Re: Question for the Professor
- From: Gareth Erskine-Jones <gej@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:35:06 +0000
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:37:25 -0800, "Jason Pawloski"
<a6794a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In general, a plumber is more valuable to society than a
group-theoretician. We have to stop overvaluing academic pursuits over
vocational jobs. (I got 100% in my group theory class.)
You actually had a class only on group theory without rings and fields?
Was it an elective course or was it a part of a math curriculum?
I've seen many, many math curricula and never once seen a class only on
groups.
He didn't say he didn't study rings and fields. The group theory
classes I've taken included rings and fields (of course), but the name
of the class was "Group Theory".
GEJ
.
- References:
- Question for the Professor
- From: mccard
- Re: Question for the Professor
- From: Bill T
- Re: Question for the Professor
- From: funky cold medina
- Re: Question for the Professor
- From: Gareth Erskine-Jones
- Re: Question for the Professor
- From: Bill T
- Re: Question for the Professor
- From: Jason Pawloski
- Question for the Professor
- Prev by Date: Re: Question for the Professor
- Next by Date: PHIL IVEY@@@phil ivey@@@check out the #1 poker site of 2008
- Previous by thread: Re: Question for the Professor
- Next by thread: Re: Question for the Professor
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|