Re: Lottery Strategies




RGL Gremlin aka "John Griffin" wrote..

You may use either a mouse or a cursor key to skip those you
don't want to see. Fool.
................................................

You just *gotta* have the last word, eh Gremlin!

You don't seriously believe that anyone here is still actually *reading* the
dreary, tiresome, monotonous, boring fuckin' *** that you continue to
spew out here every single fuckin' day!

You alone have destroyed this Newsgroup with the most repetitive, fuckin'
claptrap ever witnessed in any Usenet forum - and there are many thousands
of 'em!

You happy now? - *** dribbler!

THE GREMLIN HAS SENT MORE THAN 7,000 POSTS TO USENET FORUMS
THIS YEAR ALONE! THE VAST MAJORITY HAVE BEEN POSTED *HERE*.

Hey Gremlin! If you had even a modicum of fuckin' humanity in you at all,
then you would cease posting your never ending drivel, thus giving regular
subscribers here a well earned rest.

BELOW, IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT THE GREMLIN WILL POST TO THIS
FORUM IN JUST *ONE* DAY!

BELOW IS A MERE SAMPLE (AND EXAMPLE) OF WHAT SUBSCRIBERS
TO THIS FORUM ARE HAVING TO PUT UP WITH - ON A *DAILY* BASIS..

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns982A619173091thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Let's have a pool...I reckon I can make you say that more than
two dozen times. What's your guess? (The 20 times you've
already said it count.)

Anyway, that's pretty funny, coming from an airheaded liar whose
immediate reaction to a challenge of her lies was "you have a
little ***," paraphrastically speaking. You obviously have the
pecker on your mind, wishing you could find just one sometime in
your life that could reach in past your belly overhang.

(Guess I need to go into that in depth on Johns next profile
update).

That's a good guess...it's amusing to manipulate you into further
continuation of the lamest raft of puny ad hominem nonsense ever
posted here, and even funnier that you don't realize how lame it
is to revise something like that and repost it. Let's have a
pool here...I say a total of two people read it every time you
regush it--you and your little pimp Jim add up to one and a half,
and we can count Wanker Ricci as another half, because he surely
tries.

Please do repost that as often as possible. Laughing at you is
one of the newsgroup sporting events.

--
Revised 8/24...True stories from rec.gambling.lottery

A sampling of the posting history of giant bimbo Sherry
Davis and her pimp Jim:

Bimbos: "the odds of drawing the object numbered "50", in
6 attempts, are 6/50 or 1 in 12."
Me: "You need to start sitting up straight during your
Remedial Arithmetic class, airheads."

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: "Thats' WRONG! I purchase 2 tickets. One with the
numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second ticket with the numbers
1,2,3,4,5,6. How has this improved my odds?"
Me: "I said 'the only way,' bimbos. I didn't say 'The one and
certain way,' but it was fun making you shriek over and
over that you refuted what I didn't say. HAR DE HAR HAR
Oops..'scuse me..."REFUTED," you shriek; not just refuted."
Bimbos: "LOL John that is such a cheap cop out."
***NOTE: I did not make that up. The bimbos really said it!

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: (Paraphrased without loss or change in content)--
"SQUUUUUAAAAAWWWWK! You have a little ***!"

Bimbos: "The probability of a particular number being drawn in
a 6/50 lottery is 1/50 for the first number drawn, 1/49
for the second number, thus 6/50."
Normal people: "HA HA HA HEE HEE HO HO HO <snicker> nyuk nyuk!"
***Note from yr. 'umble 'istorian: The retards still don't see
why that's funny, but they still try to escape from having
said it, and refuse my charitable offer to explain it to them.

Saving the funniest for last...
Giant Porky Bimbo Sherry: "I'm a mental health councilor."

NEWS FLASH...That is no longer the funniest. This is:
Me: "What is the probability that a particular number will be
drawn in a 6/50 lottery?"
Bimbos: "My exact statement was 6/50*5/49*4/48*3/47*2/46*1/45=
1/15890700"
Further update: The bimbos don't understand that repeating
that exact statement a couple of lines under that exact
question was another demonstration of their illiteracy.
.........................................................

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns982A5F38C48C1thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Obesity Personified, Sherry Davis and her submissive little pimp
Jim" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx> blubbered:

Well, one thing I said, and I see you just couldn't wait to
demonstrate, is that you don't do logic. What a fucking idiot. I
bet you actually did see something about archives there. Maybe
that hints as to why you've been babbling about booze lately.
Seriously, bimbo, enhancing your congenital stupor with an
alcoholic shroud over your little mind is a bad idea. Your
tantrum makes it seem that my wild guess was right on. That's
almost as funny as your clownish babbling.

And just how many times have you posted your little "You have
a little ***" statement?

That was your statement, airhead.

Does the number 56 seem about right?

All numbers seem right to me. What could possibly be wrong with
a number? On the other hand, you sure as hell don't seem
"right."


Anyway, that's pretty funny, coming from an airheaded liar
whose immediate reaction to a challenge of her lies was "you
have a little ***," paraphrastically speaking. You
obviously have the pecker on your mind, wishing you could
find just one sometime in your life that could reach in past
your belly overhang.

LOL, John you are the one who keeps bring it up.

No, scatterbrain, wanker Jack is the one who brings his own up.

Does the number 56 times seem about right?

56 times what, bimbos?


(Guess I need to go into that in depth on Johns next
profile update).

That's a good guess...it's amusing to manipulate you into
further continuation of the lamest raft of puny ad hominem
nonsense ever posted here, and even funnier that you don't
realize how lame it is to revise something like that and
repost it. Let's have a pool here...I say a total of two
people read it every time you regush it--you and your little
pimp Jim add up to one and a half, and we can count Wanker
Ricci as another half, because he surely tries.

Thank you for your permission mommy.
ROFLMAO!!!


Please do repost that as often as possible. Laughing at you
is one of the newsgroup sporting events.

--------
Revised 8/22...

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

At this point, the crapulous bimbos snipped the remainder of the
article that caused that meltdown, and--I am NOT making this
up!--copied and pasted from a two-day-old article! They're mighty
slow learners, but that makes me wonder if perhaps someone was
able to convince them that 6/50 is not "1 in 12."

Here's what you snipped, bimbos...a true history of your comedic
newsgroup embarrassment. By the way, I do feel sorry for you for
doing this stuff to yourselves. I hope little pimp Jim didn't
get hurt in the rampage I slapped you into by laughing at you for
saying 6/50 is "1 in 12," but since you've done it several times
(56?) and continue to do it, it has to be included in this
abbreviated biography.

--
Revised 8/24...True stories from rec.gambling.lottery

A sampling of the posting history of giant bimbo Sherry
Davis and her pimp Jim:

Bimbos: "the odds of drawing the object numbered "50", in
6 attempts, are 6/50 or 1 in 12."
Me: "You need to start sitting up straight during your
Remedial Arithmetic class, airheads."

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: "Thats' WRONG! I purchase 2 tickets. One with the
numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second ticket with the numbers
1,2,3,4,5,6. How has this improved my odds?"
Me: "I said 'the only way,' bimbos. I didn't say 'The one and
certain way,' but it was fun making you shriek over and
over that you refuted what I didn't say. HAR DE HAR HAR
Oops..'scuse me..."REFUTED," you shriek; not just refuted."
Bimbos: "LOL John that is such a cheap cop out."
***NOTE: I did not make that up. The bimbos really said it!

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: (Paraphrased without loss or change in content)--
"SQUUUUUAAAAAWWWWK! You have a little ***!"

Bimbos: "The probability of a particular number being drawn in
a 6/50 lottery is 1/50 for the first number drawn, 1/49
for the second number, thus 6/50."
Normal people: "HA HA HA HEE HEE HO HO HO <snicker> nyuk nyuk!"
***Note from yr. 'umble 'istorian: The retards still don't see
why that's funny, but they still try to escape from having
said it, and refuse my charitable offer to explain it to them.

Saving the funniest for last...
Giant Porky Bimbo Sherry: "I'm a mental health councilor."

NEWS FLASH...That is no longer the funniest. This is:
Me: "What is the probability that a particular number will be
drawn in a 6/50 lottery?"
Bimbos: "My exact statement was 6/50*5/49*4/48*3/47*2/46*1/45=
1/15890700"
Further update: The bimbos don't understand that repeating
that exact statement a couple of lines under that exact
question was another demonstration of their illiteracy.

.............................................................................
"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
"Ignorant wanker Jack Ricci" <ricci@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

...The answer is 3...

You guessed one of the digits! Holy ***!

You had a one-in-ten chance...That's about the same chance
you'd have on a true-or-false question if you stopped to try
to think about it.

Love,
Jack


P.S. Now go get a fucking job, Griffin.

I had enough jobs.

Jack, that's true.
He bounced from job to job (lots of times) until he managed to
get on welfare.
(I will go into this a bit more in Johns profile)

<snicker> The giant fat broad's superpetulance is showing again.

Neither you nor I nor your pimp Jim was ever a "mental health
councilor." Stupid jealous airheads.

By the way, since I'm appending a sampling of the history of your
newsgroup activity to this, it will be your turn to show, even
more emphatically, that you two are the lamest of the lame, so
please do reply with another posting of the weakest raft of ad
hominem gobble ever posted here (your scatterbrained "profile"
<snicker>).

--
Revised 8/24...True stories from rec.gambling.lottery

A sampling of the posting history of giant bimbo Sherry
Davis and her pimp Jim:

Bimbos: "the odds of drawing the object numbered "50", in
6 attempts, are 6/50 or 1 in 12."
Me: "You need to start sitting up straight during your
Remedial Arithmetic class, airheads."

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: "Thats' WRONG! I purchase 2 tickets. One with the
numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second ticket with the numbers
1,2,3,4,5,6. How has this improved my odds?"
Me: "I said 'the only way,' bimbos. I didn't say 'The one and
certain way,' but it was fun making you shriek over and
over that you refuted what I didn't say. HAR DE HAR HAR
Oops..'scuse me..."REFUTED," you shriek; not just refuted."
Bimbos: "LOL John that is such a cheap cop out."
***NOTE: I did not make that up. The bimbos really said it!

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: (Paraphrased without loss or change in content)--
"SQUUUUUAAAAAWWWWK! You have a little ***!"

Bimbos: "The probability of a particular number being drawn in
a 6/50 lottery is 1/50 for the first number drawn, 1/49
for the second number, thus 6/50."
Normal people: "HA HA HA HEE HEE HO HO HO <snicker> nyuk nyuk!"
***Note from yr. 'umble 'istorian: The retards still don't see
why that's funny, but they still try to escape from having
said it, and refuse my charitable offer to explain it to them.

Saving the funniest for last...
Giant Porky Bimbo Sherry: "I'm a mental health councilor."

NEWS FLASH...That is no longer the funniest. This is:
Me: "What is the probability that a particular number will be
drawn in a 6/50 lottery?"
Bimbos: "My exact statement was 6/50*5/49*4/48*3/47*2/46*1/45=
1/15890700"
Further update: The bimbos don't understand that repeating
that exact statement a couple of lines under that exact
question was another demonstration of their illiteracy.

.............................................................................
"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns982A623EE14E5thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Porky bimbo Sherry Davis and mousy bimbo Jim"
<NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
"Jealous airhead Sherry Davis and her pimp Jim"
<NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
"Ignorant wanker Jack Ricci" <ricci@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

...The answer is 3...

