Re: How intelligent is Gary Carson?


Irish Mike wrote:
Actually an Irishman from County Kerry named Paddy Murphy has discovered a
cure for AIDs. Unfortunately he published it in Gaelic so it was over
looked by the medical and scientific communities. Here is the translation:
"Don't share needles or *** without a rubber".

You're welcome,

Irish Mike

Thanks Mike but those are sensible precautions to help prevent the
sprread of the disease, not a cure. There are other ways to spread it
and your suggestions don't help people who already have it. A cure is
something that helps someone who already has the disease..

Will in New Haven

--



"cinnamon sky" <starry5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:WFBTf.6714$Bj7.5011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Polymerase Chain Reaction. Another one-shot flash of genius, so obvious
after the fact. California surf-boy came up with it while motoring. He
then spent 10 years or more arguing that HIV does not cause AIDS.

Kerry Mullis is to be commended for thinking outside the bun. It's rather
compelling, is it not, that the Nobel Prize winner who invented the test
that is being used to detect and measure HIV has stated (something to the
effect of), "To err is human, but this HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of
a
mistake!" He's also perplexed that PCR is being utilized to measure the
amount of HIV, because, due to its magnification properties, its intended
purpose is to "qualify, not quantify".

Kerry Mullis has joined forces with thousands of other reputable
scientists
and doctors who are vociferously and bravely refuting the HIV/AIDS
connection. You probably haven't heard much from them, though, because
mainstream media has locked them out.

http://virusmyth.com
http://aidsmythexposed.com

(A good place to start is the '96 Spin interview with Dr. Peter Deusberg,
the world's foremost retrovirologist.)



"Bill T" <wctom1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:441e0f58$0$3280$6d36acad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ppgg wrote:
David Sklansky has stated that he could have easily won the Nobel Prize
if he
had decided to become a research scientist. Yet Gary Carson seems to
think that
Sklansly is not that smart and his thoughts are not very original. I
have no
reason to doubt either one. My question is this: how smart is a guy who
is way
smarter than a Nobel Prize level guy? If an average person's
intelligence is X,
is it like Sklansky is at 10X and Carson at 100X?


Winning a Nobel takes more than a high IQ; in fact some winners got
there just by single-minded doggedness or chutzpah.

A few examples spring to mind:

Pre-frontal lobotomy. Put on a road show and incidentally incapacitate
a few thousand patients.

Hypothalamic releasing hormones. Have several generations of grad
students grind up tons of sheep brains to get TRH.

J-particle. Organize a few hundred physicists and engineers to work on
a very very expensive piece of equipment. (Well, 2 of them.)

Cardiac catheterization. A surgical resident stuck a long rubber tube
up his arm vein. Two decades later, as a private-practice urologist, he
got a phone call from Stockholm.

DNA. A true flash of genius. Crick went on to help identify the
genetic code. Watson? No further scientific work from him.
Distinguished himself as administrator and a roving crazy-uncle of
molecular biology.

Polymerase Chain Reaction. Another one-shot flash of genius, so obvious
after the fact. California surf-boy came up with it while motoring. He
then spent 10 years or more arguing that HIV does not cause AIDS.


Geniuses? I doubt it.



Bill T




.

Loading