Re: Outsourcing Security to an Arab Country

On Feb 22 2006 3:00 PM, art_classmn wrote:

"Two of the 9/11 hijackers were from the UAE" is not an argument, it is
an observation.

When included as part of an argument, it is part of that argument. Don't
assume that everyone else is as stupid as you are.


Similar to the observation that 14 or so of the 9/11
hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. Another observation is that none of
them were from Iraq nor did any of them or Al Qaida have operational
ties to or in Iraq.

These are all merely observations.

So long as those observations are made outside of the context of
attempting to make any particular point. So...you're saying that you and
Hankins really have no fucking point?


The UAE is nowhere near as high as say, Saudi Arabia is on the list of
the worst exporters and supporters of attacks on the US.

I don't think we have to genearlly fear the importing goods and
services from the UAE. However, I don't want any company or entity
not headquartered in the USA, prefereably with home offices extremely
near the ports themselves running security. I want the people running
port security to have as much skin in the game as possible.

I want them to protect not only their business or financial interests,
I want them to be protecting their very own property, homes, families
and history.

So then you agree. Hankin's observation about two 9/11 hijackers having
been from the UAE was irrelevant.


- "Now you listen to me. If anything goes wrong, anything at all....your
fault, my fault, nobody's fault...no matter what else happens, I'm gonna'
blow your head off."

____________________________________________________________________ 
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com

.

Loading