You guessed one of the digits! Holy ***!

You had a one-in-ten chance...That's about the same chance
you'd have on a true-or-false question if you stopped to
try to think about it.

Love,
Jack


P.S. Now go get a fucking job, Griffin.

I had enough jobs.

Jack, that's true.
He bounced from job to job (lots of times) until he managed
to get on welfare.
(I will go into this a bit more in Johns profile)

<snicker> The giant fat broad's superpetulance is showing
again.

Neither you nor I nor your pimp Jim was ever a "mental health
councilor." Stupid jealous airheads.

By the way, since I'm appending a sampling of the history of
your newsgroup activity to this, it will be your turn to
show, even more emphatically, that you two are the lamest of
the lame, so please do reply with another posting of the
weakest raft of ad hominem gobble ever posted here (your
scatterbrained "profile" <snicker>).

Incredibly (well, it would be incredible for the next-to-most
retarded newsgroup poster but typical of these lamers), the
bimbos snipped the remainder of the article they pretended to
answer, and copied and pasted something from a two-day-old
article. BWAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHA!

I'll have to admit that I'm surprised that the bimbos seem to
have been able to see the hilarity in the new item at the top of
their history. The most likely explanation here is that their
social services caseworkers made them repeat "6/50 is not 1 in
12" 1000 times, or found some other way of slapping them into
accepting it against their "better judgement."

--
Revised 8/24...True stories from rec.gambling.lottery

A sampling of the posting history of giant bimbo Sherry
Davis and her pimp Jim:

Bimbos: "the odds of drawing the object numbered "50", in
6 attempts, are 6/50 or 1 in 12."
Me: "You need to start sitting up straight during your
Remedial Arithmetic class, airheads."

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: "Thats' WRONG! I purchase 2 tickets. One with the
numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second ticket with the numbers
1,2,3,4,5,6. How has this improved my odds?"
Me: "I said 'the only way,' bimbos. I didn't say 'The one and
certain way,' but it was fun making you shriek over and
over that you refuted what I didn't say. HAR DE HAR HAR
Oops..'scuse me..."REFUTED," you shriek; not just refuted."
Bimbos: "LOL John that is such a cheap cop out."
***NOTE: I did not make that up. The bimbos really said it!

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: (Paraphrased without loss or change in content)--
"SQUUUUUAAAAAWWWWK! You have a little ***!"

Bimbos: "The probability of a particular number being drawn in
a 6/50 lottery is 1/50 for the first number drawn, 1/49
for the second number, thus 6/50."
Normal people: "HA HA HA HEE HEE HO HO HO <snicker> nyuk nyuk!"
***Note from yr. 'umble 'istorian: The retards still don't see
why that's funny, but they still try to escape from having
said it, and refuse my charitable offer to explain it to them.

Saving the funniest for last...
Giant Porky Bimbo Sherry: "I'm a mental health councilor."

NEWS FLASH...That is no longer the funniest. This is:
Me: "What is the probability that a particular number will be
drawn in a 6/50 lottery?"
Bimbos: "My exact statement was 6/50*5/49*4/48*3/47*2/46*1/45=
1/15890700"
Further update: The bimbos don't understand that repeating
that exact statement a couple of lines under that exact
question was another demonstration of their illiteracy.

................................................................

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9829725D17B1Bthathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Large Bimbo Sherry Davis and Little Pimp Jim"
<NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
Robert Perkis <robertp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


<compendious>

Very Large Bimbo Sherry said "There's no *** in cranberry."

The kid said "Now you got it."

Fat Sherry still doesn't know what that kid meant. She asks
her tweaky little chump friend Jim every day. He says "Don't
ask me about cranberries. Ask me about trying to move these
sticklike legs fast enough to avoid being flattened like
roadkill when you're having one of your fits."

Actually John that was not a half bad joke, too bad it took
you two days to look it up plus

I never eat cranberry ice
cream.

It was a joke, doofus.

I should have said smegma instead of cranberry.

--
Revised 8/24...True stories from rec.gambling.lottery

A sampling of the posting history of giant bimbo Sherry
Davis and her pimp Jim:

Bimbos: "the odds of drawing the object numbered "50", in
6 attempts, are 6/50 or 1 in 12."
Me: "You need to start sitting up straight during your
Remedial Arithmetic class, airheads."

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: "Thats' WRONG! I purchase 2 tickets. One with the
numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second ticket with the numbers
1,2,3,4,5,6. How has this improved my odds?"
Me: "I said 'the only way,' bimbos. I didn't say 'The one and
certain way,' but it was fun making you shriek over and
over that you refuted what I didn't say. HAR DE HAR HAR
Oops..'scuse me..."REFUTED," you shriek; not just refuted."
Bimbos: "LOL John that is such a cheap cop out."
***NOTE: I did not make that up. The bimbos really said it!

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: (Paraphrased without loss or change in content)--
"SQUUUUUAAAAAWWWWK! You have a little ***!"

Bimbos: "The probability of a particular number being drawn in
a 6/50 lottery is 1/50 for the first number drawn, 1/49
for the second number, thus 6/50."
Normal people: "HA HA HA HEE HEE HO HO HO <snicker> nyuk nyuk!"
***Note from yr. 'umble 'istorian: The retards still don't see
why that's funny, but they still try to escape from having
said it, and refuse my charitable offer to explain it to them.


Saving the funniest for last...
Giant Porky Bimbo Sherry: "I'm a mental health councilor."

NEWS FLASH...That is no longer the funniest. This is:
Me: "What is the probability that a particular number will be
drawn in a 6/50 lottery?"
Bimbos: "My exact statement was 6/50*5/49*4/48*3/47*2/46*1/45=
1/15890700"
Further update: The bimbos don't understand that repeating
that exact statement a couple of lines under that exact
question was another demonstration of their illiteracy.

