Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- From: "Elisabeth Chorraz" <elisabeth.chorraz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:52:09 -0800
"Omaha Chris" <cpsaros@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f2ir4t0koh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
HOWEVER, I would still be interested in seeing two hand historiesinteresting.
showing the same player being dealt the same four cards back-to-back
(or, like I said, even within 24 hours). Checking for this would be very
easy to do in PokerTracker!
This back-to-back thing makes me feel special.
Or maybe I've just read too much about synchronicity, which is
Hi Chris,
I'm wondering why you think it would be more interesting in the same four
cards being dealt to a player back to back to back, but apparently not
interesting if they are dealt to the board (see my previous post).
I've only had PT for a few days, and I have the HE version rather than
Omaha, but I suppose it's the same. I don't know how to check for back to
back hands in PT, but I'd like to learn - can you explain it to me? (I
assume you mean w/out writing your own SQL query.)
Bett
By the way, I think I remember you play poker in the SF Bay area. Where are
the good places besides the Oaks and Bay101?
Thanks, Bett
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- From: Omaha Chris
- Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- References:
- Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- From: Omaha Chris
- Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- From: Omaha Chris
- Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- Prev by Date: Re: TRADE Pokerstars for Partypoker
- Next by Date: Re: OT: A Message to Hewlett-Packard's Chief Executive Officer
- Previous by thread: Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- Next by thread: Re: Pseudo-proof that something aint right with the Stars RNG
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|