Re: PALINS SECONDS CONFIRMED LIE

On Sep 17 2008 1:56 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:

"WuzYoungOnceToo" <WuzYoungOnceToo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4jtvp5xgik.ln2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 14 2008 9:51 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:

"WuzYoungOnceToo" <WuzYoungOnceToo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lbkup5xfaa.ln2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 14 2008 12:22 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
I'm going to remember that the next time I see the statistics for
pregnancy rates among inner-city girls who attend public schools
with
sex-ed programs.

Wuzzy the idiot, ladies and gentlemen!

Sex ed doesn't teach people how to ***.
Sex ed teaches them how not to get pregnant when they ***.

Inner city schools are full of poor people, which means largely no
parental
supervision a lot of the time, so they have much more available
unsupervised
time for fucking.

That's a brilliant grasp of the obvious you've displayed there. Too
bad
you completely missed the point though.


Looks like you missed it, idiot boy.

Sex ed doesn't cause fucking.

That'd be the point.

Since I never claimed that it did...you're still the idiot here. But at
least you're consistent.

Shithead, you're responsible for what you state AND what you imply.

Yeah, but I'm not responsible for your piss-poor literacy and English
comprehension skills.

This statement :
I'm going to remember that the next time I see the statistics for
pregnancy rates among inner-city girls who attend public schools with
sex-ed programs.

implies sex ed causes more sex...

Uh, no. It implies that sex ed isn't necessarily effective at preventing
things like teen pregnencies. Not that it "causes more sex".

Damn, you're stupid.

------ 
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com


.

Loading