Re: OT: New New Orleans?
- From: "Susan" <sdbratt48@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:55:26 -0500
The city of Mobile AL got it's name because they kept moving it as it got
washed out.
"ChipRider" <ChipRider@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2005083110450016807%ChipRider@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On 2005-08-31 08:17:03 -0600, "art_classmn" <art_classmn@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>
>> I tihk people just accept the fact that every hundred years or so, the
>> place gets completely wiped out.
>
> Hey, we're poker players. We know that although you get Aces once every
> 221 hands on average, sometimes you get them back to back. If they
> rebuild NO it could get wiped out again next year.
>
> There is precedent for moving it -- some whole towns were relocated to
> higher ground after the massive floods in the midwest a few years ago.
> There's a whole lot of difference between moving a town of 1,000 people
> and moving a city the size of NO, though.
>
> I expect them to rebuild it. Emotional attachments will trump logic.
>
>> I have never understood why people live in flood plains. They know the
>> risk and just accept it.
>
> The capacity for the human mind to not think about the bad things that can
> happen is considerable. Why else would anyone continue to live in San
> Francisco or Manhattan?
>
> --
> ChipRider
> Somewhere on the Range
>
.
- References:
- Re: OT: New New Orleans?
- From: art_classmn
- Re: OT: New New Orleans?
- From: ChipRider
- Re: OT: New New Orleans?
- Prev by Date: Re: Bogus argument / Very simple to falsify
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Score One More for the Good Guys with Guns.......
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: New New Orleans?
- Next by thread: Re: OT: New New Orleans?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|