...................................................................................

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns982A610647243thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Bulky bimbo Sherry Davis and her passive pimp Jim" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx>
squealed:

***Don't panic, featherbrains...your weak reply is still here, hidden in
the logical place. I hope you can find it.

Let me know when you want me to teach you about the standard practice
called interlineation. Meanwhile, practice moving a cursor around. Work
on it with mouse movements (No, I don't mean mouse***) for a couple of
hours today, and then tomorrow you can graduate to cursor keys.

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
"Large Bimbo Sherry Davis and Little Pimp Jim"
<NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
Robert Perkis <robertp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


<compendious>

Very Large Bimbo Sherry said "There's no *** in
cranberry."

The kid said "Now you got it."

Fat Sherry still doesn't know what that kid meant. She
asks her tweaky little chump friend Jim every day. He says
"Don't ask me about cranberries. Ask me about trying to
move these sticklike legs fast enough to avoid being
flattened like roadkill when you're having one of your
fits."

Actually John that was not a half bad joke, too bad it took
you two days to look it up plus

I never eat cranberry ice
cream.

It was a joke, doofus.

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!
Sure doesn't take much to set the troll off now days.

Really, scatterbrained bimbos, it was a joke. I'm not kidding.

I should have said smegma instead of cranberry.

When that set the giant bimbo and her little pimp off into constrained
laughter, they were so overwrought that they forgot to alter any quotes.
Here's the history of their newsgroup misadventure so far, strangely
unaltered from the post they tried to reply to:

--
Revised 8/24...True stories from rec.gambling.lottery

A sampling of the posting history of giant bimbo Sherry
Davis and her pimp Jim:

Bimbos: "the odds of drawing the object numbered "50", in
6 attempts, are 6/50 or 1 in 12."
Me: "You need to start sitting up straight during your
Remedial Arithmetic class, airheads."

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: "Thats' WRONG! I purchase 2 tickets. One with the
numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second ticket with the
numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6. How has this improved my odds?"
Me: "I said 'the only way,' bimbos. I didn't say 'The one and
certain way,' but it was fun making you shriek over and
over that you refuted what I didn't say. HAR DE HAR HAR
Oops..'scuse me..."REFUTED," you shriek; not just
refuted."
Bimbos: "LOL John that is such a cheap cop out."
***NOTE: I did not make that up. The bimbos really said
it!

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: (Paraphrased without loss or change in content)--
"SQUUUUUAAAAAWWWWK! You have a little ***!"

Bimbos: "The probability of a particular number being drawn
in
a 6/50 lottery is 1/50 for the first number drawn,
1/49 for the second number, thus 6/50."
Normal people: "HA HA HA HEE HEE HO HO HO <snicker> nyuk
nyuk!" ***Note from yr. 'umble 'istorian: The retards still
don't see
why that's funny, but they still try to escape from having
said it, and refuse my charitable offer to explain it to
them.


Saving the funniest for last...
Giant Porky Bimbo Sherry: "I'm a mental health councilor."

NEWS FLASH...That is no longer the funniest. This is:
Me: "What is the probability that a particular number will be
drawn in a 6/50 lottery?"
Bimbos: "My exact statement was
6/50*5/49*4/48*3/47*2/46*1/45=
1/15890700"
Further update: The bimbos don't understand that repeating
that exact statement a couple of lines under that exact
question was another demonstration of their illiteracy.
................................................................

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9829743208D58thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Porky Sherry Davis and her tweaky little pimp Jim" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx>
sputtered:

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
"Mercurial fat bimbo Sherry Davis and her piteous little
toothless lapdog Jim" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx> blew their fuckin'
tops and shrieked:

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote

"Giant, superpetulant bimbo Sherry Davis and her tweaky
little mental peon Jim" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"John Griffin" <thatPSYCHObilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote

Replied to his alter ego
"Gerry" <THETURNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Still talking to yourself John???

<snicker>

The bimbo had to snip my observation that she has no idea
what was wrong in Robert's article, but she couldn't stop
her idiotic self from recycling her astonishingly clueless
fixation in another tantrum.

Who cares?

You care one hell of a lot, as emphatically demonstrated by
your frantic and hilariously futile attempts to REFUTE some
conceptually identical facts that I've posted. You're
feeling the humiliation of having no fucking clue about any
of the fundamental facts about lotteries.

LOL, JOHNS GOING OFF THE DEEP END!!!!
Sorry John, my job is "troll and toadie basher".
It's a dirty job but someone has to do it.
(plus I find it great sport)

<snickering all the way through>: Why did you bother to quote what I said?
It certainly didn't directly stimulate such a recycling of one of your
laughable little airheaded ad hominem non sequiturs. It looks as though
virtually any stimulus causes you to reeruct a random selection from your
practiced but amazingly lame cant.

However, I do wish you had tried to REFUCKINGFUTE what I said. That would
have been even more amusing.

Unlike you, many are not here to nit-pick humorous postings
to death.

Translation: You have no idea what is the correct number and
you'd have to be damn near infinitely brighter than the two
of you bimbos put together in order for you to figure it out
for yourselves. I'll give you one more hint before I explain
it...it was a huge error, not a nit, even though it was
undoubtedly just carelessness. Robert and everyone except
you two pathetically dumb featherbrains and wanker Ricci will
immediately see it, or already have. One of the funny parts
is that if you could happen to understand the explanation, it
would enable you to see what's funny as hell about one of
your other humiliations (see below).

It's too bad you aren't good at playing the weasel role,
bimbos. Between the two of you pathetic losers, you should be
able to find at least one talent other than being the object
of the most appropriate ridicule ever seen here and lying.

John, I could care less if there is an error in Roberts post.

Yes, I know. You could care a hell of a lot less.

