Re: Why Some Have So Much And Others Have None
- From: "BillB" <bogus@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:12:23 -0700
"da pickle" <jcpickels@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:7MydnfHJo6cJSYLX4p2dnAA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Income equality" ... equality of result not equality of opportunity.
From each according to their ability ... to each according to their need.
Every man a king; a chicken in every pot; eventually everyone has everything they need.
Why should anyone have anything that someone else cannot also have?
Does anyone "need" a fancy new car? That third bedroom? Fine wine?
All the president's men (and a few selected women) know what is best for each and every group of Americans and they will see that each group gets what is fair for them. It does not matter whether they live in Los Angeles or Detroit or Peoria or South Beach ... this administration will do its best to see that everyone gets the same equal thing no matter what. They will decide what is fair. And fair is fair ... one size fits all.
lol is that what you think economists are talking about when they refer to a declining Gini coefficient? Do you recognize that an inordinately high Gini coefficient usually leads to social instability, and is not generally considered to be a "good thing" by economists of all stripes?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Some Have So Much And Others Have None
- From: da pickle
- Re: Why Some Have So Much And Others Have None
- Prev by Date: Re: OT Does she really believe this?
- Next by Date: Re: OT Does she really believe this?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Some Have So Much And Others Have None
- Next by thread: Re: Why Some Have So Much And Others Have None
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|