Re: On Topic: MTT situation
- From: Truthseeker <truthseeker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:02:13 -0600
On 8/10/11 5:16 PM, Tad Perry wrote:
I have made this exact fold in such situations. The last time I folded
QQ with short stacks on the bubble, I ended out 2nd by the time it was
over, and I would have lost if I had played it.
Results-oriented analysis. "I played it this way once and it worked, so it must be the right way."
When I analyze your situation, it's similar to the last time we talked:
you need to weigh what you feel is the chance of survival by *not*
playing it versus playing it. When we do that, we note that there is a
non-zero chance that you will make nothing combined with a chance that
you may go a bit further being weighed against a significant chance of
making the money with very little risk to you. Plus, if the queens are
strong enough to win, you're probably only going to win the blinds. The
times someone does pose a strong threat (with AA, KK, AK), they *will*
play with you and they *will* bust you out a fair amount of the time.
This kind of timid play, playing only to survive rather than to build your stack, may produce a few more small cashes but cost you the chance to win real money. It is a mistake that a lot of players make. Your approach is only valid for very flat payout structures such as satellites.
The mathmatical side of me thinks: why even introduce this term into the
equation? Are the blinds you'll likely win really enough to place higher
enough times to make up for the the times you bust? I don't think so.
False dichotomy. You are leaving out all the times you will be called and double up.
If you only get the blinds and antes, fine, you got them with no further risk. If you are called you are only a dog to two hands, and a coinflip for one, way ahead on all others. Treating this as a losing situation is bizarre.
If you're the angling sort, stall and stall and stall and make them put
the clock on you if they have to and see what happens to that small
stack. It may become a non-issue and then you can make the money AND
play the queens.
Unless they are playing hand-for-hand to prevent this sort of angle.
- Prev by Date: Re: Vegas Jerry Living La Vida Ghetto
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Proof for you global warming idiots
- Previous by thread: Re: On Topic: MTT situation
- Next by thread: Re: On Topic: MTT situation