The first reason you care so much is that you wish you had been able to
see the glaringly obvious fact that he misspoke. The other reason you
care is that you and your pimp Jim together can't understand how to derive
the correct number--even though I outlined three simple methods. You're
still wondering how it applies to one of your other laughably stupid
episodes. Hint: It's identical. Only the numbers and the flavors (ball
vs. cranberry) have changed.

I probably would not have even read it had it not contained
the magic words "ice cream" (you know how us fat bimbos love
our ice cream). I am currently preoccupied with the theory of
"Any toadie is as likely to pop out of a trolls ass as any
other toadie (provided that they are flipping a fair coin, in
a vacuum, on mars)

It's amzing the you remain obsessed (euphemistically, "preoccupied") with
something lamer than Christopher Reeve after you've regurgitated it enough
times that anyone with the average moron's intelligence would have moved
on through a dozen different preoccupations by now.



--
--
Revised 8/22...
A brief history of Blimpy & Wimpy (Big Sherry and Li'l Jim)

Starting with the REFUTATION of something that wasn't said...
Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: "Thats' WRONG! I purchase 2 tickets. One with the
numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second ticket with the
numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6. How has this improved my odds?"
Me: "I said 'the only way,' bimbos. I didn't say 'The one and
certain way,' but it was fun making you shriek over and
over that you refuted what I didn't say. HAR DE HAR HAR
Oops..'scuse me..."REFUTED," you shriek; not just
refuted."

LOL John that is such a cheap cop out.

<snicker> Did you want to argue against it? It's 100.0000% factual, you
know. Well, maybe you're too fucking stupid to know, but you'll be the
only one. You can find "only" in that dictionary you mentioned.

Like I said, you sure REFUTED the *** out of what I didn't say. <heh heh
heh> Stupid bimbos.

Did it really take you two days to come up with that?

Did I say it took two days to come up with that? It was obvious for days
while you continued to humiliate yoursleves by REFUTING the *** out of
what you, due to your industrial-strength illiteracy, thought I said. I
mentioned days ago the fact that I didn't say what you've been shrieking
that you REFUTED.

I wondered what you were doing yesterday, aside from spamming
the newsgroup with your "Gerry" posts.

I'm sure you wondered what I was doing yesterday. Your obsession has been
blatantly obvious since your initial "you have a little ***" fulmination
when I merely pointed out the fact that you're a liar and a bimbo.

Just fess up that you cut and pasted someone's else's
statement incorrectly and let it go.

Hilarious. Your superpetulance is driving you again, featherbrain.

Changing tactics at this late date will not do anything except
show everyone how desperate you are.

Tactics, my ass. Humiliating you has always been the order of the day,
and even though you're the expert at that, I'll just continue as I've been
doing since the day you posted the mendacious advertisement for your sorry
software.


Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: (Paraphrased without loss or change in content)--
"SQUUUUUAAAAAWWWWK! You have a little ***!"

John, I asked you to find where I made this statement but,
because you appear too ignorant to do a simple text search, I
went ahead and did it for you.
A text search of this statement by me, on Google, shows 0
returns.

No ***? Maybe I shouldn't have paraphrased it, but I don't remember
exactly how you expressed it. (I know you expressed it superpetulantly
and airheadedly; I just don't remember the exact wording.) Anyway, anyone
who cares would have already found it by revisiting your first eruption
here.

It first cropped up in one of your posts.
Which reminds me, just how small is it that you are this
overly fixated on it?

Average human size, I suppose...certainly not big enough to reach past
your fat rolls.

Bimbos: "The probability of a particular number being drawn
in
a 6/50 lottery is 1/50 for the first number drawn,
1/49 for the second number, thus 6/50."
Normal people: "HA HA HA HEE HEE HO HO HO <snicker> nyuk
nyuk!" ***Note from yr. 'umble 'istorian: The retards still
don't see
why that's funny, but they still try to escape from having
said it, and refuse my charitable offer to explain it to
them.

For a person (thing) that is suppose to be so savvy about
newsreaders you are one dumb example. I even pointed to the
thread, the date, the time and you still cannot get it right.

You referenced a totally different discussion and a different question,
stupid bimbos, but yes; that evasion did pop up right here before my eyes
through this newsreader. The irrelevant thread you referenced had expired
here, so the newsreader has nothing to do with your stupid yammering.

Again, since you appear too ignorant of using a newsreader,
here it is. "the odds of drawing the object numbered "50", in
6 attempts, are 6/50 or 1 in 12."

I'm so goddamned glad you reminded me of that hilariously stupid remark.
You aped the 6/50 from someone else's post, but whoever it was, I will
fucking guarantee you, was not stupid enough to say 6/50 is "1 in 12."
You need to start sitting up straight and paying attention in your
Remedial Arithmetic class, featherbrains.

I bet you think the probability of 49 coming up in those six is 6/49--
after all, I know from one of your earlier self-humiliations, that you
think the probability of 50 coming up second is 1/49.

The fact remains that you have no idea how that 6/50 is derived, and the
fact remains that that's the question you're trying to evade here. Your
laughable attempt to do so did in fact lead you to say exactly what I
attribute to you in your biography.

It's funny that you still don't know how to do that after I showed you
three different methods yesterday. <snicker> It's even funnier that you
don't know that's what I did, even after you assiduously pored over it
hoping to find one of those solecisms you're always yapping about without
ever identifying one. (Yes, in case you were asking, I know you tried
twice. No more laughable failures at that sort of thing have ever been
seen here.)

Saving the funniest for last...
Giant Porky Bimbo Sherry: "I'm a mental health councilor."

John, I asked you to find where I made this statement but,
because you appear too ignorant to do a simple text search, I
went ahead and did it for you.
LOL, even though you changed up what you have been previously
posting, again, a text search of this statement by me, on
Google, shows 0 returns.

