Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- From: Omaha Chris <cpsaros@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 23:11:40 -0700
A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
It might be wrong, of course, but that occurrence doesn't give any reason to think so, or provide any evidence to support a claim that it is.
Well okay. I believe you.
Nice hand, sir.
.
- References:
- Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- From: Omaha Chris
- Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- From: Necron99
- Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- From: Omaha Chris
- Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
- Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
- Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- From: Omaha Chris
- Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
- Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- Prev by Date: Re: 2/5 No Limit rake too high to play?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Ron Paul
- Previous by thread: Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- Next by thread: Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|