Re: Politics, not science, defines global warmists


"WuzYoungOnceToo" <WuzYoungOnceToo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8fof75x2ku.ln2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 2 2008 8:10 PM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:


No, it's the "insert some artifact that fucks up Outlook".

Like ASCII characters?


"Like" ascii? Perhaps. Ansi is "like" ascii. Indeed ALL codes are "like"
ascii.

Setting aside yet another display of your inability to interpret simple
English (note that I didn't say "Somethiing similar to ASCII")....

So what.
I showed in my response that it ISN'T ascii.
That'd be my point, retard.


So, you think his newsreader has a setting for inserting ANSI escape
sequences (which hasn't been a standard since 1997, btw) into this posts?

Did I state that?
No.
Did I claim that?
No.
Did I say ALL codes are "like" ascii? Yes, because I have no idea what his
posts are formatted in.
All I know is that they don't allow Outlook to auto-indicate reply lines.

Unlike you, idiot boy, I can accept I don't know everything about what he's
using. And I can still make a rational judgement anyway.


And even we were to accept such an absurd premise...unless you've figured
out how to run Windows on a text terminal (VT-220, or any of a host of
other data display dinosaurs) or run Outlook in a terminal emulator then
ANSI ain't the problem.

See why you're a *** for brains?
I make a simple analogy, that Ansi is "like" ascii, as are ALL OTHER CODES.

It makes the point that similar things can still cause different issues.
I never once claimed he had an ansi issue. Ansi is still in use today, of
course, but only in older programs, and not standard. I used it earlier
playing a version of Risk online.



Or maybe you're talking about the ANSI organization itself, insinuating
that they're a part of the conspiracy against you too? I'll not have you
give away the credit for my brilliant plan like that!

No, retard.
You're too busy failing basic reading.



It isn't Ascii, of course.

It's based on ASCII. It most definitely isn't EBCDIC thought.

Well, sure. Ansi just used the 8'th bit to indicate color and shapes and
such, effectively doubling the symbol allowance.



Only one other individual mentioned the issue, and he's a proven
pathological liar. Of course, that makes him a natural source of
corroboration for you.


No, the proven pathological type in this discussion is you.

Anyone with even the most remote logical sense can see what I'm saying.

Well, I think we can agree that logic is quite remote from what you're
saying.

Nope. Logic is at the forefront.
Your lack of understanding shows you have no logical grasp at all.


Translation: You're pulling conclusions out of your ass based on
nothing
other than you're desire to believe them.


No, retard.
You've gotten no support on this.
That's because the rest of the people who'd like to beat me up can see
that
this is a place where you're so big an idiot, you could be a retard
colony.

Is this where you turn to your blow-up doll for comfort?

My fiancee is a doll, and blowing is sometimes involved, but she is very
rarely full of hot air, and always a comfort to me.

Just because your and your inflate-a-man are close doesn't mean everyone
else has a rubber buddy.



No, shithead. I went to college. You stopped prior to fourth grade, which
is
why basic, simple logic is beyond you.

And this is what you have to show for all that time and money? You should
demand a refund.

I make a good living. While it isn't the best possible, I have a 6 figure
net worth, a nice house, a good woman, a loving pet, and we're trying to
adopt.

And I can read and follow logic.

You, on the other hand, are such a whack job that incorrectly accusing me of
*** is the high point of your day.



See, retard boy, when you do the same thing 20 times, in a non-random
situation, and in one instance a different result is obtained, and the
other 19 times it isn't, there's something unique about that one
instance.

Of course, nothing like that has happened here.

Yes, idiot, it did.

See, shithead, when I reply to the vast overwhelming number of posters, no
issue.
With him, issue.
Same action, different results.

Only a *** for brains such as yourself would think it was somehow MY doing.


The people POSTING that create this issue...

Invalid assumption. You having a problem responding to them does not
indicate that they are causing the problem. This is the source of your
confusion (well, when it's combined with your profound ignorance.)

No, retard, I don't have a problem responding to them.
They have a program that doesn't work properly with Outlook, the default
newsreader of Windows.

That means they have a problem, not me.

You being retarded, you keep claiming otherwise and looking like a *** for
brains.




..all post out of Google groups.

A huge number of people post out of Google groups. Seems like the problem
ought to be downright epidemic in nature.

No idea what options Google has on that end. It's entirely possible there's
some selection he has that's set incorrectly.

As I said, it's an artifact of his posts.

Now get your head out of your ass.



There's no straws grasped.

Nor are you grasping anything else.

You're grasping your ***. A small chore.



No, you neglected to deal with the logic chain.

Reply to A, B, C, D, E, F,.... get ">"
Reply to G, using the same technique, get no ">"

Logical assumption : G is different than A..F and does something to
prevent
">"

Since H, I, J, K & L get "> " when responding to G, your assumption is
***.

No, they don't.



Further investigation... Reply to H, I, J, K... also get ">"

Reply to G again, no ">"
Reply to L, using the same posting procedure as G, no ">"

Logical assumption, the artifact in G's post is created by the posting
procedure G & L use.

Another *** assumption. A better one would be that, although the content
of G & L's posts might be "different" somehow, the ability of other
posters to respond with correctly prefixed text - and with different
newsreaders - suggests that the difference is not a problem for correctly
functioning newsreaders through which responses are posted. One, or
perhaps two, users having some problem responding to G & L is an
indication of a problem of those one or two respondants.


Nope.
This is why you're a shithead.
Outlook is the default. It has the highest usage rate.
Something doesn't work correctly with outlook, it's that program's issue.

Noone else is replying to the guy with outlook and not having the same
problem.

Now that's not too difficult.

Simple-minded conclusions usually aren't...though they're also usually
erroneous. Of course, if you put a little more thinking into things you
can avoid them.

Nope, they're fine.
YOU'RE a moron, of course, for lying to "defeat" it.

Let's look at someone else's reply to an Art post :

Let's use Pickle!

Here is the entirety of his post :

art_classmn"

Actually, I'm a Chapter Leader in a union, so I'm rather familiar with
the subject.

So you know you guys are parasitic, living off the backs of workers?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You completely ignore the history of unions in this country and the
gains they did make for workers.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

art, you are correct ... but the reason for ignoring the important
contributions of unions in the past is because the history is not the
subject of the subthread ... and that is history ... we are talking about
today.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Unions are not the issue with respect to Walmart.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Oops, you must not have read much in this subthread. That is THE issue
being discussed.

That's his reply to Art on Jan 10, 2008.

Note, lying *** for brains, that in Pickle's posts, there are not ">"
indicators for art's text.

Pickle worked around it. He manually inserted characters to indicate what
was art's, which is nice, and helpful, but certainly not required. And why
did he do this? Because, as an ARTIFACT of Art's posts, his reply indicators
didn't come automatically.


.

Loading