Re: "Fold Equity" ...definition and example please


"Dutch" <no@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:zZA3k.17891$js6.7234@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
"Dutch" <no@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_Zm3k.17130$js6.4966@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
"Dutch" <no@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Wj73k.18049$gc5.11844@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Tad Perry wrote:
"mikeyvee" <chefventura@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:817532ff64cb55d4383333441380c6a9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
let's hear it players
Fold equity is that part of your opponent's pot equity that you will
get if
s/he folds.

tvp


Can you use it in a sentence in the context of working out how you'd
play a hypothetical hand? In other words show the usefulness of the
concept.
His definition seems a little muddled.

Fold equity is the likelihood your opponent will fold, given the range
of hands you have him on.

Say you have Nut flush draw on a flop of Q73.

He bets half the pot.

You consider going all in.

You may figure you have a 40% chance of winning if he calls, because he
may well have a PP below AA, or Ace, non Q, given his bet.

You may furthjer know that if he has JJ or less, there's a 40% chance
he'll fold.

This means you win the current pot 40% of the time, and 60% of the
time, you have 40% equity in the big pot.

Stack size and good estimates of the fold equity are key.



OK.. could I summarize that by saying that my fold equity on any given
hand is that portion of my chance of winning the pot which I derive from
the possibility of my opponent folding?

If so then if I happen to hold the stone cold nuts then the hand has no
fold equity for me at all since I will win no matter what.

Well, strictly speaking, no, it still 'has' fold equity, but now you
don't want to use it. Or you want to reverse it.... if he'll fold X% of
the time to a given bet size, you need to determine where the best bet
size is to get him to call most often... you could, I suppose, call that
"Call equity"

Putting it in numbers... Flop is 6s 7h 6c. You have the other two 6's. It
goes check check.
Turn is the 2h. Opponent bets half the pot... and you know he'd only do
this with 22 or 98h.
You also know he's timid enough to lay down 22 to a really big bet. BUT
he also won't call anything on the river if he has 98h and misses
completely.

You clearly want to raise something. Raising too much gets you your "fold
equity", but you don't want that. (if it's 100% certain he folds to an
all in, say, you just take the pot down there... but you want whatever
more you can milk him for)


If I am bluffing then my chance of winning the pot would be almost
completely derived from fold equity.
Yes, but the term is more often used when making a play on the flop or
turn.

Using the same hand in reverse, if you had the 98h on the turn, and your
opponentt DIDN'T have a 6 (give him, say, any good preflop raising hand),
you might consider a pot sized bet on the turn as +EV.... he folds maybe
50% of the time, and you're no worse than a 2-1 dog the rest of the time.

Wheras if you know he always calls, and he always has a better hand, then
it's insane to bet, though it may be justified to CALL that sized bet,
given the pot odds.

You sound so much more rational and intelligent when discussing poker.
No, I sound more rational when you haven't decided what the right answer is
already.

It's like you are completely different person than the ranting, grade
school insult-chucking fool we see discussing politics.

No. You're just not your typical pig-headed retard , when you admit to
yourself you DON'T know what the right answer is.

I am 100%
sincere when I say this Beldin, if you took this attitude, this tone and
applied it to other topics you would gain far more respect for your
opinions.
This isn't opinion. It's a definition; we're discussing facts.
In health care, what I state isn't opinion.
What IS opinion is whether it's more important to advance the best care or
to improve the lot of those on the lowest end of the spectrum.

We're all going to die at some point, barring major advances in medicine.
If they find immortality, or close, after I'm dead, it's of no use to me
whatever.







.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "Fold Equity" ...definition and example please
    ... It is after the turn and you are going to win the pot. ... The question becomes can you get your opponent to put more money in the pot. ... It is indeed a little silly to talk about negative fold equity ... ... That means there is fold equity involved here, and it's just the probability of him folding times the size of the pot. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: deal-making with cards to come (idiot insurance)
    ... So what if favored players were insured against disasters, acts of god, ... if I'm 88% to win the pot with 2 cards to come and all the ... In cases where 'fold equity' is cited as the justification for idiotic ... This is not just a bad beat rant in disguise. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: "Fold Equity" ...definition and example please
    ... Fold equity is that part of your opponent's pot equity that you will ... He bets half the pot. ... You may figure you have a 40% chance of winning if he calls, ... the possibility of my opponent folding? ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: "Fold Equity" ...definition and example please
    ... since the pot can't be negative and the ... probability of you winning, or of your opponent folding, cannot be zero. ... It doesn't negate fold equity, ... You have a very "German" way of looking at this, ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: "Fold Equity" ...definition and example please
    ... Fold equity is the likelihood your opponent will fold, given the range of hands you have him on. ... He bets half the pot. ... I am 100% sincere when I say this Beldin, if you took this attitude, this tone and applied it to other topics you would gain far more respect for your opinions. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)