Re: Dead bimbos
- From: "Sherry Davis" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:06:05 GMT
"John Griffin" <thatpsychothillbilly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns98265FA00DA7Dthathillbillyyahooco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Illiterate fat broad Sherry Davis, with help from her illiterate
and pusillanimous mental runt Jim" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx> bellowed:
You are going to have to do better then this John.
Simply posting a conglomeration of lies does nothing but show how foolish
you are.
RGL members know how to read past posts and have a memory span, unlike you,
of more then 30 seconds.
Just for you edification, I have REFUTED (yet again) your below grouping of
lies.
--
Updated...
A brief history of Blimpy & Wimpy (Big Sherry and Li'l Jim)
Me: "Buying a second ticket doubles your chance of winning.
Do NOT, repeat DO NOT use the same combination on both."
Bimbo Sherry and mousy Jim: "That's WRONG! If the first one
has 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second one has 1,2,3,4,5,6,
how does that double your chances?"
John: "The only way to improve your chance of winning a lottery jackpot is
to buy another ticket."
Me: "I purchase 2 tickets. One with the numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 and the second
ticket with the numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6. How has this improved my odds?"
I then pointed out the correct statement (from which you misquoted and tried
to claim credit for) is:
"The only way to improve your odds for winning a lottery jackpot is to buy
another ticket and make sure it doesn't have the same numbers you already
selected on the previous ticket"
John: "You should have known what I meant"
Sherry: "But John you are a stickler for accuracy and conciseness of
language and how every thing should be taken verbatim"
There was NO
"do NOT, repeat DO NOT, use the same combination on that second ticket".
This was not included until I pointed out the fallacy of John's misquoted
version of the correct statement.
Bimbos: "The probability of a particular number being drawn in
a 6/50 lottery is 1/50+1/49+1/48+1/47+1/46+1/45=6/50."
Normal people: "BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!"
John, find where I made this statement.
If you cannot then stop lying about it as lying about it now will not change
the facts.
Me: "The only way to increase your chance of winning a lottery
jackpot is to buy another ticket."
Bimbos: "SQUUUUUAAAAAWWWWK! You have a little ***!"
John, find where I made this statement.
If you cannot then stop lying about it as lying about it now will not change
the facts.
Saving the funniest for last...
Giant Porky Bimbo Sherry: "I'm a mental health councilor."
NEWS FLASH...That is no longer the funniest. This is:
Bimbos: "The probability of a particular number being drawn in a
6/50 lottery is 6/50*5/49*4/48*3/47*2/46*1/45=1/15890700"
(I wonder what the bimbos think is the probability of a
particular combination being drawn...<snicker>)
LOL, you have once again twisted a statement and taken it completely out of
context.
Use your scroll bar and go back to the conversation.
You do know how to use the scroll bar, don't you?
(If not I will be glad to instruct you)
Better yet, since you are to dimwitted to use a scroll bar, I'll make it
easy for you.
Just click on (you do know how to use a mouse don't you) the post:
Re: Lottery facts for Sherry
Sherry Davis NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx
Monday, July 10, 2006 12:04 AM
My full statement was, and I quote:
"To calculate the outcome of a multiple objects being pulled you would
simply factor the above. Thus, the odds of pulling a pre-selected set of 6
objects from a pool of 50 objects would be;
6/50 × 5/49 × 4/48 × 3/47 × 2/46 × 1/45 = 720/11,441,304,000 or 1 chance in
15.89 million."
Not a single number, a PRE-SELECTED SET.
By the way you will find my answer to your stupid "The probability of a
particular number being drawn in a 6/50 lottery" is in the same post.
PS.
John, are you really as stupid as you pretend to be?
I don't intentional try to make you look like an ass, you do too good a job
all by yourself.
But keep it up; everyone is having a good laugh at how moronic you make
yourself look.
PPS
I am young and healthy.
You are old and sickly.
Who's going to get the last post?
(and that is how you tell who won the debate, isn't it John)
BWAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA! HA! HA! HA! HA!
PPPS
http://www.accs.net/users/kriel/chapter%20three/roadrunner.jpg
BLEEP-BLEEP
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: John Griffin
- Re: Dead bimbos
- References:
- Dead bimbos
- From: John Griffin
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: Sherry Davis
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: John Griffin
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: Sherry Davis
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: John Griffin
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: Sherry Davis
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: John Griffin
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: Sherry Davis
- Re: Dead bimbos
- From: John Griffin
- Dead bimbos
- Prev by Date: Re: Dead bimbos (OT)
- Next by Date: Re: Dead bimbos
- Previous by thread: Re: Dead bimbos
- Next by thread: Re: Dead bimbos
- Index(es):