his picks started
losing badly...which is when he FLAT OUT LIED and stated he
*wasn't* playing them, despite a previous statment that he *was*
UN-freakin-BELIEVABLE!!!!
He also decided at that time he would "claim" an additional
+17 units to be added to his LOSING MLB record by carrying them
over from his fun-fART-CONTEST picks record, just so he could
deceptively improve his losing record up to positive values...
and he also specifically made the point of "announcing" to the
rgs public that inspite of what our eyes were revealing to us
about his LOSING MLB record, he then stated in an effort to
impress the patheticly gullible:


"the games I actually handicapped are 43-24-2 +17.90"


...uh-huh....sure they were, coward....sure they were...

*
tt VOLS ov 29.5 greek
.