Re: Is collusion really this easy?
- From: "Sir Benjamin Nunn" <bennunn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:49:59 -0000
"fuggit" <kyhangdog@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141213362.639862.50940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Funny, the only show the rounds he won. Didn't show you all the times
he didn't hit on the flop or called raises to the river only to lose.
If he did bet both accounts on a round and lost both, he lost twice as
much. Collusion isn't that easy and automatic. Say you play both hands,
and lose, which does happen. You paid twice the blinds.
Huh? I don't see your point. You pay twice the blinds because you play twice
as many hands. The blind-to-hand ratio is exactly the same as for
non-cheating players.
At the very least, playing as two players on the same table will give you
the advantage of knowing two dead cards each hand, and you can factor this
into your play, as it may be crucial to the odds.
This in itself is enough of a marginal edge for an adept player to profit
from, and that's before you even consider two-man plays like getting an
extra raise in when you have the nuts and the other player is squeezed in
the middle.
BTN
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is collusion really this easy?
- From: hotdammit123
- Re: Is collusion really this easy?
- References:
- Is collusion really this easy?
- From: hehehe
- Re: Is collusion really this easy?
- From: RazzO
- Re: Is collusion really this easy?
- From: hehehe
- Re: Is collusion really this easy?
- From: RazzO
- Re: Is collusion really this easy?
- From: hehehe
- Re: Is collusion really this easy?
- From: fuggit
- Is collusion really this easy?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT : A Woman's Right to..........GOLD DIG!
- Next by Date: Re: Did Russ lose his VOICE? "RazzO"
- Previous by thread: Re: Is collusion really this easy?
- Next by thread: Re: Is collusion really this easy?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading