Re: GSN High Stakes Poker - Danny v. Sammy - str8 vs. baby flush draw hand
- From: "Mark B" <diputsur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:51:27 -0500
"flopdudead" <43082670@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141159791$745827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Kd9d on board that is QdJdTd... or does that not count?
On Feb 28 2006 3:47 PM, Mark B wrote:
"FloridaJohn" wrote in message
news:1141158949.348673.6050@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I didn't see it, so I'll add the usual "hard to say without seeing what
happened in previous hands, etc." caveat...
But certainly Danny played it correctly. Danny has the immortal
straight in that he can't be beat by a higher one
K-9 an immortal straight? Not only are you wrong in the given
scenario, but it's impossible for K-9 to be an 'immortal straight'
under ANY circumstance.
That's not a straight ;-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: GSN High Stakes Poker - Danny v. Sammy - str8 vs. baby flush draw hand
- Next by Date: Re: GSN High Stakes Poker - Danny v. Sammy - str8 vs. baby flush draw hand
- Previous by thread: Re: GSN High Stakes Poker - Danny v. Sammy - str8 vs. baby flush draw hand
- Next by thread: Re: GSN High Stakes Poker - Danny v. Sammy - str8 vs. baby flush draw hand
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|