Re: Retraction
- From: "Nick UK" <lottoluck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 20:22:15 GMT
"VooDoo Child (Slight Return)" wrote..
.............................................................
earlier today i stated that rgl is worth saving. i was wrong. it isn't.
*** it.
Sad, but true.
Given time, I for one would certainly have participated in your
'syndicate/pool' thread.
Following the rainy/stormy UK Bank/public holiday at the weekend, I have
been extra busy at work (making up for the stay-at-home fkn holiday :-) and
I did not have the time to engage in your thread: a thread which
(incidentally) could have been a good one. It would have made a nice change
from the constant harassment and incessant ***-dribbling of the resident
Troll.
However (as you well know) it wouldn't have been long before those
3-arseholes-in-one.. Gerry/Sherry/Grif*** trashed your 'syndicate/pool'
thread, thus making it impossible for anyone joining in the discussion, to
stay on topic.
So I ask you the simple question.. what's the point of starting a new
thread in RGL, lottery related or otherwise?
And you're absolutely right: this so-called 'lottery forum' folded a while
back.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Retraction
- From: VooDoo Child \(Slight Return\)
- Re: Retraction
- References:
- Retraction
- From: VooDoo Child \(Slight Return\)
- Retraction
- Prev by Date: Re: Retraction
- Next by Date: Re: Retraction
- Previous by thread: Re: Retraction
- Next by thread: Re: Retraction
- Index(es):