Re: Update on urgent help please post re tournie



Apologies for double post. Thought I had deleted the first one.

"Unsteady Eddy" <horsey.bird@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Vfnof.772$r4.661@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Well, first of all thanks for all your help in earlier thread when I
> qualified for this satellite.
>
> I entered the tournie and was having trash hand after trash hand,
> eventually managed to double up but still ridiculously short stacked.
> Somehow clawed my way onto the final table - nearly bottom stack. Then a
> few good hands changed fortunes, suddenly found myself top stack - no idea
> how that happened, was not in my plan. Places 1 to 3 qualified for the
> million dollar tournie but received no cash - I have only been playing for
> 3 months so was really not ready to participate in this - would be eaten
> alive. A nifty bit of poker suicide (it is harder than it looks) meant
> that I finished in 4th place - exactly where I wanted to be. For a scary
> moment however I really thought I would not be able to avoid qualifying
> for the million.
>
> Needless to say very thrilled, especially as I won $411 dollar, not a bad
> days work for a newbie.
>
> I do find tournaments easier than cash games, this was discussed a number
> of threads ago. For me I think it is having a clear fixed end goal -
> getting onto the final table and then beating people. More structured
> than cash games.
>
> I do feel however that my technique could do with a huge amount of
> refinement. At the start of the tournament was playing very tight, I do
> normally anyway as surviving here is a key thing however had no hands
> worthy of gambling on, I let other people remove each other and took the
> opportunity to grab some chips with the one good hand I had. Was short
> stacked and a number of the big stacks were very aggressive, this meant
> that betting preflop was pointless, I either had a hand I was prepared to
> go All in with or not. At one point when the blinds were huge and I had
> about 8 blinds left I was forced to go all in with something I was not
> happy with but it was the best cards I had seen in the last 2 hours (I was
> predominantly getting cards like 57o), luck favoured me and did not get
> kicked out - split the pot with another player. That was luck but would
> have been out in a few rounds anyway if I had not made the most of the
> first high card I had had for ages. It was suited even though the kicker
> was horrendous.
>
> I am concious that my tournie play seems to involve an awful lot of all in
> with premium hands but not much else. If you are short stacked or at the
> beginning a few bets preflop which amount to nothing on the flop can cause
> harm. Later on once I have acquired a stack I find myself just bullying
> people out as raising minimum generally involves a bet of around 2K.
> Whilst that is good the all in does require some luck even though you can
> help it on the way by good choice of cards, the bullying is useful but
> does not involve so much skill as people keep folding.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: When should you go all in?
    ... If you have less than 10 times the big blind, the blinds are going to eat ... If you have better things to do than play four hours in a $100 ... Go all-in if you have position and two strong cards and you are ... raised by a large stack, or maniac, then don't make the bet, unless ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Live tournament hand to consider
    ... tight, but with no cards, but have still built your stack up to around ... so many cards are bad. ... Absolutely fucking ridiculous  20k in chips at the 25-50 blind level, ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Tunica Trip Report
    ... cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV ... Chan with a big stack! ... Expected result with crappy hand and crappy call ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Holy crap - poker content
    ... to have to play for your stack against her if you call PF. ... at your cards for the hell of it and bump it to 5000. ... PF, she doesn't have a big ace, or a big pair, and with an A-K-10 ... I guess having a plan is good, but having a plan that is planned ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Why do i suck at cash games?
    ... > just wondering I never do well in cash games even no limit--I do much better ... the betting to put pressure on someone for their whole stack (asuming full ... Players like ivey/grinder love this scenario, ... This is the problem I see tourney players come across with all too often. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)