Re: I'm not a gambler, I'm a poker player

From: johnny_t <nobodyis@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 10:09:43 -0700

Andyfothershops wrote:

Why consideration? Isn't consideration just required for a contract?

Formal definition requirement for a wager. It isn't gambling if there isn't consideration. It is the particular definition of consideration that is key and is local.
.

References:
- I'm not a gambler, I'm a poker player
  - From: viciousvixen6t9
- Re: I'm not a gambler, I'm a poker player
  - From: johnny_t
- Re: I'm not a gambler, I'm a poker player
  - From: Andyfothershops

Prev by Date: Re: Is Jimmy Carter Totally Nuts?
Next by Date: Re: OT: Nuclear Hypocrisy
Previous by thread: Re: I'm not a gambler, I'm a poker player
Next by thread: Ed Miller Expert Hold Em Limit Poker DVD for sale & T-shirt-- Ebay Auction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread