Re: @ Beldin - probability and likelihood
- From: "Beldin the Sorcerer" <beldinyyz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 02:32:47 GMT
"Old Wolf" <oldwolf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:a33dffa0-39f1-4430-bfe3-2442ba201616@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 8, 11:07 pm, "Beldin the Sorcerer" <beldin...@xxxxxxxxxxx>Diid you even read what you wrote, shithead?
wrote:
If you have a case 1000 known cases of something, there's a statistical
likelihood of them matching the known probabilities.
No there isn't. There's a probability of them matching
the expected values.
The 'probability of them matching expected values" is a statistical term,
meaning the confidence that something that is ,say , 10% likely will happen
10% of the time.
That has nothing to do with the expected likelihood of the event.
You didn't think at all.
Your terminology is just wrong. Can you quote any
reference that supports your terminology?
Shithead, just because you're clueless, doesn't mean I'm going to go cite
something.
Thought as much. GG.
You ignored the math, you ignored the problem, you ignored the principle of
indifferennce, and you ignored largely that Wuzzy needed the impossible,
maximum bias towards heads AND tails.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: @ Beldin - probability and likelihood
- From: garycarson
- Re: @ Beldin - probability and likelihood
- References:
- @ Beldin - probability and likelihood
- From: Old Wolf
- Re: @ Beldin - probability and likelihood
- From: Beldin the Sorcerer
- Re: @ Beldin - probability and likelihood
- From: Old Wolf
- Re: @ Beldin - probability and likelihood
- From: Beldin the Sorcerer
- Re: @ Beldin - probability and likelihood
- From: Old Wolf
- @ Beldin - probability and likelihood
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Simulating the 2 coin problem
- Next by Date: Re: Steaking
- Previous by thread: Re: @ Beldin - probability and likelihood
- Next by thread: Re: @ Beldin - probability and likelihood
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|