Re: Hot streak!!
- From: obaivasc@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 03:40:12 GMT
Michael K wrote:
9 winners 1 loser 2 pushes since friday.
Ok, I'll stop posting, but the plays will still be put up on my website.
Is that ok with you, since you seem to speak for the entire group.
Yes...we'll take you at YOUR WORD that you will STOP POSTING...it's okay with us.
Meanwhile you should know that most everyone here has a better understanding of the real menaing of "short-term/'random streaks" than YOU, apparently. We put very little if *any* stock into it and FOR VERY GOOD, MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN REASONS.
Now then rather than a MEANINGLESS 9-1, if you were to keep up that win percentage over a larger sample size of say, 100 picks, (ie. 90-10, or heck, we'd even accept a lesser number of 75-25 with a mixture of dogs and favs) *THEN* you would have something we would be interested in, me included! Otherwise 9-1 means SQUAT to anyone who understands probability -- which is the bery foundation of successful capping. And that's why no intelligent person here bats an eyelash and WON'T visit YOUR site... .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hot streak!!
- From: Michael K
- Re: Hot streak!!
- References:
- Hot streak!!
- From: Michael K
- Re: Hot streak!!
- From: james bridgeford
- Re: Hot streak!!
- From: Michael K
- Hot streak!!
- Prev by Date: Re: Hot streak!!
- Next by Date: <<< zero-risk-arbitrage.com ? >>>
- Previous by thread: Re: Hot streak!!
- Next by thread: Re: Hot streak!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|