Re: 5/10 NL - Bad play? Or instacall?
- From: "CincinnatiKid" <a16b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:10:06 -0800
On Jan 31 2006 4:05 PM, FellKnight wrote:
> On Jan 31 2006 11:40 AM, CincinnatiKid wrote:
>
> > Little info. as I havent been at the table long. I do know this player to
> > be LAG and know that he will reload if he busts.
>
> Against a LAG, easy call. In terms of pot odds, there was $410 in the pot
> (give or take). You had to call almost $300 to get an all-in showdown.
>
> If you win this hand just over 40% of the time, you show a profit. You
> are better than that against even QQ. Only against KK and AA are you
> losing money on the call. So, unless he is so tight that AA and KK are
> very likely, you must call (I'll check pokerstove tonight to figure out
> your equity vs his range).
>
> Fell
> --
> Visit http://www.fellknight.com for strategy, blog, reviews and more!
> (STILL IN BETA MODE)
Thanks
____________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
.
- References:
- 5/10 NL - Bad play? Or instacall?
- From: CincinnatiKid
- Re: 5/10 NL - Bad play? Or instacall?
- From: FellKnight
- 5/10 NL - Bad play? Or instacall?
- Prev by Date: Re: Screwy SNG Story
- Next by Date: Re: CONGRATULATIONS JUSTICE ALITO!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: 5/10 NL - Bad play? Or instacall?
- Next by thread: High and low skill gaming has arrived.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
