Re: Canada 649
- From: "buddhapest" <pestaroonie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 05:21:12 GMT
"Robert Perkis" <robertp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:461332B4.AA2A7E1D@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<johnph77@xxxxxxxxx>
buddhapest wrote:
"Gerry" <tulalip@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EswQh.17881$PL.8516@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"buddhapest" <pestaroonie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:q9wQh.19184$tD2.14231@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"NoneUr" <NoneUr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%ZuQh.17849$PL.16440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Stig Holmquist" <stigfjorden@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jqg4139gvjoib98pc9rd5nalfb36i0fbk4@xxxxxxxxxx
On 3 Apr 2007 00:27:14 -0700, "John Harriman"
sold.ticketswrote:
On Apr 2, 9:31 pm, "NoneUr" <Non...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You are victim of an illusion.If they sell 14 million random
there is likely to be about 5.15 million combinations not
0.7closeIf they sell 28 million random tickets there is likely to be
to
2 million combinations unsold. With 42 million sold about
itremainmillion
will remain unsold. With 56 million sold about 1/4 million
.
Nobody could buy millions of tickets to cover all possible
combinations. That is why jackpots roll over.
Stig Holmquist
Please let me know the source for your data.
I looked at several likely sources but must have overlooked
jumpavailableas I found no reference to these "facts".Stig is correct. The information for these calculations is
from Ion Saliu on his website.
Shame on you for ruining the day for NoneUr, who was ready to
youugly all over me for using a fake formula.
I did not ask you where you got your formula or even what formula
andused
(we'll get to that later); I ask where you got the data.
Even the most sweeping of statements must be based on hard numbers
mean,facts.
What are your baseline numbers and where did you get them?
I did not get it from
Saliu,whom I'm unable to decipher. I got it from an elementary
textbook on probability theory, which one needs to study before
statistics. My calculations are only an approximation to the
quickwhich must have a standard deviation, a concept foreign to
NoneUr.
An elementary textbook on probability, I see.
Did this textbook tell you what percentage of tickets sold are
duplicates?picks?
Did it specify how many quick pick tickets of those sold are
something fishy about easy picks.
i got 5 easy picks and got the same
mega ball in 3 of them i immediately
went to a different store and got 3 more
easy picks for the same game and had
repeating numbers in those 3 easy picks too.
[sirens in background]
The RGL Lottery Police will get right on that for you
i just can't understand why they
always pick the wrong numbers
every draw
These two lotto articles may help you understand . . .
http://www.comedyclub.co.za/feature/feature85.html
http://www.comedyclub.co.za/feature/feature74.html
Robert Perkis / r.g.l.faq
well it's all crystal clear now
.
- References:
- Canada 649
- From: Rich
- Re: Canada 649
- From: Stig Holmquist
- Re: Canada 649
- From: NoneUr
- Re: Canada 649
- From: John Harriman
- Re: Canada 649
- From: Stig Holmquist
- Re: Canada 649
- From: NoneUr
- Re: Canada 649
- From: buddhapest
- Re: Canada 649
- From: Gerry
- Re: Canada 649
- From: buddhapest
- Re: Canada 649
- From: Robert Perkis
- Canada 649
- Prev by Date: Re: Canada 649
- Next by Date: FAQ * r.g.l.faq * 04/04/2007
- Previous by thread: Re: Canada 649
- Next by thread: Re: Canada 649
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|