Re: chinese food and illegal immigration


"Pepe Papon" <hitmeister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qbff05l1tnjplek2d3sa3318ohrno5ljj4@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 11 May 2009 01:42:54 GMT, "Beldin the Sorcerer"
<beldinyyz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Pepe Papon" <hitmeister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0rg705dhogu6jm6ip8g9ejp5b6bvnrl5en@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 7 May 2009 03:00:15 -0700 (PDT), ramashiva
<ramashiva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Bell Dingbat always demands an impossible standard of proof when he
knows he is wrong. One of his many delusions is that Mr. Popinjay and
I are the same person. I invited him to come to Las Vegas, and I
would try to get Paul to come at the same time and bring his notebook
computer. Paul and I would show him our drivers licenses identifying
us as Paul Gennaro and William Coleman. Paul would then make a post
on his computer which would show up as a Popinjay post on RGP. I
would then make a post on my computer which would show up as a
ramashiva post on RGP. Bell Dingbat's response was that this would
prove nothing.

Yes, I remember that thread. Beldumb still somehow thinks he won that
one.

That's because I did.
I asked for a simple test that WOULD prove something.
Shithead refused.
You, being a shithead too, fail to understand that.

Since you're such a genius, why don't you explain how they could fudge
this test.
Any number of ways :
1) Get an advance copy
2) Bribe the evaluator
3) Fake the test entirely (write it himself)
$10,000 is surely enough to accomplish any of those.

Three simple ways. There are a lot more complex ones, that might require a
larger wager.




Believe me, I've been in a number of these types of arguments with
Beldumb. He's so insecure about his intelligence that he finds it
necessary to belittle the intelligence of everyone who disagrees with
him.
No, I point out when people are being retards.
There's no insecurity at all. You always make these moronic assumptions,
seth.
Why is that?

Because they're anything but moronic. It's obvious to everyone but
you. But it's clear by now that any attempt to explain it to you is
futile.

Seth, they're completely moronic.
I know I'm smart. Been smart my entire life. I have the grades and scores to
back it up; it's a documented, measured fact.
I don't need a whackjob like Willie "no food for 40 days" Coleman
acknowledging it.


The funniest thing is that, when I informed him that my IQ score
happens to be higher than his alleged 136, he called me a liar and
challenged me to take an IQ test with him. When I declined, he
unequivocally stated that the only possible reason for refusing such a
challenge is fear that I'm going to lose.

You've made any number of claims with no evidence at all.
When asked to prove anything, it's always a situation where it can't be
done, or you refuse to do it.

And you foolishly believe that this somehow proves I'm lying.

AGAIN with the shithead assumption.
It doesn't PROVE you're lying.
It increases the likelihood of it.
You're a poker player, for christ's sake. You claim to be a WINNING poker
player, and yet you fail to understand the basics of probability evaluation.

Even
when the obvious explanation is provided to you, you stubborn hold to
the ridiculous idea that only one explanation is possible.
Again, no, you fucking loon.
You go with the most likely explanation until given sufficient evidence that
it ISN'T.

I don't claim you aren't who you say you are, for instance. Unlike Travel, I
can accept there's enough evidence that you're the guy who wrote "Texas
Holdem"

When you claim to win a freeroll by "setting your mind to it" or win a large
field tournament once in five attempts, I'm highly skeptical.

Those kinds of tournaments are amazingly high variance, loaded with
unskilled players. I cannot begin to list the number of times I've been
raised all in on the turn holding the nuts, called, and been sucked out on
and eliminated.

Now it's certainly possible you fluked your way through the minefield early
on and stopped playing afterwards.
It's Much more likely that you'd simply be bullshitting. Why? Because the
former is an extremely low probability event.




Then, a couple of months later, you present him with a nearly
identical challenge, and he turns it down, the only difference being
that he stands to lose significant cash on the deal. But according
to Beldumb, fear of losing has nothing to do with it. He just thinks
that you have the power to somehow rig an IQ test. You can't make
this *** up!
*** for brains, anyone can rig anything.
Only a true shithead would think proposing a 5 figure bet on an IQ test
was
somehow the same as proposing two people take a third party exam.

Are you somehow trying to suggest that "an IQ test" and "a third party
exam" are two different things? The only difference between the two
proposals is that one included a bet and the other didn't. Your
attempts at weaseling out the the bet doesn't change that reality one
bit.

No, shithead.
Christ, you are an idiot.

Third party exam with no bet would be easy to do, and if some kind of scam
were suspected, easy to redo several times without an issue.

IQ test with a 5 figure bet would require a lot more to make 'secure' from
cheating, and probably be non-cost effective for the winner. NOT making this
effort makes scamming quite easy, and thus very much not cost effective for
the potential mark. Since idiot boy is the potential scammer....

I'm quite happy to take IQ tests againt the whackjob. If he wants to bribe
people, though, he can use his own money.



But you'll undoubtedly fall back on your 5th grader insults to allow
you to continue weaseling. It's what you do.

No, idiot boy.
I didn't use any of these insults in fifth grade.
Nor did I threaten to kick the *** out of people, a la Willie boy.

You ever consider getting a hair piece?


.

Loading