It's too bad you're incapable of using that search thing effectively after
so many times you've babbled about it and after literally days of
obsessing over my past posts. If you can find it, go ahead and post the
exact wording you used, bimbo.

It's as likely that you used to be a 'mental health councilor' as that I
used to be Jesus H. Fuckin' Christ, but you sure as hell did make that
hilariously dumb remark.


NEWS FLASH...That is no longer the funniest. This is:
Me: "What is the probability that a particular number will be
drawn in a 6/50 lottery?"
Bimbos: "My exact statement was
6/50*5/49*4/48*3/47*2/46*1/45=
1/15890700"
Further update: The bimbos don't understand that repeating
that exact statement a couple of lines under that exact
question was another demonstration of their illiteracy.


NEWS FLASH... The above is now the most repeated dumb
statement made by John.
He has cut and pasted one question and then cut and pasted the
reply to a totally different question
Here is the whole of my replies to two totally different
questions:

Whole, my whole ass. You posted exactly what I said above.

"the odds of drawing the object numbered "50", in 6 attempts,
are 6/50 or 1 in 12."

Every time you repeat that, you remind anyone who reads this *** of your
world-class innumeracy, which sometimes appears even more profound that
your spectacular illiteracy. There are five-year-olds who would laugh at
such abysmally poor arithmetic "skills," airheads.

and

"the odds of pulling a pre-selected set of 6 objects from a
pool of 50 objects would be; 6/50 × 5/49 × 4/48 × 3/47 × 2/46
× 1/45 = 720/11,441,304,000"

Yes, you said that--in answer to "what is the probability that a
particular number will be drawn in a 6/50 lottery?" The only reason for
you to try to refute this fact is that you're beginning to see that it's
another example of your illiteracy. It's a fire you can't put out even by
emptying your five gallon bladder on it, blimp.

Retarded trolls don't understand that repeating the same lies
and misquotes over and over again is another demonstration of
their stupidity.

That sure looks like an excuse for some of your idiocy, since it doesn't
relate to any others among all participants in this newsgroup.

PS
This is Johns "new and improved" line of attack so we will be
seeing it over and over again for the next couple of weeks.

PPS
I am young and healthy.
You are old and sickly.
Who's going to get the last post?
(and that is how you tell who won the debate, isn't it John)
BWAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

Why do you hate yourself so much that you're compelled to do that *** to
yourselves, stupid bimbos? I know you can only originate a new schtick
at intervals of several weeks, but why not get some little kids to make up
some better material for you? Just make sure they're five years of age or
more to assure that they're ahead of you.

PPPS
http://www.accs.net/users/kriel/chapter%20three/roadrunner.jpg
BLEEP-BLEEP

--
Revised 8/24...True stories from rec.gambling.lottery

A sampling of the posting history of giant bimbo Sherry
Davis and her pimp Jim:

Bimbos: "the odds of drawing the object numbered "50", in
6 attempts, are 6/50 or 1 in 12."
Me: "You need to start sitting up straight during your
Remedial Arithmetic class, airheads."

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: "Thats' WRONG! I purchase 2 tickets. One with the
numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second ticket with the numbers
1,2,3,4,5,6. How has this improved my odds?"
Me: "I said 'the only way,' bimbos. I didn't say 'The one and
certain way,' but it was fun making you shriek over and
over that you refuted what I didn't say. HAR DE HAR HAR
Oops..'scuse me..."REFUTED," you shriek; not just refuted."
Bimbos: "LOL John that is such a cheap cop out."
***NOTE: I did not make that up. The bimbos really said it!

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: (Paraphrased without loss or change in content)--
"SQUUUUUAAAAAWWWWK! You have a little ***!"

Bimbos: "The probability of a particular number being drawn in
a 6/50 lottery is 1/50 for the first number drawn, 1/49
for the second number, thus 6/50."
Normal people: "HA HA HA HEE HEE HO HO HO <snicker> nyuk nyuk!"
***Note from yr. 'umble 'istorian: The retards still don't see
why that's funny, but they still try to escape from having
said it, and refuse my charitable offer to explain it to them.

Saving the funniest for last...
Giant Porky Bimbo Sherry: "I'm a mental health councilor."

NEWS FLASH...That is no longer the funniest. This is:
Me: "What is the probability that a particular number will be
drawn in a 6/50 lottery?"
Bimbos: "My exact statement was 6/50*5/49*4/48*3/47*2/46*1/45=
1/15890700"
Further update: The bimbos don't understand that repeating
that exact statement a couple of lines under that exact
question was another demonstration of their illiteracy.

...........................................................................


"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns982A619173091thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Walrus-sized Sherry Davis and shrew-sized Jim" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"John Griffin" <thatPSYCHObilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote

However, I do wish you had tried to REFUCKINGFUTE what I
said. That would have been even more amusing.

Please list any item I have failed to "REF*CKINGFUTE".

In an earlier article, you were whining about the dozen or so that I use
as
a sig sometimes. For a complete list, just do your usual daily hours of
poring over the archives wishing you could actually refute something...or
even directly address it.

Else wise, please retire to the corner (Please feel free to
allow the voices in your head to talk amongst themselves)

John, I could care less if there is an error in Roberts
post.
Yes, I know. You could care a hell of a lot less.

Say huh??

You said you could care less. I agreed. Only illiterate airheads like
you
two culls could fail to follow that.

It's amzing the you remain obsessed (euphemistically,
"preoccupied") with something lamer than Christopher Reeve
after you've regurgitated it enough times that anyone with
the average moron's intelligence would have moved on through
a dozen different preoccupations by now.

Sorry John but as long as you keep making moronic statements I
will keep pointing out your stupidity.

