Re: OT: RGP KKK

"BillB"

You, Bill, post your foolish drivel over and over again....you disappear
and start a new thread of cut and paste drivel...You were proven to be
the troll ... called on your disengenuous drivel.... apply
Bill-land-logic and come to preposterous and unsupported conclusions ...
use words incorrectly ... illogic of your conclusions ... false premises
... you know nothing ... silly >assumptions....silly conclusions. You
just want to call name...that is what you do... Sandlot childish games
... silly trolls


This is exactly what I am talking about. Nothing but a flurry of insults.

I already addressed each and every small bit of specific information in your
original thread. I point out your incorrect perceptions and assumptions and
conclusions. I did this in detail ... as did Joe. You continued to dodge
anything specific and started with the "idiot" and "moron" name calling.
Eventually, that was all you did. You answered no question about
specifically what you meant by the words that you were using. You
specifically remain non-specific.

You continued to just repeat that you saw something and decided what it
meant and avoided any discussion about that which you said you wanted to
discuss. After repeatedly repeating the answers and questions to you ...
you disappeared and decided to start this thread, which has nothing to
recommend it as the beginning of a real discussion.

This new thread is a name-calling and cut and paste collection of childish
games. Another troll.

One ad hominem after another, and nothing else. Not one substantive
criticism of anything I wrote. Just attacks. What makes them so
uncomfortable?


You did not write anything of substance here. You left the "discussion" you
say you wanted to have in the previous thread with wild attacks and name
calling. Why do not just address the subject that you say you want to
address? Why do you start another thread with this name calling?

It is because you have no substance. If you post something specific with
substance, you will deserve a specific and substantial response. You need
to earn that substancial response. You cannot just come here and shout your
conclusions that you are the one that know what is what and when someone
challenges your assumptions, take you bat and ball and run to another
schoolyard and start shouting again and expect someone to listen to you.

RGP KKK ... this is what you consider the beginning of a reasonable and
respectful discussion of a sensitive and complicated subject. Bull***.


The fascinating thing is, in that original thread I really didn't make
anything but the most blatantly obvious assumptions and conclusions.


You assume that your assumptions are obviously "correct." They are not.
When questioned about your assumptions, you run and hide and call names.
Then you start a new thread with the subject line ... RGP KKK and you want
to whine that no one takes you seriously.

You assume your conclusions are obviously "correct." When challenged, you
call names and run away. Childish.


I really didn't say anything particularly controversial.


You really did not say much of anything at all. You said you looked up
dangerous intersections in the United States on google street view and saw
what you thought were a lot of "black people" and assumed that you could
reach the following conclusions:

"It's weird, but in the neighborhoods I looked at, almost every person you
see on the street is black. It almost seems like some kind of unofficial
apartheid. I guess these are the people the Republicans are against giving
health care?"

There it is ... the sum total of your observations and your conclusions.

"unofficial apartheid"

"these are the people the Republicans are against giving health care"

And you think these are the "most blatantly obvious assumptions and
conclusions" from your observations.

You have earned the scorn that has been heaped on you.


This was all very deliberate on my part. I wasn't there to call anyone any
names (if I did I was probably called one first!).


What did you mean by:

"unofficial apartheid"

"these are the people the Republicans are against giving health care"


All I did was post a list neighborhoods that were deemed to be the "most
dangerous", urge people to take a look at them, and offer my personal
observation that most of these neighborhoods were predominately black.
That alone was enough to send the RGP KKK into attack mode.

What did you mean by:

"unofficial apartheid"

"these are the people the Republicans are against giving health care"


.

Loading