Re: true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- From: "eleaticus" <eleaticus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 16:22:34 -0500
"Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:i5idnXcbX9RddtTVnZ2dnUVZ_qTinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"WuzYoungOnceToo" <wuzyoungoncetoo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagehelp
news:77f75987-be49-435e-b2ce-18848f4dc9e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 5, 1:33 am, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Erik Max Francis" <m...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
messagenews:DYednQ56SOObHNrVnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Clave wrote:
"tru-random" <email-addr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9IE1k.2761$ZE5.2066@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you would like to be more informed about true-random number
generation. I have a few pages about this technique on my website,
Get back to us when you get that perpetual-motion gizmo working.
This is just spam you're responding to,
Gosh, I hadn't realized. Thank God there are smart people like you to
me through this baffling maze they call Usenet.
but TRNGs are not at all mythical or crackpotty...
Did I say they were?
Yeah, pretty much.
Hell, I had true random number generation in the early 70s, on an RCA/Univac
Spectra/7.
A time sharing machine, it let you get both your CPU usage time to 1/10000
of a second (as I (mis)remember it) and 'actual' clock time to the same
fraction of a second.
I stripped the least significant digit of each call to the time function.
With some n calls between strips, a double randomization.
The time sharing aspect meant that the clock time was truly random.
I tested my results about 300 times as extensively as the IBM 1000000 random
digits were tested and never found the remotest hint (with tests over half a
million digits each) that there was a relationship between the randoms.
Even in the middle of the night - with so few users on lin - the results
were right, what with all the batch jobs and system services running, but I
used my max inter-strip calls just to be sure.
eleaticus
ee-lee-AT-i-cus
======================
Oh good grief. Impaired grasp of simple logic noted.
Jim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- From: tru-random
- Re: true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- From: Kyle T. Jones
- Re: true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- From: Clave
- Re: true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- References:
- true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- From: tru-random
- Re: true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- From: Clave
- Re: true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- From: Clave
- Re: true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- From: WuzYoungOnceToo
- Re: true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- From: Clave
- true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- Prev by Date: Re: racism?
- Next by Date: Re: BUSH IN ISREAL
- Previous by thread: Re: true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- Next by thread: Re: true-random number generator (TRNG) info.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|