Re: Poll: Who won the Vice Presidential debate?
- From: "Beldin the Sorcerer" <beldinyyz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:54:51 GMT
"Dutch" <no@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gd1em2$9vu$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Beldin the Sorcerer" <beldinyyz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wroteDutch, read this line again :
Damn, Dutch, you're QUITE the retard.When most of the people voting for you can't list any of your major
positions, then what?
No idea, but that is not the case.
During the primaries, all ANY Obama supporter could do was crow "hope and
change"
Untrue, he put forth many positions, however the focus was on leadership
and
winnability, since his platform is quite similar to Clinton's.
Most people supporting him COULDN'T put forth a position he stood for.When most of the people voting for you can't list any of your major
positions, then what?
They gave him multiple, conflicting positions, as they preferred.
It doesn't matter if he issued a position paper, noone knew about it.
Retard, he has spoken in generalities.
Even now, most people don't have a clue about his economic policies.
Don't confuse your own cluelessness with others.
What few specifics he's given clearly won't be happening now that the
bailout has been passed and implimented.
You're right.
Complete luck.It was luck, and lots of it.He got lucky the Caucuses did so well for him, and he got lucky that
his
wins came when they did.
It wasn't luck, it was political skill.
Not luck.
Nope, becing good isn't the definition of luck.
And he isn't good.
No, that's truth.
No political acumen.He got VERY lucky the press largely left him alone.
Again, political acumen, luck has nothing to do with any of it, unless
you
call being underestimated by your opponent luck.
The press left him alone. He was lucky JW didn't break in December.
Why does the press like him? Isn't it something ABOUT HIM?
Yeah, he's black..
Ooo, that's slimy even by your standards, and that's saying a lot.
They were afraid of being labeled racist if they went after him, so they
didn't.
It's well documented.
No, she was overconfident, and attacked in the press while he was left alone
He's lucky to be
articulate and smart and charismatic I suppose, but that is stretchingNo, Hillary was all those things and more, and she got crucified.
the
definition of luck in a campaign.
She got arrogant and got overtaken by a smarter politician.
Dutch, you've been an idiot since you arrived here at RGP.
And remember, I don't like Hillary.
Like I care who you like.
Pointing out I don't like her adds to my credibility when I point out she's
the superior candidate.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Poll: Who won the Vice Presidential debate?
- From: Dutch
- Re: Poll: Who won the Vice Presidential debate?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: How Racism Works (McCain vs. Obama)
- Next by Date: Re: OT: How Racism Works (McCain vs. Obama)
- Previous by thread: Re: Poll: Who won the Vice Presidential debate?
- Next by thread: Re: Poll: Who won the Vice Presidential debate?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|