Re: Dumbass, right here.

From: "CincinnatiKid" <a16b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:49:36 -0800

On Jan 31 2006 4:43 PM, FellKnight wrote:

> On Jan 31 2006 1:18 PM, CincinnatiKid wrote:
>
> Who's the dumbass? I think you can get away with a smooth call and all-in
> on the turn on this board (2 suited board, especially if the suits were to
> the T2).
>
> Fell

I obviously was the dumbass.

> Visit http://www.fellknight.com for strategy, blog, reviews and more!
> (STILL IN BETA MODE)

--------
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dumbass, right here.
  - From: LiamToo

References:
- Dumbass, right here.
  - From: CincinnatiKid
- Re: Dumbass, right here.
  - From: FellKnight

Prev by Date: Re: Don't get the collusion thing
Next by Date: Re: 5/10 NL - Another hand -
Previous by thread: Re: Dumbass, right here.
Next by thread: Re: Dumbass, right here.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Dumbass, right here.
... On Jan 31 2006 1:18 PM, CincinnatiKid wrote: ... Who's the dumbass? ... I think you can get away with a smooth call and all-in ... on the turn on this board (2 suited board, especially if the suits were to ...
(rec.gambling.poker)
Re: Dumbass, right here.
... CincinnatiKid wrote: ... I think you can get away with a smooth call and all-in ... :> on the turn on this board (2 suited board, especially if the suits were to ... I obviously was the dumbass. ...
(rec.gambling.poker)
Re: Dumbass, right here.
... CincinnatiKid wrote: ... I think you can get away with a smooth call and all-in ... >> on the turn on this board (2 suited board, especially if the suits were to ... > I obviously was the dumbass. ...
(rec.gambling.poker)