<snicker> You will keep on making the same unsupportable idiotic
assertions,
stupid fat broad, carefully avoiding trying to support them. Don't take
this as criticism; I know it's the "best" you can do and I know you can't
stop yourselves because of your obsessive-compulsive pathology.

<snicker> Did you want to argue against it? It's 100.0000%
factual, you know. Well, maybe you're too fucking stupid to
know, but you'll be the only one. You can find "only" in
that dictionary you mentioned.

Like I said, you sure REFUTED the *** out of what I didn't
say. <heh heh heh> Stupid bimbos.

Like I said, it's a cheap cop out.

Hilarious. You sure as hell spent a lot of time REFUTING what you, due to
your terminal illiteracy, thought I said. That's the fuckin' fact here.

If you would like I will do a search where you said something
to the effect of 'buying any two tickets'.

Who cares? Are you actually stupid enough to think that or anythig else
would change the fact that I didn't say that buying another ticket is
guaranteed to improve your chances?! Hint: The answer to any "are you
stupid enough" question put to you is yes.

I'm sure you wondered what I was doing yesterday. Your
obsession has been blatantly obvious since your initial "you
have a little ***" fulmination when I merely pointed out the
fact that you're a liar and a bimbo.

John I really was concerned. I feared that your shriveled up
old heart had finally landed you face down on a slab. If that
happens who can I bash? If you stroke out the loss in
entertainment value would be saddening.

uhoh...superpetulance makes the bimbos wish so fervently that they knew
something about me other than what I've said about myself (nothing), that
they can't stave off the delusional wishes or control their mindless hate.
That's funny as hell, because they sure as hell can stave off every clue
that happens to get near them.

Honestly John, I am getting bored with you repeating the same
garbage over and over and over.
LOL in the last month you have already been through your 12+
years of psychotic babbling and have started repeating the
same trash you posted weeks ago.

I reckon you'd like to demonstrate one little teeny bit of veracity in
that,
featherbrains. Every time you repeat a version of that desperate snivel,
it's worth a few chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>
<chuckle>

If you do not get some fresh material I will have to demote
you and start using a bot on you. Surly you have something
else you can pawn for more booze and pills that will hold you
over until next months welfare check comes in.

By the way, your continued claim that 6/50=1/12 is hilariously stupid.

--
Revised 8/24...True stories from rec.gambling.lottery

A sampling of the posting history of giant bimbo Sherry
Davis and her pimp Jim:

Bimbos: "the odds of drawing the object numbered "50", in
6 attempts, are 6/50 or 1 in 12."
Me: "You need to start sitting up straight during your
Remedial Arithmetic class, airheads."

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: "Thats' WRONG! I purchase 2 tickets. One with the
numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second ticket with the numbers
1,2,3,4,5,6. How has this improved my odds?"
Me: "I said 'the only way,' bimbos. I didn't say 'The one and
certain way,' but it was fun making you shriek over and
over that you refuted what I didn't say. HAR DE HAR HAR
Oops..'scuse me..."REFUTED," you shriek; not just refuted."
Bimbos: "LOL John that is such a cheap cop out."
***NOTE: I did not make that up. The bimbos really said it!

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: (Paraphrased without loss or change in content)--
"SQUUUUUAAAAAWWWWK! You have a little ***!"

Bimbos: "The probability of a particular number being drawn in
a 6/50 lottery is 1/50 for the first number drawn, 1/49
for the second number, thus 6/50."
Normal people: "HA HA HA HEE HEE HO HO HO <snicker> nyuk nyuk!"
***Note from yr. 'umble 'istorian: The retards still don't see
why that's funny, but they still try to escape from having
said it, and refuse my charitable offer to explain it to them.

Saving the funniest for last...
Giant Porky Bimbo Sherry: "I'm a mental health councilor."

NEWS FLASH...That is no longer the funniest. This is:
Me: "What is the probability that a particular number will be
drawn in a 6/50 lottery?"
Bimbos: "My exact statement was 6/50*5/49*4/48*3/47*2/46*1/45=
1/15890700"
Further update: The bimbos don't understand that repeating
that exact statement a couple of lines under that exact
question was another demonstration of their illiteracy.

................................................................................

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns982976898702Bthathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
nigel <useweb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Using Excel

permut(31,3)=26970
combin(31,3)=4995

Using arithmetic: 31!/3!(28!)=4495
WTF?


Evil Nigel

John Griffin wrote:

Robert Perkis <robertp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Take the kids to Baskin-Robbins ice cream. There are 31
different flavors of ice cream. The number of possible
triple-scoop cones without any repetition of flavors is
therefore 31x30x29=26,970; any of the thirty-one flavors
can be on top, any of the remaining thirty in the middle,
and any of the remaining twenty-nine on the bottom. If
we're not interested in how the flavors are arranged on
the cone but merely how many unique three flavored cones
are possible, we divide 26,970 by 6 to get 4,495 cones.
The reason we divide by 6 is that there are 6=3x2x1
different ways to arrange the three flavors like boxing
three digits for Pick-3. ABC, ACB, BCA, BAC, CAB, CBA.

The odds of getting a particular flavor randomly would
be 1 in 4,495.


It seems that you got distracted and stuck the wrong number
in there...

There are that many sets of three in 31, but each flavor
occurs in C(30,2)=435 of them, so the probability of getting
a particular flavor on a three-scooper is 435/4495.

Choose a flavor and ask for three randomly selected scoops...

At the moment you place that order, the chance that your
flavor will be selected first is 1/31. The chance that it
will be selected second is 1/31. The chance that it will be
selected third is 1/31. So, since a flavor can occur only
once in this forthcoming "drawing," the chance that you'll
get that flavor once in three scoops is 1/31+1/31+1/31=3/31.

