Re: is perpetual motion possible ?

On Jul 15 2008 10:10 AM, Kyle T. Jones wrote:


Yeah, hey, I never claimed it was ground breaking! Just a roundabout
way of describing the same thing that's usually described.

Cheers.

But it doesn't work. I don't think you are seeing the difference between
your model and the conventional one in the case of the sphere. He's
right, the size of the walls of the sphere are not irrelevant in your
model because they do occupy space and thus push the effects of the vacuum
outside the sphere further and further away.

Secondly, you haven't responded and I wonder what is your explanation for
the different densities of objects? Let's take your "gravitational map"
of the solar system, and let's replace the Sun with the supermassive black
hole that is probably at the center of the milky way. Holy ***, that
"ridge" (and I really think the 3D analogy here is weakening fast - don't
give it more power than it really has) caused by mass gets really fucking
large! How do you explain that? Is there suddenly way more vacuum in the
space between Mercury and the center of the system? It seems like
nonsense. Tell me what I am missing?

---- 
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com


.

Loading