Re: Attn: Neil Schulman
- From: "GrouchySmurf1002" <a1648@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:47:05 -0800
On Feb 28 2006 3:41 PM, ChrisBrown wrote:
On Feb 28 2006 2:40 PM, GrouchySmurf1002 wrote:first
On Feb 28 2006 3:25 PM, Neil Schulman wrote:
I merely cautioned those to avoid gimmicks and learn the fundamentals
However, you think they should learn the funadmentals only at 10/20 and
above.
10/20? isn't he the guy that struggled moving to 6/12 from 3/6 in vegas
games?
I have no idea. I just know he thinks the nickle/dimers should go to
hell before they try to learn to play poker at that level.
________________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Attn: Neil Schulman
- From: Neil Schulman
- Re: Attn: Neil Schulman
- References:
- Re: Attn: Neil Schulman
- From: ChrisBrown
- Re: Attn: Neil Schulman
- From: Neil Schulman
- Re: Attn: Neil Schulman
- From: GrouchySmurf1002
- Re: Attn: Neil Schulman
- From: ChrisBrown
- Re: Attn: Neil Schulman
- Prev by Date: Re: GSN High Stakes Poker - Danny v. Sammy - str8 vs. baby flush draw hand
- Next by Date: Poker and Backgammon - a Poker player review
- Previous by thread: Re: Attn: Neil Schulman
- Next by thread: Re: Attn: Neil Schulman
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|