Check: 435/4495=3/31

Since we have a couple of retardates here, there might be
some doubt about the 1/31+1/31+1/31. They have "reasoned"
that after the drawing has started, (or here, after the first
flavor has been selected), there are only 30 left to choose
from, so the probability of the selected flavor appearing
second has changed to 1/30. (dumb bimbos) The actual
probability is (30/31)*(1/30) (the chance that yours wasn't
selected first, times the chance it will be selected second);
that's 1/31. The third probability is
(30/31)*(29/30)*(1/29)=1/31. Same result again, 3/31.

If that doesn't explain it to the slower folks, there's
another way...(1-(30/31)*(29/30)*(28/29)) =1-28/31 =3/31.

You knew all that...


One would have to eat all 4,495 combinations to try every
flavor combination, it's less fattening to play lotto.



One day Giant Porky Sherry lumbered into Baskin-Robbins and
bellowed "Give me a gallon of cranberry ice cream."

The kid behind the counter said "Sorry, we're out of
cranberry."

Sherry said "You have a little ***," and left in a
gale-force huff.

Five minutes later, bimbo Sherry was back. She said "Give me
half a gallon of cranberry ice cream."

The kid said "I told you before, we're out of cranberry."

Sherry let out a long, loud, contrabass moo and left.

Five minutes later, the fat slob came back and said "Give me
a fucking cranberry ice cream cone, you moron."

The kid said "Lady, how do you spell the 'van' in 'vanilla'?"

She swung at him and missed, and said "Who fucking cares?
It's 'v a n,' amazingly getting it right.

The kid said "Okay, good work for such an idiot. Now, how do
you spell the 'straw' in 'strawberry.'?"

Somehow, fatso got it right. "S t r a w," she blared.

The kid said "Attaboy, monster. Final question...how do you
spell the '***' in 'cranberry'?"

Very Large Bimbo Sherry said "There's no *** in cranberry."

The kid said "Now you got it."

Fat Sherry still doesn't know what that kid meant. She asks
her tweaky little chump friend Jim every day. He says "Don't
ask me about cranberries. Ask me about trying to move these
sticklike legs fast enough to avoid being flattened like
roadkill when you're having one of your fits."


................................................................................

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns982A62B6F6DE0thathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Scatterbrained bimbo Sherry Davis and her servile little pimp Jim"
<NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx> gushed:

[ previously-dismissed idiotic ad hominem gibbering ]

Lame and "newbyesque," for sure, but far less insalubrious than your
fascinatingly sad attempts to discuss anything related to lottery.

For a good laugh, imagine how these idiots would shriek if one of the
normal people spoofed their common practice of following up several
articles with not a word related to the topic but just some comments about
them. I know it isn't fair, in that such comments would be "unfairly"
based on actual observations whereas theirs are borne of nothing but
jealousy, resentment and the voices in their heads, but you can be sure
they'd freak out. They're never more than one tiny step away from a total
freakout anyway.

Bimbos, are you ready to admit that 6/50 is not "1 in 12"? Are you ready
to admit that 6/50 is not 1/50+1/49+1/48+1/47+1/46+1/45? Are you ready to
beg for an explanation of why the 1/50 is the only correct term in your
sum there? Do you realize how funny it is that I explained three ways to
derive that 6/50 and you not only failed to understand it but failed to
even recognize it in a virtually identical setting? Normal people do, you
know.

--
Revised 8/24...True stories from rec.gambling.lottery

A sampling of the posting history of giant bimbo Sherry
Davis and her pimp Jim:

Bimbos: "the odds of drawing the object numbered "50", in
6 attempts, are 6/50 or 1 in 12."
Me: "You need to start sitting up straight during your
Remedial Arithmetic class, airheads."

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: "Thats' WRONG! I purchase 2 tickets. One with the
numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second ticket with the numbers
1,2,3,4,5,6. How has this improved my odds?"
Me: "I said 'the only way,' bimbos. I didn't say 'The one and
certain way,' but it was fun making you shriek over and
over that you refuted what I didn't say. HAR DE HAR HAR
Oops..'scuse me..."REFUTED," you shriek; not just refuted."
Bimbos: "LOL John that is such a cheap cop out."
***NOTE: I did not make that up. The bimbos really said it!

Me: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: (Paraphrased without loss or change in content)--
"SQUUUUUAAAAAWWWWK! You have a little ***!"

Bimbos: "The probability of a particular number being drawn in
a 6/50 lottery is 1/50 for the first number drawn, 1/49
for the second number, thus 6/50."
Normal people: "HA HA HA HEE HEE HO HO HO <snicker> nyuk nyuk!"
***Note from yr. 'umble 'istorian: The retards still don't see
why that's funny, but they still try to escape from having
said it, and refuse my charitable offer to explain it to them.

Saving the funniest for last...
Giant Porky Bimbo Sherry: "I'm a mental health councilor."

NEWS FLASH...That is no longer the funniest. This is:
Me: "What is the probability that a particular number will be
drawn in a 6/50 lottery?"
Bimbos: "My exact statement was 6/50*5/49*4/48*3/47*2/46*1/45=
1/15890700"
Further update: The bimbos don't understand that repeating
that exact statement a couple of lines under that exact
question was another demonstration of their illiteracy.

.............................................................................

Repeat..

THE GREMLIN HAS SENT MORE THAN 7,000 POSTS TO USENET FORUMS
THIS YEAR ALONE! THE VAST MAJORITY HAVE BEEN POSTED *HERE*.

Hey Gremlin! Now get back on your ***-dribblin' fuckin' commode and..

SHUT THE *** UP!

Ya hear!..
SHUT THE *** UP!

You fuckin' deef?..
SHUT THE *** UP!

For once in your miserable fuckin' life..
SHUT THE *** UP!

Once more, fuckwit..
SHUT THE *** UP!

CLICK HERE AND SEE EVIL PERSONIFIED..
http://rglsheepman.bravehost.com/Griffin.html












.